Geezah21:
Hi everyone, I though it is about time for my first rant on here. So here we go:
Why is it that some (about 50%) of pedal bike riders dont use the cycle paths made for them. There is one road like below that i go down almost daily.
I…I…I…I
I…I…I
I…I…I…I
I…I…I
I…I…I…I
I…I…I
I…I…I…I
I…I…I
It is a duel carriageway with a footpath/cycle path on the right. Well why is it that cyclist seem to use lane 1 of the duel carriageway like this (c = cycles path taken)
I…I…C…I…I
I…I…C…I
I…I…C…I…I
I…I…C…I
I…I…C…I…I
I…I…C…I
I…I…C…I…I
I…I…C…I
Swerving all over the road. Not only is it dangerous for me and other drivers but them too. They do not seem to care. Why dont they use the path that has cost the council money 1000’s of pounds to build and they dont use. Does that mean we can start using the cycle paths to drive on?
Its not only on that road but all over the country.
Anyway rant over.
Has anyone else had this problem. having to break hard because you cant overtake them safely (because you are on a single carriageway or cars coming up lane 2 wont let you out)
Andy
First of all, nice graphics - must’ve taken you ages!!
Right, on to your questions/comments;
I am a ‘cyclist’ as in I do Time Trials so pedal quite a few miles per week for training. Cycle paths are not designed, nor suitable, for the types of bike we use nor the speeds that the majority of ‘sports cyclist’s’ ride at. Although it may look like the better option, the cycle path is no good for travelling at speeds of (in my slow case) 20 -28mph, as they are not as smooth as roads, have kerbs and no end of street furniture poorly located about them. A law that is being looked at/reviewed, which is in place in many other European countries (including Germany where I did most of my training/racing), is that a cycle travelling at over 22kmh is to use the road and NOT the cyle path!
Moving on to the issue of cyclists using all of the inside lane on a dual carriageway; well, being a good professional driver you would give them plenty of clearance (as per the Highway Code) and as such, render the outside lane as occupied and of no use for another vehicle that may wish to overtake you.
As for your comment (having to break hard because you cant overtake them safely ) about safety, again because we are all professional drivers, we will be reading the road ahead and would have seen these cyclists in plenty of time to take the appropriate action i.e. reducing to a speed that affords you the opportunity to react the situation as it develops ahead of you! Wouldn’t we■■
Don’t get me wrong, some of the people I have been training with do worry me as you’d think they were crash-proof, however, neither cyclists nor motorists have exclusivity with regard to our Highways. If you ever see me ‘too far out’ from the kerb, it’ll be because our tight-arse councils have allowed the road to get into such a state that it is more dangerous to stay close to the kerb than to move out, possibly into the traffic flow.
TBH I don’t have too many problems with large vehicles, it’s the daydreaming car drivers that worry me. It’s not hard to spot the difference between a professional driver and one who isn’t.