Victims of think accounting

morphie:
im a so called victim of think accounting or more of an unwitting victim…im slowly paying hmrc as my bill wasnt as big as some of the lads i worked with but i had it so i guess i must pay it but i certainly didnt go into it thinking i was “dodging tax”

i was made redundant from a 16yr job. as part of the redundancy talks our union at the time got some agencys together and held a night to "help " the 80 or so drivers out . at these meetings every agency there pushed the think accounting way as being the future and oh how good it is you must do it. I / We as drivers went into it blindly under all this “advise” we were given. i had no idea about all the ins and outs of what was invloved. i just wanted to work and pay the bills and as this was “recommended” thats what most of us did very naievely as it turned out. we certainly didnt set out to dodge tax etc. Not all people are like that maybe some but not all.

i understand now how it works and all a bit late am paying it back as said before mine is a pretty small ammount compared to some of the lads i worked with who are in it for over 20 grand.

An absolute classic example here of how this piece of legislation is totally unfair.

We have the Agencies, the Union and Think Accounting pushing what was a total breach of the MSC legislation at the Drivers. Its a fact that Think and the Agencies, (there is one particular Agency which I shall not name but has been mentioned already), that seemed to have been in bed with Think Accounting, both knew of MSC legislation.

Yes, the Driver’s had the choice to say yes or no, but why would they suspect anything, MSC, in the main was unheard of, at least by the man in the street. Im not aware of when the poster started using Think, but Think were aware of the MSC Legislation as far back as Sept 2011, but carried on taking money off people.

When it comes to the usual, “Driver’s deserve it they were tax dodgers”.

Fact, there are thousands of Ltd Co Drivers acting as contractors driving other firms trucks, if this is not allowed then why don’t HMRC close them down? I’m pretty sure you can set up a Ltd Co doing just about anything.

Fact, the only reason why the Drivers have fallen foul of MSC is that HMRC are saying that because Think were classed as a “provider” then those companies that used Think were not being run correctly, so the Ltd Driver was deemed to be employed, so therefore received a large extra bill for 2 lots of NI, 1 as employer NI and 1 as employee NI, and a slightly higher Income tax bill.

Fact, had the Drivers not used Think,and used any other Accountant, then they would have been able to claim just as many expenses as they did with Think without a squeak from HMRC. HMRC set the rules on expenses. It was Think that were breaking the rules.

Fact, had HMRC got their fingers out when they knew of Thinks wrong doings then no one would now be in receipt of large bills, but there again, HMRC like to issue large bills and dont mind taking tax off a bent Accountancy Company, whilst they took 3 years to make a decision, just picture it, by delaying their decision they kept revenues coming in from Think, they kept Thinks employees in a job therefore not claiming benefits and they allowed unsuspecting Drivers to be landed massive bills years down the line from when they could have put a stop to it, ie by shutting Think down in 2011/2012.

Fact, the bills are based on a joint and several basis, which means HMRC go firstly for the Drivers co, when that cant pay they go after the Director, then after Think, then after Thinks Directors then even as far back as the Agency. YES this legislation allows collection from the personal wealth of Directors of Ltd Cos which is totally unique in company law.
If the Drivers are classed as tax avoiders, then why are HMRC able to persue others…Answer beacause HMRC want money and will get it however they can and from whoever they can. If the Driver was a tax dodger then the bill would stay with him.

peirre:
Victims?..
I don’t think anyone was a victim as they willingly used, (albeit blindly) the services of said companies in a get rich scheme. Where they made mistakes was being ignorant, or not wanting to know the details of the scheme they’d enrolled. This is where they where taken advantage of…

A little bit contradictory there? Are truck drivers to be qualified accountants now? Many times in our lives we have to place our affairs in the hands of other professions. That’s why they exist? On occasion those professionals turn out to be, at best, incompetent, at the worst they are fraudsters. When you can get a fella to drive a class 1 for £7.50 ph you’re not going to be dealing with the sharpest tool in the box are you? And conmen like these are well aware of that.

TiredAndEmotional:

peirre:
Victims?..
I don’t think anyone was a victim as they willingly used, (albeit blindly) the services of said companies in a get rich scheme. Where they made mistakes was being ignorant, or not wanting to know the details of the scheme they’d enrolled. This is where they where taken advantage of…

A little bit contradictory there? Are truck drivers to be qualified accountants now? Many times in our lives we have to place our affairs in the hands of other professions. That’s why they exist? On occasion those professionals turn out to be, at best, incompetent, at the worst they are fraudsters. When you can get a fella to drive a class 1 for £7.50 ph you’re not going to be dealing with the sharpest tool in the box are you? And conmen like these are well aware of that.

Spot on.
Also sharks like Think are facilitated by a not fit for purpose HMRC whom in the main are incompetant and actually appear to encourage the likes of Think by the way in which they take years to make a decision which should have been made years earlier.

TiredAndEmotional:
you can get a fella to drive a class 1 for £7.50 ph you’re not going to be dealing with the sharpest tool in the box are you?

That’s the problem, people blindly join schemes without knowing the details.
Surely when you setup a business you understand what your getting into before you start.

Would you walk into a bar with a wedge of money, throw it on the table & walk away and say help yourself I’m buying, I’ll be back later to pick up what’s left.
Then when you return there’s little or nothing left for you, and worse still they took your money back & didn’t use it to pay for the beer, and your left with a massive bar bill, and an angry barman demanding to be paid. No you wouldn’t, so why do it with your main source of income?

peirre:

TiredAndEmotional:
you can get a fella to drive a class 1 for £7.50 ph you’re not going to be dealing with the sharpest tool in the box are you?

That’s the problem, people blindly join schemes without knowing the details.
Surely when you setup a business you understand what your getting into before you start.

Would you walk into a bar with a wedge of money, throw it on the table & walk away and say help yourself I’m buying, I’ll be back later to pick up what’s left.
Then when you return there’s little or nothing left for you, and worse still they took your money back & didn’t use it to pay for the beer, and your left with a massive bar bill, and an angry barman demanding to be paid. No you wouldn’t, so why do it with your main source of income?

?

robbo99.:

peirre:

TiredAndEmotional:
you can get a fella to drive a class 1 for £7.50 ph you’re not going to be dealing with the sharpest tool in the box are you?

That’s the problem, people blindly join schemes without knowing the details.
Surely when you setup a business you understand what your getting into before you start.

Would you walk into a bar with a wedge of money, throw it on the table & walk away and say help yourself I’m buying, I’ll be back later to pick up what’s left.
Then when you return there’s little or nothing left for you, and worse still they took your money back & didn’t use it to pay for the beer, and your left with a massive bar bill, and an angry barman demanding to be paid. No you wouldn’t, so why do it with your main source of income?

So when a firm is bent , its the Drivers fault, I know Drivers get blamed for just about everything, but that takes the biscuit lol

peirre:

TiredAndEmotional:
you can get a fella to drive a class 1 for £7.50 ph you’re not going to be dealing with the sharpest tool in the box are you?

That’s the problem, people blindly join schemes without knowing the details.
Surely when you setup a business you understand what your getting into before you start.

Would you walk into a bar with a wedge of money, throw it on the table & walk away and say help yourself I’m buying, I’ll be back later to pick up what’s left.
Then when you return there’s little or nothing left for you, and worse still they took your money back & didn’t use it to pay for the beer, and your left with a massive bar bill, and an angry barman demanding to be paid. No you wouldn’t, so why do it with your main source of income?

I’ve always thought that to be a rather grand way of describing these schemes :smiley: however the point remains that at many times we delegate certain matters to other professions because of our lack of knowledge therefore, we are entitled to protection from the law when these rogues surface and that’s how it should be. On R4 this week there was a short history program about a pyramid selling scheme that brought anarchy to Albania. The whole country was taken in at every level of society.

So once again the Driver takes the blame, a bent Accountant operating right under the nose of HMRC and the Driver is supposed to be an all singing all dancing Lawyer/accountancy expert lol

del trotter:
What happened to personal responsibility, your corporation tax but you asked your accountant to pay it for you, no wonder some people get mugged off they are to easy.

As much as I think del is being a bit bull in a chinashopish about getting his point across, from what I understand of it he has a point.
If they let this lot tell them “Oh dont worry, we will calculate your tax and pay it all for you” then if said drivers didnt think “here wait a minute, thats sounds like an employer/employee pay system” and start alarm bells ringing and instead let them do it then they are partly at fault in my opinion.
Its got nothing to do with expecting people to be “qualified accountants or tax experts”. An accounting firm only works out your tax for you and you are supposed to pay it yourself.
Any agency and accounting firm who collude to say to drivers that they will deal with workin out and paying the corporation tax is up to something and anyone who didnt at least hear alarm bells should have stuck to being a FTE.

Unless im not understanding the whole picture in which case I might just be talking ■■■■■■■■, which is entirely possible. I moved house a week ago, my dogs are not fully settled in yet, my sleep pattern is screwed and its WAY to early on a saturday morning for me to think clearly.

Its all about what was known and when it was known. If a Company sets out to deduct Corpo Tax at source and then doesnt pay the tax over to HMRC then in my mind that is bent. Same as if you pay for something up front, ie partially of fully and you dont receive your goods then that in my mind is bent.

Its always easy to say after the event that that shouldnt have happened and this shouldnt have happened, thats called hindsight, (strangely enough, Thinks sharks have an association with a company named Hindsight) The fact is that Think were allowed to operate for 3 years whilst HMRC arsed about knowing that Think were breaking the rules. The Drivers that received bills were told by HMRC that the legislation was very straight forward yet it took HMRC 3 years to bill people…I smell a rat there. Dont forget if HMRC had put a stop to Think earlier, then they would have missed out on massive amounts of revenue.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatal

Thank you for sharing with the group.

robbo99.:
Dont forget if HMRC had put a stop to Think earlier, then they would have missed out on massive amounts of revenue.

I see your point, but let’s consider what the outcome would have been if HMRC had shut Think down at the point that you suggest they should have?

I reckon that lots of drivers would simply have ended up going to other accountants and HMRC receiving what they were due and, after some corrective payments, mostly at around the time they should have received it.

HMRC might have egg on its face with this, but I’m not convinced that there’s anything else going on.

HMRC are there to collect tax. They are not there to positively vet all companies and schemes even before they start trading. Maybe there is a need for better standards and bigger penalties for directors of dodgy accounting firms etc, Id agree with that, but for all that it aint HMRC`s fault.

del trotter:

Jackron:
Quote victims of think accounting
Vat was not paid nor was corperation tax
By think accounting on behalf of ltd companies
Only got to find out when the bill came through the door… i had to pay corperation tax again… something that think had said they had done same with vat…think thats fraud in my book

Im also led to believe that the police are now involved

And the media are knocking on the door
So ill stand by the statement VICTIMS

What happened to personal responsibility, your corporation tax but you asked your accountant to pay it for you, no wonder some people get mugged off they are to easy.

I’m very much in favour of personal responsibility but at some point in many aspects of our daily lives we rely on professionals to advise us and unless you’re particularly well advised by people who through personal experience you believe are trustworthy then sometimes it falls out of bed despite precautions being taken. So yes, some people are easier than others to hoodwink. I suggest they are naive rather than greedy bandwagon hoppers!

robbo99.:
So when a firm acts fraudulently , its the Drivers fault

The driver should know what the bookkeeper is doing

PS can you preview your posts to check the quotes are correct before submitting

dieseldave:

robbo99.:
Dont forget if HMRC had put a stop to Think earlier, then they would have missed out on massive amounts of revenue.

I see your point, but let’s consider what the outcome would have been if HMRC had shut Think down at the point that you suggest they should have?

I reckon that lots of drivers would simply have ended up going to other accountants and HMRC receiving what they were due and, after some corrective payments, mostly at around the time they should have received it.

HMRC might have egg on its face with this, but I’m not convinced that there’s anything else going on.

No absolutely not. The other Accountants would not have been in breach of MSC legislation so therefore the Ltd Cos would not have been billed for extra NI and Income tax as they have been because Think were breaking the rules, it sounds crazy but that is how it is.

peirre:

robbo99.:
So when a firm acts fraudulently , its the Drivers fault

The driver should know what the bookkeeper is doing

PS can you preview your posts to check the quotes are correct before submitting

LOL, what world do you live in…Eutopia? So along with his class 1 licence he needs to be an expert in Accounting, company law and so on.

Regarding my posts, its the easiest thing in the world for someone to nitpick at other peoples sending of posts when the nitpicker hasent got a clue about the topic, yes you peirre.

Franglais:
HMRC are there to collect tax. They are not there to positively vet all companies and schemes even before they start trading. Maybe there is a need for better standards and bigger penalties for directors of dodgy accounting firms etc, Id agree with that, but for all that it aint HMRC`s fault.

HMRC are there to collect taxes and yes they are not there to vet every company. We are not talking about all of the Ltd cos Drivers companies here we are talking about Think Accounting.
HMRC have departments such as Specialist Investigations and Counter Avoidance amongst others to investigate company practices.

They were investigating Think back as far as Sept 2011, they knew how they operated and knew they were breaching the legislation. Anybody that used the services of Think from that point on were liable to a NI/tax bill, not straight away, some years down the line. Think were breaching the rules and in doing so HMRC landed Drivers with hefty bills.

robbo99.:

Franglais:
HMRC are there to collect tax. They are not there to positively vet all companies and schemes even before they start trading. Maybe there is a need for better standards and bigger penalties for directors of dodgy accounting firms etc, Id agree with that, but for all that it aint HMRC`s fault.

HMRC are there to collect taxes and yes they are not there to vet every company. We are not talking about all of the Ltd cos Drivers companies here we are talking about Think Accounting.
HMRC have departments such as Specialist Investigations and Counter Avoidance amongst others to investigate company practices.

They were investigating Think back as far as Sept 2011, they knew how they operated and knew they were breaching the legislation. Anybody that used the services of Think from that point on were liable to a NI/tax bill, not straight away, some years down the line. Think were breaching the rules and in doing so HMRC landed Drivers with hefty bills.

Are you then saying, that as soon as HMRC start an investigation the company being investigated should be prevented from trading? If they were found to be doing nowt wrong, how would that work out? That HMRC were mounting an investigation doesnt mean they knew all the insnouts straightaway. I can see you may have a genuine grievance against Think, but surely HMRC arent up for much blame in this matter.