He tried to behead one of the poor little girls.
The frenzied knife attack, one was stabbed over 70 times.
The Al-Qaeda manual.
The ricin.
How many more clues do you need? In the last 20 years we have sat back and watched these radical Islamists blow people up with bombs, behead them, slice them to death, drove into crowds en masse. 7/7 in London, Lee Rigby, London Bridge, Manchester Arena. All done to create maximum devastation, shock and horror.
Erm, you are kind of missing the point of a cover up. Selective information is put out there to either hide something or push whatever narrative or agenda those in power want or need you to believe. The establishment relies on people like you who believe everything that is fed to them hook, line and sinker.
And they especially love people who go that one step further by not only believing everything they are told, but those that actually parrot and repeat that same message en masse to everyone else.
The tedious Karen-offa-Facebook comment that he uses ‘all the time’ now is all he has to shut down an alternative POV or opinion on something he doesn’t like or has no logical answer to.
No he aint mate trust me, …
It’s all for effect…it’s what he does no matter how delicate, sensitive, or innapropriate as in this case the subject matter may be…he has got to be what only he sees as … ‘‘Right’’.
He is as aware as the rest of us of the ‘‘clues’’ and that this absolute horror of little defenceless little girls being literally butchered points to the hallmarks of an Islamic terrorist attack designed to create maximum shock and outrage…for what they see as ‘‘furthering their cause’’.
All this absolute twonk is doing is both excercising his ‘usual ‘Argue with the majority for the sake of it’’ stance, for effect, and as usual keeping up the versions of the official narrative,.and re.spewing them out, because he is incapable of thinking for himself and daring to question it…or even consider for one minute what is being pointed out to him as a very likely alternative pov.
He fails to see, accept or admit that he is totally disrespecting the memory of those little girls by what essentially is tantamount to him defending that piece of scum…which in my book is downright shameful.
Just ignore him, he will no doubt try and defend what I have pointed out in this post also (because quote Franglais..; ‘‘That is the idea of a forum have you not grasped that yet’’ unquote.)
and carry it on for pages and pages until we all tire of him in disgust until he gets his …’ last word.
Absolutely Pathetic.
Conspiracy theory rhetoric on view here.
When questioned why is the murderer being referred to as an “Islamic terrorist” we are repeatedly told “he is because he is”.
Where is the proof?
There is no proof because there is a cover up.
Why is there a cover up?
Because the gov are frightened of reaction if the “truth”, ie he is a Muslim terrorist, came out.
So him being a Muslim is hidden.
There is no proof of him being Muslim, because he is Muslim!
Can’t possibly be otherwise can it?
Of course, all the media, who always agree with the Labour gov and fans of Starmer such as GBN, and St Farage of Florida, all agree not to investigate and find out his history.
Mad as hatters.
Of course we also have the typical ad hominem attacks.
Spreading the lies about me defending the murderer.
Again, No examples, No evidence.
Will I call out your lies? Yes.
I have defended no murderer.
Are you going to tell me in your roughy toughy voice that i would never say that to your face?
OK I never would. I am a 6 stone puny coward. Maybe you would knock my block off or whatever you keep hinting at but never say out loud.
Happy now?
You the big man. Me the weak coward.
That makes no difference at all to your telling of lies and spreading misinformation.
It is you using the deaths of these innocents to spread your hate.
There ya go he got his last word …so I won’t directly address him to spoil it for him…bless him.
All I can say is…
Draw your own conclusions…(as I have.)
And ooh look he’s called me a liar again, and forwarding his bravado from a different angle this time by making a joke of the FACT that he’s all gob, with no back up or substance, and proving it by having another pop at me.
He’ll now be sat there in his cardigan and y.fronts a smug happy man.
So well done to him.
Meanwhile despite all his usual verbal apologist type diarrhoea, I will continue to believe that this attack was terror related, and more than likely Islamic radicalism related.
The fact that Starmer makes a strong response of denying that, vindicates it…for ME at least.
As for whether a nonentity like Franglais accepts it is now irrelavent.
I’m done with this for now, let those poor little girls rest in peace.
Of course this kind of news report doesn’t get fed to us from the BBC, it gets fed to us from sources that lefty fanatics see as a threat. Good on Talk tv and the like.
Exactly how conspiracy theorists work.
Trying to stop the damage done by lies proves (in their twisted logic) that they are right all along! Show them evidence that their idea is wrong only proves they are right!
Both evidence against the conspiracy and absence of evidence for it are misinterpreted as evidence of its truth.
In the colloquial “Mad as hatters”.
–.–.–.–.
Anyone with a half hour to spare might amuse themselves by looking at the online explanations of conspiracy theory and those who are victims of it.
OK, my use of mad as hatters does not apply to all, but some of the typical character traits of the more radical adherents are quite educational.
Seriously mate you are one sad individual.
I give you the last word and you still keep slavering on in your pompous overbearing style pontificating to us where you are always right and we are wrong…
Why don t you just bore off …
Or even better comply to Billy Connollys suggestion.
Yep the fact that it offends these idiots is enough for me.
It aint reported by BBC because they are up to their necks in all this lefty based smokescreen cover up sh.
The idiots sideswipe it all in compliance by casually writing all it off as a conspiracy theories …as our own resident lefty idiot does.
16 weeks suspended for 2 serious assaults. hurty words on face ache 15 months, 20 months, 21 and 23 months not suspended. and people say it isnt a 2 tier system anyone with a brain cell can see what is happening.
Rob, are you feeling OK? You’re not sounding too great, I’m concerned. Dwanna talk off line about something worrying you maybe?
Oh come on man, I never said, or used words and phrasing that could be construed to suggest you personally are a Knight Crusader or anything. Read wot I wrote again and stop feeling so un-characteristically sensitive, it wasn’t about you, it was an argument for you to bash or run with somewhere, anywhere. The bloody Scientologists haven’t gotten to you have they? They’ve been a pain in the backside dragging innocent people off Fawcett Street for decades now “just come in and do a test young man…”
Sure I agree with you and anyone who dismisses sky gods and uses common sense, equality, compassion, reasonableness, etc to form their sense of morality, rather than a “Just wait till you get home” warning.
just looked it up as i had been meaning to for a while …
heres the thing. plead not guilty on the 13th of feb. released on unconditional bail until 30th of june. That was the first available date because the trial is expected to last 3 weeks.
whos taking bets that they have left the country to enter again under a different name.
The people jailed in the riots were all denied a pre sentence review that takes months for the probation service to write for the judge to calculate the sentence.
In MSM it was cited that some were sent to jail the day after the court appearance, to basically jump the queue of the 95,000 defendants awaiting their crown court cases and 387,000 in the magistrate courts.
The media did not film the peaceful protesters who took their families along to voice their concerns about out of control and unfettered migration levels from cross channel migrants.
They solely concentrated on the violent behaviour.
The police herded the peaceful protesters in to exclusion zones away from the cameras.
You directed it at me so I responded to you…
No other reason.
Fact is I have no involvement nor interest in ANY religion, but yeah, I am fully aware that all religions through the ages have been far from whiter than white than they make out…some more than others in recent times.
But the lefty Liberals shudder at the mention of Islamic terrorism.
That,.and the fact that it is all preposterous fantasy type nonsence, that belongs in historic times when people were less astute, primitive and more easily led.
The fact that a modern day human being, who is otherwise level headed, and fully aware of the laws and facts of science, still subscribes to this type of mumbo jumbo, in ANY religion, I find puzzling…but there ya go.
I bear no grudge to those who do btw, as I have family members myself who do so.
The problem I do have is those who carry it out to the absolute n.th degree to the point of it manifesting it’s self in violence and trerrorism.
The ones I aint to keen on are a particular ‘‘type’’ of radical, who partake in the Middle Eastern superstition of Islam, who are wholly non indigenous to that part of the world, but white Westerners otherwise like myself …
They seem to be the ones who are the most gobby about it, and who need to be monitored in my view.
But apparentlly that has prompted our resident useful idiot to call me a racist on a number of occasions…even though those I have a problem with are of the same racial category as myself…