Just to reiterate that they are choosing to come here an extract from the guardian in 2016
Many have been offered the chance to apply for asylum in France, but would prefer to take their chances by stowing away on a boat or lorry to reach Britain.
Of course they are its called the eu. Why do you think they are now escorted by french navel ships. Why do you think its now only the rnli that goes out to get them.
Maratime law says its the nearest ship that should go to a distress call and take them to the nearst point of safety. It also says that any stricken boat is considered salvage and belongs to the rescuers yet they never take the boats.
Incidently @robroy has your mate ever commented on the fact that they have a chapple for all these poor persecuted christians to pray in or do they go to the local church. Do they all say grace before meals etc. Or is it they need a mat 5 times aday
Everything starmer is giving them for free and more.
Yet exports have gone up. The only reason it is more expensive is because the eu made it so. Again like a spoilt child they spat their dummy out because we saw through their bs
Of course they would…
Why would they literally risk their miserable lives on a perilous journey if there was no vast incentive?
It would defy all logic, common sense and instinct of survival otherwise…it aint complicated ffs.
Unless of course you listen to the politically brainwashed and the terminally deluded.
Choice…
A long unptedictable stay in a tent on a beach with zero facilities with alm the hardship that brings..
Or…
An all inclusive virtual holiday in a 4 star hotel with all the benefits that curremtlly go with it, followed by a more than likely permanent stay with a house …provided free of charge.
Oh I forgot, there is NO incentive according to our resident ‘Useful Idiot’.
Apparentlly they come here because ‘‘most speak English’’ and/or ‘‘have relatives over here’’…(presumably who have arrived in the same illegal way btw )
And apparentlly accordingvto the same authoriative source…
They do not stay in 4 star hotels, but ‘‘hostels’’ with no facilities…(despite the fact that I can confidently refute that boll Ocks having visited one myself covertly.)
Oh yeah…and they aint even ‘‘illegal’’ …they are in fact.
‘‘Irregular’’
And as long as this tragic tyoe of attitude prevails in our govt, the records of hostile criminal third world young men will continue to arrive in record numbers, with all the cluster ■■■■ of results that will undoubtedly come home to roost in the (near) future.
The words ‘‘Hell’’ and ‘‘Handcart’’ spring to mind when it comes to OUR country and future way of life.
But hey !..Never mind…most are more concerned about 'kin Trump and the situation in the US.
Not with YOU I aint…been there done that..re BREXIT thread.
I would not give you the satisfaction nor indulge you.
You are a joke mate.
It would be akin to taking up a opposite stance with Carryfast on China.
Go and watch a bit of p0rn if you crave excitement so much, don’t involve me in your quest.
Others on here seem bizzarelly willing to indulge you on the subject, I will leave it to them
Quite so.
There was no plan to stop the boats on day one. @cooper1203 has had that pointed out on many occasions yet he continues to repeat this blatant untruth.
Starmer said he would work from day one to stop the boats. He did not say he would stop them on day one.
Either @cooper1203 does not understand English, or he is choosing to repeat a lie.
Yes they do.
Some boats are fitted with cannons, and other larger dinghies with flight decks for our Naval Fleet Air Arm to use.
Also, you are wrong on the law:
"Anthony Rogers, senior lecturer at City University of London, specialises in maritime law and said salvage rights only exist in the case of a navigable ship and not a small boat.
He said: “If it is an inflatable there are no rights. There is an element of criminality going on here as well.” and note this
“The Home Office says the inflatable dinghies are important criminal evidence which need to be kept safe.”
Posting a link to some operation inthe middle of europe has tge far side of fa to do with seizing the boats in the channel as i said
If the thick gits are sitting in a boat on land wondering why theyarent going anywhere and calling for assistance then they do need help i recom3nd 5 courses of shock thearpy
Ffs what is wrong with you man??..
Are you incapable of taking ’ NO’’ for an answer?
My 2 yr old grand daughter shares the same traits as you.
To shut you up (fat chance) I will say only this without referring to anything specifically Brexit…
My nature is this…since you asked for reasons.
(So excuse me whilst I blow my own trumpet for 5 mins)
I am not a conformist to stuff I do not agree with.
I will strive to get my own way by fair means or foul in said situations.
I do not roll over, I try and fight and stand up for myself and mine whatever the situation or however odds are stacked against me.
If I can not win I will deal with crap by trying to make the best of said crap situation for myself and mine.
I will try and use stuff against those who set such rules by using those rules to my advantage…aka beating them with their own stick.
(It is what I do in my job in fact, and how I deal with company aggravation and b/s.)
So having said all that you can more than likely deduce why I would not go and admit defeat by giving those (and people like you ) their own way by reneging admitting defeat,.and co.operating with them.
I aint under any illusion that my personal attitude,.actions nor opinions on Brexit will make a ■■■■ of difference in the grand scheme of things either…I’m just a bloke who drives a 'kin truck.
Hope that explains it.
And if that makes me a ‘‘drama queen’’ in YOUR eyes or you disapprove…that kinda vindicates my attitude tbh.
Now go and discuss Brexit your favourite subject with some other unfortunate who has no qualms about having his arse bored off him.
If the evidence needs to be kept safe why are they allowing the criminals to take it away. Its akin to saying to a bank robber here is all the evidence against you now be a good chap and dont destroy it or use it again will you. Grow up ffs
If your memory is that bad i sugest a visit to the memory clinic. Or is it just another example of lefty codswallop being exposed that you blindly spout as truth being e posed so you have to try and side step it blaming others because god forbig you acctualy take any resoncabikity for the 5hitshow you and your dictator mates are making of the country
You said at first that the boats were not taken away That shows they are taken away and held as evidence.
Why do you say the criminals are allowed to take them away?
Where does that come from?
No i said they werent taken away at the point of rescue a point you clearly understood as you started spouting about ships and inflatables and telling me i was wrong. You cannot dispute that so you gave a link to a raid in a different country.
The only possible explanation in reality if they aren’t being siezed at the point of rescue is that someone is taking them back. Maybe all those poor people that refuse rescue as all the lefty spiel tells you aren’t so vulnerable and are the bloody smuglers
You also said in bold and i quoted “and note this” going on to say how they were important evidence as if the rnli couldnt be trusted to keep a chain of custody. if they are so important again why dont they sieze them they dont they let them sail off into the wide blue yonder