Mike-C:
RoadsRat:
Mike-C:
Anyway if anyones interested, here’s who instigated the crackdown…Tispol Organisation, who according to companies house are an Architectural & Engineering Activities & Consultancy company. They are run by ACPO, or sort of headed by them. Here’s their up and coming crackdown dates…
tispol.org/road-policing/rp … dates-2013They’re an interesting organisation…
You’re wrong, two seperate campaigns were ran in the same week:
suffolk.police.uk/newsandeve … paign.aspx
suffolk.police.uk/newsandeve … ivers.aspx
But lets not let incorrect info get in the way eh!
I’m wrong am i ? You deduce this how, by relying on a police press release to actually say Tispol is responsible or do you know other wise? Because one press release doesn’t mention TISPOL we can take it for gospel its not a TISPOL led initiative can we? Lets see what the alternatives are, Suffolk Police (and others) meet the TISPOL initiative to have a seat belt crackdown and you reckon whilst the POlice are providing the rescources for this they think…hey we’ll do our own crackdown too. Even though as you intimated the RPU are hard pushed and you can be waiting ages for help if they’re ■■■■■■■, they’ve still got the manpower to run two seperate operations? I’d doubt it.
Also you infer people can vote their own Police commisioner who can have a direct say in what the public want (or words to that effect). Thats actually not true. TISPOL is a private company answerable to no one, with spivs on its board who run crash for cash type companies, this TISPOL organisation is “headed” or “overseen” by ACPO who are (as you well know) a complete unelected and law to them selves, who is well documented for favouring the economic concerns of their ex members or ex coppers. TISPOL and ACPO decide where and when the campaigns are run. Its nothing to do with what the electorate wants or needs and its certainley nothing to do with what the local Police Chief thinks.
Like you say, if a trucker gets caught without a seatbelt then he’s ony himself to blame for the fine, whats hard to fathom out though is why the Police are searching for this stuff to issue fines when they claim their remit is ‘saftey’. If it was really saftey, they’d pull them and advise them. If people wants more coppers on the beat instead of driving up and down the motorway in trucks stopping people for seatbelts, then thats some thing they’re entitled to decide upon as the Police work for them but its not going to happen, because they really do not have a choice, even though you intimate they do. Even though there is talk about openess/community liason/stakeholders etc…its [zb] and bluff.
The difference between a lorry driver and you is that one knows what he’s doing and why he’s doing it and the other hasn’t a clue , he just does what he’s told and what his priorities are this week.
One was a TISPOL operation, the other wasn’t. It’s really that simple.