Jimmy Savile

[carryfast]

Wheel Nut:
I am 54, apparently the same age as CF. Tonight I was in the pub with a few friends, the eldest is 63, the youngest girl was 16, we had banter, we had fun, we all commented on her arse, and she understood it was banter. There is not one of us who would take advantage, even if it was offered on a plate. It is normal behaviour, however if her mum or dad had have been in the pub, no one would have even dare spoken to her.

Where were the parents when these girls were getting shafted by JS and his friends? Stood outside the dressing room door listening in?

The girl tonight was totally relaxed and safe, and her Auntie was sat with us, she owns the pub, she runs the bar and keeps a tight ship. I was brought up with adults from a very young age, my friends at 9 were my fathers customers who were between 18 and 70. I wasn’t abused, because I knew what it was about. I was taken to race meetings at 10 years old and still keep in touch with those friends. Should I suddenly report that one of them touched my knee when I was 8. They cannot reply when they are scattered ashes or worm fodder.

In Carryfasts vast “experience” this is wrong, however the 16 year old was more impressed with a couple of older blokes discussing American politics than with two 18 year old giggling bucks across the room.

No mention of the BBC, The Royal Family, Black Royals or Virgin Princesses.

She will grow up to be a wise girl and will certainly meet someone closer to her own age, as is normal for the majority of the population, not at 16 or 18, but maybe in her mid 20’s. That is what experience is about, not some brainwashed idea from the Victorian morality books.

I don’t get the connection .
Unless you’ve actually been in the position,of actually experiencing the situation,of what happens when a girl of that age, goes against everything that you ‘think’ you know,about the age thing,as it applies in the case of some girls,not others, you really are just guessing.

The fact is you’re talking about a modern day teenaged girl in a modern day setting in which the age issue has been brainwashed into them that all older single blokes looking for a younger woman are creeps just like Savile regardless.But the bit I don’t get is where were you in the early 1970’s because if you think that view which you’ve written there applied back then to many of the few girls we actually had then you either weren’t there or you slept through it all.

Suggest you get yourself back to the real world again by checking out some more of those old TOTP episodes on youtube when it was pop stars or even ordinary blokes of Gary Glitter’s age and Savile’s age,who were in more demand,with too many of the few girls we had who were 14-15 let alone 16,than blokes of their own age ever were.

Although having said that there’s a fine line between what is effectively an arranged marriage based on what others feel is right for her and giving her the freedom at 16,which is the relevant age not 25,at which she should be left alone to make her own way and decisions.Not sitting there with her chaperone looking over her shoulder considering that this isn’t,as you say,the Victorian era.Which may be why those 18 year olds were laughing.Although they obviously wouldn’t have needed to be bothered about any competition from any older blokes.Unlike things were during the early 1970’s for me.Where you were is anyone’s guess.

[carryfast]

raymundo:
This thread is getting as boring as watching paint dry or watching my much younger wife mow the grass as I refuse to do it (my contribution to our disappearing natural fauna & flora). CF keeps on about the same old [zb] about how he missed out on shagging a young bird to keep her pregnant so she would be around longer to share more ‘‘many happy years with her off spring’’ than if she had them later and maybe end up hating the [zb] who had lumbered her with a load of ungrateful brats as she had no life as a young woman in her teens.

You’ve obviously missed every other post in which I’ve said that ‘she’ (rightly) ‘wanted’ to have a family early not later and did just that with a middle aged divorcee instead of me.Although no doubt the meaning of ‘life’ in your book would have meant running round being shagged by loads of different blokes on a casual basis until one day one of them knocked her up in which case,just as is so often the case today,she would have been a single mother wondering which one of those blokes was the father.

[kr79]

[farnboroughboy11]

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
Humans arnt supposed to be monogamous, males certainly arnt. Women should be though
Why don’t you agree on mixing race relationships?

That’s the idea of marriage zb’d then in your world.

On the interracial marriage issue I’d reverse the question.The fact is it’s all about pc integration and keeping the immigrant groups happy not multiculturalism.No surprise that the biggest supporters of the idea,of interracial relationships,are the Afro ethnic groups who prefer our girls to their own for the simple reason that ours are generally (a lot) better looking than their own.Which,as I’ve said,explains that massive change in outlooks which took place in the early 1970’s clubbing scene among ‘certain’ groups who’d been happy to mix with the Afro groups ‘until’ they realised the ‘real’ reason why many of the ethnic Afro blokes were so keen to get involved with the indigenous population instead of keeping to their own.

The same issue is probably the main reason for the ethnic strife which applied throughout the Southern US States where the ethnic european population has always understood the difference between multiculturalism compared to integration.To put it simply there’s nothing good about the idea of wiping out our own ethnic group on the basis of some zb’d up socialist ideal of turning the world into one single ethnic group especially when that idea also means that we have to settle for an ethnic African (or Asian) wife so the ethnic African blokes can get a better looking ethnic European one.

While no surprise that,as I’ve said,from experience,the Italians are as keen as any Southern US States redneck,on the idea of keeping the different ethnic groups different (multiculturalism),as opposed to the idea of ‘integration’,when it comes to any other ethnic group (such as the British) except their own,going for a good looking Italian bird in the average Italian venue.
That’s even before the age thing is taken into account.

While it was no surprise that with all the bs about ‘integration’ being supposedly good for the working class the Royals didn’t seem to be that keen on finding an African or Asian wife for Prince Charles. So just typical British hypocricy.

You sound to me like a typical product of the modern generations that have swallowed all the pc brainwashing,concerning the acceptance of contiinuing integration,within the working classes,so that the rich zb’s can keep their cheap labour scam going without too many riots in Brixton or Croydon.Although I doubt that the Polish will be as keen on the idea of integration between the Slav girls and the Afro Carribean groups in the long term.

Not at all because when and if I ever get married I wouldn’t cheat on her.

What a load of crap, again your looking into something so much deeper than what it actually is.
I personally think mixed race birds are generally all better looking that white girls, if you way it up there are more ugly white birds than ugly mixed race birds. Skin, teeth, eyes, arse and ■■■■■ are more likely to be better on a mixed race bird between any mixed races white/black, white/Asian, black/Asian than that just from a white/white combination.

And I’m sure your theory about Latinas will be [zb] along the line somewhere, they have definitely got a bit of Afro in them somewhere from way back… And guess how, because people mixing their ethnicity together.

Your so wrong on many levels, I haven’t been fed anything at all. I’ve got black mates who go out and shag white girls as well as black girls, and the same goes with me. I can appreciate a good looking attractive human being regardless.

If,in your view,humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous,then how do you reach the conclusion that you would ever want to get married being that the two statements contradict each other .

Make your mind up you’re saying it’s all about mixed race birds (in your view) looking a lot better than ethnic euro ones but you’re also saying that you think the Afro girls are just as attractive to you and your Afro mates as our own girls are.

What are you talking about :s I’ll get my shagging out of the way before I get married because when and if I do get married its because I will actually want to be with that girl and actually want to be faithful to her for the rest of my life… That’s what marriage is.

I said I think there are more ugly white girls than mixed raced girls but if someone is good looking then they are good looking regardless of what they are.
I also said that I can appreciate a good looking person.

So you wouldn’t even entertain Nicole Sherzinger if she was spread eagle dripping all over your bed just because she is German/Hawaiian/black and god knows what else?
You only like white girls and Latinas?

[farnboroughboy11]

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
Humans arnt supposed to be monogamous, males certainly arnt. Women should be though
Why don’t you agree on mixing race relationships?

That’s the idea of marriage zb’d then in your world.

On the interracial marriage issue I’d reverse the question.The fact is it’s all about pc integration and keeping the immigrant groups happy not multiculturalism.No surprise that the biggest supporters of the idea,of interracial relationships,are the Afro ethnic groups who prefer our girls to their own for the simple reason that ours are generally (a lot) better looking than their own.Which,as I’ve said,explains that massive change in outlooks which took place in the early 1970’s clubbing scene among ‘certain’ groups who’d been happy to mix with the Afro groups ‘until’ they realised the ‘real’ reason why many of the ethnic Afro blokes were so keen to get involved with the indigenous population instead of keeping to their own.

The same issue is probably the main reason for the ethnic strife which applied throughout the Southern US States where the ethnic european population has always understood the difference between multiculturalism compared to integration.To put it simply there’s nothing good about the idea of wiping out our own ethnic group on the basis of some zb’d up socialist ideal of turning the world into one single ethnic group especially when that idea also means that we have to settle for an ethnic African (or Asian) wife so the ethnic African blokes can get a better looking ethnic European one.

While no surprise that,as I’ve said,from experience,the Italians are as keen as any Southern US States redneck,on the idea of keeping the different ethnic groups different (multiculturalism),as opposed to the idea of ‘integration’,when it comes to any other ethnic group (such as the British) except their own,going for a good looking Italian bird in the average Italian venue.
That’s even before the age thing is taken into account.

While it was no surprise that with all the bs about ‘integration’ being supposedly good for the working class the Royals didn’t seem to be that keen on finding an African or Asian wife for Prince Charles. So just typical British hypocricy.

You sound to me like a typical product of the modern generations that have swallowed all the pc brainwashing,concerning the acceptance of contiinuing integration,within the working classes,so that the rich zb’s can keep their cheap labour scam going without too many riots in Brixton or Croydon.Although I doubt that the Polish will be as keen on the idea of integration between the Slav girls and the Afro Carribean groups in the long term.

Not at all because when and if I ever get married I wouldn’t cheat on her.

What a load of crap, again your looking into something so much deeper than what it actually is.
I personally think mixed race birds are generally all better looking that white girls, if you way it up there are more ugly white birds than ugly mixed race birds. Skin, teeth, eyes, arse and ■■■■■ are more likely to be better on a mixed race bird between any mixed races white/black, white/Asian, black/Asian than that just from a white/white combination.

And I’m sure your theory about Latinas will be [zb] along the line somewhere, they have definitely got a bit of Afro in them somewhere from way back… And guess how, because people mixing their ethnicity together.

Your so wrong on many levels, I haven’t been fed anything at all. I’ve got black mates who go out and shag white girls as well as black girls, and the same goes with me. I can appreciate a good looking attractive human being regardless.

If,in your view,humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous,then how do you reach the conclusion that you would ever want to get married being that the two statements contradict each other .

Make your mind up you’re saying it’s all about mixed race birds (in your view) looking a lot better than ethnic euro ones but you’re also saying that you think the Afro girls are just as attractive to you and your Afro mates as our own girls are.

What are you talking about :s I’ll get my shagging out of the way before I get married because when and if I do get married its because I will actually want to be with that girl and actually want to be faithful to her for the rest of my life… That’s what marriage is.

I said I think there are more ugly white girls than mixed raced girls but if someone is good looking then they are good looking regardless of what they are.
I also said that I can appreciate a good looking person.

So you wouldn’t even entertain Nicole Sherzinger if she was spread eagle dripping all over your bed just because she is German/Hawaiian/black and god knows what else?
You only like white girls and Latinas?

[wheel_nut]

FarnboroughBoy11:
What are you talking about :s I’ll get my shagging out of the way before I get married because when and if I do get married its because I will actually want to be with that girl and actually want to be faithful to her for the rest of my life… That’s what marriage is.

That is what the 70’s were for to me, and the 80’s too, settled down in the late 90’s and back in the game again

[carryfast]

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
Humans arnt supposed to be monogamous, males certainly arnt. Women should be though
Why don’t you agree on mixing race relationships?

That’s the idea of marriage zb’d then in your world.

On the interracial marriage issue I’d reverse the question.The fact is it’s all about pc integration and keeping the immigrant groups happy not multiculturalism.No surprise that the biggest supporters of the idea,of interracial relationships,are the Afro ethnic groups who prefer our girls to their own for the simple reason that ours are generally (a lot) better looking than their own.Which,as I’ve said,explains that massive change in outlooks which took place in the early 1970’s clubbing scene among ‘certain’ groups who’d been happy to mix with the Afro groups ‘until’ they realised the ‘real’ reason why many of the ethnic Afro blokes were so keen to get involved with the indigenous population instead of keeping to their own.

The same issue is probably the main reason for the ethnic strife which applied throughout the Southern US States where the ethnic european population has always understood the difference between multiculturalism compared to integration.To put it simply there’s nothing good about the idea of wiping out our own ethnic group on the basis of some zb’d up socialist ideal of turning the world into one single ethnic group especially when that idea also means that we have to settle for an ethnic African (or Asian) wife so the ethnic African blokes can get a better looking ethnic European one.

While no surprise that,as I’ve said,from experience,the Italians are as keen as any Southern US States redneck,on the idea of keeping the different ethnic groups different (multiculturalism),as opposed to the idea of ‘integration’,when it comes to any other ethnic group (such as the British) except their own,going for a good looking Italian bird in the average Italian venue.
That’s even before the age thing is taken into account.

While it was no surprise that with all the bs about ‘integration’ being supposedly good for the working class the Royals didn’t seem to be that keen on finding an African or Asian wife for Prince Charles. So just typical British hypocricy.

You sound to me like a typical product of the modern generations that have swallowed all the pc brainwashing,concerning the acceptance of contiinuing integration,within the working classes,so that the rich zb’s can keep their cheap labour scam going without too many riots in Brixton or Croydon.Although I doubt that the Polish will be as keen on the idea of integration between the Slav girls and the Afro Carribean groups in the long term.

Not at all because when and if I ever get married I wouldn’t cheat on her.

What a load of crap, again your looking into something so much deeper than what it actually is.
I personally think mixed race birds are generally all better looking that white girls, if you way it up there are more ugly white birds than ugly mixed race birds. Skin, teeth, eyes, arse and ■■■■■ are more likely to be better on a mixed race bird between any mixed races white/black, white/Asian, black/Asian than that just from a white/white combination.

And I’m sure your theory about Latinas will be [zb] along the line somewhere, they have definitely got a bit of Afro in them somewhere from way back… And guess how, because people mixing their ethnicity together.

Your so wrong on many levels, I haven’t been fed anything at all. I’ve got black mates who go out and shag white girls as well as black girls, and the same goes with me. I can appreciate a good looking attractive human being regardless.

If,in your view,humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous,then how do you reach the conclusion that you would ever want to get married being that the two statements contradict each other .

Make your mind up you’re saying it’s all about mixed race birds (in your view) looking a lot better than ethnic euro ones but you’re also saying that you think the Afro girls are just as attractive to you and your Afro mates as our own girls are.

What are you talking about :s I’ll get my shagging out of the way before I get married because when and if I do get married its because I will actually want to be with that girl and actually want to be faithful to her for the rest of my life… That’s what marriage is.

I said I think there are more ugly white girls than mixed raced girls but if someone is good looking then they are good looking regardless of what they are.
I also said that I can appreciate a good looking person.

So you wouldn’t even entertain Nicole Sherzinger if she was spread eagle dripping all over your bed just because she is German/Hawaiian/black and god knows what else?
You only like white girls and Latinas?

I was going by the statement in which you said ‘humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous’.

You say you’ll ‘get your shagging out of the way before you get married’. That actually is what marriage is for and as I said to kr if you don’t think that’s right then try telling any girl’s father that you’re only using his daughter, amongst others,as an unpaid ■■■■■■ until you find one who you want to marry and when you do find one who you might want to marry try telling her father that you’ll marry her when you’ve finished trying all the others.

If I had a daughter I think that I’d prefer it if she was with someone with my views than someone with your views concerning how to treat women regardless of the age thing.

As for Nicole Sherzinger v one of our own.No contest it’s Wendy Hurrel who I’d rather spend the rest of my life with and Nicole Scherzinger could get the bus home and you can have her,assuming that I was lucky enough for both of them to be sitting waiting on the side of my bed saying which one do I want and in my case one being enough. Sadly it will never happen because she’s spoken for according to the ring on her finger.Lucky zb.

4.bp.blogspot.com/-S_eS8TCzdv0/T … inger-3.jp

therevcounter.com/attachment … _11-19.jpg

[carryfast]

Wheel Nut:

FarnboroughBoy11:
What are you talking about :s I’ll get my shagging out of the way before I get married because when and if I do get married its because I will actually want to be with that girl and actually want to be faithful to her for the rest of my life… That’s what marriage is.

That is what the 70’s were for to me, and the 80’s too, settled down in the late 90’s and back in the game again

I think that’s probably how a lot of those old pop stars like Gary Glitter saw it.

Are you sure you’re not an ageing pop star from the time who’s just lying about his age.

But it probably proves what I’ve been saying that if it was just a casual no strings shag,regardless of the age of who they chose to do it with,that they wanted,then it’s no good them complaining about the way they were treated now.

But as in most other things your luck and experience at the time was obviously ( a lot ) different to mine and those girls’ fathers obviously must have had a different view than yours now and those of the parents of that 16 year old bird down the pub.But I’m still in the game enough to have asked her for a date and then see what happens.It’s a zb life anyway so I’d have had nothing to lose when her dad came looking for me afterwards.

[kr79]

Ffs carryfast I don’t think me or anyone else when we were in our young free and single days poped down the local chatted up a young lady and before we had our wicked way asked to speak to there dad for permission to get ones leg over.
It’s not a modern thing either how many young couples got married years back because of a knee trembler round the back of the cinema resulted in pregnancy. Now many of them marriages resulted in 40 or 50 years or whatever of marriage as many of that generation just got on with it but how many of them marriages left both partners trapped somewhere they didn’t want to be.
Although you have to respect the chivalry of our forefathers at least they took responsibility for there actions unlike lots of the Jeremy Kyle fodder who knock out kids for the state to support.

[kr79]

[carryfast]

kr79:
Ffs carryfast I don’t think me or anyone else when we were in our young free and single days poped down the local chatted up a young lady and before we had our wicked way asked to speak to there dad for permission to get ones leg over.
It’s not a modern thing either how many young couples got married years back because of a knee trembler round the back of the cinema resulted in pregnancy. Now many of them marriages resulted in 40 or 50 years or whatever of marriage as many of that generation just got on with it but how many of them marriages left both partners trapped somewhere they didn’t want to be.
Although you have to respect the chivalry of our forefathers at least they took responsibility for there actions unlike lots of the Jeremy Kyle fodder who knock out kids for the state to support.

Blimey I think it’s that idea of chivalry and responsibility for any actions ( if only I’d have been lucky enough to have got some action ) which is the case I’ve been making.Ironically for me I never had any brothers or sisters but the way my dad saw things and brought me up was on the basis that he didn’t want me doing anything with anyone else’s daughter which he wouldn’t have wanted to have happened to his own daughter if he’d have had one.Hence that idea if you decide to shag someone’s daughter then you had better be reasonably sure that you’re going to keep her and at least get to know her first.

To put it simply I was never looking for the casual scene even when I was ‘young,free and single’.Then into that mix you need to factor in the fact that many girls just accepted that scene because many blokes saw it the same way that you and Farnborough Boy see it and the women’s lib lot had also brainwashed them into thinking that idea was better than the idea of monogamy from day 1.

All you then need to do is factor in the ideas of blokes like Gary Glitter etc etc and Savile into that mix and the fact that many of those groupy type birds preferred a ■■■■■■■■■ with an older bloke like them at worse or a marriage with a middle aged divorcee at best,after being brainwashed by the goings on at the BBC on programmes like TOTP.

So it’s then no surprise that resulted in some blokes,of those girls’ own age,like me who’ve been left on the shelf and many of those groupy type birds who are the subject of many of the complaints concerning Savile etc now they look back with regret at what happened to them back in the day.

The fact is it’s that type of young,free and single idea being taken to the extreme of casual ‘relationships’ which is a lot of the cause of how those girls got themselves into such a situation.This topic really needs an answer to my question,which only those ‘victims’ could answer.

If there had been some blokes like me,invited to those ‘partys’ at the BBC on TOTP,or at the Duncroft girls school,could any of those groupies honestly say that,at the time,they’d have preferred to have given me a chance to give them something which involved chivalry and responsibility instead of a ■■■■■■■■■ with an old pop star or Savile.

If not then,as I’ve said a plague on all their houses and it seems hypocritical that anyone who supports that zb idea,of ‘casual ■■■’ with loads of different birds,instead of just settling down with one nice one from the start,then wants to whine about what happened when the obvious results of that type of zb were taken to their obvious conclusions by a load of old depraved pop stars and tv presenters,bearing in mind the fact that you need to factor in that big difference between how the age thing is viewed today compared to how it was viewed in the 1970’s for obvious reasons.

All because the establishment had it’s eye on a 15 year old ( probably even younger ) teenaged bird who they wanted to fix up in an arranged marriage with a pushing 30 Royal,regardless of wether he loved her or not,to give them the kids they needed to carry on the Royal line.

A lot of the events at least at the BBC and Duncroft during the 1970’s,concerning this case,are the result of that perfect storm,caused by the combination of all those issues.Just as is the fact that I’ve probably paid as high,if not higher,price than many of those so called ‘victims’.

[wheel_nut]

Carryfast

You ARE Bonkers

Luck had nothing to do with it mate, you dangle your worm wherever the big shoals are, someone will give it a bite

[farnboroughboy11]

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
Humans arnt supposed to be monogamous, males certainly arnt. Women should be though
Why don’t you agree on mixing race relationships?

That’s the idea of marriage zb’d then in your world.

On the interracial marriage issue I’d reverse the question.The fact is it’s all about pc integration and keeping the immigrant groups happy not multiculturalism.No surprise that the biggest supporters of the idea,of interracial relationships,are the Afro ethnic groups who prefer our girls to their own for the simple reason that ours are generally (a lot) better looking than their own.Which,as I’ve said,explains that massive change in outlooks which took place in the early 1970’s clubbing scene among ‘certain’ groups who’d been happy to mix with the Afro groups ‘until’ they realised the ‘real’ reason why many of the ethnic Afro blokes were so keen to get involved with the indigenous population instead of keeping to their own.

The same issue is probably the main reason for the ethnic strife which applied throughout the Southern US States where the ethnic european population has always understood the difference between multiculturalism compared to integration.To put it simply there’s nothing good about the idea of wiping out our own ethnic group on the basis of some zb’d up socialist ideal of turning the world into one single ethnic group especially when that idea also means that we have to settle for an ethnic African (or Asian) wife so the ethnic African blokes can get a better looking ethnic European one.

While no surprise that,as I’ve said,from experience,the Italians are as keen as any Southern US States redneck,on the idea of keeping the different ethnic groups different (multiculturalism),as opposed to the idea of ‘integration’,when it comes to any other ethnic group (such as the British) except their own,going for a good looking Italian bird in the average Italian venue.
That’s even before the age thing is taken into account.

While it was no surprise that with all the bs about ‘integration’ being supposedly good for the working class the Royals didn’t seem to be that keen on finding an African or Asian wife for Prince Charles. So just typical British hypocricy.

You sound to me like a typical product of the modern generations that have swallowed all the pc brainwashing,concerning the acceptance of contiinuing integration,within the working classes,so that the rich zb’s can keep their cheap labour scam going without too many riots in Brixton or Croydon.Although I doubt that the Polish will be as keen on the idea of integration between the Slav girls and the Afro Carribean groups in the long term.

Not at all because when and if I ever get married I wouldn’t cheat on her.

What a load of crap, again your looking into something so much deeper than what it actually is.
I personally think mixed race birds are generally all better looking that white girls, if you way it up there are more ugly white birds than ugly mixed race birds. Skin, teeth, eyes, arse and ■■■■■ are more likely to be better on a mixed race bird between any mixed races white/black, white/Asian, black/Asian than that just from a white/white combination.

And I’m sure your theory about Latinas will be [zb] along the line somewhere, they have definitely got a bit of Afro in them somewhere from way back… And guess how, because people mixing their ethnicity together.

Your so wrong on many levels, I haven’t been fed anything at all. I’ve got black mates who go out and shag white girls as well as black girls, and the same goes with me. I can appreciate a good looking attractive human being regardless.

If,in your view,humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous,then how do you reach the conclusion that you would ever want to get married being that the two statements contradict each other .

Make your mind up you’re saying it’s all about mixed race birds (in your view) looking a lot better than ethnic euro ones but you’re also saying that you think the Afro girls are just as attractive to you and your Afro mates as our own girls are.

What are you talking about :s I’ll get my shagging out of the way before I get married because when and if I do get married its because I will actually want to be with that girl and actually want to be faithful to her for the rest of my life… That’s what marriage is.

I said I think there are more ugly white girls than mixed raced girls but if someone is good looking then they are good looking regardless of what they are.
I also said that I can appreciate a good looking person.

So you wouldn’t even entertain Nicole Sherzinger if she was spread eagle dripping all over your bed just because she is German/Hawaiian/black and god knows what else?
You only like white girls and Latinas?

I was going by the statement in which you said ‘humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous’.

You say you’ll ‘get your shagging out of the way before you get married’. That actually is what marriage is for and as I said to kr if you don’t think that’s right then try telling any girl’s father that you’re only using his daughter, amongst others,as an unpaid ■■■■■■ until you find one who you want to marry and when you do find one who you might want to marry try telling her father that you’ll marry her when you’ve finished trying all the others.

If I had a daughter I think that I’d prefer it if she was with someone with my views than someone with your views concerning how to treat women regardless of the age thing.

As for Nicole Sherzinger v one of our own.No contest it’s Wendy Hurrel who I’d rather spend the rest of my life with and Nicole Scherzinger could get the bus home and you can have her,assuming that I was lucky enough for both of them to be sitting waiting on the side of my bed saying which one do I want and in my case one being enough. Sadly it will never happen because she’s spoken for according to the ring on her finger.Lucky zb.

4.bp.blogspot.com/-S_eS8TCzdv0/T … inger-3.jp

therevcounter.com/attachment … _11-19.jpg

What!!! She looks like a right plain Jane, looks boring as hell as well. Yes please, give me Nicole any day.

Your completely missing the point, ■■■ is a part of knowing someone inside and out (excuse the pun) and its not them being an “unpaid ■■■■■■” at all, ■■■ is a natural physical emotion that happens when two people like each other.
Marriage is a serious commitment and a big deal so why shouldn’t you make sure it’s right before you settle down rather than settling with the first girl you meet at 16■■

And if you had a daughter you would be lucky to have a son in law like me
I’ve never once cheated on a girlfriend, and every girl I’ve met knows where she stands and it’s been the same the other way round as well, I’ve met a few girls that I actually quite liked a lot but for them it was just “play mates” and nothing serious, just two people that fancied each other and had a good laugh when they were together.
One thing I have learnt though, when a bird doesn’t want you they certainly don’t want no one else to have you either!!

[keebs26uk]

kr79:
0

Pffft spat me tea out…I was thinking just the same just as this picture showed up

I drifted off about 5-6 pages ago as i got very bored but I see its still going on strong

[carryfast]

Wheel Nut:
Carryfast

You ARE Bonkers

Luck had nothing to do with it mate, you dangle your worm wherever the big shoals are, someone will give it a bite

I think you missed the bit about the fact that there were no ‘big shoals’ in the world I knew in the 1970’s because too many of them were all locked away in all girls schools and approved schools and unlike Savile and co I never got the chance to join them at any partys on TOTP etc.But those birds probably still would have preferred a ■■■■■■■■■ with Savile and Gary Glitter instead of a dance with me anyway,even if I had got an invite.

But that sounds like BBC company policy of the 1970’s to me.It’s just that like Savile they weren’t bothered about age or gender.Although nothing seems to have changed in the case of the latter on East Enders in 2012.

While no surprise that most of those hypocritical blokes,who seem to want girls of 16 to live like nuns until they reach 25,are often the same ones with your ideas of how to treat someone else’s daughter when they were young themselves.

[carryfast]

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
Humans arnt supposed to be monogamous, males certainly arnt. Women should be though
Why don’t you agree on mixing race relationships?

That’s the idea of marriage zb’d then in your world.

On the interracial marriage issue I’d reverse the question.The fact is it’s all about pc integration and keeping the immigrant groups happy not multiculturalism.No surprise that the biggest supporters of the idea,of interracial relationships,are the Afro ethnic groups who prefer our girls to their own for the simple reason that ours are generally (a lot) better looking than their own.Which,as I’ve said,explains that massive change in outlooks which took place in the early 1970’s clubbing scene among ‘certain’ groups who’d been happy to mix with the Afro groups ‘until’ they realised the ‘real’ reason why many of the ethnic Afro blokes were so keen to get involved with the indigenous population instead of keeping to their own.

The same issue is probably the main reason for the ethnic strife which applied throughout the Southern US States where the ethnic european population has always understood the difference between multiculturalism compared to integration.To put it simply there’s nothing good about the idea of wiping out our own ethnic group on the basis of some zb’d up socialist ideal of turning the world into one single ethnic group especially when that idea also means that we have to settle for an ethnic African (or Asian) wife so the ethnic African blokes can get a better looking ethnic European one.

While no surprise that,as I’ve said,from experience,the Italians are as keen as any Southern US States redneck,on the idea of keeping the different ethnic groups different (multiculturalism),as opposed to the idea of ‘integration’,when it comes to any other ethnic group (such as the British) except their own,going for a good looking Italian bird in the average Italian venue.
That’s even before the age thing is taken into account.

While it was no surprise that with all the bs about ‘integration’ being supposedly good for the working class the Royals didn’t seem to be that keen on finding an African or Asian wife for Prince Charles. So just typical British hypocricy.

You sound to me like a typical product of the modern generations that have swallowed all the pc brainwashing,concerning the acceptance of contiinuing integration,within the working classes,so that the rich zb’s can keep their cheap labour scam going without too many riots in Brixton or Croydon.Although I doubt that the Polish will be as keen on the idea of integration between the Slav girls and the Afro Carribean groups in the long term.

Not at all because when and if I ever get married I wouldn’t cheat on her.

What a load of crap, again your looking into something so much deeper than what it actually is.
I personally think mixed race birds are generally all better looking that white girls, if you way it up there are more ugly white birds than ugly mixed race birds. Skin, teeth, eyes, arse and ■■■■■ are more likely to be better on a mixed race bird between any mixed races white/black, white/Asian, black/Asian than that just from a white/white combination.

And I’m sure your theory about Latinas will be [zb] along the line somewhere, they have definitely got a bit of Afro in them somewhere from way back… And guess how, because people mixing their ethnicity together.

Your so wrong on many levels, I haven’t been fed anything at all. I’ve got black mates who go out and shag white girls as well as black girls, and the same goes with me. I can appreciate a good looking attractive human being regardless.

If,in your view,humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous,then how do you reach the conclusion that you would ever want to get married being that the two statements contradict each other .

Make your mind up you’re saying it’s all about mixed race birds (in your view) looking a lot better than ethnic euro ones but you’re also saying that you think the Afro girls are just as attractive to you and your Afro mates as our own girls are.

What are you talking about :s I’ll get my shagging out of the way before I get married because when and if I do get married its because I will actually want to be with that girl and actually want to be faithful to her for the rest of my life… That’s what marriage is.

I said I think there are more ugly white girls than mixed raced girls but if someone is good looking then they are good looking regardless of what they are.
I also said that I can appreciate a good looking person.

So you wouldn’t even entertain Nicole Sherzinger if she was spread eagle dripping all over your bed just because she is German/Hawaiian/black and god knows what else?
You only like white girls and Latinas?

I was going by the statement in which you said ‘humans aren’t supposed to be monogamous’.

You say you’ll ‘get your shagging out of the way before you get married’. That actually is what marriage is for and as I said to kr if you don’t think that’s right then try telling any girl’s father that you’re only using his daughter, amongst others,as an unpaid ■■■■■■ until you find one who you want to marry and when you do find one who you might want to marry try telling her father that you’ll marry her when you’ve finished trying all the others.

If I had a daughter I think that I’d prefer it if she was with someone with my views than someone with your views concerning how to treat women regardless of the age thing.

As for Nicole Sherzinger v one of our own.No contest it’s Wendy Hurrel who I’d rather spend the rest of my life with and Nicole Scherzinger could get the bus home and you can have her,assuming that I was lucky enough for both of them to be sitting waiting on the side of my bed saying which one do I want and in my case one being enough. Sadly it will never happen because she’s spoken for according to the ring on her finger.Lucky zb.

4.bp.blogspot.com/-S_eS8TCzdv0/T … inger-3.jp

therevcounter.com/attachment … _11-19.jpg

What!!! She looks like a right plain Jane, looks boring as hell as well. Yes please, give me Nicole any day.

Your completely missing the point, ■■■ is a part of knowing someone inside and out (excuse the pun) and its not them being an “unpaid ■■■■■■” at all, ■■■ is a natural physical emotion that happens when two people like each other.
Marriage is a serious commitment and a big deal so why shouldn’t you make sure it’s right before you settle down rather than settling with the first girl you meet at 16■■

And if you had a daughter you would be lucky to have a son in law like me
I’ve never once cheated on a girlfriend, and every girl I’ve met knows where she stands and it’s been the same the other way round as well, I’ve met a few girls that I actually quite liked a lot but for them it was just “play mates” and nothing serious, just two people that fancied each other and had a good laugh when they were together.
One thing I have learnt though, when a bird doesn’t want you they certainly don’t want no one else to have you either!!

If I’ve read it right you’d never have needed to cheat on any bird because they all had/have the same view of ‘monogamy’ as yours.So you’re saying that the only way to get the ‘right’ one is after shagging loads of ‘wrong’ ones first.The flaw in that plan is that it’s just as likely that you’ll run out of wrong ones before you find the right one because the right one was actually the bird that you overlooked and missed at the beginning when you started on wrong one number one.

But Wendy Hurrel boring plain jane and Nicole Scherzinger is better looking .
If only the lucky zb who’s pulled Wendy Hurrel agreed with you in which case I might have sent a fix it request to the BBC weather centre before he’d had a chance to change his mind.

[raymundo]

I tried again to get interested in this ramble of CF’s but lost the plot but am very surprised how he can type so accurately with one hand on the keyboard while the other is down his trousers

[carryfast]

raymundo:
I tried again to get interested in this ramble of CF’s but lost the plot

Maybe you just lost the plot because you can’t understand it or don’t want to understand it.

[wheel_nut]

[carryfast]

Wheel Nut:

No if it ain’t 1970’s it ain’t music.Late 1969 in this case but close enough.

youtube.com/watch?v=9WjK4chPb-4

Which just leaves that question for those TOTP and/or Duncroft ‘victims’.‘If’ I’d have got an invite and been there would it have been worth my while to have kicked the zb out of Savile and co,if it had come to an argument between him/them,and at least me,about who got at least one of those girls .