raymundo:
Carryfast,
If you had married the girl of your dreams all those years ago who is to say that it would have been an eternally happy union, then if it then went wrong and you split up you would feel worse about it than you do now.
I was with my second attempt at getting it right for about 11 years (I think) and to me that was perfection with a thriving light haulage company under my belt, money in the bank and a 4 year old XJ6 as a runaround but one day she decided her first love was to the business & general expenses bank account (plus cash in hand jobs money) and [zb] off with the lot. I was more than gutted.
You may feel you have missed out but maybe fate decided you would be better off on your own rather than maybe even more emotionly damaged over a failed relationship.
But luckily life goes on, In the end I told myself to get over it and live the rest of my life to the best of my ability and stuff what had happened in the past. It were done and nothing would bring it back.
That’s all fair enough the only thing worse than no one is a wrong one.
Although having said that it’s no surprise to me that she’s stayed with the bloke into his 80’s and her 50’s the last I heard.So like all the best marriages it’ll be one that lasts a lifetime and with a 30 year age gap that takes a special type of girl.All the evidence tells me she was a right one not a wrong one and it was just zb luck in my case probably not helped by the same environment concerning the one which fooled those girls into thinking that a ‘date’ on TOTP with Savile or Gary Glitter would beat saying to the BBC they’ll go but only if they get to mix with the blokes there of their own age no one else.
Which then just would have meant an ad in the local/national papers and on the BBC saying that there’s an under 18 teens only party at TOTP every week on tele if anyone’s interested send in your applications.Then who knows.But that wouldn’t have fitted in with the agenda of a late 20’s-early 30’s Royal being fixed up in an arranged marriage with one of those teenaged birds who should have been there with us blokes of her own age.
Sorry ole mate but I read your post an then reread it and read it again but your answer just don’t come up with anything you aint said many times before.
raymundo:
Sorry ole mate but I read your post an then reread it and read it again but your answer just don’t come up with anything you aint said many times before.
The important and relevant thing is that it doesn’t matter how many times you think I’ve said anything before or not.What matters is that within those posts is contained at least some of the answers as to the type of environment and culture which existed at the BBC,that allowed Savile and allegedly others,to get access to young girls in a way which they probably wouldn’t have been able to today.
The reasons for that seem to be an inconvenient truth that goes right to the top of the British establishment at the time for obvious reasons,related to what seems to me,like a search for a teenaged girl for an arranged marriage with a bloke 13 (or possibly even more depending on who was eventually chosen) years older and,what might have been mistakenly seen,as the possible need,to soften up the population,to accept that situation,together with the obvious influence,which such a totally over the top media blitz,would have on similar aged girls at the time and the opportunities,which those over the top media methods,used to carry out such a blitz,provided to paedophiles like Savile and Gary Glitter.
Unless you can provide evidence which shows that Diana Spencer ever dated any blokes of around her own age between at least the ages of 15 and 18,or at any point before the eventual marriage with Prince Charles,and the names of who those blokes were and if not why not .
Maybe Savile knew all that too which explains why the media waited until he was dead before exposing him for the pervert he was.
An answer as to wether she dated any blokes of around her own age when she was between the ages of 15 and 18 who they were and if not why not would do.
But I do believe that the moon landings happened and as for Roswell who knows and who cares.
But why was the flag blowing around when there isn’t any wind on the moon■■?
Got me stumped
Roswell did happen as well, they recovered the body’s and took them to Area 51.
Also the bloke that was In the news recently that hacked into the mainframe said he found what he was looking for.
Pretty naive to think we are the only foundations of life in the whole universe.
FarnboroughBoy11:
But why was the flag blowing around when there isn’t any wind on the moon■■?
Got me stumped
Some of CF’s hot air maybe ?
Maybe the hot air could be used to generate electricity?
Along with harnessing the methane from all the bs we’d save another gorilla!
Just thinking of the primates.
alamcculloch:
Lady Diana made it very clear to all of her set that she was keeping herself for Prince Charles.She was sadly let down.
Really.Even if that version of what ‘actually’ happened was true (doubtful).The idea of a 15 year old girl in Northampton, telling her parents that she doesn’t want to mix with anyone of her own age,at any partys,because she’s ‘keeping’ herself for a bloke in his late 20’s,who she thinks will marry her when she’s a bit older and he’s in his 30’s,would probably be met with some issues by those parents and/or her teachers and social services,who’d be aking questions about what the 20 something bloke is all about and sorry there’s no way they’ll allow that because he’s too old for her anyway.
The same would probably apply in the case of the same thing being said by an Asian bird who told her teachers the same thing as to the reasons why she doesn’t want to go to the school disco.
Notwithsatanding any of that the situation related to the years between when Diana first met Charles at the age of 15 and when she was 18 aren’t much different to the situation which took place between Joe and Nicola Phiplot.The only difference was that he was a bit older than Charles but the couple actually loved each other enough to have a family and get married against all the hypocritical public backlash and outrage when she was 16-17.Whereas Charles (or was it just the establishment ) chose the coward’s way out,of waiting/making sure that the media had distorted public perceptions enough,to give the green light to go for a vulnerable teenager,who didn’t have a clue what she was getting into,with a bloke who didn’t even love her and no surprise large scale public celebrations for what was no better than the worst type of Asian arranged marriage.
Lady Diana had to be physicaly checked to make sure that she was a virgin.Doesnt happen nowadays,but that was the way of the world back then.Like the Savile business a lot of people kept their mouths shut when they could have told her that there would be 3 in the marriage.
alamcculloch:
Lady Diana had to be physicaly checked to make sure that she was a virgin.Doesnt happen nowadays,but that was the way of the world back then.Like the Savile business a lot of people kept their mouths shut when they could have told her that there would be 3 in the marriage.
This was 1970’s/early 1980’s Britain we’re talking about not 1970’s to date Iran.
Your first and last sentences there say it all and seems to be getting to my way of thinking about the zb which was going on back then in order to give the establishment what it wanted and a lot of girls,not just Diana,obviously paid the price (and maybe a few 1970’s blokes,who were done out of having the chance to get to know and build relationships with the 70’s girls of our own age.Because perverts like Savile and Gary Glitter and more than a few older blokes and middle aged divorcees managed to take advantage of the situation and got them instead ).Just like the establishment did in the case of Diana.If my theory is correct and no one will ever convince me otherwise.
Which just leaves that issue and question of wether there’s a link between what was effectively a form of grooming going on in the case of the search for a girl like Diana and the attempt to justify that situation,in the eyes of the public and the potential girl,as eventually chosen,herself,using the type of zb that was obviously going on in the media like TOTP at the time,both on and obviously off camera backstage,just as I’ve said.
One thing is for sure they’ve made sure that Savile was gone and couldn’t say anything before bringing the issue to light and the stink coming from the BBC seems more about a cover up than putting their hands up and admitting that what was going on back then was just plain wrong,both in the case of the corporation’s support,for the so called Royal Wedding (arranged marriage of the worst sort),and ‘it’s idea’ of an ‘under 18’s party’ every week.Which was obviously set up to make that search,for a young teenaged virgin,for a late 20’s early 30’s bloke,and the subsequent ‘marriage’,more socially acceptable,than they thought it might be to the unlucky girl eventually chosen and the general public,and make it out to be something it really wasn’t and never was.
keebs26uk:
A whole day without crap and you saved a Gorillia Cf, how does it feel ?
I don’t think there’s anything ‘crap’ about bringing to light the reasons for an establishment inspired media grooming excercise.In order to smooth the way for a late 20’s /early 30’s Royal,in searching for a teenaged virgin,who he didn’t love,in an arranged marriage.Which also backfired by having the unintended consequences of providing a gang of paedophiles at the BBC with access to the similar aged girls who were being used for the set up.
The missing link seems to be that no one seems to give a zb about the young blokes of those girls’ own age at the time who were obviously being kept away from them so those older paedos could get at them instead.Considering that,as I’ve said,there weren’t any under 18’s only partys being arranged with those girls just for all the young blokes of their own age at the BBC TOTP studios or at the approved girls’ school.In which case,had there been,Savile and Gary Glitter would have had to zb off and play with themselves.‘Unless’ they wanted to spend a long time in hospital in traction drinking through a straw ‘if’ they were lucky.
Although having said that I’d doubt if many of those girls could honestly say that they’d have preferred giving the blokes of their own age a chance at the time instead of Savile and co.
So not really much different to the idea of Diana supposedly ‘keeping herself’ for later marriage (use by the establishment) in an arranged marriage with an older bloke which had nothing whatsoever to do with love.
As for the gorillas I thought the natives in the jungle had eaten them all by now anyway.
By the way for kr’s and others benefit while Savile etc were getting all the women this was the real world of ‘clubbing’ during the early 1970’s and later for the blokes of those girls’ age.Obviously not this area but it’s the ‘numbers situation’ (problem) that’s the relevant bit.
keebs26uk:
A whole day without crap and you saved a Gorillia Cf, how does it feel ?
Aw c’mon ‘keebs26uk’ you didn’t really think it could go for 24hrs once you had posted something
It seems that now according to CF since the late 60’s early 70’s there has been a massive establishment conspiracy to enable Prince Charles to marry a virgin who was younger than him and that the BBC was involved by allowing Jimmy Savile et al to abuse children Just so the entire population of the UK would see it as OK for older men to be with younger girl’s and the vehicle for this social engineering was TOTP’s.
Carryfast you are a crazy crackpot, a total wind up merchant and a sad troll
keebs26uk:
A whole day without crap and you saved a Gorillia Cf, how does it feel ?
Aw c’mon ‘keebs26uk’ you didn’t really think it could go for 24hrs once you had posted something
It seems that now according to CF since the late 60’s early 70’s there has been a massive establishment conspiracy to enable Prince Charles to marry a virgin who was younger than him and that the BBC was involved by allowing Jimmy Savile et al to abuse children Just so the entire population of the UK would see it as OK for older men to be with younger girl’s and the vehicle for this social engineering was TOTP’s.
Carryfast you are a crazy crackpot, a total wind up merchant and a sad troll
Regards
Dave Penn;
That’s just what the head of the BBC would have said if/when anyone had asked,or asked now,the questions as to why was it that the girls on TOTP weren’t just kept with blokes of their own age and why all those blokes weren’t sent an invite to the show in regards to same.Or for that matter why ‘invite’ Savile to ‘get at’ those birds at the approved school instead of arranging a few (plenty of) partys for them with the blokes of their own age in the area.Which wouldn’t,of course,have fitted in with the agenda of the establishment searching for that 15 year old girl for that late 20’s Royal so that he could be fixed up with her in an arranged marriage when they’d softened up the puplic to accept it.Who better to choose to do that softening up in the media,during the relevant period,at least concerning the issues related to TOTP ,than a known ■■■■■■■■■■ who already by that time had a reputation for his interest in underage girls with the ‘visits’ to the approved school and the backstage meetings on TOTP being a perk of the job for him and all the rest involved.Bearing in mind that it wasn’t just Savile shown on camera and possibly backstage with more than a normal interest in the young girls on the show during the 1970’s,which are the relevant examples,which I’m referring to,not the 1960’s.
However what was it that was stopping Charles from marrying Diana at the age of 16 or 18 assuming that he loved her and that she was supposed to be ‘keeping herself’ for him anyway according to the evidence here .If not then why would,and how could she,have been ‘keeping herself’ from meeting any other blokes,of her own age,until he was conveniently then only ‘suddenly’ interested in her later,bearing in mind the questions which such behaviour would raise with any normal parent .In which case,as I’ve said,who did Diana date,after first meeting Charles,when she was 15.However assuming that she didn’t date any blokes of her own age after she first met Charles then the question is why and why would her parents have not raised the issue,when she told them that she didn’t want to meet any blokes of her own age and why,as any normal parent would have done .
It’s you who’s having a laugh and who doesn’t seem so keen on chasing up the issues all the way to the top.The question is why .
I heard Gary Pucket & Union Gap singing ‘Young Girl’ tonight on the radio.
Wonder if that song was inspired by the establishment to encourage a lot of pervs to play with children so Chas could have a bash at Diana?
Now that seems very logical
raymundo:
I heard Gary Pucket & Union Gap singing ‘Young Girl’ tonight on the radio.
Wonder if that song was inspired by the establishment to encourage a lot of pervs to play with children so Chas could have a bash at Diana?
Now that seems very logical
Not exactly.No.
These days it would be more like the East Enders storylines concerning softening up the puplic to accept same ■■■ marriages.Although,as I’ve said,I don’t think they’d be writing any storylines,concerning a bloke of 30-32 (let alone older ) getting engaged to and marrying Abi,after she’s told her parents and friends that she’s been ‘keeping herself’ for him since she was 15 and so she’s not interested in dating Jay.Which just leaves the virginity examination before the marriage.Or putting Rita,Sue and Bob Too on the BBC film schedule this weekend.
Charles was all geared up for marrying Amanda Knatchbull, granddaughter of Louis Mountbatten, it was only after he got blown up that she decided that the Royal Family life was not for her, so Charlie was seeing to Dianas sister at the time of meeting her
Just so the entire population of the UK would see it as OK for older men to be with younger girl’s and the vehicle for this social engineering was TOTP’s. 