FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast what are you actually saying? That Charles and Diana was just a public stunt to develop modern culture to accept age gap marriages?
No I’m saying the opposite.The media culture of the 1970’s by the BBC was a publicity stunt to change attitudes and perceptions,amongst the public and any potential girl,who fitted the search for a young teenaged Royal ‘bride’,for the (by then) too old Prince Charles,from revulsion to acceptance.So no wonder that the BBC employed such drastic tactics to get the job done by ‘inviting’ loads of teenaged girls onto the stage of TOTP etc to get ‘involved’ physically with older tv ‘presenters’ on camera while keeping those girls away from blokes of their own age.The result being the unintended consequences of the girls involved,in being duped into involvement in the publicity stunt on tv,then also being being got at off camera backstage by those ■■■■■■■■■■ tv ‘presenters’ who were taking advantage of the situation.While other young girls of the same generation,were also influenced by the same media stunt,and then decided to go for older blokes instead of ones of their own age,whereas they probably wouldn’t have done previously.
It’s that fact,that the format of programmes like TOTP,was arranged and directed on the basis,of making sure that there was no actual contact between the girls and the blokes of their own age,while there was between those girls and the adult ‘presenters’,which shows the motivation behind those programmes.Whereas if it had been genuine it would have been young blokes and girls of under 18 invited in equal numbers ( hopefully a slight surplus of girls would have been even better 
) every week with just contact between those groups of young people.Without any contact allowed whatsoever between any of those young people and the presenters or stars on the show at all together with plenty of references reaffirming the reasons for the segretion on the show.IE all the presenters and stars telling everyone they could have been getting some of the action if only they were under 18.But that probably would have sunk Charles’ and the establishment’s prospects of getting the teenaged virgin that they were looking for and then found in the mid 1970’s. 
But surely no one can be naive enough to think that a lot of the content that gets put into the tv schedules isn’t just peacetime propaganda to sway societal views to whatever direction those who are directing that content want. 
I’m actually saying that the establishment just wanted Diana as a breeding tool nothing more and the BBC’s actions during the 1970’s,concerning it’s treatment of the young women,of my age at the time,was just a propaganda excercise to justify the age thing in the eyes of the potential girl and the general public.Considering that the idea of such a grooming excercise and arranged marriage,between a bloke of Charle’s age and a girl of Diana’s,would be unnacceptable to most girls and their parents and many of the public.As shown since that time when public perceptions returned to ‘normal’,in regards to that issue,again.
As I’ve said East Enders today reflects the establishment wish for the societal acceptance of close age relationships and same ■■■ relationships while pushing that societal acceptance away from age gap relationships.As I’ve said that’s in total contrast to the situation in the 1970’s.Which is why in the 1970’s we saw Savile,Gary Glitter amongst others getting away with doing stuff with under 18,even under 16 girls on TOTP etc,on camera,let alone what possibly went on off camera and backstage,that today would probably have the alarm bells ringing at social services and the police.
It’s also why today we have same ■■■ relationships being portrayed and numerous other content in other programmes that are suited to the cause of getting same ■■■ relationships made societally acceptable to the point of allowing such marriages in church and such couples to adopt other people’s children because their ideas obviously won’t let them have any of their own.
While,as I’ve also said,there’s no way that we’re ever going to see any storylines these days in East Enders that would reflect that situation in the 1970’s in which age gaps between older blokes and teenaged girls were being portrayed in the media as something to be celebrated not an issue for public revulsion.Such as in that hypothetical storyline concerning a bloke of Prince Charles’ age being with Abi.Which would have been no big deal in the world of the 1970’s, after all the softening up carried out in the media by blokes like Savile,Gary Glitter,and ‘others’,but probably totally socially unnacceptable now.
As the Romans would say who gained from all this and why the big change.
Obviously it’s those at the top who arrange the content so it’s those at the top on who’s agenda the whole issue is based.
It doesn’t take a genius to realise that what was obviously an arranged marriage between Charles and Diana for obvious reasons,would today be a cause of grooming investigations,based on the questions which I’ve raised,concerning her being kept from having the chance to date anyone of her own age,so that Charles could have her when the establishment felt the timing would be best to minimise any possible public revulsion,concerning the issue of an obviously naive young girl,being pushed into (groomed for) an innapropriate relationship (for her) with an older bloke who didn’t love her because he never even knew her,as we are led to believe,because it was ‘supposed’ to be her older sister that he wanted.What makes it all worse is that her parents and family seem to be implicated in the action by co operating with it instead of protecting her from it.
It also doesn’t take a genius to realise that the agenda at the BBC (establishment mouthpiece) was all about pushing that idea,of keeping teenaged girls away from blokes of their own age,so that a load of older tv ‘presenters’ (paedophiles in reality) could get at them instead.Which obviously would have had an influence on public perceptions and impressions on any young girls of the relevant age at the time in regards to their general outlooks,towards age gap relationships,which probably wouldn’t have been anything like as accepting and tolerant had such a propaganda excercise not been carried out in the media before and during the time in question.
After the establishment had got what it wanted from Diana that agenda obviously gradually changed from pushing age gap relationships to one of furthering the cause of same ■■■ relationships and same/close age relationships.Hence the reason for the total opposite agenda in the content of 2012 East Enders as opposed to 1970’s TOTP etc.
But the common denominator,that connects all those different agendas,is that they’ve all,at one point in time or another,had friends in very high places.While,as I’ve said,the issue of young blokes losing out with the girls of their own age today,to older blokes would be seen as a morale breaker with the young single troops in the ‘war on terror’ and the ones who haven’t joined up also obviously benefitting from the situation.
Which isn’t a luxury which young single blokes had during the 1970’s for obvious reasons.While obviously at least some of the girls from the time having also paid a high price all for what was effectively an establishment Royal age gap search,‘courtship’ and ‘wedding’ of the worst kind,that obviously had nothing to do with love,and a media blitz being used to justify it at the time. 
… 