keebs26uk:
True that, ahhh well I guess Gorillas will be extinct now due to that comment
LOL, I know. By the time I get to the end of his posts I’ve completely forgotten what he’s said at the start!!
keebs26uk:
True that, ahhh well I guess Gorillas will be extinct now due to that comment
LOL, I know. By the time I get to the end of his posts I’ve completely forgotten what he’s said at the start!!
keebs26uk:
True that, ahhh well I guess Gorillas will be extinct now due to that comment
LOL, I know. By the time I get to the end of his posts I’ve completely forgotten what he’s said at the start!!
And I’m not helping them either by posting twice
Send for Sigourney Weaver.
She will save the Gorillas.
neil46:
Send for Sigourney Weaver.She will save the Gorillas.
![]()
![]()
![]()
She can’t this weekend, sadly…She’s got CF haunting the inside of her fridge.
Fileep:
Carryfast:
Fileep:
Read up to page 10 then lost the will to live… CF Peado views/tendencies, no other words for it! And why the Mods have left this to run with your homophobic remarks is beyond me!As I read it it’s not me who’s shagged an underage ■■■■■■■ here or who agreed with that idea.Unlike others so long as the bloke isn’t considered ‘too old’.
As I’ve said if what I’ve said is paedo views or tendencies then Joe Philpot would be in jail.So why don’t you report us both to the law so we can then both sue you or at least quote the relevant criminal posts here so Rikki can at least then inform me of my crime.
If I had your name and address I would certainly be passing it to the DPMU dept. at your local Police station, I would hazard a guess that your computer may be confiscated.
Just put your issues to Rikki in that case and then Rikki can inform me that he thinks my open postings here for all to see are crminal acts and that he’s informed the local police and then I’ll give myself up by going to see them to help with their enquiries etc etc voluntarily because it’s obvious at that point that I’ll need a defence solicitor.Is that ok in your view or is the name and address thing possibly about you having some plans about settling the matter on an ‘unofficial’ basis .
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast,
Just because a 17 year old shags a 15 year old, doesn’t mean it’s ■■■■!! Your being a hypocrite as you say they are young enough to make decisions whether to go out on a date with a 40 year old but she can’t make a decision about when she wants to have ■■■ with someone.A girl is of an age at 15 where she can decide to chat with a 17 year old or a 40 +year old but she’s not at an age at 15 to be able to consent to a ■■■■■■ relationship and if a 17 year old or a 40 year old then shags her,knowing that,then both are (should be) criminals of equal measure in the eyes of the law which effectively is the charge of statutory ■■■■.But obviously not in the zb’d up criminal views of those like yourself.
A date isn’t the same thing as ■■■ simples and that’s why Joe Philpot is still happily married not in prison.Although you obviously think the law should be applied with double standards just based on age gaps and obviously in which the effective intention is to ignore the meaning of the age of consent,as it stands at present,and reserving girls for blokes of their own age.Which is simply ageist.
Yes but the 40 year old is an adult, the 17 year old is not.
So you’re saying that if a 17 year old rapes or murders someone it’s not the same crime as if a 40 year old rapes or murders someone .
Assuming they’ve had a ■■■■■■ relationship with a 15 year old girl,they’d both have committed the same crime and they’re both over the age of criminal responsibility so they are (should be) both equal in the eyes of the law.It’s obvious that the agenda seems to be about changing societal views and the law to one in which it’s the age of the bloke and/or the age gap that matters not the age of the girl.Which,as I’ve said,isn’t exactly the way my dad would have seen it,if it had been his daughter,and I’d trust his judgement over yours thanks.
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast:
kr79:
Carryfast:
Boring Johnson:
Hello againi have not written much on the forums but have read a lot for several months. my wife is a counsilor who helps broken marrage and relationships. she tells me she has more people who are closely matched then with great age differents!it could be lawfull to have a young girl slepping with a 40 year old but is it normal, same young girl sleeps with old schoolboy and it is treated as young loves . wife reads paper to me and mention schoolteacher and small girl, i think that wrong as he is trust between father and mother
James
Just tell her to check out that story of Joe and Nicola Philpot if she really thinks that age gap marriages can’t work.Legal is all that matters wether it’s normal or not isn’t your,or your wife’s,call.That’s for the couple to decide.
However if your wife is really a marriage councellor then I’m sure she’ll be well aware of what often happens when a same age marriage reaches the point where the wife is ageing faster than her husband and then he gets an offer by a much younger girl.
Which probably explains the Jeremy Forrest case.If he is still in a loving caring relationship he wouldn’t look twice till death us do part and all that. If the relationship has problems or has run it’s course he may be tempted.
So,in that case,why not just look for another divorced or widowed older woman of the same age,like I’m expected to do now, instead of going for a woman in her teens/20’s to have another family with thereby removing that possibility for a single bloke,who’s never had that chance,to try to pull her instead
.
Haven’t you ever met a women say in her 40s that you like or have you just never given anyone over the age of 20 a chance?
Yes I know a great girl in her 40’s and we get on like a house on fire and always have done.In fact she’s the one that I referred to earlier who married the bloke who she met at school when she was 14 and who she’s stayed with ever since.I’m sure he’ll be glad to know that I’m not looking for a married 40 + year old woman who I like and always have done though.Because I can’t see any reason why I shouldn’t be looking for a young single girl to have a wife and family of my own with just as I’ve always been.Although no surprise that the age police would be happier if I decided to go for his wife than if went for the single teens/20’s girl I’m actually looking for.
However having said that and with hindsight and assuming I could turn the clock back to when she was in her teens-early 20’s maybe I could just see things the Henry V111 way by trying to break them up for my own benefit.
But no there aren’t ‘millions’ of young single spare women compared to the amounts of blokes looking for them and every married/divorced bloke who gets one means one less chance for a single bloke.
Muckaway:
neil46:
Send for Sigourney Weaver.She will save the Gorillas.
![]()
![]()
![]()
She can’t this weekend, sadly…She’s got CF haunting the inside of her fridge.
No thanks the alien was welcome to her.
I wonder where King Kong went… Ahhh yes now I know
kr79:
As I said before Charles and di were hardly an advert for marriage. Look at the older royals it’s common knowledge that despite having a royal wife laid on the men often had lovers to and it was accepted but it’s certainly not right.
My parents met in the 70s not at school as my mum went to a girls school and my dad lived in another country. Met at 17 married at 19 I was born when they was 21 my sister when they was 23 and divorced at 26. My dad has re married and my mum and stepdad have been together for a long time both partners are around the same age.
You can’t plan life like your trying to [zb] happens just go with the flow.
So you’re saying all that is an advert for close age marriages .
The issue of the zb morals in this country concerning the sanctity of marriage and the British idea of an ‘arranged marriage’ compared to the Asian one,goes back to Henry V111 and then just gets ‘adjusted’ to suit the prevaling societal perceptions as in the case of only same or close age marriages being tolerated now and/or establishment requirements as in the case of Diana Spencer and the knock on effects which that had during the 1970’s.I think that the Asian idea if combined with the idea of it’s the girls’ choice that takes precedence over all else would be a lot better than what we’ve got now or your example of a ‘happy household’.
As for me I grew up in what could be classed as an age gap marriage,in which my dad married a girl,who was ‘officially’ a ‘child’ when he was ‘officially’ well into being an ‘adult’ at the time when he was dating her,which lasted longer than the years I’ve lived so far and which was only ended by his death at 80 years of age.
It got adjusted because its abhorrent to most of us to even think about tampering with a child.
Lets go down the asian route as long as the child consents.
You should be locked up buddy.
Joe Philpott (whoooooo!!!), Jeremy Forrest, Diana Spencer, Gary Glitter, old ■■■■■ wanting young girls/women but girls preferably it would seem…
…This thread is meant to be about Jimmy Saville, but just like the Gardner thread (hijacked with American truck waffle) it’s virtually unreadable because of stupid quotes aslong as a tramps teabreak.
Not an advert at all it shows perhaps they were to young to settle down but my best friends mum and dad who are the same age as my parents have just celebrated there 35 wedding anerversery and will no doubt celebrate many more.
It shows everyone is different and despite my parents divorcing when I was young I couldn’t wish for better parents as they have always been there for there children and spent loads of time with us but in glad they separated and down that than grow up in a relationship where they didn’t want to be.
You can’t plan love.
aranger:
It got adjusted because its abhorrent to most of us to even think about tampering with a child.Lets go down the asian route as long as the child consents.
You should be locked up buddy.
Where the zb is the connection between the average normal Asian arranged marriage and the type of zb which you’ve described related to the type of offence which Savile did.
You sound like one of the worst of the raving loony nutter age police to me.
For your information what Savile did had no relation whatsoever to an arranged marriage because the church doesn’t marry children to anyone and that pervert wasn’t looking for a wife.Although it’s obvious that ‘adjustment’ to the raving age gap nutters would eventually mean making marriage of 15 year old girls to 17 year old blokes legal.While no surprise Joe Philpot gets his door kicked in and he gets dragged off to jail.
But no I shouldn’t be locked up because I haven’t had his luck in finding a wife like his anyway and obviously never will.
Joe Philpott (yes, whoever he is) if imprisonned, would probably get his door kicked in there too.
kr79:
Not an advert at all it shows perhaps they were to young to settle down but my best friends mum and dad who are the same age as my parents have just celebrated there 35 wedding anerversery and will no doubt celebrate many more.
It shows everyone is different and despite my parents divorcing when I was young I couldn’t wish for better parents as they have always been there for there children and spent loads of time with us but in glad they separated and down that than grow up in a relationship where they didn’t want to be.
You can’t plan love.
You’ve contradicted yourself there because you’re saying that all marriages which start out early will fail just based on your own experience and then you’ve said everyone is different.However trust me a lot less marriages would ‘fail’ if middle aged blokes weren’t able to dump their older wives and then re marry or even have a relationship legally with a younger single girl.
Carryfast:
aranger:
It got adjusted because its abhorrent to most of us to even think about tampering with a child.Lets go down the asian route as long as the child consents.
You should be locked up buddy.
Where the zb is the connection between the average normal Asian arranged marriage and the type of zb which you’ve described related to the type of offence which Savile did.
You sound like one of the worst of the raving loony nutter age police to me.
For your information what Savile did had no relation whatsoever to an arranged marriage because the church doesn’t marry children to anyone and that pervert wasn’t looking for a wife.Although it’s obvious that adjustment to the raving age gap nutters means marrying 15 year olds to 17 year olds.
You said in a general way that the Asian route is the way to go so long as the girl consents.
We all know what the asian route is, girls barely out their nappies now you use the word normal.
Your prattling on about 40 year olds and 17 year olds being no different.
Your Dad marrying a child.
If thats not dodgy sounding then forgive my ignorance and explain what ages you are thinking about here.
is not the age police, its the peado Police.
Carryfast:
For what it’s worth I think you’re having a laugh and on a wind up.So those girls on TOTP were there with their parents who saw what was going on.That sounds a bit like the bs of the Nolans saying (now) that they ‘would’ have killed Savile if he touched their sister Coleen while they stood there watching her giggling as he did exactly that.
Sorry wheelnut as in the case of me probably having been a better driver than many out there,maybe even yourself, (even if I do say so myself) but just didn’t get all the breaks I wanted,the same applies,but in far greater measure with my luck with women over the years,or at least the years when it mattered.When I go to my grave at least I’ll have the pleasure of knowing that I didn’t break any laws or hurt any woman in whatever way wether physically or emotionally and never would have done,unlike a lot of other zb’s out there.If only just one of them who I wanted had given me a chance in life instead of giving a divorcee another one.Although as I’ve said not surprising considering the type of media bs that was going on at the time turning the girls heads and widespread societal acceptance towards the idea of older blokes being with (sometimes much) younger women.Ironically unlike the situation now that I’m one of those older blokes myself.
All feel sorry for the bloke who didn’t get the breaks, even though he was probably better at a job he never did than the rest of us. Hey bud, you may well be a better driver but I have coped OK so far. I wouldn’t argue any other way. I am but a simple lorry driver with no skills, just a few years under my belt, and a few extra stones over it
All feel sorry for the bloke who didn’t have any luck with women, even though he was probably better at it than the rest of us!
If you want to bring luck into it, think yourself very fortunate you had your Father until he was 80 years of age and you still have your Mother to keep you off the streets and safe from predatory females, whatever the age.
It’s not my complaining they couldn’t get a bird due to old men going to a boys school working in the wrong job or god knows what. Going on your logic every lorry driver should be single.
I think you need to look at your self for your short comings in life. I know my failings in life are largely down to something I have or haven’t done or due to my personal shortcomings.