Jimmy Savile

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
You have a strange way of looking at things Carryfast.
Those girls were preyed upon by a evil sick predator and it was not their fault nor did they have any inkling in what was going to happen to them.

:open_mouth:

As I’ve said any mid teens girl with normal intelligence levels wouldn’t have got into that situation if she didn’t want to be there.I was there in the day and the fact is those girls would have been too busy with all the blokes of their own age who wanted them than zb’ng about with Savile and zb Glitter.

The ones I’m talking about just fitted the description of groupies and I,for one,had marked their card at the time so I’m not at all surprised at what happened to them.Although,admittedly,at the time,it was a case of having an idea of what was going on back stage as the groupy culture was well known at the time and what I’d seen on camera even that being more than I’d ever got near to getting from any bird of my own age at the time and probably wouldn’t have asked them for anyway until I’d got to know them for a while ‘if’ they’d have given me that chance.

Sorry but in my eyes they’ll always be guilty as charged although that doesn’t make what happened to them right but in the modern pc world there’s too much bs in which excuses are made for people who should be taking responsibility for their own actions in life at a reasonable age.In just the same way that 14-16 year olds were considered,and expected to be, responsible enough to use dangerous industrial machinery in better les pc days,including at that time.

You say it would be a disaster if everyone on here got called up to jury service but imagine if there was 12 carryfasts on the jury, rapists, pedos, and ■■■ offenders would be walking free or getting reduced sentences by the way you think.

Your unbelievable, maybe your views will change once you have kids.

switchlogic:

Carryfast:
As I’ve said any mid teens girl with normal intelligence levels wouldn’t have got into that situation if she didn’t want to be there…

Yeah I’ve met loads of girls that just love sleeping in hospital beds in the hope of a celebrity touching them up.

Blimey you don’t get any brighter do you.I never said anything about any girls in any hospital beds if you’d have read my comments I was only referring to ‘some’ of the victims such as on TOTP etc who were fit and of an age and intelligence level that (should) have mean’t that they told Savile and the BBC producers to zb off because they were only prepared to mix with the blokes there of their own age as that seems to be what it’s all about these days.In which case I’m sure in that case the BBC would have been flooded with applications from blokes who wanted to join all the girls on the shows to get to know them.I would have been one of them. :bulb: :unamused:

Somehow though I don’t think that was the agenda either at the BBC or of many of the girls involved.At least those who ended up in the hands of zb Savile and Glitter. :imp: :unamused:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
You have a strange way of looking at things Carryfast.
Those girls were preyed upon by a evil sick predator and it was not their fault nor did they have any inkling in what was going to happen to them.

:open_mouth:

As I’ve said any mid teens girl with normal intelligence levels wouldn’t have got into that situation if she didn’t want to be there.I was there in the day and the fact is those girls would have been too busy with all the blokes of their own age who wanted them than zb’ng about with Savile and zb Glitter.

The ones I’m talking about just fitted the description of groupies and I,for one,had marked their card at the time so I’m not at all surprised at what happened to them.Although,admittedly,at the time,it was a case of having an idea of what was going on back stage as the groupy culture was well known at the time and what I’d seen on camera even that being more than I’d ever got near to getting from any bird of my own age at the time and probably wouldn’t have asked them for anyway until I’d got to know them for a while ‘if’ they’d have given me that chance.

Sorry but in my eyes they’ll always be guilty as charged although that doesn’t make what happened to them right but in the modern pc world there’s too much bs in which excuses are made for people who should be taking responsibility for their own actions in life at a reasonable age.In just the same way that 14-16 year olds were considered,and expected to be, responsible enough to use dangerous industrial machinery in better les pc days,including at that time.

You say it would be a disaster if everyone on here got called up to jury service but imagine if there was 12 carryfasts on the jury, rapists, pedos, and ■■■ offenders would be walking free or getting reduced sentences by the way you think.

Your unbelievable, maybe your views will change once you have kids.

I think you’ve totally misunderstood my point.I haven’t said that some of those girls’ zb morals makes any of the crimes committed any less serious.

All I’ve said is that they didn’t help themselves or anyone else who might have been able to help them have a much better life during that time by keeping them out of the hands of blokes like zb Savile and ‘Gary Glitter’ and hopefully in a decent loving relationship instead. :bulb: :unamused:

In which case as I’ve said their stupidity hasn’t only cost them but it’s possibly cost other blokes too who’ve been left on the shelf since that time because there wasn’t exactly a surplus of young women of that age compared to the amount of blokes looking for a wife at the time.

Why do you find such a simple issue so difficult to understand :question: :question: . :confused:

By the way on the subject of women staying single and keeping their ‘freedom’ bs instead of settling down and getting married and having a family early this was around during the late 1970’s probably after many women had found out what the zb idea of so called women’s ‘liberation’ and the ‘permissive society’ bs was really all about.Suggest you read J Lo’s comments.

youtube.com/watch?v=SZgIk2b68gQ

Carryfast is talking ■■■■■-sense.

Oh Carryfast you old paedo. Do you need me to tell you for the forth time I’m just goading you? And you say I’m the one thats not getting any brighter

FarnboroughBoy11:
Your unbelievable, maybe your views will change once you have kids.

I think its safe to assume thats never going to happen, well, not in the traditional sense anyhow. Kidnapping however…

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
You have a strange way of looking at things Carryfast.
Those girls were preyed upon by a evil sick predator and it was not their fault nor did they have any inkling in what was going to happen to them.

:open_mouth:

As I’ve said any mid teens girl with normal intelligence levels wouldn’t have got into that situation if she didn’t want to be there.I was there in the day and the fact is those girls would have been too busy with all the blokes of their own age who wanted them than zb’ng about with Savile and zb Glitter.

The ones I’m talking about just fitted the description of groupies and I,for one,had marked their card at the time so I’m not at all surprised at what happened to them.Although,admittedly,at the time,it was a case of having an idea of what was going on back stage as the groupy culture was well known at the time and what I’d seen on camera even that being more than I’d ever got near to getting from any bird of my own age at the time and probably wouldn’t have asked them for anyway until I’d got to know them for a while ‘if’ they’d have given me that chance.

Sorry but in my eyes they’ll always be guilty as charged although that doesn’t make what happened to them right but in the modern pc world there’s too much bs in which excuses are made for people who should be taking responsibility for their own actions in life at a reasonable age.In just the same way that 14-16 year olds were considered,and expected to be, responsible enough to use dangerous industrial machinery in better les pc days,including at that time.

You say it would be a disaster if everyone on here got called up to jury service but imagine if there was 12 carryfasts on the jury, rapists, pedos, and ■■■ offenders would be walking free or getting reduced sentences by the way you think.

Your unbelievable, maybe your views will change once you have kids.

I think you’ve totally misunderstood my point.I haven’t said that some of those girls’ zb morals makes any of the crimes committed any less serious.

All I’ve said is that they didn’t help themselves or anyone else who might have been able to help them have a much better life during that time by keeping them out of the hands of blokes like zb Savile and ‘Gary Glitter’ and hopefully in a decent loving relationship instead. :bulb: :unamused:

In which case as I’ve said their stupidity hasn’t only cost them but it’s possibly cost other blokes too who’ve been left on the shelf since that time because there wasn’t exactly a surplus of young women of that age compared to the amount of blokes looking for a wife at the time.

Why do you find such a simple issue so difficult to understand :question: :question: . :confused:

By the way on the subject of women staying single and keeping their ‘freedom’ bs instead of settling down and getting married and having a family early this was around during the late 1970’s probably after many women had found out what the zb idea of so called women’s ‘liberation’ and the ‘permissive society’ bs was really all about.Suggest you read J Lo’s comments.

youtube.com/watch?v=SZgIk2b68gQ

Your looking far too deeply towards it, they didn’t go to TOTP looking for a husband or a relationship or whatever, they went to listen to some music, dance and chill out on a normal Saturday night.
And they were probably star struck when they were offered to hang out with a celebrity but what followed was not their fault nor were they stupid to go hang out with him. He was a celebrity, a face of modern culture, why would they even think that he was a sick dirty old ■■■■■■■■■?

And whether you like it or not, women have as much right as we do, if they want a career and not a family until mid 30s that’s fine, and in my opinion I think the relationships and marriages that last are the ones where people have lived their life when they are younger and so they are content with what they have got later in life.
It seems you just want a young wife to have your kids whilst not letting her leave the kitchen.
What do you think about women driving trucks?

switchlogic:

FarnboroughBoy11:
Your unbelievable, maybe your views will change once you have kids.

I think its safe to assume thats never going to happen, well, not in the traditional sense anyhow. Kidnapping however…

:slight_smile: :slight_smile: :slight_smile:

Harry Monk:
If a 16 year old is mature enough to decide that he wants to go and fight a war in Afghanistan and an 18 year old is mature enough to take out a mortgage, then a 20 year old is mature enough to decide what type of men she wants to share her body with.

Thanks Harry I don’t feel like a so called assumed stupid woman any more from Reading this Topic.
I’m 25 you can see a picture of me in the aka thread. My partner is 59, we have been happily going out for 2 years now and are very settled. At first some of his work colleagues called him a peado which majorly upset him and me.
I’ve been in the army, I’ve took out a mortgage and by heck I get treated better by him than any other bloke I have ever had the pleasure of going out with ( aged between 19 and 45)
At the end of the day our happiness is all that counts. My mom and dad aren’t 100% happy with it but they don’t kick up a fuss because they know I am the most chilled out and cheerful I have ever been.

Back to saville ,
What I think is a major misunderstanding between men and women that has gone on for years. The blokes famous having women throw themselves at him etc etc he then seems to think that all women want him and can have anything he wants from them.
At then of the day if he has had any kind of ■■■■■■ activity ( kissing right through to ■■■■■■■■■■■) with anyone underage or non consensual the bloke is a pervert and if he was still alive should have his bits chopped off and fed to dogs.

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
What do you think about women driving trucks?

Don’t start him on that one I had a reply to a benefits thread with him on this one that said I was upsetting the natural order of things by going out to work and not getting up the duff.

oddzpop:

Harry Monk:
If a 16 year old is mature enough to decide that he wants to go and fight a war in Afghanistan and an 18 year old is mature enough to take out a mortgage, then a 20 year old is mature enough to decide what type of men she wants to share her body with.

Thanks Harry I don’t feel like a so called assumed stupid woman any more from Reading this Topic.
I’m 25 you can see a picture of me in the aka thread. My partner is 59, we have been happily going out for 2 years now and are very settled. At first some of his work colleagues called him a peado which majorly upset him and me.
I’ve been in the army, I’ve took out a mortgage and by heck I get treated better by him than any other bloke I have ever had the pleasure of going out with ( aged between 19 and 45)
At the end of the day our happiness is all that counts. My mom and dad aren’t 100% happy with it but they don’t kick up a fuss because they know I am the most chilled out and cheerful I have ever been.

Back to saville ,
What I think is a major misunderstanding between men and women that has gone on for years. The blokes famous having women throw themselves at him etc etc he then seems to think that all women want him and can have anything he wants from them.
At then of the day if he has had any kind of ■■■■■■ activity ( kissing right through to ■■■■■■■■■■■) with anyone underage or non consensual the bloke is a pervert and if he was still alive should have his bits chopped off and fed to dogs.

That isn’t a million miles away from what I’ve been saying.

Your partner is 59 and you’re 25 so the fact that I’m looking for a girl as young as 19 (or even younger if she’s interested) shouldn’t be a problem so long as it’s legal.But I don’t think that’s the way that the raving age police on here will see it.Your partner’s experience shows that it’s the age gap issue which society has a problem with not just the girl’s actual age and cases like the Savile one are just being used to justify that prejudice.

Although we’ve obviouly got some diffrent views related to a woman’s place in society and the idea that just kissing a 15 year old girl would be classed as ‘■■■■■■ activety’. :open_mouth: :confused: But if that’s the law so be it no problem to wait to kiss a girl until she’s 16.While Nicola Philpot’s views seem to obviously have been close enough to mine on what she saw/sees as her preferred place.

The way I’ve read it the age police seem to have issues regardless of wether something is legal or not and in your case it would be interesting to hear wether Farnborough Boy thinks that your partner should morally be obliged to drop you or not :question: :question: :question: While following on from that issue maybe there’s even some hypocricy contained in your own view if you’re saying that it’s ok for a bloke of 15 to kiss a 15 year old girl but not a bloke who’s over 18 :question: :question: .

oddzpop:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
What do you think about women driving trucks?

Don’t start him on that one I had a reply to a benefits thread with him on this one that said I was upsetting the natural order of things by going out to work and not getting up the duff.

:smiling_imp: :laughing:

Don’t forget I was brought up with the idea that the blokes drove the trucks and the women were there to have and look after their kids and get the dinner ready.Which is a lot better than what they found with Savile. :bulb: :wink:

But at least you don’t seem to be one of the raving age police taliban.

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:

Carryfast:

FarnboroughBoy11:
You have a strange way of looking at things Carryfast.
Those girls were preyed upon by a evil sick predator and it was not their fault nor did they have any inkling in what was going to happen to them.

:open_mouth:

As I’ve said any mid teens girl with normal intelligence levels wouldn’t have got into that situation if she didn’t want to be there.I was there in the day and the fact is those girls would have been too busy with all the blokes of their own age who wanted them than zb’ng about with Savile and zb Glitter.

The ones I’m talking about just fitted the description of groupies and I,for one,had marked their card at the time so I’m not at all surprised at what happened to them.Although,admittedly,at the time,it was a case of having an idea of what was going on back stage as the groupy culture was well known at the time and what I’d seen on camera even that being more than I’d ever got near to getting from any bird of my own age at the time and probably wouldn’t have asked them for anyway until I’d got to know them for a while ‘if’ they’d have given me that chance.

Sorry but in my eyes they’ll always be guilty as charged although that doesn’t make what happened to them right but in the modern pc world there’s too much bs in which excuses are made for people who should be taking responsibility for their own actions in life at a reasonable age.In just the same way that 14-16 year olds were considered,and expected to be, responsible enough to use dangerous industrial machinery in better les pc days,including at that time.

You say it would be a disaster if everyone on here got called up to jury service but imagine if there was 12 carryfasts on the jury, rapists, pedos, and ■■■ offenders would be walking free or getting reduced sentences by the way you think.

Your unbelievable, maybe your views will change once you have kids.

I think you’ve totally misunderstood my point.I haven’t said that some of those girls’ zb morals makes any of the crimes committed any less serious.

All I’ve said is that they didn’t help themselves or anyone else who might have been able to help them have a much better life during that time by keeping them out of the hands of blokes like zb Savile and ‘Gary Glitter’ and hopefully in a decent loving relationship instead. :bulb: :unamused:

In which case as I’ve said their stupidity hasn’t only cost them but it’s possibly cost other blokes too who’ve been left on the shelf since that time because there wasn’t exactly a surplus of young women of that age compared to the amount of blokes looking for a wife at the time.

Why do you find such a simple issue so difficult to understand :question: :question: . :confused:

By the way on the subject of women staying single and keeping their ‘freedom’ bs instead of settling down and getting married and having a family early this was around during the late 1970’s probably after many women had found out what the zb idea of so called women’s ‘liberation’ and the ‘permissive society’ bs was really all about.Suggest you read J Lo’s comments.

youtube.com/watch?v=SZgIk2b68gQ

Your looking far too deeply towards it, they didn’t go to TOTP looking for a husband or a relationship or whatever, they went to listen to some music, dance and chill out on a normal Saturday night.
And they were probably star struck when they were offered to hang out with a celebrity but what followed was not their fault nor were they stupid to go hang out with him. He was a celebrity, a face of modern culture, why would they even think that he was a sick dirty old ■■■■■■■■■?

And whether you like it or not, women have as much right as we do, if they want a career and not a family until mid 30s that’s fine, and in my opinion I think the relationships and marriages that last are the ones where people have lived their life when they are younger and so they are content with what they have got later in life.
It seems you just want a young wife to have your kids whilst not letting her leave the kitchen.
What do you think about women driving trucks?

:open_mouth:

Blimey that’s unvbelievable bs.As I’ve said I was there at the the time and I think I’m a better judge as to what those groupy type birds were ‘actually’ looking for when they let Savile put his arms around them and went backstage afterwards.It wasn’t about playing zb tiddly winks or a game of monopoly. :unamused:

As for a woman’s place in society you’ve obviously been fed so much pc,modern day,women’s lib bs that it’s impossible for you to understand that a woman’s place in society,before that bs took off,was actually better for them and for their families.However after that most of the girls who preferred the old ways have had that idea brainwashed out of them by the pc school system,probably to the point where any girl who said that she’d rather be married with two kids before she’s 20,especially if she chooses the idea of an older husband,would probably be sent for ‘re education’ at a school for ‘special needs’ just like in some tin pot commy state society.The different types of marriage such as the one of Prince Charles compared to that of his son shows the massive gulf between the two societies. :imp:

As for me you can keep the hell,of orphaned families losing their mothers before they are 50 assuming they were born in the first place without IVF ‘intervention’,and dumped wives resulting from failed same age marriages,which recent generations are building for themselves.

I think you will find more marriages end today not because of age gaps but because people today will more often than not split up if they no longer want to be together on either party’s part. Whereas people who married before the 70s 80s onwards more often just stayed together wether they liked each other or not.
Perhaps in someways this is worse as some people just get married and divorce at the first rough patch but at the same time if the relationship is violent abusive or even if you are both just different people its better you have another chance at happiness.

kr79:
I think you will find more marriages end today not because of age gaps but because people today will more often than not split up if they no longer want to be together on either party’s part. Whereas people who married before the 70s 80s onwards more often just stayed together wether they liked each other or not.
Perhaps in someways this is worse as some people just get married and divorce at the first rough patch but at the same time if the relationship is violent abusive or even if you are both just different people its better you have another chance at happiness.

I think you’re (massively) underestimating the issue of a same age wife ageing faster than her husband.The fact is a relatively younger fertile woman presents a massive attraction.Which needs a same age marriage based on very high tensile steel to withstand if that temptation gets offered at some point when the wife is in her 30’s.I know because I’ve seen it and lost out to that issue remember.You haven’t. :bulb:

Suggest you read what Michael Douglas’ chat up line was to Catherine Zeta Jones when he first pulled her. :bulb:

Well no if you have been married or in serious relationships you would realise its about companionship friendship love having some intrests that are shared not wether you can keep breeding. I know loads of couples in there 40s and over same sort of age who are happy and have been together 20 or 30 years and others who have got together more recently some second marriages some just net later in life. But they are totally happy and have no urge to shack up with a teenager.
I’d imagine most of these middle aged blokes you list out to we’re in relationships that ran there course and they chose to end it because of that not because they wanted to keep breeding.

kr79:
Well no if you have been married or in serious relationships you would realise its about companionship friendship love having some intrests that are shared not wether you can keep breeding.
I’d imagine most of these middle aged blokes you list out to we’re in relationships that ran there course and they chose to end it because of that not because they wanted to keep breeding.

And then it was all just a coincidence that they ended up doing what you say can’t be done by shacking up with a teenaged bird and doing exactly that.Just as in the case of the Joe and Nicola Philpot example.While the Jeremey Forrest case seems like a case today of an older bloke losing the plot because of the attraction of a younger teenaged bird than his wife. :open_mouth: :unamused: :confused: :laughing: :laughing:

The idea of love and companionship and ‘breeding’ as you call it go hand in hand.I can actually remember as a teenager one of my mum’s younger friends married a bloke and only found out afterwards that she couldn’t have any kids.The zb dumped her although if it had been me I wouldn’t have done because the vows said for better or worse.If she’d have known before the marriage and hadn’t told him that would have been different.

There’s a big difference between something that’s not meant to be compared to the fact that the object of the excercise in all other cases is that ‘breeding’,love and companionship are all interdependent and the same thing and that’s what marriage is all about.It’s only after the bloke has exhausted that natural drive that a marriage turns into being based more towards the companionship angle and as I’ve said it’s only the strongest marriages that can survive a woman ageing faster than a bloke loses the natural drive to procreate.You’re trying to argue with nature itself and there’s loads of extended families out there,dumped older wives,and younger blokes like me who’ve lost out,because of that fact that the displacement which it causes down the line,can’t be corrected easily for any single bloke,having lost out to a married one,getting a second chance in life with a younger woman,in a society which generally won’t allow for large age gap relationships.While ironically the issue is actually being made worse by the idea of same age relationships only environment.

But the problem with the permissive society is that the whole thing got zb’d up anyway to the point where breeding sometimes has nothing whatsoever to do with love.

While in the Savile case it’s obvious that the whole thing wasn’t about marriage,and therefore love and breeding at all.

Carryfast:

kr79:
But the problem with the permissive society is that the whole thing got zb’d up anyway to the point where breeding sometimes has nothing whatsoever to do with love.

While in the Savile case it’s obvious that the whole thing wasn’t about marriage,and therefore love and breeding at all.

Well I totally agree on these two points lots of the problem seems to stem from the whole have a kid and live off the state culture and what chance do these kids have as they see that as been right and it’s a viscous circle.

Saviles case is a case of an evil predator picking on the vunriblie and naive.

@ carryfast
We are never going to agree on the job issue. Unusually I was bought up by a stay at home mom, unfortunately although she didn’t go out to work, she did a ■■■■ sight more than nearly all women I know now.
From splitting and chain sawing logs for my dads business right the way through to teaching me how to bake and crochet. ( and funnily there is nearly 15 years difference between my parents ages too)

I don’t have any kids but by Christ if some 18 year old was knocking on my 14 year old I’d have some serious issues. At 14/15 although physically developed a lot of the time, mentally a lot of them still think that relationships run like fairy tales. believe the hyped up bull that some folks come out with. And do you really think that an 18 year old is always after a 14/15 year old for anything more than ■■■? I would be surprised if it was for looking at pressed flowers together.
At that age many have no “so called” life experience. Although someone may prove me wrong.

As to your story about your love being “stolen” from you by an older man.
In school I was never the pretty or popular ones and as such at 15 had never had a boyfriend, actually as sad as it may seem never even been asked out on a date. Funnily I wasn’t the one giving handjobs out at the back of the playing fields either. Kids aren’t in it for love ( personally I don’t think so).
What I’m saying is guys my age didn’t seem to be interested so I looked elsewhere I.e. up/older. If now when I’m 25 they are interested all of a sudden doesn’t mean I’m going to drop what relationship I’ve got just to go with someone nearer my own age.

I can appreciate you side of the argument as in all cases it is never going to be the same circumstances.

However if the allegations of saville of touching up kids in hospitals that puts a serious downer on anything good that’s ever been said about him.

It also puts in to view to the people who are coming out with it now, the adage what’s right and what’s right to do. Obviously right is to string up the dirty ■■■■■■ to the authorities. Right to do not black and white depends on the person but even if they did do what was right how do you know saville wasn’t slipping the coppers investigating it money to keep it hush hush.

What I don’t understand why these people have had to wait til he’s dead. If any bloke had done anything similar to me at 13-16 I would want it resolving before the person was dead so some retribution could be bought upon him.
What’s the use of taking his titles and stuff off him now he has lived with them ain’t going to make no difference now.
All I hope is that it highlights others around the same time who were upto it and that they get (excuse the pun) shafted for it.

oddzpop:
@ carryfast
We are never going to agree on the job issue. Unusually I was bought up by a stay at home mom, unfortunately although she didn’t go out to work, she did a ■■■■ sight more than nearly all women I know now.
From splitting and chain sawing logs for my dads business right the way through to teaching me how to bake and crochet. ( and funnily there is nearly 15 years difference between my parents ages too)

I don’t have any kids but by Christ if some 18 year old was knocking on my 14 year old I’d have some serious issues. At 14/15 although physically developed a lot of the time, mentally a lot of them still think that relationships run like fairy tales. believe the hyped up bull that some folks come out with. And do you really think that an 18 year old is always after a 14/15 year old for anything more than ■■■? I would be surprised if it was for looking at pressed flowers together.
At that age many have no “so called” life experience. Although someone may prove me wrong.

As to your story about your love being “stolen” from you by an older man.
In school I was never the pretty or popular ones and as such at 15 had never had a boyfriend, actually as sad as it may seem never even been asked out on a date. Funnily I wasn’t the one giving handjobs out at the back of the playing fields either. Kids aren’t in it for love ( personally I don’t think so).
What I’m saying is guys my age didn’t seem to be interested so I looked elsewhere I.e. up/older. If now when I’m 25 they are interested all of a sudden doesn’t mean I’m going to drop what relationship I’ve got just to go with someone nearer my own age.

I can appreciate you side of the argument as in all cases it is never going to be the same circumstances.

However if the allegations of saville of touching up kids in hospitals that puts a serious downer on anything good that’s ever been said about him.

It also puts in to view to the people who are coming out with it now, the adage what’s right and what’s right to do. Obviously right is to string up the dirty ■■■■■■ to the authorities. Right to do not black and white depends on the person but even if they did do what was right how do you know saville wasn’t slipping the coppers investigating it money to keep it hush hush.

What I don’t understand why these people have had to wait til he’s dead. If any bloke had done anything similar to me at 13-16 I would want it resolving before the person was dead so some retribution could be bought upon him.
What’s the use of taking his titles and stuff off him now he has lived with them ain’t going to make no difference now.
All I hope is that it highlights others around the same time who were upto it and that they get (excuse the pun) shafted for it.

Ironically I think,at least some of that,just reflects the random nature in the outlook of the more recent generations such as yourself and Farnborough Boy compared to how things were in the 1970’s.Back then trust me most of the 14/15 year old age group,let alone 16,were grown up enough to know exactly what they were looking for and what they were getting into and we were effectively adults.

Because we were growing up amongst an age group of elders who not that long before had been fighting a war as teenagers and working in factories with dangerous machinery from the age of 14 and they expected us to have the same level of responsibility at a similar age and it was only the pc bs,such as the school leaving age being progressively raised to 15 then 16,which started the change to where things are now with up to 17 year olds being viewed as children and treated as such.

In addition to that needs to be factored in the women’s lib bs which was being indoctrinated into girls minds from around that time compared to the values which my old Grandmother gave my Mum and my Dad’s parents had given him which then got handed down to me and I was expected and was happy to live by those good old fashioned rules.

Like so many other issues the 1970’s were a turning point in societal history and as such things got blurred to the point of some/lots of girls losing track of right and wrong in the contradictions between old and new because some were being taught the old ways and it was those who were in demand as marriage material while those others were full of the women’s lib free love bs with the groupy type culture being some of the worst of the lot.

It really is a mistake to judge the behaviour of those women at the time using kid glove bs pc modern day ideas when the issue should be judged by the standards at the time.Make no mistake the reason why those crimes weren’t brought to light at the time,at least the ones involving the groupy type zb on TOTP etc,was because those girls knew what they were doing and what they were looking for and it wasn’t playing monoploy on camera or backstage with blokes like Savile and Gary Glitter.

It would also be interesting to find out,if at least some,if not all,of the situation that was going on in the 1970’s,concerning what seemed like a concerted over the top media blitz,to raise the social acceptance of large age gap communications of all types,between young teenaged girls,and older blokes,had some connection,in very high places,because of some paranoia about wether,what they knew was likely to be such a relationship,for continuation of the line of the Royal family with Prince Charles,might be met by public revulsion at the time :question: .IE a sort of softening up excercise to create societal acceptance of something in just the same way that East Enders story lines seem to be made for now by the BBC. :open_mouth:In which case it’s no wnder that paedophiles like Savile and Gary Glitter would have been as happy as pigs in zb and took full adavantage of the situation in which the last thing the BBC and authorities would have wanted to do was to rock the boat.While middle aged blokes wanting to dump their older wives for a much more attractive teenaged girl would also have been more than happy about the situation. :bulb:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQbBEeXvQGU 2.49-2.57

But at any point in history it’s always been possible to have a decent relationship between couples regardless of age wether it started between a girl of 15 and a bloke of her own age or wether it started between a girl of 15 and a bloke of 54 as in the Joe and Nicola Philpot example.

Likewise there’s probably always been perverts and blokes who haven’t got a clue how to treat women properly out there regardless of age too.Which is why I posted that comparison between what life dealt out to Rebecca Aylward compared to Nicola Philpot.Although I’m betting that if it had been me who was with her,instead of the scumbag zb of around her own age then,just like Nicola Philpot,she’d have had something a lot better to show for her life now than what she ended up with.Although I’d bet that her parents would have said that I was a pervert at the time just like those who said the same about Joe Philpot.
Unlike I’m betting they would now if they were to read this topic. :bulb: