How would You stop knife crime?

Franglais:
The USA with firearms more readily available has over 4 times the homicide rate of the UK.
Does that suggest anything, to anyone?

There are too many local variables to make any relevant like with like comparisons.In that many parts of the US are safer than the ‘wrong’ parts of the UK in that regard.While ‘homicide’ rates obviously don’t distinguish between criminal on innocent attacks v criminal on criminal ones.The fact that an innocent victim could be armed with the right to defend themselves with deadly force obviously being more of a deterrent than the carte blanche which criminals have here.

As for comparing ‘London’ with St Louis that would obviously look a lot different if ‘London’ didn’t poach relatively safer areas from the surrounding counties and then call them ‘London’.IE Surrey,Hertfordshire and Kent etc were never exactly the murder capital of the world. :unamused:

metro.co.uk/2019/06/16/murder-g … s-9971033/

It is always interesting when people talk guns, they automatically look to the US for comparison.

The US is a very different nation to the UK. The UK has one large city, London with typical “big city problems” High density, low income sections of population with gang, drug, violence and other typical socio-economic problems encountered by this demographic, where as America has many large cities, so will always have more of these problems.

The US also has a border issue with Mexico, allowing illegals to travel across the border illegally and commit homicides, again illegally. If there was a way to discount these illegal “aliens” as they like to call them, then I reckon the stats would look quite different. If we could remove the homicides from the figures from London and all comparable large cities in America and then look at the stats, they might tell a different story.

I remember hearing at one point, London had more violent crime than New York City !

Defining what a homicide is, can change the statistics to favour any argument. I remember hearing America generally includes committing suicide and suicide by cop in their homicide figures

You only need to look to the recent Texas Church incident to see how effective a good guy with a gun can be vs a bad guy with a weapon can be and how many lives were saved compared to being defenceless and waiting the average 9 minute response time for police to arrive. Sadly the UK police cannot be relied upon to actually come out to a crime, since 14 of the UK’s police forces now look to a computer to tell them if a crime is worth investigating or not.

robroy:
If somebody pulls a knife on you, at least you have a chance of defending yourself (or doing a runner :smiley: )

The problem with knives is, you very rarely see it coming. Unless a knife is being used to threaten you (from afar) in which case they most likely don’t intend (or have the guts) to actually use it but that’s different.

Franglais:
The USA with firearms more readily available has over 4 times the homicide rate of the UK.
Does that suggest anything, to anyone?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

^^^^^^^^^^^
the uk has 63 million population with america being 309 million,so id say it proves beyond doubt that you are much safer when the gun laws of the usa prevail?

dieseldog999:

Franglais:
The USA with firearms more readily available has over 4 times the homicide rate of the UK.
Does that suggest anything, to anyone?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

^^^^^^^^^^^
the uk has 63 million population with america being 309 million,so id say it proves beyond doubt that you are much safer when the gun laws of the usa prevail?

I would suggest DD that you read the other posts too…like this one… .

"4 times the homicide rate of the UK.

2017
UK…803 intentional homicides…1.2 homicides per 100,000 people per year.
USA …17,284 intentional homicides…5.3 homicides per 100,000 head per year.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c … icide_rate

According to a national newspaper yesterday(yes,I know) the most dangerous place to live in the UK is West Yorkshire.Statistics involving crimes of violence,robbery,theft,vandalism and ■■■■■■ assaults demonstrate an occurrence of 107.6 per 1000 of population.No.2 was Cleveland and London was no.9.

Hyh:
It is always interesting when people talk guns, they automatically look to the US for comparison.

The US is a very different nation to the UK. The UK has one large city, London with typical “big city problems” High density, low income sections of population with gang, drug, violence and other typical socio-economic problems encountered by this demographic, where as America has many large cities, so will always have more of these problems.

The US also has a border issue with Mexico, allowing illegals to travel across the border illegally and commit homicides, again illegally. If there was a way to discount these illegal “aliens” as they like to call them, then I reckon the stats would look quite different. If we could remove the homicides from the figures from London and all comparable large cities in America and then look at the stats, they might tell a different story.

I remember hearing at one point, London had more violent crime than New York City !

Defining what a homicide is, can change the statistics to favour any argument. I remember hearing America generally includes committing suicide and suicide by cop in their homicide figures

You only need to look to the recent Texas Church incident to see how effective a good guy with a gun can be vs a bad guy with a weapon can be and how many lives were saved compared to being defenceless and waiting the average 9 minute response time for police to arrive. Sadly the UK police cannot be relied upon to actually come out to a crime, since 14 of the UK’s police forces now look to a computer to tell them if a crime is worth investigating or not.

“Intentional homicide is defined by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in its Global Study on Homicide report[10] thus:
Within the broad range of violent deaths, the core element of intentional homicide is the complete liability of the direct perpetrator, which thus excludes killings directly related to war or conflicts, self-inflicted death (suicide), killings due to legal interventions or justifiable killings (such as self-defence), and those deaths caused when the perpetrator was reckless or negligent but did not intend to take a human life (non-intentional homicide).”
From the link I posted, to the stats I quoted.

Japan is a very densely populated country with big cities.
It has a homicide rate of
…0.20…way less than the UK or USA.
Cities are not in themselves an apparent cause.
But if you say that a disaffected underclass, in any unjust society may tend to congregate in cities…?
That may be so, but the cities aren`t the cause, the society is.

Yes. Stats can be bent to fit a cause, (as all tools can be used for good or ill) so we must look closely at them.

Hyh:
If we could remove the homicides from the figures from London and all comparable large cities in America and then look at the stats, they might tell a different story.

Stats can be chosen to tell a story, just as you want to above.

Franglais:

dieseldog999:

Franglais:
The USA with firearms more readily available has over 4 times the homicide rate of the UK.
Does that suggest anything, to anyone?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

^^^^^^^^^^^
the uk has 63 million population with america being 309 million,so id say it proves beyond doubt that you are much safer when the gun laws of the usa prevail?

I would suggest DD that you read the other posts too…like this one… .

"4 times the homicide rate of the UK.

2017
UK…803 intentional homicides…1.2 homicides per 100,000 people per year.
USA …17,284 intentional homicides…5.3 homicides per 100,000 head per year.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c … icide_rate

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
i read somewhere that statistically speaking then statistics can be made to show anything. :smiley:

dieseldog999:

Franglais:

dieseldog999:

Franglais:
The USA with firearms more readily available has over 4 times the homicide rate of the UK.
Does that suggest anything, to anyone?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

^^^^^^^^^^^
the uk has 63 million population with america being 309 million,so id say it proves beyond doubt that you are much safer when the gun laws of the usa prevail?

I would suggest DD that you read the other posts too…like this one… .

"4 times the homicide rate of the UK.

2017
UK…803 intentional homicides…1.2 homicides per 100,000 people per year.
USA …17,284 intentional homicides…5.3 homicides per 100,000 head per year.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c … icide_rate

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
i read somewhere that statistically speaking then statistics can be made to show anything. :smiley:

A shovel can be used to plant seeds to grow food. It can build dams to prevent flooding. It can build roads to help all travel and prosper. It can dig clay to fashion bricks and build hospitals.
.
.
.
Or it can be used to bash annoying posters over the head!

:smiley:

Or it can be used to bash annoying posters over the head!

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

line of the year so far…

Santa:

ETS:
Give guns to everyone

More or less what I was going to say. In the USA there is less knife crime because they shoot each other instead, so if guns were legal here (Pop into Tesco to pick up a nice little automatic in the sales) the yoofs would be less likely to stab anyone.

Leaving aside the ever so suspicious upscaling of manchurian/monarch,‘mass shootings’ wer’e seeing with increasing regularity chez usa.The right to bare arms has been the Pan/zio corporation of Americas biggest obstacle for aeons.Witness the new ■■■■ going down in Virginia.They (deep state) desparately need the yanks to be de-fanged.Good luck with that.

dieseldog999:

Franglais:

dieseldog999:

Franglais:
The USA with firearms more readily available has over 4 times the homicide rate of the UK.
Does that suggest anything, to anyone?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

^^^^^^^^^^^
the uk has 63 million population with america being 309 million,so id say it proves beyond doubt that you are much safer when the gun laws of the usa prevail?

I would suggest DD that you read the other posts too…like this one… .

"4 times the homicide rate of the UK.

2017
UK…803 intentional homicides…1.2 homicides per 100,000 people per year.
USA …17,284 intentional homicides…5.3 homicides per 100,000 head per year.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c … icide_rate

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
i read somewhere that statistically speaking then statistics can be made to show anything. :smiley:

statistics/bikinis?..google it :wink:

If we’re going to be able to buy firearms to protect ourselves then this is my first purchase
gunbroker.com/Barrett-50/se … rrett%2050

It’s called Glock17 and it uses a thing called
“9mm parabellum”!!! :grimacing:

Franglais:
“Intentional homicide is defined by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in its Global Study on Homicide report[10] thus:
Within the broad range of violent deaths, the core element of intentional homicide is the complete liability of the direct perpetrator, which thus excludes killings directly related to war or conflicts, self-inflicted death (suicide), killings due to legal interventions or justifiable killings (such as self-defence), and those deaths caused when the perpetrator was reckless or negligent but did not intend to take a human life (non-intentional homicide).”
From the link I posted, to the stats I quoted.

Japan is a very densely populated country with big cities.
It has a homicide rate of
…0.20…way less than the UK or USA.
Cities are not in themselves an apparent cause.
But if you say that a disaffected underclass, in any unjust society may tend to congregate in cities…?
That may be so, but the cities aren`t the cause, the society is.

Yes. Stats can be bent to fit a cause, (as all tools can be used for good or ill) so we must look closely at them.

Hyh:
If we could remove the homicides from the figures from London and all comparable large cities in America and then look at the stats, they might tell a different story.

Stats can be chosen to tell a story, just as you want to above.

THE UNODC also massage their figures. They aren’t an enforcing body in any nation in regards to criminal law, so their source of figures could be called into question as they’ll be via third party sources, which can always present “grey areas” open to interpretation.

Stats can be massaged in many different ways - My comment you replied on, would in effect discount large cities from statistics to see if the problem is mainly in big major cities or if it is everywhere - Nothing wrong with looking at specific areas under the microscope to see if there are any telling issues that could go towards suggesting a solution

My comment about cities was how many share socio-economic issues, not about the population size - If you consider Tokyo, the demographic and income is very different to London or New York. Japan has a very different culture compared to the UK or the US. You might as well include Ushuaia if you wish to cover cities that are completely different to Western cities with vastly different violent crime problems

Keeping things slightly more relevant to the West, perhaps it would be worth looking at how Switzerland deals with knife crime, if such a thing exists, since their population is also well armed as a %. Prague to an extent is similar in the Czech Republic with, arguably, the most relaxed firearms laws in the EU

Murder being illegal isn’t preventing knife crime deaths, making having a knife on your person illegal isn’t working, so why do people think extra laws will work ?

m.a.n rules:
Or it can be used to bash annoying posters over the head!

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

line of the year so far…

While a sharp spade is almost as good as a Samurai Sword for defence against annoyances threatening you with a shovel.Although a petrol strimmer with a brush cutter is probably better than either of those for medieval combat. :laughing:

biggriffin:
If we’re going to be able to buy firearms to protect ourselves then this is my first purchase
gunbroker.com/Barrett-50/se … rrett%2050

But a bit difficult to claim self defence if you’ve shot the alleged perp from over a mile away removing most of his upper torso. :laughing:

When they are caught put them to work in a mortuary to let them see what knife crime really looks like.

Big Truck:
It’s called Glock17 and it uses a thing called
“9mm parabellum”!!! :grimacing:

A walther ppk anytime.Discreet,pedigree,perfect first line of defence.An mp5 for more vigorous use,ie multiple crack- head- gang- home- invasion-scenarios.

manalishi:
An mp5 for more vigorous use,ie multiple crack- head- gang- home- invasion-scenarios.

youtube.com/watch?v=eB9gUiC3Z7U