Dolph:
The smoking gun is the obvious deliberate confusion by both the immigrants and the pro immigration agenda with ‘safe’ also having to mean relatively richer developed western society.
IE there is no need for anyone to ‘have’ to get here at all even ‘if’ they supposedly really are ‘asylum’ seekers.While it seems obvious that even if they are fleeing from ISIS,then why would a country like ours,with an already known home grown Jihadist type contingent within it,be considered as being any ‘safer’ for them than any of the other Middle Eastern or North African countries considered safe enough for Europeans like Turkey,Jordan or Saudi,Kuwait,Morrocco etc.As opposed to going to Bulgaria,Romania,Hungary or Poland for example.
The fact is bearing in mind our already over populated country by comparison with the rest of the Eurasian landmass.Much of that increase in population being the result of already too high levels immigration and the fact that our economy isn’t even strong enough to support that existing population hence the calls for social spending ‘cuts’.There is no sensible argument for any form of further immigration.Let alone an illegal invasion,by a combination of economic migrants from poorer countries and/or hostiles amongst them looking for revenge and even the possibility of takeover.
Which leaves the question as to where is the confirmation by Cameron of the reported change in policy,regarding all the above, which supposedly puts repatriatriation of the so called ‘asylum seekers’ on the table and immediate implementation of same.As opposed to lots of diversionary talk to cover yet more of the same old let them all in but put on the pretense of stopping them to appease the small Con Party anti immigration faction. 
On that note I’ll await a change with immediate effect.In the orders for the Navy to now return any ‘asylum seekers’ found in the Med to North Africa instead of taking them to Italy.I won’t be holding my breath though.
They are coming here as well, at least 12 000+ applied for asylum, but we are poor country and a bit narrow minded when comes to dark skin muslim foreigners, that just the truth. Another issue is they cant do sh*t without proper ID, which takes time to be issued, because we have to know who they are. Until then they remain in detention centers. We are taking people from war thorn countries of American, British and our own adventures…We should have never gone to Irag and Afghanistan.
Just yesterday 50+ illegals from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan were caught on the Border and that’s everyday.
novinite.com/articles/169517 … ring+Sofia
novinite.com/articles/168693 … s+in+Sofia
Another article
novinite.com/articles/170191 … p+Migrants
Die hard pro immigrants from Germany tried to cut down the fence last year, unsuccessfully. The problem of the asylum seekers is that they don’t want to live in Bulgaria, as poor as it may be, we have sunshine, beaches, mountains and peace which they seek. They refuse to enter the country via border check point does we had to make the fence to detour them. Entering illegally they can sneak to Western EU claim asylum there and have a better life, well we have contradiction, either they are refugees or economic migrants, because Turkey is a lot safer as well. They use the excuse of war to reach WE simple as that.
[/quote]
To be fair the ‘issues’ which applied in the former Yugoslavia suggest that the fact that the Slavs ( rightly ) prefer to keep to their own isn’t just a one sided issue.The Muslim/Asian culture obviously also prefers the same.But also with a more sinister side related to takeover ambitions/rule of any where that they see as ‘Unislamic’.
In this case there is absolutely no reason as to why any so called ‘asylum seekers’ from Africa or Asia can’t be resettled within those respective continents.Wether that be South Africa or North Africa or Turkey and other developed areas of the Middle East that are ( a lot ) better off in terms of resources to afford the social costs in addition to all being the same/similar ethnic cultures.
As opposed to making exactly the same mistakes as Tito etc did in Yugoslavia in trying to integrate totally alien and potentially hostile cultures.
Which is why I included the example of the slavic country example because being familiar with the slavic culture I knew what the answer would be in being the perfect example of the difference between nativism v racism. 
IE it isn’t racist to call for the idea of each to their own and it isn’t racist to tell the respective governments that we’ve all had enough of economic migration/immigration and the deliberate policy of ethnic integration that goes with it.
All of which being based on lies which dresses up a combination of bleeding heart,or even cynical,Socialism and economic opportunism by both the immigrants and their cheap labour employers,as so called ‘asylum’.On that note ironically the same also applies in the case of Slavic integration with North European/Gallic.
In which case the slavs are applying typical hypocritical double standards of the type which kicked off WW1 when it suited them.But they now seem to be happy enough to be part of a German run EU federation when they see a financial benefit.
