msgyorkie:
The ability to stop the free movement of people.
Ok, this is some argument. Of course, as you said, this issue could be tackled to some extent without Brexit if Brtian chosed to enforce existing EU regulations.
But while you’re right that with Brexit free movement of people ends, for the most part*, you have to remember that it also ends for yourselves - was it worth it? You can say it was. I would not be so sure if I would count it as a real benefit.
*) I say “for the most part”, because for those EU citizens (and, in many cases UK citizens that live in other EU countries) freedom of movement is still a thing for the most part. For example while you are no longer allowed to go to Europe for more than 90 days at the time without a visa, to work there, study and whatnot, and when you go, you’ll need a private health insurance, I, as a resident of Britain with settled status, can go there for UP TO 5 YEARS at the time and enjoy all the rights given to me by my EU citizenship. So if someone here is to eat a cookie and retain it, it’s me 
robroy:
Nobody that I know who voted, or expressed a preference to move away from this corrupt organisation that is the EU , say the same…ie none of us voted for ANY deal (as such) we just voted to leave, end of,.and this is what many remainers do not seem to understand.
That’s what puzzles me, because literally EVERY Brexiter friend of mine had very specific vision as how it is going to look. Not that their visions were anywhere near the realm of “possible”, but they were assuring me, that Britain will retain all the perks, while not having to follow the rules, because, just as you say “EU at the best need us and at the least want us, in terms of trade, and why would they not?”. The thing is, tho, as showed by an unfavourable trade you had to sign, that you need them more than they need you…
So if you were indeed the one who said “I have no idea what Brexit brings, but it does not matter, I will vote for this anyway and hope for the best” then you’re the first one I met.