Franglais:
muckles:
As I posted before the Swiss regulators refused to approve any of the vaccines due to concerns over lack of information.
Now this article seems to cast doubt on the Pfizer vaccine testing.
2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr … -petition/
Also mentions the lack of reliability of the PCR tests.
Do you think the UK regulators have gone too early?
From your link:
“The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.”
And from your previous posts:
muckles:
yourhavingalarf:
I’m in…
I’m rolling my sleeve up already.
I’ll add it to my collection of MMR, hepatitis, meningitis, tetanus, diptheria, yellow fever, typhoid, polio and pnuemonia jabs. All very nasty diseases from which I’ve never suffered.
Tested on 50,000 of which 50% were placebo subjects, no ill effects from 25,000 is good enough for me.
It took many years for those vaccines to be developed, tested and approved, on average it takes 10 years. Not only is it the first ever Coronavirus vaccine to be approved, its the first time an mRNA vaccine has been approved for human use and all in 10 months from starting work in it.
You haven`t argued any issues with the 25,000 doses given without apparent harm?
And here is Dr Yeadon again:
politifact.com/factchecks/2 … pandemic-/
arguing in Oct that the pandemic is over and there is no need for a vaccine.
P.S. Who are 2020news.de?
I know Dr Michael Yeadon is an opponent of much of what’s been going on, but he has the qualifications, so why is his opinion any less valid than those who agree with the government position, (especially as government scientists stood in front of diagrams, which were proved to be out of date and superseded, to tell us why we needed yet another lockdown) ? From what I’ve heard Michael Yeadon, hasn’t said we don’t need a vaccine, but we don’t need to vaccinate the entire population.
As for the pandemic being over, maybe there is justification to doubt his claim due to the definition of a pandemic being affecting a a large proportion of the population over many countries, but is it still an epidemic in the UK or now and endemic disease?
The justification by politifacts (from what I’ve seen fact checkers are often linked to various media and political organisations, so anything they write has to be checked) was that there was a rise in confirmed cases in the UK, the rest of their case relied on getting quotes from somebody who disagrees with Dr Yeadon, so one opinion vs another.
They showed a massive increase in confirmed cases, but didn’t mention the massive increase in tests carried out. On September 7 when their graph show cases start to rise the UK carried out 188,000 tests, on November 17th that was 364,000.
Positive cases per tests is probably a better measure and one used by the ONS, Early September positive tests were about 1.5% of all tests mid November it was around 7.7%. but there is a rise in many respiratory diseases in winter months, does that mean we have an epidemic every year?
According to the King College/Zoe study (who have millions of people reporting each day and also carry out their own testing, similar to the ONS does studies) at the maximum point of the recent spike in cases, they estimated 600,000 people had Covid on the 5th November, that’s less than 1% of the population, what percentage of the population being infected would you suggest would be an epidemic?
The vaccine might have been tested on 25,000 people, it is going to be rolled out quickly to many millions, but there hasn’t been time to study if there are long term side effects, while maybe for those at extreme risk from Covid a vaccine might be worth the risk, is it worth the risk for those who are more than likely have no problem getting over Covid, that’s if they know they have it in the first place.
