boredwivdrivin:
tommy t:
Well the petition against immigration was debated yesterday in parliament, what a waste of time when they are all pro immigration socialists who don’t have a clue what is really going on, with the bunch of morons running the show we are doomedMy comments above were originally addressed at this gentleman who was talking about ‘parliament’ meaning England/Britain and being ‘pro immigrant SOCIALISTS’
My point was they are pro immigrant LIBERALS .
I think that is the case . And it is the case that Liberals have caused our current woes .
The wider argument about socialism / nationalism is irrelevant to us here now
Our predicament is/was caused by liberals : Thatcher , Major , Blair , Brown and Cameron and their respective administrations . ( i have not included Heath or Wilson as they are Not responsible for out current woes, and may not have been liberals)
They are all guilty , to greater or lesser extent , for signing away our sovereinty with successive treaties with Euro Socialist project members .
And they are all liberals
I bet that woman with her caravans is not actually a socialist . she is a bloody liberal .
The people who want everything to be nice and soft and fluffy and safe …
Forgetting that forces greater than liberalism or socialism mean actually we must feel pain and suffer …
Evolution and Mother Nature .
And evolution tells us if the bums in calais have moved beyond their source of food and water they will die .
Survival of fittest means they have not been good enough to survive , and their weak genes have been irradicated .
The liberals will want to stop this happening . fiddle with mother nature at your peril
As Juddian said Heath is among the same treasonous lot as all the rest of the Federalist/Socialist pro EU lot.As for the idea of the red herring of liberalism then explain exactly which Socialist group is it that is supposedly anti immigration and anti EU in your view. Bearing in mind that having been there and a supporter of the out campaign in 1975,as I’ve said Shore,Benn and Heffer all arguably went through a shift towards a more nationalist tendency in political outlook than a Socialist one.It’s just that,as I’ve said at least Benn and Heffer didn’t realise it.While Shore arguably did.
independent.co.uk/news/obitu … 04257.html
As for the idea of natural selection you’re again taking an arguable viewpoint that sits on the borderlines between Nationalism v Socialism ( ■■■■ ).In which case the view of charity begins and stays at home and let em look after themselves and if they can’t make a go of it because they aren’t good enough tough,is a justified nationalist view.Which I agree with.
As opposed to the view we must use the riches gained by our our superior know how and efforts to provide for them or bring them all to live here among us to share our better fortune,or they are unter menchen who should be enslaved or exterminated.Both of those outlooks are what defines a Socialist view.