Warming up an engine

milodon:

newmercman:
So yes, I’m doing it the right way

Well, there’s always the possibility that the oil samples are good despite your actions, not thanks to. And 63.5 tons is not that that big of a deal, around here lorries are running at 74tons at -40 degrees celsius.

I’m sure there are, plenty over here running around a lot heavier than me too, but I fail to see what your point is? Unless your point and that of others is to keep on trying to force your opinions on those of us that choose to warm our engines?

You raise the point of my oil samples that prove that I’m doing the right thing, yet you have no data beyond advice, not instructions, but advice from the manufacturer’s handbook. There has not been a single post from a start and go fan that has mentioned having oil analysis results to back up their claims.

Another thing to consider is that I’m only answering the OP’s question and staying the reasons for doing so, unless you’re driving one of my trucks I really DGAF what you do.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

newmercman:
As I pointed out, my operation is outside the norm, one, I run in extreme cold conditions for a significant part of the year and two, I’m grossing up to 63.5tons. So my story is based in that. However as I also said, I have oil samples analysed after every oil change and those numbers are coming back on the better side of good, so 15mins idling before starting is not having a detrimental effect on my engines and I have that in black and white.

Agreed, although I’m not amongst those posters who have argued that cold idling is positively bad for the engine against moving off whilst cold.

I would only note that idling does not pre-heat all the moving parts of the vehicle which are only really heated in normal use - like the gearbox, differentials, wheel bearings, steering racks, and so on.

I would suggest that the overwhelming variable in causing wear and tear on the engine, completely irrespective of the temperature of the engine, is the use of the throttle and the feeding of fuel into the engine. Pre-warming the engine itself feeds fuel in (therefore wearing the engine, simply because it is switched on when it need not be), and has no effect on the driver’s subsequent use of the throttle (which will be high or low according to factors completely unrelated to the engine temperature).

If pre-warming has any effect at all on subsequent wear, it is not an appreciable effect in normal circumstances, in normal climates, with standard vehicles (which are designed and built with more than enough margin of robustness to ensure that the engine lasts for the life of the vehicle and commensurate with the lifetime of all other parts).

My opinion against pre-warming is purely in terms that, whether it has a marginal benefit or no benefit at all, any extension in the life of the engine is not justified monetarily against the cost of the fuel consumed, and the inconvenience caused and waiting time wasted.

So yes, I’m doing it the right way, but am I doing it the ONLY right way? No, I’m in no doubt about that. There is no single answer to this conundrum, even the manufacturers say that there is no NEED to warm up, they are not say DON’T warm up.

This we can agree on, that there is no particular damage caused by idling, other than the general damage caused by wasting revs, wasting fuel, and wasting time - all of which are appreciable and indisputable kinds of damage.

If I had the choice in personal motoring between sitting in my car waiting 10-15 minutes every single time I switched the engine on (which is several times a day most days) and wasting all that fuel, and paying for an engine overhaul (if not a completely new vehicle) after a few hundred thousand miles, I’d pay for the overhaul and still have a nest egg of money left over.

I scrape two eyeholes in the frost and crack on

Sent from my SM-J510FN using Tapatalk

Motorcycles do not sit on the grid idling, the mechanic warms the engine gently under load, barp barp barp, tyres are warmed up with an electric blanket while the rider is pampered by some sort in a very short skirt [emoji14]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Carryfast:

Freight Dog:
Says this in my car manual. So Carryfast is disagreeing directly with this from German engineers. I suspect this won’t lead to any agreement :smiley: . I’ll stick with my manual.

So how do you accelerate a loaded truck on an entry slip road from a motorway services for example to a safe merging speed without applying a considerable load to the engine,going strictly by those instructions ?.

Its easy, i just use a small amount of throttle and keep the revs down to 1200rpm…

newmercman:

milodon:
I’m sure there are, plenty over here running around a lot heavier than me too, but I fail to see what your point is?

Just wondering the same, gathering you’ve mentioned the weight at four different occasions for some reason :unamused:

The causality between idling up to working temperature and good oil samples is in my mind still more of a coincidence but it’s not my money still so godspeed.

It’s all getting a bit apples to oranges on here, people are talking about cars, big yards that take 15mins to get to the gate. Me, I’m talking about my specific circumstances, which is why I mention the weight I run at, because it’s a factor, a very important one too.

I’m currently sat in a truckstop, I’m grossing just under 60ton, it’s -15c outside and my engine has been off for 10hrs. When I leave here I’m straight out onto the Trans Canada highway which has a 110km/h speed limit. The ability to poodle up the road bringing the engine slowly up to operating temperature does not exist.

Because of this, I idle until my coolant temperature is at 150deg. I also do oil sample analysis, so I know for a fact that this is not doing my engine any harm, not a guess, not an RDC waiting room story, it’s a cold hard fact.

Yet there are people here trying to prove that I’m doing it wrong, when the facts prove otherwise. Now if there was supporting evidence to their claims, such as an oil sample, I may be convinced to change my methods, but there hasn’t been.

Now I’m going to work, I will jump out, check my oil and water, start my engine, do a walk around check, bump up my idle to 1000rpm, take a wander over to the truckstop, have a dump, have a wash, brush my teeth (with Colgate) and then once my temperature gauge hits 150c, I’ll hit the road, safe in the knowledge that the facts I have from my oil samples prove that my ritual isn’t doing my engine any harm.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Yeah! :smiley:

newmercman:
It’s all getting a bit apples to oranges on here, people are talking about cars, big yards that take 15mins to get to the gate. Me, I’m talking about my specific circumstances, which is why I mention the weight I run at, because it’s a factor, a very important one too.

I’m currently sat in a truckstop, I’m grossing just under 60ton, it’s -15c outside and my engine has been off for 10hrs. When I leave here I’m straight out onto the Trans Canada highway which has a 110km/h speed limit. The ability to poodle up the road bringing the engine slowly up to operating temperature does not exist.

Because of this, I idle until my coolant temperature is at 150deg. I also do oil sample analysis, so I know for a fact that this is not doing my engine any harm, not a guess, not an RDC waiting room story, it’s a cold hard fact.

Yet there are people here trying to prove that I’m doing it wrong, when the facts prove otherwise. Now if there was supporting evidence to their claims, such as an oil sample, I may be convinced to change my methods, but there hasn’t been.

Now I’m going to work, I will jump out, check my oil and water, start my engine, do a walk around check, bump up my idle to 1000rpm, take a wander over to the truckstop, have a dump, have a wash, brush my teeth (with Colgate) and then once my temperature gauge hits 150c, I’ll hit the road, safe in the knowledge that the facts I have from my oil samples prove that my ritual isn’t doing my engine any harm.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

As you say, you are discussing your own circumstances. But that is also true of others, myself included. When we all started talking about the OP question it uncovered how common it is in alsorts of vehicle manuals to discourage idling an engine to warm it. So it’s relevant chat, and naturally, people will mention their own types of vehicles rather than solely discuss your heavy lorry.

For myself, I’ve never advocated you change. As I said previously, it’s personal choice. And you have your, personally good reasons. I do mine. For my own engine fitted to a different vehicle.

My personal approach wasn’t to require proof to change my behaviour, rather accept the various expert advice provided for my vehicle. But that’s me. How you approach the question of your combustion engines is quite rightly your choice.

To save paying for oil analysis and to be on the safe side i always have the oil and filters changed at half the recommended service intervals, same goes for the fuel filters. Expensive but peace of mind…

I like facts freightdog, trust me if my oil sample results indicated excessive idling was increasing my wear metals, I would change my approach immediately.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

newmercman:
I like facts freightdog, trust me if my oil sample results indicated excessive idling was increasing my wear metals, I would change my approach immediately.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

No I can recognise the approach relevant to your own circumstances, albeit differing from mine.

For myself I didn’t require proof of facts to change my own behaviour. I took a practical common sense approach. My guidance came from provenience, was in good faith and also tallied with my owners manual. I asked for a back ground explanation to fill in the gaps a bit. For similar reasons at work we don’t ask for proof as to why we need to run the engines prior to shutdown.

Sensible chap, same here, half the suggested mileage which works out twice a year, and i too warm up and cool my own vehicles as well as the lorry.
Bought in bulk packs when on offer oil is cheap, a bloody sight cheaper than turbos/engines.

On another forum one of the lads reckoned the new Transit has 36000 mile service intervals, somehow i don’t think the sump plug threads are going to wear out before that goes pop.

I quite fancied the 3.2 Ranger, would you recommend it?
[/quote]
Yes so far I like it, it went back once for a loose brake pipe on the abs pump but other than that it’s been spot on, I may look at getting a re map at some point, mine is one of the very last on a 17 plate without ad blue so that’s a bonus, nice to drive, didn’t fancy a hi lux and hate nissan’s offerings!
Got 3 wagons as well so always service myself @ 20,000 ks and lately even less as I don’t do big miles at the moment.

newmercman:
It’s all getting a bit apples to oranges on here, people are talking about cars, big yards that take 15mins to get to the gate.

I assume that’s a reference to what I’ve said. To be honest, it wasn’t solely the size of the yard that I had in mind when I talked about 15 minutes to the give way line - although some larger yards with low speed limits do take quite a few minutes just to navigate. It’s all the arsing around on the site itself - moving the vehicle around the site, finding the trailer and coupling up, loading the trailer, queueing, opening gates (whether by hand, or waiting for some slow automatic gate to move, or waiting for the gateman to react, etc.). Not all factors are present at every yard, but I’m damned if I can think of any yard where you consistently shot right out of the gate - even those yards that were set up so that sometimes it could happen that you could turn the key and be straight out onto the road, it really doesn’t happen most of the time in those places, let alone in the majority of yards.

And in those cases where it has happened sometimes, it wasn’t straight out onto the motorway at 56mph, it was straight out into an industrial area at relatively low speeds (and idling at various junctions) for at least several minutes more before you were anywhere that would allow you to do more than 30mph.

Me, I’m talking about my specific circumstances, which is why I mention the weight I run at, because it’s a factor, a very important one too.

I’m currently sat in a truckstop, I’m grossing just under 60ton, it’s -15c outside and my engine has been off for 10hrs. When I leave here I’m straight out onto the Trans Canada highway which has a 110km/h speed limit. The ability to poodle up the road bringing the engine slowly up to operating temperature does not exist.

Which is why I don’t dispute your approach in your particular circumstances. It’s just that going straight onto a motorway at 60ton and -15c is completely unrepresentative of normal British work. A motorway service area is probably the closest you can be to going straight onto a motorway in Britain, and like I say, in most MSAs it’s normally a few minutes of gentle meandering before you actually get to the slip, so it’s not like you’re turning the key and slamming the engine straight up to full throttle at high revs.

On all other points you mention too, you’d have to be on heavy haulage to be carrying 60 ton (most journeys will involve carrying a fraction of that weight, with the legal maximum for normal haulage being 44ton). Temperatures as low as -15c are extreme and almost unheard of, and then would almost certainly involve the driver idling the vehicle for several minutes just to clear the frost off the screen and get the cab comfortable (even if he doesn’t give a hoot about the engine itself).

Because of this, I idle until my coolant temperature is at 150deg. I also do oil sample analysis, so I know for a fact that this is not doing my engine any harm, not a guess, not an RDC waiting room story, it’s a cold hard fact.

Yet there are people here trying to prove that I’m doing it wrong, when the facts prove otherwise. Now if there was supporting evidence to their claims, such as an oil sample, I may be convinced to change my methods, but there hasn’t been.

Now I’m going to work, I will jump out, check my oil and water, start my engine, do a walk around check, bump up my idle to 1000rpm, take a wander over to the truckstop, have a dump, have a wash, brush my teeth (with Colgate) and then once my temperature gauge hits 150c, I’ll hit the road, safe in the knowledge that the facts I have from my oil samples prove that my ritual isn’t doing my engine any harm.

The facts are that what you’re doing consumes operating time on the engine, consumes fuel, and consumes labour time. None of it will do any special harm to the engine or show up on an oil sample - any minor extra wear will just blend into the vagaries of the wear which an engine experiences anyway.

If the harm shows up anywhere, it will show up spectacularly as a greater number of stops at petrol stations, from which you will take away a greater number of diesel receipts displaying greater amounts of money, and on your timesheets. In your case it might all be justifiable in one way or another because of the extreme conditions, and put down to the cost of doing business, and if you’re leaving the vehicle unattended (something that would be criminal in Britain) while you go to freshen yourself up, then the labour time isn’t wasted.

But if we’re talking about advice in general, such as applies to the typical British trucker or to the person who writes a manufacturer’s manual, the advice must be that there is no evidence whatsoever for the benefits of idling, certainly not against its provable and indisputable costs. The argument for idling has been shown to be purely from laymen who are speculating from engineering principles, and not apparently supported by any reputable sources or knowledgeable professionals who have particular experience in engines.

No doubt about it, idling uses fuel, but does it use more fuel than running an engine below operating temperature? I’m not so sure, my in dash computer shows that the engine burns more fuel at a dead idle immediately after starting than it does at 1000rpm once it’s warmed up a bit. I know a engine running under temperature because of ambient temperature or stuck open thermostats will use more fuel, it’s possible that this situation is one of six and two threes.

Time wise it doesn’t have an effect, it would be next to impossible for the fuel used during idling to cause extra stops for fuel, in practice you don’t run your tanks to bone dry before refilling and the extra time putting a few more litres in would be immeasurable unless you ran your operation to the second.

Horses for courses though, if I were running a large fleet on a 3yr replacement cycle I would have my lorries with idle shut down programmes, then the cost of idling would far outweigh any possible benefits of running up to temperature by gentle idle, but I don’t and as my oil analysis proves, my way isn’t detrimental to my engines, I’ll carry on doing it the way I do until evidence to the contrary proves otherwise.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Freight Dog:
My guidance came from provenience, was in good faith and also tallied with my owners manual.

Going by the idea of the operator’s manual being right then we’ve got some evidence here that it isn’t all one sided in that regard. :wink:

Pages 4-5 4-7

peterbilt.com/resources/PACC … Manual.pdf

The question then is why does the manual for the PX engine contradict the MX in that regard which says don’t idle during warm up ?. :confused: When logic suggests that load applied to the engine before temperatures and with it working tolerances between working parts and fluid temps and circulation has reached at least a reasonable level,doesn’t mix.As for Rjan’s economics we’re discussing expensive truck engines not small relatively cheap to rebuild car engines.

Also seem to remember the DAF 85 having an auto exhaust brake application against an idling engine to supposedly help the warm up process.They obviously didn’t intend that feature to be applied to the engine under load on the road.

Carryfast:

Freight Dog:
My guidance came from provenience, was in good faith and also tallied with my owners manual.

Going by the idea of the operator’s manual being right then we’ve got some evidence here that it isn’t all one sided in that regard. :wink:

Pages 4-5 4-7

peterbilt.com/resources/PACC … Manual.pdf

The question then is why does the manual for the PX engine contradict the MX in that regard which says don’t idle during warm up ?. :confused:

Even then it is equivocal if not contradictory, arguing that the engine should be idled before operating with a load, but is best pre-heated quickly at a fast idle, and should not be left at a low idle when cold, or left at idle at all for more than a few minutes.

I was most surprised by what I read on page 4-11 however. It says “if an overheating condition starts to occur [and] the engine temperature does not return to normal, shut off the engine”. So far so sensible. But then, in the column next to it, the advice is “if the warning lamp comes on showing an oveheat condition, or you suspect the engine may be overheating, do not turn off the engine unless a low water warning device indicates a loss of coolant”. The writer does not seem to be able to make up their minds.

When logic suggests that load applied to the engine before temperatures and with it working tolerances between working parts and fluid temps and circulation has reached at least a reasonable level,doesn’t mix.

Engines and loads don’t mix full stop - at any temperature, a high load will wear an engine out faster relative to its elapsed operating time, it’s as simple as that.

As for Rjan’s economics we’re discussing expensive truck engines not small relatively cheap to rebuild car engines.

I believe you mentioned personal motoring first. :laughing:

Also seem to remember the DAF 85 having an auto exhaust brake application against an idling engine to supposedly help the warm up process.They obviously didn’t intend that feature to be applied to the engine under load on the road.

Eh?

Rjan:

Carryfast:

Freight Dog:
My guidance came from provenience, was in good faith and also tallied with my owners manual.

Going by the idea of the operator’s manual being right then we’ve got some evidence here that it isn’t all one sided in that regard. :wink:

Pages 4-5 4-7

peterbilt.com/resources/PACC … Manual.pdf

The question then is why does the manual for the PX engine contradict the MX in that regard which says don’t idle during warm up ?. :confused:

Even then it is equivocal if not contradictory, arguing that the engine should be idled before operating with a load, but is best pre-heated quickly at a fast idle

I don’t think anyone has suggesting that there is any inconsistency between fast idle and warming up the engine without load.Idle generally accepted as meaning fast idle in this case.The point being that the differences in opinion here obviously also applies to those producing the operators’ manuals.Which obviously weakens FD’s argument.

Scania actually advocates for engaging the retarder , after starting driving with a cold engine. Pull the stalk to the first setting and keep it there until you see the temperature gauge rising.

Carryfast:

Rjan:

Carryfast:
The question then is why does the manual for the PX engine contradict the MX in that regard which says don’t idle during warm up ?. :confused:

Even then it is equivocal if not contradictory, arguing that the engine should be idled before operating with a load, but is best pre-heated quickly at a fast idle

I don’t think anyone has suggesting that there is any inconsistency between fast idle and warming up the engine without load.Idle generally accepted as meaning fast idle in this case.The point being that the differences in opinion here obviously also applies to those producing the operators’ manuals.Which obviously weakens FD’s argument.

I don’t think that’s it. I think it’s just the manual writer has grappled with the complexity and came off worse.

I know the principles they’re arguing from - that an engine that is overheating purely from excessive load should be unloaded and idled to allow the cooling system to operate and move the excess heat out, whereas an engine that is overheating from a cooling system defect must be immediately shut down.

The problem is that there is no sure way of quickly and clearly identifying the cause in all cases, and those not already possessed of much greater and clearer knowledge than the manual conveys will struggle to make an effective judgment.

Anyway, I guess it’s all been done to death.