waitrose

Happy Keith:
Britain was cajoled & LIED to in the 1970s and my parents generation were not informed that Euro Federalism was the primary ambition. However, Waitrose served that generation well back then, too.

Jeezzz. If Churchill was a was one of found fathers of EU how should have British people vote ?
Are Brits voting for whatever is invented in here. I don’t think so.

On my way to work last night I was listening to British people in debate about EU referendum. You know what ?! Only 3 out of 30 calling in backed what you say.

Does it mean that every generation now should have a vote ? That would mean referendum should take place every minute from now on.

Happy Keith:
Crikey mate, neither Asia or Africa affects Britains legislature to the extent of Brussels

Wasn’t that discussion [ the one between you and me ] also about migrants ?

Happy Keith:
… Britain initially stood-up to them alone.

All alliees should take that as an offence.
You really never read history.
And to add to the facts - if not the 21 mile stretch of water you probably would speak German now

Happy Keith:
Remaining on thread: Waitrose runs itself, by itself and for the benefit of itself and for Britain overall: Why can’t Britain do the same for itself politically without the EU diluting us all into a diverse but compulsory dull, grey morass :question:

Remaining on thread: Waitrose still discriminates against nation. It is a form of racism.
Running company is one, breaking the law is another.
Personally I belive it is decision of a single or few people who thinks they have power.In reality they are down the chain in the company and only express they political ideas such as yours. Top of the company might not even be aware of such circumstances as they have other thinghs [ sale numbers ] to look at, but I belive that if they would know of them the irresponsible racist heads in transport office/s would be held responsible for putting such a bad name to such a big and famous company.

Worzel:
I’ve no wish to add to MisterStroods slanging match which seems way off beam for this thread but from personal oberservation there are quite a number of Eastern Europeans working as Partnership drivers at waitrose bracknell also quite a few on the agencies my point at the end of the last post was that we got the enhanced rate as they were having trouble geting agency drivers on a sunday
( i might have the year wrong by the way ) once there was an ample supply of drivers due to THE GOVERNMENTS actions in encouaging mass immigration our rates were depressed .

Just as an aside two stories I have witnessed at first hand the first was in the drivers waiting area at bracknell in the run up to christmas two or three years ago a gentleman from the east (not polish by the accent ) had a very loud conversation with a young female from his agency ( not the one I work for ) regarding the drivers hours regulations ( I was sitting next to him at the time ) over a protracted to and fro conversation at high volume they decided between them that the rules were 20mins break to be taken after 6 hours driving the rest room was full but very quiet as this went on surprisingly when he was called up to get his job he was straight out of the door!!! as several of us had tipped the wink to the desk .

The other side of the coin was at a sainsburys depot i also work out of where another gentleman of the east had his 3 digicards out on the table trying to work out which one to use today despite a word been had he was still out on the road that day

Today for a change I was asked by British driver how to put manual entries on Digi card :unamused:

I was called to this thread by PM (and NOT by MisterStrood) and asked what my opinion is…

  1. I never worked for Waitrose, I think they opened their first shop in Glasgow only recently. BUT I think John Lewis is the same company?
    I wasdoing a lot of agency shifts for John Lewis over several years from 2005 (as a driver mate) and then from 2006 to 2008 when, due to injuries that I had in the accident (incidentally, caused by British driver - they are not perfect, no nation is) I was no longer unable to lift heavy washing mashines and stuff. I am still signing up with agency when the job in my place is quiet, and I am often asked to go for John Lewis, but I have to refuse due to my spinal problems - delivering Washing Mashines around Glasgow West End can be a tough job.

They never had any problems with me NOT having British license, moreover, it was one of the first places I worked here after I made my truck driving license and I worked there despite not having British counterpart yet, on my “bare” Polish license. No problem with this as well.

I was not the only Pole from our agency who worked there, the other guy was my friend and none of us ever feel discriminated, so I guess even if that might be true about one depot that discriminates foreigners. I still wave to some of the guys we used to work together when we meet on the road. And I really miss the tips I was getting at this job :slight_smile: Once the two of us were given 50 pound note and told “go for some lunch, boys” :slight_smile:

  1. I told everything I had to tell about my views on history of Europe already, and I am not willing to get dragged into this discussion agasin :slight_smile:

  2. I do believe in that stories Worzel says about these Eastern European drivers. Each nation has its share of idiots. As long, as we don’t generalize and put the same measure to the whole nation it’s all right. I for that matter do not consider Scots any worse drivers than me, despite that, for example, I know a Scot, who was caught twice over the limit driving 26 tonner (and twice over British limit is 8 times over Polish limit, by the way). I also had to give my fair share of lectures and advice to beginner British drivers. And I saw some, who were thinking that they don’t need to ask, because by definition they know better, because they are British. Somehow both of them were sacked very soon :slight_smile: I also had my favourite ever, I found a tacho disc in CD Player. The name on it was starting with Mac. Mister MacSomething obviously was very confised to see digi tacho truck and he was not sure about to where to put his paper disc :slight_smile:

But I also had a Pole, who asked me if I can ask my boss to give him a chance when we were looking for the driver. I agreed, as I know he was driving trucks when he was in the army. I wanted to tell him about the lorries in my place, but he refused to listen - you know, he had his licence from the Army, and Army is the best! Then he was taken for the test drive and never got a job. My boss told me “what kind of idiot you sent to me, he can’t drive”. My fellow Polish driver told me “Why you never told me that there are these range gearboxes, I was ever only driving straight sixs, so I did not knew how to use them, it’s all your fault that I didn’t get that job”. That cured me from recomending someone for the job only because he is Polish :slight_smile:

So I don’t believe that foreign licenses are any worse than British. I did my truck license in Poland, and I was doing my bus licence in Britain, but never completed it due to financial reassons, but I know the difference in training system. And i was to choose in which country I would make my license, if the factor in question was “where it’s easier” I would go for Britain. Saying that, I don’t believe Polish drivers are trained better when they have to face the real life. Polish wannabe drivers just have to face much more challenging exam, but after they pass, they go on the road as green and unexperienced, as their British counterparts do.

  1. My Polish license, that was never exchanged into British, never caused me any problems. I obtained British counterpart license, and from that day on, I am considered “full UK holder”. I have my GB Driver Number, got fixed penalty offers and have 6 points on it :blush: As for people’s opinion on it, sometimes people are surprised with the unusual colour of my counterpart, as it’s slightly different to the one that British photocard holders get. Apart from that I read several comments on trucknet that it has to be worse because it’s Polish and I heard two comments - one from my employer, other from my employer-to-be that never happened due to other reason. They both said that I propably know how to drive better, because I made my driving license in Poland (sadly, they were not willing to pay me more than to my British collegues for that :slight_smile:) And I don’t believe they mean that the Polish license is better - I think they meant that driving in Poland is harder due to worse conditions on the road.
    Apart from that - everyone was treating my as anyone else.

  2. The only situation when I was not sent to a job was at the very beginning of my residence in Britain, when job was refused to me due to poor English. I have no problem with that, I would do the same if I was an employer and I needed a driver for cash sales.

So that’s my views on that.

orys:
…so I guess even if that might be true about one depot that discriminates foreigners…

As I said in my previous post - it might be the case of person/s in particular depot that should not have this vacancy as it brings shame to the whole company - in my case Aylesford RDC

orys:
… I do believe in that stories Worzel says about these Eastern European drivers…
.

I am aware of this “sort” of foreigners but few does not make whole East Europe and as you say Orys there are examples throughout British drivers too.
Hence I only use examples known to me when someone uses his against me by generalisation of single cases.

orys:
…So I don’t believe that foreign licenses are any worse than British…

Try to explain that to Aylesford RDC

I still can not understand what they meant by telling to my mentioned friend by saying " if you will retest in Britain we might put you for an assestment " - He already in his case have UK one exchanged from Latvia so what should he have done ? Go to DVLA and lie that he havn’t got one ■■?

orys:
…The only situation when I was not sent to a job was at the very beginning of my residence in Britain, when job was refused to me due to poor English. I have no problem with that, I would do the same if I was an employer and I needed a driver for cash sales…

I wouldn’t have a problem with that one too. Personally i think no one who doesn’t speak English should get a job in English spoken country but in my case I am self lerner since I was 6 and anyone can judge my knowledge of it by reading of what I have to say.

I’m glad you have learnt Orys and can share your views with us.

MisterStrood:

orys:
…so I guess even if that might be true about one depot that discriminates foreigners…

As I said in my previous post - it might be the case of person/s in particular depot that should not have this vacancy as it brings shame to the whole company - in my case Aylesford RDC

orys:
… I do believe in that stories Worzel says about these Eastern European drivers…

I am aware of this “sort” of foreigners but few does not make whole East Europe and as you say Orys there are examples throughout British drivers too.
Hence I only use examples known to me when someone uses his against me by generalisation of single cases.

orys:
…So I don’t believe that foreign licenses are any worse than British…

Try to explain that to Aylesford RDC

I still can not understand what they meant by telling to my mentioned friend by saying " if you will retest in Britain we might put you for an assestment " - He already in his case have UK one exchanged from Latvia so what should he have done ? Go to DVLA and lie that he havn’t got one ■■?

orys:
…The only situation when I was not sent to a job was at the very beginning of my residence in Britain, when job was refused to me due to poor English. I have no problem with that, I would do the same if I was an employer and I needed a driver for cash sales.

I wouldn’t have a problem with that one too. Personally i think no one who doesn’t speak English should get a job in English spoken country but in my case I am self lerner since I was 6 and anyone can judge my knowledge of it by reading of what I have to say.

I’m glad you have learnt Orys and can share your views with us.

Are you still moaning? Well I guess you are but it’s hard to read because you don’t seem to be able to quote properly!
I thought you said you’d got over it? :confused:
What you are saying has nothing to do with the OP’s question anyway :confused:

MisterStrood:

Happy Keith:
‘…Britain was cajoled & LIED to in the 1970s…’

What has since expensively emerged - and at never-ending cost to this nation’s happiness, prosperity and World trading ability, is the undemocratic but very real and ugly intention of Federalism for all ‘members’.

As this nation writhes in disaffected, disunited, disenfranchised, isolated, lazy and miserable agony, why do many (economic?) immigrants deny Britons a bite at challenging the big, single-issue truth of the EU being the common cause of these very tangible symptoms of decay :question:

Take a moment to argue that it isn’t, whilst also perhaps reflecting on why Waitrose is not decaying :exclamation:

Intrusion is not what many citizens within the EU’s grasp desire: At least be fair & admit that the goal-posts have been blown-apart since the 1970’s, ie., why am I no longer a subject of the United Kingdom but rather a citizen of a grey-faced Belgian bloke who draws higher pay that the US President (as a reminder, it’s Mr Van Rumpuuy: Who?). It is happening and it is ugly :exclamation:

MisterStrood:
‘…Only 3 out of 30 calling in backed what you say…’

I’ve utter faith in that all radio phone-in’s are truly unbiased and prone to balanced, rational debate.

MisterStrood:
‘…Does it mean that every generation now should have a vote … That would mean referendum should take place every minute from now on…’

Whilst some people’s parents were revelling with AK47’s & Kruschev in the 1970’s (40+ years and not ‘…every minute…’ ago) British parents were being lied to about the true effects of human made unfairness, dis-harmony and in-equality with neighbours whose languages & culture we still don’t wish to engage with.

Can we understand here that none of that stuff in the 1970’s mentioned, eg., single currencies; external intrusion or Brussels sourced austerity costing us £48m per day, which we don’t have, to fund marble embellished Greek swimming pools (and their ugly, national culture of avoiding tax by never finishing off their home extensions); or extravagant Spanish transport networks and being given a President to whom Queen Elizabeth is actually subordinate. Please note that she didn’t invite him to the Britain’s Olympic celebrations - any idea why?

MisterStrood:
‘…All allies should take that as an offence…’

Let them enjoy that liberty along with granting the British - with Waitrose, their liberty to be proud and successful at no expense or offence to foreigners who come here demanding that Briton’s dance to their tune

MisterStrood:
‘… Waitrose still discriminates against nation. It is a form of racism … Personally I believe it is decision of a single or few people who thinks they have power … bad name to such a big and famous company…’

Simply being offended does not make anyone right - although I’m sure that a hefty fine from a glass & chrome office of unelected Big Brother in a far off land will cut off Waitrose pedigree legs to the benefit of European Blandification Regulations :neutral_face:

Happy Keith, without getting to deep into your discussion, please let me know if my feeling is all right: UE was GOOD for Britain when Britain was obvious benefitient of it. Now when you feel that you are not getting enough of it, you are not happy…

Does it not undermine the basic rule that UE was solidarity between the nations? We have the Polish saying that translates to English in a way of “One day you ride the cart, the other day you are run down by the cart”. I think this apply to the idea of European cooperation and solidarity…

Saying that, I fully support your point when it comes to saving Greece and Euro crisis. I think that the situation with Greece is outrageous. In my view, UK is not doing enough, it’s just sit over the fence, and cannot decide onto which way it wants to jump down. I think you should have bigger balls and decide either to:

  • grit your teeth and pay for Greece as eveyrone else do, hoping that one day the fortunes will change and you again will make bigger profits from being member of the EU
  • hit the table with your fist and say: “we won’t pay to these lazy Greeks who were miliking the system for so long and are not paying taxes. It’s not fair that whole EU, including poor Eastern European countries have to bail them out when, for example, their unemployment benefits are higher than minimum wages or, in some case, average wages in some of the EU members. So either they start behave, or the EU has to decide if they want THEM to stay in EU, or US to stay in EU” and not finish with talking only.

I would then fully support British Politicians, no matter if they forced Greece to behave, if they forced them to being kick out from EU for not following the rules, or if they will puill the UK from EU - I would also rather not be in the club when some other members are cheating. But in the latter case, off course, you loose all benefits from participation in the common market etc and you become isolated island with all customs and border taxes.

But as it seems now to me, UK just annoys everyone else with moaning, because suddenly membership in EU is not as profitable to them as it was in the past, and you can’t see further than end of your own nose.

Seany:
Are you still moaning? Well I guess you are but it’s hard to read because you don’t seem to be able to quote properly!

Well Darren { :question: } I guess you are bitter because the case is about your depot. Typical to a man with no argument to attack on grammar - scientificaly proven.
Sad you can’t read it, but I will edit it for you so you can. When I was replying to Orys I was over 20 hrs with no sleep.

Seany:
I thought you said you’d got over it? :confused:

Than go and read again what I said as it looks like you have problem with reading with understanding.

Seany:
What you are saying has nothing to do with the OP’s question anyway :confused:

No. But it has with the discussion which some people that are still dragging it after I gave my last comment to Happy Keith.

P.S.

Seany:
… you don’t seem to be able to quote properly!

A proof that single occurance gives you a reason to generalize :unamused:

orys:
Happy Keith, without getting to deep into your discussion, please let me know if my feeling is all right: UE was GOOD for Britain when Britain was obvious benefitient of it. Now when you feel that you are not getting enough of it, you are not happy…

That is what I said in one of the previous posts. For over 25 yars it was all fine as he could benefit from it.

With all respect to you views Happy Keith I am not going to discuss with you as I said what I had to say. This thread is not about EU.
This thread is about Waitrose [and experience you had with them - yes Seany - people have various and mine was as stated before ].

But taking the last opportunity on this thread [ we can put the EU discussion on new one if you wish just not to put our political rubbish on thread that has nothing to do with it ] I’ll quote history of EU for you.

“With statements such as Winston Churchill’s 1946 call for a “United States of Europe” becoming louder, in 1949 the Council of Europe was established as the first pan-European organisation.”

Hope that it makes clear for you why Britain is a member state of it :unamused:

orys:
‘…let me know if my feeling is all right: UE was GOOD for Britain when Britain was obvious benefitient of it. Now when you feel that you are not getting enough of it, you are not happy…’

I was too young to be politically aware as a 14 year-old, but how can today’s subscription of £48 million a day ever be ‘…benefitient…’? That cost has been ramped up - as sanctioned by Lib/Lab/Con politicians wanting a pension supplemented with a cosy EU job - far beyond reasonable correlation.

We now know that my parents generation were denied being told the fact that Federalisation was the covert ambition of today’s EU. That is the essence of today’s argument and is incompatible with Britain being able to do what it does best, ie, whinge, take in strays, win wars against tyrants on it’s own fair & decent terms and not those of meddling, fight-shy foreigners.

My elders are often very embarrassed at being deceived by the slippery Mr Heath, and also self-serving Mr Blair, so I see my/your/our role being to seek honest, democratic justice being served for the benefit of this economic zone of the EU, once known for enjoying the epithet ‘Great’ within it’s name title.

orys:
‘…Does it not undermine the basic rule that UE was solidarity between the nations? … I think this apply to the idea of European cooperation and solidarity…’

Britain has solidarity with many nations world-wide and is broadly seen, proven and respected as a fair & decent nation.

The fact today is that because Germany & France once needed coralling (Federalising!) from repeating their regular & historic fisticuffs (originally by a common 1950’s bond always referred to here - albeit informally - as a ‘Common Market’) into being friends together, the EU now forbids the UK from trading direct with the rest of the world. How is that a winner for Waitrose or Britain?

orys:
‘…I think you should have bigger balls … pay for Greece as eveyrone else do…’

Greece lied to get into the EU and the ‘eager-to-please’ auditors were hastily ordered to let them ‘in’ were clearly negligent. Why has no-one been jailed for this? Maybe the rampant ineptitude of unaccountable, EU civil-servants and undemocratic politicians are exempt from accountability :neutral_face:

What would happen if, as a driver under EU regulations, you committed similar, professional negligence :question: Why is the EU administration immune from accounting for it’s foul-ups? Would Waitrose tolerate such dismal performance from it’s executives, clerks or drivers?

orys:
‘… one day the fortunes will change …’’

I understand that the fortunes of Greece are doomed whatever they do for the foreseeable future: Their (sad?) destiny is to recover to average (not a bad thing) - but hey, at least they remain free to avoid paying tax on their unfinished house extensions that we’ve all seen and always accepted as Greek state sponsored & nationally inept corruption.

orys:
‘…I would then fully support British Politicians … if they forced Greece to behave, if they forced them to being kick out from EU for not following the rules…’

Only UKIP’s Farage is wanting the truth, so why not support him :exclamation: Both Greece & EU mandarins distorted the truth - so there is no need to remain mute in demanding democratic accountability any longer :exclamation:

Maybe we Britons as a whole are not overly bothered because we’re tired, disenfranchised and far too busy to swallow the truth (thanks to smoke & mirror (Olympic?) type diversions) and that burying heads in the sand is a perfectly adequate short-term solution. That’s fine until our children wake-up - like they now are - to realise that playing at ultra-liberalism with Britain’s previous high standards has come at a cost to them. Maybe if Waitrose gets bought out by Primark or Starbucks (an easy tax-dodge lesson for the retarded EU to bumble over?) the Lib/Lab/Con ultra-liberals will be happy :neutral_face:

Britons almost know the EU will blank us - or when pushed, they’ll tell us off in front of their ‘King’s-new-clothes’ mates (ie, the ‘happy-to receive’ new Eastern member states?) whilst hitting Britains EU puppet Government with a fine for insubordination and Waitrose with a directive to employ people they don’t particularly wish-to :exclamation:

orys:
‘…But as it seems now to me, UK just annoys everyone else with moaning … and you can’t see further than end of your own nose…’

I’d be happy to be kicked out (they’d be £48 million per day poorer, so it’s not likely) and am gagging to learn what undemocratic, unaccountable, poorly managed, EU sponsored Utopia anyone can envision lying beyond my nose-end, please.

Clean, fresh and healthy air, perhaps - or another bullying Directive: I’d prefer it to be the Waitrose model - as envied by many as a lesson-for-Britain - but it’s the one which many are determined to choke out :smiley:

MisterStrood:
‘…This thread is not about EU…’

Agreed: It seemingly went that way when someone’s unhappiness with a proven & decent British company was commented upon thus:

MisterStrood:
'…I have been told twice + one best friend of mine that we can not work at Waitrose due to the country we come from… That is the gratest racism I have received in the Great Britain so far and worth mentioning both of us were applying to Aylesford depot…!

Single issue politics being what it is, someone vaguely grey in an unaccountable, far-off office needs to spend a shed-load of someone elses dosh for a crippling Directive to topple the evil perpetrator of such international, fascist misery.

It would maybe address the evident dissatisfaction behind those big red letters, or at least bring the miscreant down to the level of, eg., Spanish employment; Italy’s Defence budget in liberating Afghanistan from tyranny or even Greek fiscal morality, etc :wink:

However, to ■■■■-up to equality in my own back-yard and endeavour to appease the evident offence, I’ll dutifully lick-off the racist’s night-soil and restore a saviour’s shoe sole. Then I’ll don a rucksack of indignant attitude to expect the same in his back-yard…

Happy Keith:
I was too young to be politically aware as a 14 year-old, but how can today’s subscription of £48 million a day ever be ‘…benefitient…’?

Because you got much more in return as a benefits from common market and stuff. You pay 8-9 billion per year - which comes to about 15 pounds per citizen, but according to your own goverment estimates, you “earn” around 2500 pounds per household from the benefits of single market - as EU is your biggest export market, and, unlike like with China, you don’t have export deficite there…

Just for Poland - you export 3 times more stuff to Poland today that you did in 2003.

Norway is not in EU, and it’s very often given as an example of what Britain should do. But to be allowed to benefit from the signle market Norway pays proportionally much more than Britain - as this is the deal: “you can be part of our signle market if you put some money into EU funds”.

I got a feeling that this 48 milion a day is a very populist argument - because it’s much easier to show how much you PAY into the common jar, than to show all the benefits you got from being an EU member…

We now know that my parents generation were denied being told the fact that Federalisation was the covert ambition of today’s EU. That is the essence of today’s argument and is incompatible with Britain being able to do what it does best, ie, whinge, take in strays, win wars against tyrants on it’s own fair & decent terms and not those of meddling, fight-shy foreigners.

Ah, so you just miss the good old times when you were a nation that was putting others into their place, deciding who is tyrant and who is not, and when you were important and people in other countries cared about you? In simply words: you blame EU for that you are no longer Great and you are “just Britain”?

Britain has solidarity with many nations world-wide and is broadly seen, proven and respected as a fair & decent nation.

Or you just like to think so. If you only spoke other languages and were able to read what other nations think about you…

The fact today is that because Germany & France once needed coralling (Federalising!) from repeating their regular & historic fisticuffs (originally by a common 1950’s bond always referred to here - albeit informally - as a ‘Common Market’) into being friends together, the EU now forbids the UK from trading direct with the rest of the world. How is that a winner for Waitrose or Britain?

You have a choice: you can trade direct with the rest of the world, but not with EU, or you can trade freely with the rest of EU, but not with the rest of the world. Recent data shows that your trade just with Ireland is bigger than that with China, Brazil, India and Russia put together… Feel free to abandon EU rules and try luck in the world market, competing with China and other cheap countries…

I think this is exactly the confirmation of my feelings after I read your previous post: you are happy from benefits, but you are not happy when you have to sacrifice something. You would like to keep cookie and eat it. That’s your problem, I think.

Greece lied to get into the EU and the ‘eager-to-please’ auditors were hastily ordered to let them ‘in’ were clearly negligent. Why has no-one been jailed for this? Maybe the rampant ineptitude of unaccountable, EU civil-servants and undemocratic politicians are exempt from accountability :neutral_face:

What would happen if, as a driver under EU regulations, you committed similar, professional negligence :question: Why is the EU administration immune from accounting for it’s foul-ups? Would Waitrose tolerate such dismal performance from it’s executives, clerks or drivers?

Here we agree in full.

I understand that the fortunes of Greece are doomed whatever they do for the foreseeable future: Their (sad?) destiny is to recover to average (not a bad thing) - but hey, at least they remain free to avoid paying tax on their unfinished house extensions that we’ve all seen and always accepted as Greek state sponsored & nationally inept corruption.

I was talking about British fortunes. I am of the similar opinion when it comes to Greece.

Maybe we Britons as a whole are not overly bothered because we’re tired, disenfranchised and far too busy to swallow the truth (thanks to smoke & mirror (Olympic?) type diversions) and that burying heads in the sand is a perfectly adequate short-term solution. That’s fine until our children wake-up - like they now are - to realise that playing at ultra-liberalism with Britain’s previous high standards has come at a cost to them. Maybe if Waitrose gets bought out by Primark or Starbucks (an easy tax-dodge lesson for the retarded EU to bumble over?) the Lib/Lab/Con ultra-liberals will be happy :neutral_face:

The problem here is that most of the people, as you say, are not bothered to dig the truth, and the few who are bothered, are happy with just some populistic crap - like this “48 milions per day” without broader view of all income and spending that comes with your membership in the EU.

The problem, in my eyes, as the oustide observator is, that your goverment is balancing between not doing anything to change the things and doing some half-way moves to please populists. If Britain was still Great, you will go to one of this European summits, hit your fists into the table, and told Merkel and co “stop doing circles, I know that you are too afraid to do some BIG CHANGES, but EU needs big changes, and if you are not up to this BIG CHANGES, we are leaving!”.

Britons almost know the EU will blank us - or when pushed, they’ll tell us off in front of their ‘King’s-new-clothes’ mates (ie, the ‘happy-to receive’ new Eastern member states?) whilst hitting Britains EU puppet Government with a fine for insubordination and Waitrose with a directive to employ people they don’t particularly wish-to :exclamation:

The mistake in that thinking is typical for Britain. Suprisingly there is no such thinking in France or Germany for example. You think that Eastern Europe is some poor guys from outside who might beg you for membership in Europe and you can let them in at your will… You are forgotting, that Eastern Europeans have the same rights to be part of Europe as you have (well, until we speak about Geography, then they are more in Europe than you are). They weren’t begging to be allowed to Europe, they are in Europe for 1000 years or more. And common Europe is in the interest of everyone, as the small European countries are already being marginalized on the world market - we need to stick together to have our voice heard in China, USA or Latin America.

I’d be happy to be kicked out (they’d be £48 million per day poorer, so it’s not likely) and am gagging to learn what undemocratic, unaccountable, poorly managed, EU sponsored Utopia anyone can envision lying beyond my nose-end, please.

Well, they would get much more from the taxes and customs from your companies exporting to EU :slight_smile:

Clean, fresh and healthy air, perhaps - or another bullying Directive: I’d prefer it to be the Waitrose model - as envied by many as a lesson-for-Britain - but it’s the one which many are determined to choke out :smiley:

Everyone would prefer Waitrose type of business - when the wages are high, working conditions comfortable etc. But then, suddenly, when they go shopping, they all go to Tesco, because Tesco is cheaper and Waitrose is expensive. That’s why Tesco is blooming and keep opening new shops at every second corner of the street every week, and Waitrose is not.

This is how it works on a small scale, and how it works on the biggest scale.

orys:
Norway is not in EU, and it’s very often given as an example of what Britain should do. But to be allowed to benefit from the signle market Norway pays proportionally much more than Britain - as this is the deal: “you can be part of our signle market if you put some money into EU funds”.

And thanks to that simple Norwegian pays 36% tax from his salary to the budged - wondering if those giving them as an example would like them (taxes ) to go that sky high ?

We now know that my parents generation were denied being told the fact that Federalisation was the covert ambition of today’s EU. That is the essence of today’s argument and is incompatible with Britain being able to do what it does best, ie, whinge, take in strays, win wars against tyrants on it’s own fair & decent terms and not those of meddling, fight-shy foreigners.

In 2004 when my Country voted for EU we weren’t told that either. That is called diversity.

Anyway guys if we want to continue I created a seperate topic so we do not put our views on Waitrose tread
http://www.trucknetuk.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=91834

Happy Keith:

MisterStrood:
‘…This thread is not about EU…’

Agreed: It seemingly went that way when someone’s unhappiness with a proven & decent British company was commented upon thus:

MisterStrood:
'…I have been told twice + one best friend of mine that we can not work at Waitrose due to the country we come from… That is the gratest racism I have received in the Great Britain so far and worth mentioning both of us were applying to Aylesford depot…!

So my blushing red post seems to be right to the topic as it is about OP topic.
Nothing mentioned about EU here :wink:

orys:
‘… you “earn” around 2500 pounds per household from the benefits of single market - as EU is your biggest export market…’

Great, how do those earnings really manifest other than, eg., rubbish town-centre fountain projects - and maybe explain why Britain should be told who to trade with by non-Britons?

Where’s the global freedom in that - without a clipboard-wielding Belgian telling us what dimensions a banana should be?

orys:
… and, unlike like with China, you don’t have export deficit here…’

The balance of payments is not equal: Britain imports more than it exports - since having it’s hitherto life sucked out (although the unions didn’t help much either).

orys:
‘…Just for Poland - you export 3 times more stuff to Poland today that you did in 2003…’

Yeah, but piece-parts for washing machines or tv’s that cheaper labour assembles to bring back here don’t really count.

The same goes for chocolate making machine parts for Cadbury with scant appreciation by its new manufacturing worker of Cadbury’s heritage value and the negative manufacturing withdrawal impact of that product from Britain’s culture? Maybe Waitrose by ‘digging-in’ have more guts that any of us has hitherto realised. Go for it, Partners :exclamation:

orys:
‘…I got a feeling that this 48 milion a day is a very populist argument…’

Then please answer those populists who realise that it’s a lot of money when hospitals,schools, etc are neglected at home and Britain is the worlds free-health travel destination of choice with no-thanks to the EU also.

orys:
‘… it’s much easier to show how much you PAY into the common jar, than to show all the benefits you got from being an EU member…’

Alternatively, perhaps indicate what the secret benefit is (whilst noting that ‘…the common jar…’ isn’t common). Undemocratic membership is bringing far more misery by shackling this nation’s spirit & moral than any fancy EU flag, EU anthem or multi-tiered & unrepresentative bullying from vindictive foreigners is able to heal. You perhaps take us for fools, man :question:

orys:
'…Ah, so you just miss the good old times when you were a nation that was putting others into their place, deciding who is tyrant and who is not, and when you were important and people in other countries cared about you…?

Whilst I cannot undo history, you are perhaps proving my above point by both mocking me and attempting to humiliate my country? You also indicate that your ‘…care…’ for this place - the place that accommodates & employs you and others from abroad - is in the past tense.

Meanwhile, Britain lead the world in abolishing the slave-trade - even after it had known & at first exploited from the short-term, easy-money benefits. But now Britain is a cash slave for those that neither earns it but extracts it democratically from a nation currently priding itself with Waitrose :question:

orys:
‘…In simply words: you blame EU for that you are no longer Great and you are “just Britain”…?’

I understand that the EU formally refers to this place as something like ‘The EU’s British Economic Zone’: Perhaps someone can explain when the British voted for that?

orys:

Happy Keith:
'…Britain has solidarity with many nations world-wide and is broadly seen, proven and respected as a fair & decent nation.

orys:
‘…Or you just like to think so. If you only spoke other languages and were able to read what other nations think about you…’

We accept that learning other’s language isn’t Britain’s strength, - and whilst you look-down upon us for that you maybe deny Britain the English speaking Commonwealth dotting the globe?

orys:
‘…You have a choice: you can trade direct with the rest of the world, but not with EU…’

Thank-you: You’ve identified how the EU bullies it’s members by telling them what to buy and from whom. Brilliant; the EU making everyone second-class :neutral_face:

orys:
‘…you are happy from benefits, but you are not happy when you have to sacrifice something…’

When that sacrifice is democracy - especially when it is practised by a good, British employer such as Waitrose, you are correct.

MisterStrood:
'…we can not work at Waitrose due to the country we come from… That is the gratest racism I have received in the Great Britain so far …

Then we (perhaps smugly?) see:

MisterStrood:
‘…Nothing mentioned about EU here :wink:…’

So who’s definition of ‘…racism…’ is being used in red if not that dictated to Britain from Brussels about how nice the British are forced to be to migrants that are heavily populating & for various reasons, are endangering British jobs in Britain?

Britain is a decent nation with both decent people and decent companies (see Waitrose) who - it’s no secret, arguably resent being told how compulsory it must now be - and often soil themselves at being fined huge penalties (paid to Brussels) for being human.

Happy Keith:

MisterStrood:
‘…Nothing mentioned about EU here :wink:…’

So who’s definition of ‘…racism…’ is being used in red if not that dictated to Britain from Brussels …

Ohhh Happy Keith. I told you you should go to history books and you won’t listen.

HUMAN RIGHT ACTS ARE NOT INVENTED BY EU. "Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and the atrocities of The Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948"ONE OF THE PROPAGATORS WAS SIR WINSTON LEONARD SPENCER - CHURCHILL WHO WAS BRITISH SO YOU [BRITISH] HAVE IMPLEMENTED THE DEFINITION YOURSELF AS WELL AS EU.
WHEN WILL IT GET TO YOUR HEAD :question:
I wrote that big and coloured so maybe finally it will. Anything else - go to the topic mentioned and created to wich i gave link in previous thread.

MisterStrood:
‘…Ohhh Happy Keith. I told you you should go to history books and you won’t listen…’

Please understand that I’m reading the meaning & nuance behind your colourful rollocking, and at last understand your answer as ‘…the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948…’

Thank you and apologies for my slowness of grasp.

I can’t help but feel, however, that you are avoiding the thrust or even the existence of a contemporary and very live, British perspective supports & encourages Waitrose as a decent, British employer.

Further to that, please understand that I’ll not be following the reference to an essay on why migrants (guests?) to this country justify and promote why Britain should endure abusive & undemocratic treatment in the 21st Century.

Also, as Sir Winston himself may once have corroborated, unwanted intrusion into an Englishman’s back garden is rude.

Happy Keith, I answered you here: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=91834&p=1311807#p1311807

Hihi, I see the EU thread is deleted :slight_smile:

Obviously we have to come back to this one…

I just found that interesting read: economist.com/news/leaders/2 … mr-cameron