Carryfast:
JeffA:
I paid £600 for one that was 20 years old a few months ago - and even that sailed through ULEZ. So apart from vintage car owners - I dunno who’se driving these cars that will be affected by ULEZ. Certainly not “poor” people. If you can afford road tax and petrol you can afford £600 for a car for sure.So it’s ok for you to run a 20 year old piece of junk when it suits you.
Exactly which supposed 20 year old car would comply with ULEZ and how many compliant cars and where, with one year MOT, can you find for 600 quid.
As opposed to normal working class cars of well under 20 years old worth well over £2k but which would add Kahn’s ULEZ tax to an NHS worker’s commuting costs.
The big question is why won’t the Tories, who state that they are against it, repeal the London Government Act thereby putting Bexley, Bromley, Kingston, Barnet, Redbridge, Havering, Hillingdon etc back where they belong and smashing Kahn’s powers over his stolen London Boroughs tax cash cow overnight.
No it doesn’t “suit me”. I don’t drive different cars for different days of the week. It was all I could afford at the time.
Which 20 year old peice of junk would still pass ULEZ? Mine would. So there’s not going to be many cars that wouldn’t pass if a 20-odd year old £600 car passes is there? And if there is don’t tell me it’s going to kill anyone buying a car for a grand - just running a car needs more money than that every year. Plus the bonus that you arn’t poisoning as many people.
And if anyone offerered me 2 grand to replace mine like the ULEZ scheme would I would get down on my knees and thank god for ULEZ - like any other person with not much money to burn would.