Some people want to believe Russia are the villains here, some people think that NATO are - and the most of us by this point - have been so blinded by the constant blizzard of bull that is the “Mainstream Narrative” - that at very best we don’t (or at least shouldn’t) know WHAT to believe.
The West seems hell-bent at present trying to whip up the Western Public into a situation where we DEMAND a nuclear holocaust of our politicians.
The only reason the invasion happened to start with, right or wrong - is because the West and their institutitions - refused point-blank to both sit down and discuss Putin’s concerns (which go rather beyond just “NATO expansion” btw)
Any sensible leader would have negotiated with troops on their doorstep.
I suspect the Kiev leadership were told not to do any deals with Putin under any circumstances.
This “War” - is the result, and the obvious age-old adage:
“War - is the continuation of Politics by other means”
It is well-known that “Agitators” loyal to the Kiev Regime (if we don’t consider them to be Neo Nazis already)
are using surplus left over from the cold war years to act like the IRA within their own country’s Eastern regions, trying to drive out the ethnic Russians living there.
It is very likely these same agitators that shot down MH17 deliberately and on purpose to get Putin’s Russia villified by the West, which I also suspect knew full well that such a false flag throwdown incident was coming…
Shame about the innocent lives lost “just to make Putin look bad”.
BUT… That is exactly the kind of “Gangsters” that Putin is up against - fully backed by the Globalist Narrative, Mainstream Media Mouthpiece OF the Globalists, and of course Western Leaders that are being pressured to “support this evil - or else!”
There’s rumours abound that Macron has broken rank… I won’t say anything else, until I have more substantial input however.
Cluster Bomb Attack - Grainy Video, camera strangely doesn’t pan to show “dropping aircraft”, camera knew exactly what to focus on, looks like a line of explosive charges on the ground, as would be used in a building demolition.
Conclusion: “Agitator Throw-down event”. Motive: Make it look as though Putin was using stuff banned by international law.
If Putin IS being thus reckless, then wouldn’t he already be using thousands MORE of such alleged devices all over?
Nope. There’s a limited amount of such “surplus, antiquated kit” to be used sparingly.
Ditto for handy BUK missile systems left over from the 1980’s as well.
Missile attack on building: Video clearly shows it WAS a missile, albeit a rather old (again) so-called “Vacuum” device.
Again, how come none of these devices have been used on Kiev yet?? If Putin is behind it, has unlimited stocks of these devices, and is prepared to go out of his way to use them?
Conclusion: Missile attack - Agitators in any area BUT Kiev.
TV Mast attack - actually in Kiev this time:
Russia warned that there was inbound, local authorities refused to evacuate the area to cause maximum of their OWN civillian casualties. (5 dead, 5 wounded - we’re told…)
Conclusion: Russia actually behind this one, but perverted into another potential “war crime” by simply denying that a warning was given. Dissenting “Journalists” - hounded until they toe the deep state line.
There will be a netflix series about this “Gangster Empire” that Putin is trying to totally eradicate in a decade’s time, I suggest…
“Empire of Lies” - sounds like a good title, too…
What the Western Media are doing - is like if during the late 1930’s there were programs on American and British TV showing Russians, Jews, and Slavs going around Germany “causing trouble”, and then showing Hitler’s crime crackdown bringing order and peace back to Europe…
Britain wasn’t supposed to declare war on Germany in 1939.
Churchill wasn’t supposed to move off the backbenches “I told you so” position to become PM.
London wasn’t supposed to get bombed in 1940 - the target was Britain’s airfields.
The Fog of War is common to ALL This, past and present.
The only journalism we can take seriously here - is actual people in tin hats on the spot filming it AS it happens, rather than the alleged “aftermath”…
If I pulled out an AK-47 and blew away a classroom of schoolkids - but the media liked me rather than the regime the school belonged to…
The media would report that “An unknown white guy, likely white supremacist today murdered school kids with a Russian-made weapon.”
If it later emerged that “Gunman is English”
…It would be followed up by “Gunman was acting alone”.
If any of the kids were of colour/other religion etc.
…“Motive for attack, seems to be race-hate” providing the culprit was suspected by the authorities of being far LEFT rather than can be casually accused of being “Far Right”.
Confirmation Bias - I think that is called.
In all things, you cannot prove a negative of course.
