Truck stopped on M25 and driver suspected to be stoned

Harry Monk:

RoadsRat:
This has no relevance. Is your business empire going through a quiet spell Harry?

The number of officers involved in wrongdoing is less than 1%.

Oh, I do apologise, I inferred from your posts that we were making generalisations about an entire profession based on the actions of one or two people. :unamused: :unamused:

It’s more than just ā€œone or two peopleā€.

Danny_b:

RoadsRat:

commonrail:

RoadsRat:
You still drove while you knowingly had drugs in your system? :wink:

How was I supposed to know drugs would be in my system…it was days ago.

If it was days ago, it’s likely there’d be little trace of it left in your system…unless you are a heavy user.

Highway code will tell you any drink or drugs may be tracable for upto 48hr in your system. Drugs stay in your system longer. 1 splif is tracable for upto 3 wks via hair samples.

Yes, we were talking about day’s so greater than 48 hours.

The police currently don’t test via a hair sample but via blood where cannabis doesn’t stay long.

As I’ve already said, the more you use cannabis the longer it stats in your body.

Pimpdaddy:
Oh I take it you’ve already put yours In then!?:lol:

Yes, several years ago and it was accepted.

Pimpdaddy:
I happen to have a large ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  & I drive trucks, what’s your point!?

The ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  on your forehead doesn’t count.

RoadsRat:

Pimpdaddy:
Oh I take it you’ve already put yours In then!?:lol:

Yes, several years ago and it was accepted.

Pimpdaddy:
I happen to have a large ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  & I drive trucks, what’s your point!?

The ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  on your forehead doesn’t count.

Either way it’s bigger than yours officer…:laughing:

commonrail:

RoadsRat:

commonrail:

RoadsRat:
You still drove while you knowingly had drugs in your system? :wink:

How was I supposed to know drugs would be in my system…it was days ago.

If it was days ago, it’s likely there’d be little trace of it left in your system…unless you are a heavy user.

Pot stays in your system for ages.
btw, I work with an ex traffic cop…who was laterly a custody sergeant.
did his time, and now drives trucks with the real men :wink:
come and join us road rat…you know you want to

If you’re a heavy/frequent user it stays in your system for a long time.

Thanks for your offer but I wouldn’t fork out Ā£2k for training just to earn Ā£7 an hour. :wink:

I’m not prepared to take a big pay cut.

Pimpdaddy:

RoadsRat:

Pimpdaddy:
Oh I take it you’ve already put yours In then!?:lol:

Yes, several years ago and it was accepted.

Pimpdaddy:
I happen to have a large ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  & I drive trucks, what’s your point!?

The ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  on your forehead doesn’t count.

Either way it’s bigger than yours officer…:laughing:

Better than being a massive ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  I guess?

Blimey, and the police wonder why they have a bad reputation.

switchlogic:
Blimey, and the police wonder why they have a bad reputation.

Typical attitude of most traffic cops though don’t you think? Look at Angus Nairn on Motorway cops, an ex trucker who more than likely run bent who is now preaching his gospel to other truckers as though they are a ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  :unamused:

SteveBarnsleytrucker:

RoadsRat:

limeyphil:
It’s just annoying when people can’t win an argument, So they resort to the ā€œwhat if it was your wife and kidsā€ scenario.
It’s like when the counrty went all politically correct. ā€œHow to get off with this? I know, i’ll play the race cardā€.
Same tune, different lyrics.
There’s no proof he was stoned. They found some joints and some weed. It would be more worrying if he’d smoked the joints and the weed.
He could have been ill.

I’m just thankful that idiots like yourself only make up the minority of the population.

Had you bothered to read the link, you’ll have read that the police had received numerous calls about the manner that the truck was being driven. Once stopped, the driver failed a roadside impairment test. How does that make your theory look now?

can you explain to me why that copper isn’t getting prosecuted for doing 140mph on the A1ā– ā– ? Any other member of Joe Public would have the book thrown at them but as usual it’s one rule for the boys in blue and another for the rest of us.

He could have killed our loved ones and children! :open_mouth: :laughing:

I think it’s quite important that the likes of roadsrat and other traffic officers come on here.
He has clearly stated he doesn’t agree that what other officers have done is acceptable. How would you feel going on a cycling forum and everyone accuses you of driving like a knob just because they think all truck drivers are the same.
It’s nice to see a more human side to these people that we cross paths with due to our jobs. Lets not forget the help they can offer when it comes to answering questions.

Maybe if you can just clear up crossing a double solid line to enter a layby facing the wrong way then Muckaway will be sorted too.

RoadsRat:

Harry Monk:

RoadsRat:
This has no relevance. Is your business empire going through a quiet spell Harry?

The number of officers involved in wrongdoing is less than 1%.

Oh, I do apologise, I inferred from your posts that we were making generalisations about an entire profession based on the actions of one or two people. :unamused: :unamused:

It’s more than just ā€œone or two peopleā€.[/quote

But probably less than 1 percent… (based on my own fabricated ā€œstatisticsā€)

Interesting! We get numerous ā€œtameā€ traffic cops posting from time to time, so instead of using them as an invaluable tool for gaining info on relevant legislation or perhaps even giving them an insight into the daily problems we have to content with thus giving them a more balanced view, no, we abuse them and when they bite back we accuse them of being corrupt or unprofessional!

Way to go guys.

the maoster:
Interesting! We get numerous ā€œtameā€ traffic cops posting from time to time, so instead of using them as an invaluable tool for gaining info on relevant legislation or perhaps even giving them an insight into the daily problems we have to content with thus giving them a more balanced view, no, we abuse them and when they bite back we accuse them of being corrupt or unprofessional!

Way to go guys.

Have you read his replies back to everyone?? :unamused:

the maoster:
Interesting! We get numerous ā€œtameā€ traffic cops posting from time to time, so instead of using them as an invaluable tool for gaining info on relevant legislation or perhaps even giving them an insight into the daily problems we have to content with thus giving them a more balanced view, no, we abuse them and when they bite back we accuse them of being corrupt or unprofessional!

Way to go guys.

The bloke reckons he’s a police officer, Yet he makes assumptions based on hearsay without proof.
He assumes the guy was guilty of being stoned.
He also assumes that lorry drivers are uneducated.
His attitude suggests he is a wannabe copper.
A propper copper would be impartial, He would wait until there was some evidence before making any sort of assumption.

switchlogic:
Blimey, and the police wonder why they have a bad reputation.

Really? So Pimpdaddy can use abusive words towards me but I can’t do so in response? Yeah ok.

I’ve been perfectly civil to others who have been equally civil towards me.

SteveBarnsleytrucker:
Have you read his replies back to everyone?? :unamused:

Or his user name? Or his location? Or his signature?

As pointed out by numerous others, ā€œRoadsRatā€ is just a runt who was bullied at school, and now obtains job satisfaction from punishing others in revenge, now that he has finally achieved some type of power and respect, based not on his looks, intelligence, charisma or charm, but simply on the uniform he wears to work and the big blue lights on his car.

I still like engaging with him though. There’s nothing more pleasurable than a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent! :stuck_out_tongue:

SteveBarnsleytrucker:

switchlogic:
Blimey, and the police wonder why they have a bad reputation.

Typical attitude of most traffic cops though don’t you think? Look at Angus Nairn on Motorway cops, an ex trucker who more than likely run bent who is now preaching his gospel to other truckers as though they are a piece of [zb] :unamused:

I think this unhealthy obsession with Angus Nairn says more about truckers than it does about him.

Wheel Nut:

SteveBarnsleytrucker:

RoadsRat:

limeyphil:
It’s just annoying when people can’t win an argument, So they resort to the ā€œwhat if it was your wife and kidsā€ scenario.
It’s like when the counrty went all politically correct. ā€œHow to get off with this? I know, i’ll play the race cardā€.
Same tune, different lyrics.
There’s no proof he was stoned. They found some joints and some weed. It would be more worrying if he’d smoked the joints and the weed.
He could have been ill.

I’m just thankful that idiots like yourself only make up the minority of the population.

Had you bothered to read the link, you’ll have read that the police had received numerous calls about the manner that the truck was being driven. Once stopped, the driver failed a roadside impairment test. How does that make your theory look now?

can you explain to me why that copper isn’t getting prosecuted for doing 140mph on the A1ā– ā– ? Any other member of Joe Public would have the book thrown at them but as usual it’s one rule for the boys in blue and another for the rest of us.

He could have killed our loved ones and children! :open_mouth: :laughing:

Not necessarily. :wink:

ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– :

RoadsRat:

Harry Monk:

RoadsRat:
This has no relevance. Is your business empire going through a quiet spell Harry?

The number of officers involved in wrongdoing is less than 1%.

Oh, I do apologise, I inferred from your posts that we were making generalisations about an entire profession based on the actions of one or two people. :unamused: :unamused:

It’s more than just ā€œone or two peopleā€.

But probably less than 1 percent… (based on my own fabricated ā€œstatisticsā€)

Which ā€œfabricated statisticsā€ are you referring to?

SteveBarnsleytrucker:

the maoster:
Interesting! We get numerous ā€œtameā€ traffic cops posting from time to time, so instead of using them as an invaluable tool for gaining info on relevant legislation or perhaps even giving them an insight into the daily problems we have to content with thus giving them a more balanced view, no, we abuse them and when they bite back we accuse them of being corrupt or unprofessional!

Way to go guys.

Have you read his replies back to everyone?? :unamused:

Nothing wrong with my replies to 99.9% of the members here. I treat the knobs like…knobs. Simples!