So the risk assessment says not to do something and you do it anyway ■■
Legend
shade:
So the risk assessment says not to do something and you do it anyway…
…and then have an accident.
Contraflow:
shade:
So the risk assessment says not to do something and you do it anyway……and then have an accident.
…and then blame a van.
peirre:
Dopey should have gone to specsavers
You know the saying glass houses etc, it’s you who needs specsavers you blind ■■■■■■■■ it’s DOZY 
I think Dozy’s class.
He’s an employed driver though right? Mm. Throws a spanner in the works. Suprised the apologists over on the agency vs employed thread haven’t picked up on this awkward glitch in the argument. They’ve missed a trick there.
Big Roy:
peirre:
Dopey should have gone to specsaversYou know the saying glass houses etc, it’s you who needs specsavers you blind [zb], it’s DOZY
The irony is obviously lost on you 
peirre:
Big Roy:
peirre:
Dopey should have gone to specsaversYou know the saying glass houses etc, it’s you who needs specsavers you blind [zb], it’s DOZY
The irony is obviously lost on you
not at all mate, hence the wink at the end
Terry T:
Contraflow:
shade:
So the risk assessment says not to do something and you do it anyway……and then have an accident.
…and then blame a van.
Of course it the bloody dot com vans fault ,in that yard there is designated parking area for 4/5/6 vans ,that van was not parked in that area ,it was parked in my turningcircle ,he had not worked too his risk assessment had he 
,by doing this he caused me too have too make a manuover I would not of not normallymake ,its not my job too have too run round and find him too get him too move his van ,it’s his bloody job too park it where it should be ( note there was on 1 van parked in the designated parking area so no reason not too park there other than couldn’t be assed too ) .
Hopefully now his action have caused damage too a building and tri he’ll think twice before he just dumps it in the area reserved for trucks too turn 
but I wontbhold my breath .
Either you’re someone on a wind up or you’re Britains worst lorry driver. Either way you’re an idiot.
switchlogic:
Either you’re someone on a wind up or you’re Britains worst lorry driver. Either way you’re an idiot.
I’ll second that mate.
dozy:
Hopefully now his action have caused damage too a building and tri he’ll think twice before he just dumps it in the area reserved for trucks too turn…
He didn’t cause any damage to the building or the trailer though, a lorry driver with a skull full of cabbage caused the damage.
Dozy it’s your fault!!!
You hit the building. Not .com van driver.
If you had followed your risk assessment YOU wouldn’t of hit the large imobile building.
All you had to do was go in and ask the staff to get van moved. Then phone ya boss and tell him.
Or. Ever thought of going to work in demolition ■■ 
dozy:
Of course it the bloody dot com vans fault ,in that yard there is designated parking area for 4/5/6 vans ,that van was not parked in that area ,it was parked in my turningcircle ,he had not worked too his risk assessment had he
Hopefully now his action have caused damage too a building and tri he’ll think twice before he just dumps it in the area reserved for trucks too turn
Now this gem of wisdom is why I want you off premod. I mean how long have we had to wait for this ■■■■■■■■■■■ of twisted logic to appear.
You cannot blame a stationary object be it van, building (in this case a combination of both), tree, the planet etc for a collision.
Risk assesments are designed as an exercise in common sense and to the average person just state the obvious and are often useless but just occasionally point out a hazard that may be easily missed.
Just because someone had failed in their duties doesn’t give you the right to fail in yours.
Please keep em coming though.
dozy:
Hopefully now his action have caused damage too a building and tri he’ll think twice before he just dumps it in the area reserved for trucks too turn
Hopefully now YOUR actions have caused damage to a building and tri you’ll think twice about trying a manouvre in a space too tight for a truck to turn.
But I wont hold my breath
This is an early front runner for the next new RDC story of the year.
"My mate was in an RDC once, and a dot com van driver had parked in the wrong place. So my mate swung round in the yard a different way to his risk assessment, and took out a roof and the back of his trailer.
Best of it was the manager came out and saw the devastation, and he went and found the dot com driver who caused all this havoc, and had him arrested for terminal stupidty.
My mate is now the driver trainer at that RDC."
dozy:
its not my job too have too run round and find him too get him too move his van
Upon reflection do you now think that running round and finding him to get him to (not too) move his van would’ve been a smarter option in this instance ■■?
dozy:
Of course it the bloody dot com vans fault ,in that yard there is designated parking area for 4/5/6 vans ,that van was not parked in that area ,it was parked in my turningcircle ,he had not worked too his risk assessment had he
Hopefully now his action have caused damage too a building and tri he’ll think twice before he just dumps it in the area reserved for trucks too turn
Dozy mate Seriously…this has to stop, I mean EVEN I 
(the most cynical and idiot-intolerant bloke you could wish to meet BTW) am starting to feel embarrassed for you.
Every time you come on here you make a bigger and bigger ■■■■ of yourself. Put your brain in gear man before you open your gob!!! 
How t. f can the van be at fault it was stood still ffs, you may as well say it was the buildings fault for actually being there.
All this ‘risk assessment’ bull crap is written up for people (mostly idiots) that cannot think for themselves, you should have assessed the risks for yourself before you made the manoeuvre saw that it was impossible and not attempted it.
Despite the fact that you provide endless entertainment and amusement on here, you ain’t doing yourself any favours mate.
robroy:
dozy:
Of course it the bloody dot com vans fault ,in that yard there is designated parking area for 4/5/6 vans ,that van was not parked in that area ,it was parked in my turningcircle ,he had not worked too his risk assessment had he
Hopefully now his action have caused damage too a building and tri he’ll think twice before he just dumps it in the area reserved for trucks too turnDozy mate
Every time you come on here you make a bigger and bigger [zb] of yourself. Put your brain in gear man before you open your gob!!!
How t. f can the van be at fault it was stood still ffs, you may as well say it was the buildings fault for actually being there.
All this ‘risk assessment’ bull crap is written up for people (mostly idiots) that cannot think for themselves, you should have assessed the risks for yourself before you made the manoeuvre saw that it was impossible and not attempted it.
Despite the fact that you provide endless entertainment and amusement on here, you ain’t doing yourself any favours mate.
Shhhh! Leave him be serious people. I like reading his posts 
last thing I want to do is scare him off along with his mate Conor. At least Dozy’s posts are funny (unintentionally). It’s like a weekly calamity John read. Keep them coming Einstein.
Yeh, OK fair enough, it’s just that he is actually starting to become a caricature of himself, and even though I find his posts funny (for all the wrong reasons 
) I am starting to feel a bit guilty for taking the ■■■■, in the sense that it’s wrong to mock the afflicted
I find it fascinating.
The being on pre mod gives the impression he’s oblivious. Theres probably a tirade of acknowledgment awaiting. He’s a bit like carryfast. He’s made of rubber, it just bounces off him. Love it