Stock market crash in progress

Winseer:

merc0447:
How does a crash affect the housing market winseer? I don’t want to buy a house then the very next week it plummets into deepest darkest negative equity :open_mouth:

Sorry bud, the bond market rally (flight to quality) means that upward pressure is taken off interest rates.
Without the threat of an imminent interest rate hike or mansion taxes - the only way property prices are going for the remainder of this parliament is up, unfortunately for those unable to get a house already.

After the stock market crash of 1987, Nigel Lawson slashed interest rates - which sparked off the massive boom in house prices that ended in the great housing bust of 1990-94.

He also slyly got rid of mortgage interest tax relief as well, meaning that in the long run we are all worse off.

China have today cut interest rates.

A housing crash cannot happen unless there are millions of people forced to sell because their mortgage payments have gone up to more than their current income.

The best bet for a housing crash therefore - is an overheating economy, and an idiot at the helm in Government. We’ve got the second half of that equation in place already for sure… It could be a long wait for the former to appear at street level however. :bulb:

Sounds plausible but I think this might only be that.

Great Depression was preceded by a massive stock crash. I would say interest rates exacerbate things for those with mortgage problems but what really causes a mass wave of house repos is stubborn widespread unemployment of the Boys from the blackstuff gizza job type.

newmercman:
So I’m guessing now would be a good time to invest in something like an S&P500 account? Thinking of a minimum investment term of 15yrs with monthly contributions.

Ever considered trading the S&P Emini futures?

$50 per handle, commissions around the $15 mark round turn.

A position can be taken, exited, or reversed at the press of a mouse button - so none of this phoning the broker, wasting valuable time, etc.

The liquidity is VERY good in the American contracts in particular. Thousands on the bid and thousands on the offer just above.
The price can still move quickly though, as these things trade by the thousand per minute, so the price you see won’t be there long, even on a quiet day.
At night time, the market is closed for the electronic trading between 10pm and 11pm UK time. Other than that, it can be traded from 11pm Sunday night right around to 10pm friday night.

To trade one contract requires around $10,000 of margin for an overnight hold (necessary if you don’t win out on the first day of entering a position)
If you’re happy to exit win or lose on each day by day basis “day trade” (exiting before 10pm each night) then the commissions are less, the account requires less for the trade, - but the risk of losing money increases, since you lose each and every day the market closes against your position.

I’m really looking for a hands off investment, I don’t have the time or knowledge to watch the markets.

I’m thinking that I’ll stick to doing what I do best to make money, lorry driving and let someone that specializes in making money out of money increase my nett worth.

Big Truck:
+2 for Neil Woodford.
Spread your investments about the world by TAX EFFICIENT means.
Remember theres no such thing as Xmas in Far East/Japan etc,
while your sleeping off the turkey somebody in an office in those countries is trying HARD to make you money!!!

The thing about “tax efficiency” today, is that for those people already ripping off their taxes via offsets - there is less and less to be had by “investing tax efficiently”.
Today, I think you’ll find it’s those people otherwise on 45% rate who are still able to find “tax efficient investments” as it were.

Think about how hard it would be to sell something to those who have dropped out of paying taxes outright - by their incomes dropping below £10,500…

newmercman:
I’m really looking for a hands off investment, I don’t have the time or knowledge to watch the markets.

I’m thinking that I’ll stick to doing what I do best to make money, lorry driving and let someone that specializes in making money out of money increase my nett worth.

You could always do something simple like stick £10,000 on the FTSE. Unless there is an extreme drop right after you invest, you’ll not be bothered by daily market fluctuations, and you’d be investing for a fixed period each time, be that a minimum of the “current month” or a maximum of 5 years out. The longer one goes out however, the higher overhead one pays in “cost of carry”, so the most popular period to invest in the FTSE for tends to be around three months. At the end of that time, the market settles automatically against what you put in, and you are paid or deducted the difference off your £10,000 pot you paid in - which sits in a deposit account at the brokers for the interim. When interest rates are high, the “carry trade” can be quite lucrative in itself - because you’d be getting interest on your £10,000 AND any gain in the FTSE on top. A drop in the market though drains money out of the account on a day-by-day basis should you “buy at the top” which is the main risk one takes when investing directly in the FTSE.

Trickle investing over years tends to iron out such rises and falls on a daily basis - but increases the overheads in terms of commissions on tiddly small amounts to such an extent - that you need to see a much higher gain on the FTSE to make anywhere near the same amount of money…

Eg. Invest £10,000 in the FTSE for December 2015 @ say, 6300 and by december it reaches 7000 - You’ll be looking at getting £17,000 back.
Trickle-invest £100 per month for 100 months into the FTSE at an average spread price of the same 6300 that also rises to 7000 but in 10 YEARS say, you’ll be making less, and tying your money up for a lot longer to boot. You might get around £11,000 back since the FTSE has risen around 10% less your considerable overhead charges for investing in dribs and drabs via a third party investing firm.

“A long term investment is a short term investment that went wrong” Warren Buffet.

Winseer:
You could always do something simple like stick £10,000 on the FTSE. Unless there is an extreme drop right after you invest, you’ll not be bothered by daily market fluctuations, and you’d be investing for a fixed period each time, be that a minimum of the “current month” or a maximum of 5 years out. The longer one goes out however, the higher overhead one pays in “cost of carry”, so the most popular period to invest in the FTSE for tends to be around three months. At the end of that time, the market settles automatically against what you put in, and you are paid or deducted the difference off your £10,000 pot you paid in - which sits in a deposit account at the brokers for the interim. When interest rates are high, the “carry trade” can be quite lucrative in itself - because you’d be getting interest on your £10,000 AND any gain in the FTSE on top. A drop in the market though drains money out of the account on a day-by-day basis should you “buy at the top” which is the main risk one takes when investing directly in the FTSE.

Trickle investing over years tends to iron out such rises and falls on a daily basis - but increases the overheads in terms of commissions on tiddly small amounts to such an extent - that you need to see a much higher gain on the FTSE to make anywhere near the same amount of money…

Eg. Invest £10,000 in the FTSE for December 2015 @ say, 6300 and by december it reaches 7000 - You’ll be looking at getting £17,000 back.
Trickle-invest £100 per month for 100 months into the FTSE at an average spread price of the same 6300 that also rises to 7000 but in 10 YEARS say, you’ll be making less, and tying your money up for a lot longer to boot. You might get around £11,000 back since the FTSE has risen around 10% less your considerable overhead charges for investing in dribs and drabs via a third party investing firm.

This comparison seems to show the link between share value increases and interest rates.

wordpress.cityindex.co.uk/market … mance2.jpg

economicshelp.org/wp-content … -79-11.png

IE share values are just a reflection of general returns on capital.On that basis it’s difficult to see how shares can significantly out perform cash.With both being dependent on the same interest rate environment.With low interest rates creating a shares regime subject to and blighted by sharp downward corrections whenever share values outrun the general interest rate environment.Especially bearing in mind that shares can result in returns that are significantly less than the original deposit.

The funds that I’m looking at spread my investment over the whole S&P500 or whatever other markets I choose, so my gamble is on stocks rising as a whole, rather than trying to pick a few winners, obviously there’s more profit in picking a winner than betting the whole field in the hope that the profits outweigh the losses, but 12% compounded over 15yrs with a decent monthly investment is going to earn a tidy sum by the time I start pulling it out. As I’ll be taking a salary of sorts from the pot, the remaining money will still be earning too. I can’t see many downsides.

FTSE tracker funds will obviously balance out a whole basket of all constituents, but the ordinary non-millionaire investor has no such money to do them all on a private basis, hence why these funds are quite popular.
One way it is possible to set up a “pseudo tracker portfolio” however, is to research the top twenty constituents by captialization - and then work out which SIX of those 20 are on a reletive downswing in price for the year. Build a portfolio with these six, and movements up and down in the FTSE and the six shares in the portfolio will match up pretty well.
If you happen upon a single share that outperforms the other FTSE constituents, then you’ve done just as well as a pro fund manager who’s managed to “outperform the market” with their version of a tracker fund, which might well be mixed and matched in a very similar method to the way I’ve described.

A fund that ONLY buys all the constituents and then sits on them - clearly isn’t going to overperform ever, but can still underperform by a small amount thanks to management charges being based on what you put in rather than how much you made. Avoid!

Smart investors in the past piled into Tescos once all the bad news (and Warren Buffet!) had already got out, and the market had bottomed.
Smart investors also avoided losing their shirts on FTSE constituents like Polly Peck and Marconi - because these shares looked “full of air” prior to their collapse.

Don’t be afraid to bet against the big boys. Form your own judgements and opinions as you would on this board.
Playing the markets via derivatives (such as CFDs or Index Futures) is like driving a sports car at it’s maximum speed. If you’ve just passed your test, you’re probably gonna get killed. If you’re an experienced driver, you’ll fare much better. If you are an intermediate (like myself) then you can still make consistent profits - but you have to treat a lot more carefully. Over the years, I’ve made the most money on privatization issue shares & commodities and lost the most on non-FTSE shares and Currencies, in particular the Euro. I would be seriously out of pocket overall if it were not for the fact I have made a good amount out of the interest rate futures (Bonds) where you get swings in the price according to the ebb and flow of interest rate expectations.
Bad news tends to push bond prices UP, and good news sends them DOWN btw. The fact that I’m better at driving a truck than I am at investing should answer any questions as to “Why The F— I’m still driving trucks pushing 50 instead of living it up in a city office somewhere”. :blush: :wink:

Carryfast - Have you ever actually traded stocks and shares, let alone derivatives? :question:

The best time to buy is when a sell-off has been overdone, either because of a general market crash and/or a slump in the individual share price that is over the top compared to the bad news that’s just been released… Eg. If a company suddenly reports profits are HALVED, then does that mean the share price should also halve? - Hell no! But if it DOES, then you fill your boots and don’t wait for the bottom, unless you are prepared to watch a screen all day whilst waiting…

Companies to avoid are those who’ve passed on their dividend when they were not expected to. Such shares have then dropped for a good reason, and should best be avoided. Without that dividend to soften the blow of any further weakness in the share price - you are going to likely end up being stuck with them for a long time. :bulb:

NMM,
as I’ve stated before on the O/D forum an ISA is a VERY “tax efficent” form of investment for us here in the UK only.
(Your bound to have something similar in Canada)
ANY money you make in a UK ISA is completely free of capital gains taxes and you don’t even need to mention it in a HMRC tax return!!!
By investing in the S&P500 your limiting your choice to NA alone.

Tax efficiency is all very well, but if you don’t make any profits for the risks you take - it’s irrelevant.

The tax free capital gains allowances for each person are about the same as the income tax free allowance over the years past.
This means a joint account for trading purposes won’t be touched for tax until it’s made a profit of around £25,000 in each and any one year.

Most people don’t ever use up their allowance here for CGT. Surely an investment that makes use of this allowance consistently would be the most tax efficient of all, especially based on how reasonable expectations are of being able to make upto that amount per year with a trading account…

Getting a 1-2% return on an ISA absolutely tax free then pales into insignificance as it should before that. ISAs will perform the tax efficiency thing a lot better once interest rates have returned to the levels they were a generation ago. Trouble is, that’s actually not priced in the interest rate market to happen for over a DECADE yet.

Is a lot of practically nothing better than nearly all of a lot? - Decisions on this kind of argument tend to go in a similar manner to whom one votes for. Those keen to partake often do not have enough moey or learning to make it work, whilst those WITH enough will baulk away from it, chicken like, but jump at the chance of investing in some “fine wines” or some other scam that then fleeces them out of every penny of their investment, compared to the possibility of only losing part of their investment with something like the FTSE where you only get Zero back if every company in the FTSE index goes bankrupt… People need to get a grip on “realistic risk expectations” with their investments, whatever they are. If you don’t know - find out. If you have suspicions, make checks. :bulb:

2 questions winseer.

Have you made any money from investing?
Do you like a flutter?

Winseer:
Tax efficiency is all very well, but if you don’t make any profits for the risks you take - it’s irrelevant.

The tax free capital gains allowances for each person are about the same as the income tax free allowance over the years past.
This means a joint account for trading purposes won’t be touched for tax until it’s made a profit of around £25,000 in each and any one year.

Most people don’t ever use up their allowance here for CGT. Surely an investment that makes use of this allowance consistently would be the most tax efficient of all, especially based on how reasonable expectations are of being able to make upto that amount per year with a trading account…

Getting a 1-2% return on an ISA absolutely tax free then pales into insignificance as it should before that. ISAs will perform the tax efficiency thing a lot better once interest rates have returned to the levels they were a generation ago. Trouble is, that’s actually not priced in the interest rate market to happen for over a DECADE yet.

Is a lot of practically nothing better than nearly all of a lot? - Decisions on this kind of argument tend to go in a similar manner to whom one votes for. Those keen to partake often do not have enough moey or learning to make it work, whilst those WITH enough will baulk away from it, chicken like, but jump at the chance of investing in some “fine wines” or some other scam that then fleeces them out of every penny of their investment, compared to the possibility of only losing part of their investment with something like the FTSE where you only get Zero back if every company in the FTSE index goes bankrupt… People need to get a grip on “realistic risk expectations” with their investments, whatever they are. If you don’t know - find out. If you have suspicions, make checks. :bulb:

Some ISA % growth figures for you:
hl.co.uk/funds/wealth-150
(Click on “annual percentage growth” just a wee bit more
than the 1/2% returns your quoting :exclamation: :exclamation: :grimacing: )

Count them up over 5yrs and tell me that not “tax efficient” :exclamation: :exclamation:

There are “working class” savy investors out there who’ve been in the PEP/ISA investment game since Nigel Lawson introduced same in 1986, some are sitting with portfolios worth near £2million now from approx £180/200k invested (drip fed over past 30yrs) and ALL completely free from CGT :exclamation: :exclamation: :sunglasses:

Plus nowhere near the risks assoc with the more “exotic” investments your mentioning. :wink:

I used up my full isa allowance last year and this financial year as I was left some when my mum died. I will save some money with it next year but my mortgage Is finished June 2017 and will hopefully be able to plough a lot more in after that.
It may not offer massive returns but hopefully enough for a nest egg for the future as I’m not Realy a gambler and don’t know enough about it all to trust my own judgement or just some coke head with red braces.

kr79:
I used up my full isa allowance last year and this financial year as I was left some when my mum died. I will save some money with it next year but my mortgage Is finished June 2017 and will hopefully be able to plough a lot more in after that.
It may not offer massive returns but hopefully enough for a nest egg for the future as I’m not Realy a gambler and don’t know enough about it all to trust my own judgement or just some coke head with red braces.

Ruturns on ISA’s are crippled by the same low interest rate regime that affects any other type of cash deposit account.The difference being that ISA’s don’t have the same guarantees regards protection of the original deposit.

moneysavingexpert.com/savings/best-cash-isa

nsandi.com/income-bonds

Ironically you are about to go from benefitting as a borrower from the artificially subsidised mortgage payment interest regime to the liability of paying for it as a saver. :bulb:

I agree the returns on cash isa or savings accounts are negligible unless you have a huge amount of capital to invest but I’ve gone with a stocks and shares plan which funnily enough with the company big truck posted the link to. It’s a long term thing 10-15 years minimum so hopefully any blips in the market should iron themselves out over the period.
I could of cleared the mortgage with the money I’ve put in the isa but as I’m in a fixed deal the redemption penalty was prohibitive.
One alternative was to look at buying another property as a buy to let but between not knowing if the property bubble will burst or will intrest rates rise by a lot added to the agravation of Tennants etc.
We are happy enough where we live now so the security of been mortgage free in a couple of years was the main priority.

Cash isas will be as much use as a chocolate fire guard from next April. Next April the first 1000pound interst you earn in any current/savings account will be interst free. So you may aswell use a high rate current account.

Seen someone say put 20k into a Santander current account and 2k into a tsb account and you’ll get 700 a year.

In Canada we get a ten grand a year tax free saving allowance. With my wife’s allowance we can double that. I plan to invest in other markets than the S&P, the European and Asian funds have had the same 10%ish gains over the past few years, so I’m going to be looking at those too. I’m thinking about a three way split between them all with my monthly investment.

I’m also looking at property as that has always been a very good long term investment and if you rent it out your investment is paid for by the renter, which is rather nice.

Property is an option no doubt but is a complete “ballicks” if you happen to want some ready dough quickly.
I “upgraded” a couple of things this year to the tune of £26k and it was my ISA that paid for them and when deals done the money was twice in the current account in little under a week!!!
You’ll have CGT liabilities with property too although not sure how a buy to let works in Canada.

Big Truck:

Winseer:
Tax efficiency is all very well, but if you don’t make any profits for the risks you take - it’s irrelevant.

The tax free capital gains allowances for each person are about the same as the income tax free allowance over the years past.
This means a joint account for trading purposes won’t be touched for tax until it’s made a profit of around £25,000 in each and any one year.

Most people don’t ever use up their allowance here for CGT. Surely an investment that makes use of this allowance consistently would be the most tax efficient of all, especially based on how reasonable expectations are of being able to make upto that amount per year with a trading account…

Getting a 1-2% return on an ISA absolutely tax free then pales into insignificance as it should before that. ISAs will perform the tax efficiency thing a lot better once interest rates have returned to the levels they were a generation ago. Trouble is, that’s actually not priced in the interest rate market to happen for over a DECADE yet.

Is a lot of practically nothing better than nearly all of a lot? - Decisions on this kind of argument tend to go in a similar manner to whom one votes for. Those keen to partake often do not have enough moey or learning to make it work, whilst those WITH enough will baulk away from it, chicken like, but jump at the chance of investing in some “fine wines” or some other scam that then fleeces them out of every penny of their investment, compared to the possibility of only losing part of their investment with something like the FTSE where you only get Zero back if every company in the FTSE index goes bankrupt… People need to get a grip on “realistic risk expectations” with their investments, whatever they are. If you don’t know - find out. If you have suspicions, make checks. :bulb:

Some ISA % growth figures for you:
hl.co.uk/funds/wealth-150
(Click on “annual percentage growth” just a wee bit more
than the 1/2% returns your quoting :exclamation: :exclamation: :grimacing: )

Count them up over 5yrs and tell me that not “tax efficient” :exclamation: :exclamation:

There are “working class” savy investors out there who’ve been in the PEP/ISA investment game since Nigel Lawson introduced same in 1986, some are sitting with portfolios worth near £2million now from approx £180/200k invested (drip fed over past 30yrs) and ALL completely free from CGT :exclamation: :exclamation: :sunglasses:

Plus nowhere near the risks assoc with the more “exotic” investments your mentioning. :wink:

ISAs don’t take into account the more subtle “losing aspects” of investing, - which makes a person like me “not like them”. Obviously, it’s only an opinion on my part - what’s right for me, a person prepared to take calculated risks - and someone who wants no perceived risks at all - are different things.

Put it another way, the “portfolio worth £2m” doesn’t exist as “£2m in cash” until you flog it, and convert it into the actual cash. Paper values mean nothing. It’s hardly ever the case that the price you finally get for liquidating something matches or exceeds the ramped-up paper valuations. When a rate of return is low, few people consider the damage that years of inflation does to it. Admittedly, ISAs have been performing well in a low-inflation environment - but their value over and above inflation is held back by the continuing low rates of interest that have been fuelling that low inflation.

There are a lot of people in this country right now who’ve been paying into one of the “defined contributions” pension schemes that are up for some serious dissapointment because they don’t understand the nature of long term erosion of capital by not just inflation, but over-the-top management charges as well.
An investment being “free of CGT” isn’t as good as an investment free of ALL taxes" either. As I said earlier in this thread - Most people don’t use their CGT allowances for each year per husband & wife as it is. It’s not giving people a lot to suddenly allow people to “roll up those ununsed CGT allowances for the longer term using an ISA as the investment vehicle to do it”.
Those better heeled investors that have already used up their CGT allowances long ago - I don’t think they find ISAs suitable for them at all. Too many limitations and restrictions.
Again, this is just my opinion of such things of course.

There’s nothing exotic about an investment that tracks the FTSE point for point. There are many funds that allow you access to either the entire FTSE, certain sectors of it, or even “only green companies” and the like within it. The simplest investment of all is one that gains you when the market rises and loses you when it falls. It’s the type of investment that “gains a little” when the market rises, and “breaks even” when it falls - that I’d consider to be a fancy exotic investment on the FTSE… :neutral_face:

commonrail:
2 questions winseer.

Have you made any money from investing?
Do you like a flutter?

Essay time… :smiley: :smiling_imp: :unamused:

I have a lot of experience in the middle-range investments, but I steer clear of the “unlimited liability” ones.
This means that I don’t touch things like “insurance underwriting” or “option granting” or even chasing trends in the commodities markets.

The kind of investment I will go for started with the privatization share issues of the 1980’s. Some of the issues I didn’t get any of, as I lost out in the ballot when they were oversubscribed.
I didn’t touch BP because the float @ 330p was reducing the leverage to a point that I didn’t think I’d make much out of it.

Part-paid issues like BT, BA, British Steel, etc. were a goldmine on the other hand, as paying 50p for something part-paid, and seeing it open by almost that amount higher on day one of trading - meant doubling my money for only a 20-30% move in the actual fully-paid stock. Investments that cost two digits that then move two digits in a day’s trading - are exciting!

I didn’t touch Eurotunnel, because I didn’t like the idea of buying shares in something that was YEARS from turning any possible profit. I was wrong in that the shares went from 350p to over a tenner - but they did at least fall back to ease my emplonkeredness. I missed out, but a missed opportunity costs nothing.

The privatization issues introduced me to the concept of “how lucrative it is to have a part-paid investment, providing the ■■■■ thing goes your way of course”.

I had a close escape with shares in companies like British & Commonwealth and TVS -which I sold days before they collapsed in price. This taught me NEVER to just buy something and not keep at least a casual eye on it… I flogged shares that were getting bad press, and it was still possible for me to get out at a profit - so I made that happen at the earliest opportunity. “Never Let A Profit Turn Into A Loss”…

In 1989 I started trading derivatives. In those days, Traded Options on FTSE stocks were a lot more liquid than they are now, and you could effectively “rent” some shares buy purchasing call options, and “Insure” shares by purchasing put options. This allowed the kind of profits possible on privatization issues to be made on the long-quoted shares already out there.
Eg. instead of buying British Gas shares @ 200p and dumping them for 250p three months later, would buy 3 month-out 220p call options for 10p, and flog them for 30p when the share price hit the original 250p target. Options are worth at expiry the amount they exceed the strike price by, thus in this example 250p is 30p above 220p, so you have a good idea what you are going to get, which is even better if you exceed your target.

Options also have the advantage that if you bought say, 220 call options on PollyPeck with the shares currently at 200p, and the shares then go bust (as they did) - then you lose your 10p you paid for the option (per option) instead of the 200p you’d be losing (per share) if you’d bought the shares outright.

Options taught me that you can gear up your investment into a short-term punt on the market. The risk of losing money is higher, but the amount you can lose is limited at the outset to a known level.

Note that the share trader in this 200p to 250p example made a profit of 25% less commissions. The option trader made 200% less commissions. This struck me as a pretty good payoff - providing I got it right of course. Any fall in the share price would take the 10p options to be worth zero pretty damned quick, - but you still had until the expiry day for them to make some kind of comeback, which did occur in firms like Asda, Barclays, & Tescos for example.

Because you are buying options on shares for 1,2,3,6,9 months out (paying an interest rate premium on the price for the further-out contracts) you are effectively “renting the shares for a part-payment” giving you the lucre of the privatization issues at a fraction of the price. Commissions are based upon what you pay in rather than what you profit out. Turning £2000 into £20,000 has the same commission as turning £2000 into £3000 essentially.

Futures were something else I initially started in 1989, but didn’t fare so well on at first. My timing always seemed to be lousy, and I’d be buying just before a big fall, and would come a cropper.
I notice that this was coming about too often for comfort - because I was chasing trends all the time, rather than adopting the “contrarian” style trading practices that I used from Year 2000 onwards.
Yes, I came such a cropper in 1989 that I didnt trade again in futures throughout the entire 1990’s :blush:

Chasing a trend: The market goes up 3 days on the spin. I’d buy, then the market falls back. I’m chasing the trend. I’m losing nearly all the time. Markets that rise 4,5,6+ days on the spin are quite rare even now… I stopped using this method of trading after the face slap I got in 1989.

Contrarian Trading: The market has already risen 6 days on the spin, and is now “Overbought” in technical terms. I get short the market by selling contracts I don’t own, and when the price falls back this time - it’s now in my favour for it to do so. If the right “set-up” doesn’t arise, then I am not in the market at all, just having my bankroll sitting on a broker’s account getting barely any interest. (Broker client accounts tend to pay slightly under the Bank of England rate which currently means zero:unamused: It was paying a bit more than that back in 2000 though!)

The setups are such that much time is spent looking at screens, and little time spent actually doing trades - just watching for the right setup to pull the trigger on one.
Even if every trade turns a profit (my best winning streak was 36 trades on the trot turning a profit in 2005) it might be over a year between the first trade on that list, and the last one - because of the sheer amount of time “doing nothing but looking at a screen”… I was working at RM at the time, so I stuck to trading those things I could follow at work such as the Sterling currency contract & the Dow Jones which was being quoted on the radio news at regular intervals. There were a few occasions where I heard the quote and thought "What the F— is it doing up there? - I’ve got to get short this!" which meant a phone call from work to the wife at home, who could stick the trade into the PC… I’d come home from work (late shift at that time) and it would often be a case of something like “Dow Jones sold @ 10850 up 300 on the day, come home to find the dow jones closed up only 100, and I’ve made 200 points @ $5 per point - a nice round $1000 in a few hours…”.
Yes, my missus played a large part in doing these particular trades with the Emini Dow Jones contracts… The commission is only $15 in and out as well, making it very cost effective. The profit goes towards the CGT allowace of both myself and my wife - having opened a joint account to merge both our allowances.

The most I ever made in a year was £15,000 - still under the combined CGT allowances we had at that time, and thus I never ever paid CGT.

I use as risk capital the sort of money others use to buy a new car with every now and again… Instead of buying that car, I’ll get an old banger instead, - and put the money I saved into something like a year’s worth of trades with the appropriate broker. I stopped trading in 2011 when I first went onto agency. I couldn’t know in advance what times I’d be working, and if I could not keep track of what I was doing, I’d probably come a cropper again - so I pulled the £16,000 I had on the account out, closed it, and done the house up. Quite a few bits done around the house (new carpets, new double glazing, etc) got paid for by amounts I occasionally took out of accounts like this.

One big problem that I never really solved though was “When the money was pouring in, I’d tend to draw it back to my bank account, and spend it all”. This meant that downswings on the trading account such as during the credit crunch when I got short the Euros bigtime - blew up in my face, 'cos I was completely wrong, and the Euro went up and up… I’d already drawn down more than I’d originally put on the account, and had only left about £8k (half of my profits) behind - which got wiped out by that Euro trade, and compounded further by a Yen trade that went ■■■■ up as well. I made a recovery of around half what I’d lost there on Coffee, Bonds, & Oil - but not enough to cover the Euro damage.

If you have drawn down to the home account, spent it all, and then had the trading account wiped out - guess what? - That’s me out of the game, on that occasion until 2010 when I did some more trading shortly after leaving RM with some VR money to play with.

It’s easy to make a few quid, but even easier to lose it all again. In that regard, I must be described as someone who likes to take a flutter. One MUST go into this sort of thing with eyes open - or one is going to be sorely disappointed.

Here’s the sort of screen I’d be keeping an eye on all day when trading… The actual trades are entered through software provided by the broker, not this board btw. It’s just there for information only, which is pretty good seeing as the data is live and free on the russian site.

The barchart site is there for charts, trendspotting, technical details, etc. Pretty good for research. Anyone out there good at math would find such information very useful in this game. :wink: