Political discussions...

It’s because Reform have them frightened as a threat to them, despite the way they just laugh them off as a joke or a protest vote.
Did Starmer not put out some kind of official in Parliament , a statement of concern warning potential voters about them… even though they say they consider them just a small party and a protest vote party…and no doubt true to form a …‘‘Far right’’ and/or ''A racist ’ one.:joy::joy:
No mention of the other who they see as ‘‘Also Rans’’ like the Lib Dems or the Green clowns.

Same situation with TR/YL the govt and the establishment certainly seem to give him a hell of a lot of their time, their concern and attention for someone they officially put down as a joke and another nonentity in their official line.:smiley:

top comment on face ache about it…
just one cornetto
give it to me
you have one house
Rayner has three :rofl:

Just been sent this from a lad I know in the Royal Marines, we had a bit of history when he was younger,.where I had to ‘‘explain a few things to him’’ (if you see what I mean) long before he joined up I hasten to add.:grinning_face:
He’s kinda respected me ever since for it which I like, and we often had a laugh when I’ve told him I wouldn’t be too keen (nor brave) to hold him by the throat nowadays :joy:…anyway I digress.

The ‘Ant Middleton running for London mayor’ thing.
Apparentlly there’s a lot of enthusiasm for it in the forces, and with ex servicemen.

This is a run down from a military based you tube source, highlighting it.
It’s including views from both sides, including all the ‘‘litmus test’’ style criticisms :joy:
It mentions him living in Dubai for whatever reason and needless to say all the obligatory Lefty b/s type accusations of ‘‘Racist Ant Middleton’’ and the like :roll_eyes: :joy:

I have also been told (NOT by my Marine mate btw) there is a lot of unrest about Starmer in much of the military circles,.which aint good from any angle.

Ayhoo have a listen if you are interested and can be arsed, if none of the above…dont !
Simples.

The GLA is the problem.The solution isn’t about who runs it they will always be governed by the urban based Socialist leaning vote.It’s about who is dedicated to scrapping it and thereby taking out the influence and power of that vote.

With the present counting method, of seats v votes, the Socialist scumbags don’t need to give a zb about votes let alone the Reform vote.This is the new DDR and Yugoslavia combined.

It ain’t lefty it’s Socialist.I’m a lefty Nationalist.Workplace solidarity to look after our own workers and pensioners.

Well unlike some on here I don’t pretend to be an authoriative expert on politics…I just blag a lot of it in fact.:worried:
But I always understood it that being a ‘Lefty’ and a Socialist went hand in hand.

OK, this is a thread about politics, and not about pinning your colours on any one,

A new kid on the block? Green party, seen by many as lentil eating, newt saving, hippies. But bearing in mind they have as many MPs in government as Reform. and in local councils they have 850 compared to reforms 880.

But the new leader seems to be very savvy with speeches.

Along with Corbyn/Sultana and also Advance, who at present have no MPs or councillors

This could maybe dent both Reform, Tories and Labour results

the green party had a lot less votes than reform in the general election. Same as the lib dems.

the other issue is that reform was founded in 2018 and the greens were founded in 1990 so in other words reform have done what took the greens 35 years to do in 7

it is just like the greater london authority is london

More word soup and verbal diarrhoea from this embarrasment of a govt.
‘‘Last govt’’ this, ‘‘we inherited’’ that…
What about the 50000 + and constantly counting who invaded us after the last govt whilst this lot are in power ?
Are they actually believing the b/s spouted by their useful idiots… ‘‘Refugees welcome here’’ ?

‘‘We need fewer people in the asylum system’’ she says…no sh eh?
An asylum system that is being abused in epidemic proportions…so why not excercise your own laws then you stupid incompetent cow.

more leftie maths…“we have knocked a billion a year off the bill” have you really darling well lets look at that shall we…
1 billion a year is 2,739,726 a day it costs 45k per asylum seeker per year which is 123.28 a day so to achieve that they would of had to send home 22,223 asylum seekers. Labour CLAIM to of sent home 34,000 since they have been in power i cant find the yearly figure (july to july) 34,000-22,223 = 11,777 more than they needed to… well done however, 50,000 again i cant be bothered to add them all up have crossed since labour came to power so they have added a further 38,223 illegals to the bill.

as to the town house

they are in a hamlet of less than 500 people so there will be very few local amenities so will need transport. excluding all that the are three bed homes so 3 illegals in each totals 12. 1,200 a month x 12 = 14400 a year x 4 properties = 57,600 adding on the weekly allowance we are told is all they get. 49.18x52x12 = 30,688 gives a total of 88,288.32. so the labour government have managed to save 0.003% of the annual bill by stealing 4 homes wow.

one of the main reasons they come over from a safe country like France is that they have already been refused aslylum by France. or spain or italy or wherever. theyre economic migrants with a sob story

As europe has a single system for asylum, it means if you get refused asylum in France you can’t go to Germany or Sweden or Belguim and try again. the only choice is either go back home or head for the nearest non-eu country where you CAN try to get asylum again, because they have a completely different system

but we dont really know because France doesnt share that information with us anymore. they share it with every other country in europe just not us, for…….some reason

Ahhhh right. :thinking:
And here’s me thinking it’s because of the lure of the second to none 4 star all inclusive lifestyle incentive, …(as oppsed to moving from their own sh hole state, to another sh hole field in France ) …what was I thinking eh?

So ‘‘poor destitute refugees’’ after all then, and not freeloading chancers at all…ok got it.

Does that include btw the ones who have been proven to have already lived in different parts of Europe for a couple of years already, or the ones who have admitted on camera they only csme here for the (real) reasons I pointed out?

(Ignore the question marks btw, I can predict the official narrative based reply already :+1:)

Stop press.
Starmer is about to sort out the illegal immigrant problem.
He’s reviving the old Blair chestnut, introducing us with Stazi esque ID cards for Brits…like those old war films where a Gestapo agent stares at a suspect saying. ‘‘Papers’’.:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:
So how does that work exactly?..apart from Starmer finding an excuse to do something unpopular by using positive spin.

Is his next problem solving excercise going to be re.join the EU to solve homlessness or something equally as unconnected.
Do these clowns not realise that those with a brain can see right through them ffs?

of course they always shared any information we requested when we were part of the eu like business info to claim back the billions in unpaid toils at dartford etc of wait all that was written off because we couldnt trace them.

when are you daft lefties going to learn that every single thing you cry about is either wrong or they didnt do in the first place.

James murry has been promoted from exchequer secretary to the treasury to chief secretary to the treasury aka deputy chancellor.

he has obviously done well in the last year or so to get this promotion here are some of the highlights you might of missed because they wernt reported in the media every 2 nano seconds for 6 months .

architect of the family farm tax,
Failed five times to say if landlords are ‘working people’ (October 25, 2024)
Refused seven times to rule out a recession under Rachel Reeves (January 26, 2025)
Floundered when asked about the crackdown on quangos (March 12, 2025)
Couldn’t rule out a wealth tax (March 28, 2025) (he supports it and wont admit it)
Couldn’t rule out extending the tax thresholds freeze (July 18, 2025)

yep its completely clear why he got the job.

The GLA is a Tory creation which was then predictably taken advantage of by city urban centric Socialism.

Basically it’s just expansionist City government the whole intention of which being urban expansion politically and literally in which Green Belt means land bank.

Ironically the deliberate conflating and confusion of workplace collective bargaining and solidarity, with the ideology of Collective no borders Soviet style government, is how Socialism hijacked and created its self styled monopoly of working class interests.

I think I’m acting far too god dam ‘‘grown up’’ these days.:joy:
Sat at home today, no Sky Football news today for this lad, no online games, no ‘Hamster’ related dodgy sites…
I found myself watching PM question time. :flushed_face:
:joy:

Amazingly Starmer keeps referring to Reform and mentioning Farage, obviously not in a complimentary way. #litmustest :joy:
He looked particularly uneasy when the ‘‘Father Ted guy arrest for hurty words’’ fiasco was brought up, especially after badmouthing Farage who is taking great pleasure in keeping the Yanks uo to date with our dwindling free speech situation…Farage is ‘‘unpatriotic’’ apparentlly, I think he needs to borrow Franglais ironymeter.:joy:
I thought the Tories were his main opposition and biggest threat…funny how much of his attention is paid to a small party.

how much of it did they spend spouting out the usual sound bites of broken asylum system and 20 billion deficit. and its all the torys fault if they cant shoe horn the usual ones in