What an absolute (usual) Labour half arsed crock of sh.
Ok they send 26 or whatever back.
But then another 26 ‘‘processed ‘ are sent back over here….
Why?….if those 26 have been processed why can they not stay in France?
Why do only they think that we have an automatic responsibility to take them?
Are they going to be provided with (free) homes?
Are they going to be continued to be provided with….well.every ‘kin thing going?
Are these people in govt so out of touch with the majority of people, brainwashed with socialism, just plain bloody stupid ….or all 3?
The problem is we are a small island, our infrastructure our facilities our services are stretched to the limit……that and the FACT that these people are prioritised and better looked after than our own native people (@Franglais before you jump in….whatever colour of their skin ) is the problem here.
There is no place for economic migrants, scroungers and spongers in our country.
We already have enough of the latter 2 in the indigenous population.
yep… and the thing is who decides who to send back to france…. france… who decides who to bring here…. france.
its nothing to do with stopping the illegals its to do with cutting the figgures. they think that if instead of an average of 1000 a week coming here its only 950 on the boats and 50 “legaly” we wont complain
do you really think the ones that france takes back wont be on next months quota
just plain bloody stupid. i saw a churchill quote today “an appeaser is one who feeds the crocodiles hopping they will eat him last”
Processed by UK authorities, in France, and known to have some legitimate claim to enter the UK.
Who says that? We do not have an automatic responsibility to take everyone. Neither does France, nor Germany, nor anywhere else.
Asylum seekers are given free housing whilst their claims are being assessed. It is illegal for them to work at this time. After they are assessed they are either liable for deportation, or can then get a job and earn their keep like everyone else.
Whilst being assessed the Gov give accommodation and food. They do not give “every ‘kin thing going”. Some charities give extra.
Yes. Our infrastructure has been hammered by many years of underinvestment. Someone arriving tomorrow is not the one responsible for that.
Yep. And I notice that the Police have arrested another one today. A 42 year old bankrupt beggar was detained after getting a plane earlier.
so none will be coming… or is that processed by france and we are told they have a legitimate claim
deliveroo… security…cleaners….
so they are entitled to social housing and housing benefit. ie free (to them) i thought you said there was a housing shortage? or have you changed your mind on that one since starmer has because british people are getting thrown out of their homes so they can be given to illegals.
driving lessons provided by the council. trips out provided by the council. phones and laptops given to them at manston etc etc etc etc etc. so yeah every fing thing.
If any asylum seekers are working illegally that is…. illegal…!
Both the worker and employer are breaking (probably multiple) laws.
They get to queue up with everyone else on the list.
Yes.
If a council is doing that then the rate payers have the chance to vote them out.
But a fact (if really a fact) shoud be backed up by some evidence. On multple occasions I have given link showing what the gov does in fact provide. I do not think that numerous Karen-offa-facebook allegations have the same weight.
really…. so that illegal that moved in down the street from you was next on the list huh…. ok
so your quite ok giving the supposed shortage to people that have no right to be here that have contributed nothing
we did remember may 1st you and others were on suicide watch. of course if you deny that was/is happening then clearly there is fraud going on and they are falsifying the books
and multiple times it has been proven leftie drivel. with copious amounts of evidence to prove it but you either ignore the thread and disappear for a few days post other drivel so it gets knocked up the thread and you can claim you never saw it or dismiss it out of hand because you disagree
So is their method of entry in the first place….no further questions
So the argument should immediately stop there, when any rights are disqualified at that point of ILLEGAL entry (seeing as you like capitals)
Then send them back to France (after ditching the meddling ECHR obvs) and all further arguments and debates like this one would not even come into play.
Job done.
Try and get your tragically deluded head around that one !
you know sunaks immigration bill said that anyone who enters the country illegally is automatically bared from asylum (im paraphrasing). The only thing starmer did the first day was get rid of that clause
if you really want to send a message though instead of giving france over a billion for deck chairs and baguettes get a couple of frigates in the english channel and just sail round them a few times physics and the current will sort the issue in very short order