Political discussions...

Selective memory?
I can find records of Starmer castigating far right rioters. I cannot find him castigating every protestor.
Or is that you accusing him of saying something he did not in fact say?
Is that you taking offence at what your imagination has invented?

Maybe it is sensitive wee laddies and lassies feeling all upset because of “hurty words” that exist only inside their own heads?

I’ll tell you what: you stop mentioning how much of a pathetic wee weakling I am, and I will stop replying to those posts.

Maybe try talking about politics?

Now now franglais, Starmer quite clearly blamed far right thugs. A one size fits all narrative, not thugs, far right thugs.

I’ll tell you what, you stop presenting yourself as one, being a hypocrite, and implying I am the same as you in that respect …and I will.
:roll_eyes:

No, many of the legitimate protestors, the like who had never been in trouble before, but who were heart sick of your…‘‘irregular immigrants in hostels’’(as the majority of people are in this country) were all batched together with the troublemakers as one,.. in his warped lefty mind, and he jailed them all.
Including one working class grand dad who died in jail.
Note…before you ask, no I aint got any names,.addresses dates of birth .:roll_eyes:

Just the other day in the local press, a far right thug / beauty therapist lol.

The people setting fires and assaulting Police etc?
Yes, I think “thug” is an apt description.

Thugs come in different forms, some are far right, some are far left, some are thugs for no “reason” at all.
In the case of the riots last year they certainly looked like far right ones to me.

“he jailed them all”

Not even a touch of exaggeration there?
Who were jailed? By Starmer ? No-one.
He is not a Judge. He cannot do that.

The courts, can do that, not politicians.
Of course you probably know that, but chose to spin events to make a political point. Or else are ignorant of the way the UK judiciary works. (Less well than migrants who sit tests to become UK citizens)

Peter Lynch age 61.
Is the “class” of the guy relevant? Is him being a grand-dad relevant?
He was imprisoned after pleading guilty to violent disorder.

And? Imprisoned for?
Peaceful protest?
OR
Throwing missiles at the Police, stealing mobile phone accessories, to fuel her crack cocaine addiction?

What is up next? “This man is jailed for speeding at 21mph in a 20mph zone!”
Never mind it was in a stolen car and he knocked a lolly-pop lady.

Never mind franglais, just ignore the “far right thug” narrative. No one is disputing she broke the law and no one is knocking the prison sentence.

Jolly good. So I wonder why you posted the link?

Keep wondering then.

Of course they did…:roll_eyes: it fits the oficial narative innit.

You may well be right, or maybe they had no political leanings whatsoever.
You would not know in your naive little world but there are those among us who would use any god dam excuse for a fight or causing trouble, I have came across this type of f/wit in my time many times.

Ok fair comment ‘‘them all’’ was an exaggeration.
As for Starmer the ex head honcho of the political system?
I did not think even YOU would be so naive not to recognise he had pull in the establishment’s ‘old boy network’'…but I suppose you are.

Yep that’s the official line so it must be true and not open to influence.
Hypocrisy interspersed with usual naivity I see.:joy:

Ftfy.

:joy::joy::joy:
What a prat…I think the bar is set purposely so that a chimp could pass that one.
These freeloading criminal scum are here to stay.

Honestly mate you are beyond reason and help, your naivity and level of brainwash is off the scale.:joy::joy:

I’m for it, but who the hell will follow him as PM?
Does Angela Rayner cut the mustard?

I’ll leave a thought with you…
Prime Minister Milliband.:flushed_face:

An example of what is happening all over here…and apparentlly Ireland.
Women in fear of groups of hostilevyoung foreign men whilst going about their daily lives.
I can vouch for this being wholly accurate, with my own family, and still these scum bags are allowed in, welcomed, and catered for to the extreme.

1 Like
1 Like

Life in the UK Test - Mock Exam #1 of 45 [Updated for 2025] not that easy


I kid you not…:flushed_face:
Franglais was right, and I take back the chimp thing.:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

Looks like I qualify for being deported.
Ah well I’ll just catch the next dinghy back from Calais.
I fancy a free 4 star accomodation all inclusive package ‘staycation’ this year, and I’ve got a couple of teeth needing looked at.:joy:

1 Like

well when boris left all the lefties wanted a ge so obviously if starmer goes they will want a ge this time. Then we will get someone sencible in..


I’ve swung this across from the Trump thread.
Ant Middleton wants to stop violence in London? Good.
He talks a good fight, but does he have a valid plan? I didn’t hear one there.
Like others he has a list of targets, no violence, everyone is nice to each other…
…Or else I will thump you and be really nasty…
Yeah, right.
And no costings for the extra personnel etc.

I really do not trust that a man imprisoned for assaulting two coppers (including one female) is a good figurehead for an anti-crime campaign. And someone who is banned from being a company director, because of owing the Gov over a million quid should not be in charge of London’s finances IMHO.

:joy::joy:
Obviously you wouldn’t would you?
That goes without saying,.and especially when the litmus test critetia kicks in.:grin:

You would prefer some pathetic woke liberal lefty wet wipe, with a penchant for diversity, who walks around with a rainbow badge and a Palestine flag shoved up his arse…the type of which are the absolute ruination of our country, but who fits your bill.
None of us would expect anything else.:roll_eyes:

Yeah well made up.
It certainly enhances your argument,.albeit being total dog sh.:joy:

Given the choice of Middleton or Khan…(or you for that matter) as a man who gets things done, or a back up, or in my corner, I know who I’d go for.