I don’t know why you keep knocking the Rwandah scheme (btw was it the ECHR that scuppered that one) .
The Rwandah scheme is a proven method of stopping these illegal freeloaders.
For some cases there is an open route.
For some cases there is no open route, and so irregular routes have to be used.
If the asylum application is granted then the irregular route is a legal one. If not granted then it is an illegal route.
For some there is no regular route of entry
.
I assume you are not being serious?
Do you believe the number of places in the Rwanda scheme was limited by the size of the transport being used?
If so I think that the capacity of multiple departures of cross channel ferries will be bigger than charter aircraft to Africa.
.
■■■■■■■ amazing!
Hey thanks man, you aint the first to tell me that I’m amazing.
What is also ‘amazing’ is that a similar scheme (pack up the trash to another country) works as proven method.
It’s worked ‘amazingly’ for France for a couple of years now…WE are THEIR Rwandah,.they send their’s 'over to us.
Clever bloke Starmer’s mate Macron…respect.
Again people wilfully miss the point of the Rwanda scheme. The mere threat of it drastically altered the landscape. Suddenly they were heading for Ireland en masse. It would have only taken one or two flights to actually take off before the threat became ultimately effective in stopping illegal immigration.
The Australian government has dramatically reduced illegal migrants attempting to get to Australia on boats by towing them out of their maritime territorial or back to where they came from.
The government kept it very quiet that they spent 6 million on a training facility that included purchasing out of use aircraft for security staff to practice getting people on the aircraft,that were supposed to go to Rwanda, the Rwandan government have no legal obligation to return the millions we gave them to build new hotels.
The staff were taught restraining methods.
When the Home Secretary visited the country to triumph on her achievements, did you notice how the film crews for the news only panned around to film the small area of construction for new accommodation and not pan out wide to let us see what was really going on, as a lot of money being spent on very little.
You’d be a brave person to attempt to row to Oz. How close is the nearest land?
Following on from the latest lefty default racist accusation.
I filled this in today.
And could not resist this.
2 Likes
Fixed that for you
Fixed it again
Not at all it was in reference to your absurd comment that they could only send 50 in 6 months. There was no limit…the only limitation was the number of planes that could take off in a day
It takes 3h20 to get to calais and back over 700 planes a day take off from heathrow you do the maths
Things that happen and/or ‘start off’ in London, usually have a habit of filtering down to our own local cities, some are already like London.
Here’s how things are now in Labour controlled London…where the mayor got a knighthood for running it.
A brave lass, but she has decided to keave because of the infestation of scum.
Here’s Nigel (my hero 
) Farage’s take on Macron’s visit and Sratmer’s epic kiss arse excercise in his effort yo get us back in the EU.
According to a senior reporter in a major French national newspaper the one in, one out new deal has not been made aware to the French public in relation to the recent meeting with the PM and the French president.
The French don’t have the problem of boats landing on their shores.
The authorities are not permitted to enter the sea even if it’s only up to one inch of seawater as they have been told by their government it may panic and scare the people trying to get on to boats.
We have to ask how that works out when the RNLI and the Border Force taxi service picks them up mid channel, the staff could easily say it’s too dangerous to get them out of the channel, the criminal gangs are purposely making sure the engine runs out of fuel mid channel so they have to be rescued or that could be down to strict laws in France for purchasing fuel in containers from fuel stations?
I have indeed witnessed the hostility and misogynistic attitude against English women from foreign nationals when on a night out in Bournemouth town centre at about 23.00, a group of young ladies clearly enjoying themselves on a hen night all dressed up in fancy dress, I saw two men that I could deduce to be Arabic by their Pashto or Dari dialect and accent,and to be guests of the hotel that I saw them coming out from that’s closed for the public, they were staring at them with evil eyes and one said to the group the following:
“ I will F…all of your mother’s ”, the group of ladies ignored the comments and walked past the two men.
There are numerous videos circulating of young women sat alone on buses then a lone male sits next to them when the bus is mostly empty with a plethora of empty seats to choose from, these creeps are everywhere.
They attempt a conversation that is sleazy and talk of intentions relating to sexual advances, the girl says leave me alone, not interested, but they persist.
I would not recommend a food delivery from this disgusting and vile premises.
All this little sh weasel is doing is setting the Lefty trap of getting her to mention the word ‘Moslem’ or ‘Pakistani’ in order to call her racist.
It’s amazing all the continued bile against Trump on here…a foreign politician, when we have our own grown weapions grade ■■■■ on our own doorstep.
Crime rates are fairly similar under Sir Sadiq Khan as they were under the previous mayor. Crimes are slightly higher but not by that much
here’s how per capita crime figures compare between Boris Johnson and Sadiq Khan’s terms as Mayor of London, using available data:
Population Context (Approximate)
| Year | Population |
|---|---|
| 2008 | ~7.6 million |
| 2016 | ~8.7 million |
| 2023–2024 | ~9.0 million |
Boris Johnson (2008–2016)
- Overall recorded crime fell from ~850,000 to ~740,000 per year.
- Per capita rate :
- 2008: ~111 crimes per 1,000 people(850,000 ÷ 7.6M)
- 2016: ~85 crimes per 1,000 people(740,000 ÷ 8.7M)
- Homicides dropped from 163 to 109:
- 2008: ~21.4 per million
- 2016: ~12.5 per million
Net change during Boris:
Crime rate dropped ~23%, homicides nearly halved per capita.
Sadiq Khan (2016–Present)
- Overall recorded crime returned to ~850,000–900,000 annually post-COVID.
- Per capita rate :
- 2023: ~94–100 crimes per 1,000 people(850,000–900,000 ÷ ~9M)
- Homicides :
- 2019 peak: 149 deaths → ~16.5 per million
- 2023: ~109–120 → ~12–13 per million
Net change during Khan:
Crime rate per capita increased slightly, homicide rate rose then returned to ~2016 levels.
Summary (Per Capita Figures)
| Metric | Johnson (2008–16) | Khan (2016–24) |
|---|---|---|
| Total crime rate | ↓ from 111 → 85 /k | ↑ from 85 → ~95–100 /k |
| Homicide rate | ↓ from 21 → 12 /M | ↑ to 16 (2019), then ↓ ~12–13 /M |
Conclusion :
Yes — per capita, crime decreased under Boris Johnson and increased under Sadiq Khan, though some recent declines (especially in youth homicides) have brought numbers closer to earlier levels. Khan’s era saw a spike in violence around 2018–2019 that has since moderated, but overall crime rates are still higher than in Johnson’s final years.
Don’t assume that disliking (to put it mildly) Trump and its ego trip equals any kind of support at all for that Khan thing with its desire to expand its London empire. Nor the same for disgusting liar Starmer who at Referendum time was one pontificating that it was a once in a lifetime decision and would abide by the decision, yet when it went the “wrong” way was on about a second referendum … to get the “right” decision.