Political discussions...

Speaking of Starmers clowns…:roll_eyes:
How cringeworthy, demeaning,.shamefull and pathetic is this?

Pandering and kow towing to the Moslem vote,.their main target audience now they have alienated their raison d’etre …the British Working class.. (or ‘Far Right’ as they are now known.)

So you are saying the child the child is, or can be, dual nationality, both French and “white English”? Both things.

Yes, I agree.

Goodwin is saying, and the Telegraph is repeating, that the child is not “white English”.
Not “white English” so therefore not dual nationality.

Is that clearer?

To call it out for what it was. To show what a stupid definition of nationality that Goodwin and the Telegraph are using.

You are a credit to your political masters.
I’m sure both Goodwin and The Telegraph are hanging on your every word, and watching this thread with trepidation and bated breath.
Keep up the good work.

:joy::joy::joy:

I agree with you.

The Telegraph, Goodwin, GBN, etc do not care a toss about me.
Nor do they care about almost everyone else in the UK.

It really is simpler to use one word instead of four.
Why not try giving up the drama queen phraseology and say talking ?

■■■■ me is he still banging on about bloody goodwin and the telegraph… again it had nothing to do with the bloody story.

mind you it makes you think that there is something to all this rather than another quiet word that anyone who isnt looking for it doesn’t see. Its like a child that copies a parent and swears if ignored it wont do it will soon get bored. But make a fuss it will do it all the more. Just a shame the cant keep quiet dont do just that.

Oh dear…she really does not like her heroes being criticised or shown up to what they REALLY are does she? :joy:
And ooh look more big man talk bravado.:joy:
Dry yer eyes.

How ironic from somebody who spent months constantly criticising the last govt to the point of embarrasment and obsession …too many words, or nouns for you there btw?,.(whoops a double whammy there in fact)

Because she is pandering and kow towing …duh.

Why not try ####ing off.
:joy:

diane abbott gets confused by a gate :rofl:

1 Like

Of course he is, Goodwin is a staunch critique of his beloved Left Wing fraternity, and I’m assumimg The Telegraph is Tory orientated.
(Pardon my English btw,.apparentlly I use too many words in a sentence.:grinning_face:.)
So he’ll get as much milage out of it as possible, because of the ambiguity, given that Goodwin speaks the truth on the whole about the derisory Starmer crew.
They don’t like it up em.:joy:

David Lammy in drag, you never see them in the same room.
They share the same intellect.:joy:

You would to have to trawl through the various immigration / nationality acts to determine the nationality of the child. It is a rather complicated issue depending on the parents status at the time of birth.
The child may be British but could be a British Subject not a full Brit Cit. there are numerous classifications that can be put into a British passport.

Aye but I think he’s focusing more on the ‘‘White’’ part of it.
His lot jump on a possible accusation of ‘‘racist’’ like a tramp on a discarded kebab.

:rofl: good one :+1:

looks like ole starmer is telling lies again. He promised the people that were displaced from the chagos islands. Seems like they have had to take him to the human rights courts so they can return home.

Dont tell me they dont want to return home otherwise why would they be taking him to court.

Thing is this is just labours pattern to screw over the british people. right from 1947 when attlee was pm and gave away india. to 1968 when willson was pm and gave away mauritius to tony blare in 1999 and tried to give scotland and wales away. Even brown sold off government public buildings. In Fact the only labour pm that hasnt given anything away was callaghan however he tried to give away the faulklands but the winter of discontent put a stop to that.

I agree. Awful decision.
The Indians drive on the right (sometimes) so that proves they are really part of Engerland.
What next? Give away Kent?

nope he has surpassed himself and all the others and given the armed forces over to europe

Wow!..What a brilliant idea :smiling_face_with_sunglasses:
…Frangalis actually DOES think he is an Alistair Campbell political advisor type.:grin:
Turns out…he SHOULD be.:grin:

So…
Give Kent away to the invading illegals (whoops irrgulars) already here…then when the others land there they are no longer illegal.

Empty the hotels…(whoops ‘hostels’) kick out the locals over the new border, and give them their homes and bish bosh Hamid’s yer uncle job done.

Starmer has solved the illegal problem and housed them in one swoop,.and the new Moslem state of Starmersthan exists…
:joy:

Hey! …He could sign another fantastic trade deal with them!

Open free borders so all the existing Doctors and Solicitors…(not forgetting the scientists) could jack their dodgy jobs in at the kebab shops and car washes, add to the '‘diversity programme’ here, and enhance our society.
No more asylum waiting lists…
Absolutely Brilliant

Starmer needs this put to him.

I never thought I’d say this…but Franglais IS a genius after all.
:joy:

i know that was tongue in cheek least i hope it was… but i think that is semi their idea… they want them close to london to service their hospitality jobs. Hence why or otherwise all these supposedly desperately needed new homes are being built in the counties surrounding london as they dont acctualy want them in london.

It is a good job that sticks have two ends.
If they had only one, there would not a wrong end for @robroy to grab hold of.

jesus even after i said it was tongue in cheek …

trousers go on after your underpants.

Obviously, that is why all the unbuilt on vacant plots in London, all those vast areas of empty land, at almost free cost are not being used to build on.