Really?
It is just the same deal that Johnson had. Which he arranged to end 2026.
–..–..–..
How could any PM not re-negotiate it?
Just sit at the side and do nowt? Ridiculous.
Ah,! So you found out about the issues before taking a stance?
You listened to the arguments and made an informed post?
You decided that knowing little about the subject, you would stay quiet on this?
Nope.
In spite of knowing next to nowt you slag off Starmer. You parrot anyone who slags him off.
Fair enough.
But at least we can now dismiss that slagging off as being ignorant of the facts, and from a mind that is not even trying to learn any of the facts.
no need to explain further it is quite clear its bad for the uk fishermen. A reduction in our quota, a more severe control on fishing their waters and back to the free for all for everyone else is clear to anyone with a brain cell is bad for the uk and bad for our oceans.
As far as fish price rising and all the other cobblers starmer and the brain dead are coming out with it wont. The reason the fish export figures fell after brexit is because the pre brexit figgures included the fish caught by spain and france etc or at least what they declared they caught. The true figures have gone up ie fish caught by british fishing boats and exported to the eu market.
There is another concern. the gov webpage that catalogues the migrant crossings has now had its wording changed now illegals that get here by fishing boat wont be counted. So all those illegals that were counted before 2018 and the brexit deal wont be counted now.
If anyone is interested in the PM replying to Badenoch, here is just a couple of minutes of it. https://youtu.be/GXHxg77-sk8?si=XLYqgHWt7PLxdY1H
If you want to see him respond to Farage’s questions you are out of luck. Farage was not allowed to ask any questions today.
What?
UK exports fell because they were caught by other countries? Or someone is making false declarations? Do you know about how catch is monitored on boats?
Who is lying, and where do you get the true figures from? What are you talking about?
thats what the woke lefty brigade do when they cant argue with reason they pretend they cant understand. Because its so bleeding obvious to anyone that speaks a modicum of english you doubt yourself. The usual one is the grammar and spelling police although that one doesnt seem to happen on here too much,
Count yourself lucky you havent had to sit through a quaker agm they will spend 2 hours arguing about where a comma goes.
99% of the time yes! But sometimes when you present logic to him that no biased link or source can refute he goes silent or pretends he hasn’t seen it. I’m still waiting for the reasoning why the illegals arrive with no documents/ID when according to him they have family and friends already here.
In fairness to Franglais, one thing he is not is thick. Naïve, gullible & brainwashed … definitely yes! Because he believes everything he’s fed by those in power and above, whether that be directly or what’s carefully orchestrated and choregraphed through various MSM sources and outputs.
You mean to tell me that ‘Fishermen’ working in the job day in day out know more about this deal and whether it’s good or bad for them than some know it all lorry driver on a forum?
I believe it’s the young men that attempt to come over first, then once they have made it , they later bring in their family.
It’s the law in Europe to have ID on the person at at all times, it’s thrown away if they get a ride over the channel to avoid being returned to their homeland by the UK authorities.
At the moment the government can’t do any returns to Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria.
By having ID when arriving here may link them to the criminal gangs that they pay £6000 for the cross channel trip.
In the recent case of the Egyptian people smuggler who got 25 years prison, he told his cohorts to tell the migrants to throw away their phones, if they were caught with a phone, his instructions were that they should be killed.
Of course they know about the deal. So l listen to what they say.
And what do they say?
That they are disappointed.
They say that they wanted better.
No ■■■■ Sherlock!
So what do they say has happened that is so bad?
Have they lost quota? No.
Have they lost grounds? No.
Have the EU gained quota? No.
Have the EU gained grounds? No.
The argument is that the deal is going to be the same for 12 yrs.
And why is that a problem for them?
Because they seem to assume that all future talks and agreements will benefit them.
Why would future talks make the fishers better off? Why would future deals not be worse?
Aren’t they guilty of magical thinking? “We get talks therefore we are better off”
Don’t they realise that the other side of the table are also saying “Good! More talks we will get a better deal”…?
Are they still looking for the Brexit Unicorn?
Just around the next corner.
We just need one more round of talks.
If only someone else did the talks.
Yes. The UK caught and exported a greater tonnage of fish.
And because the Brexit we have means more expense in documents, and checks, and delays in transport, it cost more to send them to market, and they arrived later, with less shelf life and so were worth less.
More fish moved for less income, and greater costs.
A Pyrrhic victory.
More fish…Less profits.
short answer is the majority dont the very small minority that have some tenuous link makes for a good lefty excuse for all of them.
long answer. If in the very slim chance they do have relatives here. The relatives are either illegals themselves or the relation is an undesirable and cant apply through the proper channels. Circa 10,000 ukrainians came here illegally despite over 250,000 coming here legally. So why couldnt the rest come here legally? Because they didnt qualify for some reason.
I personaly have met several migrants (not illegals) that came here because their cousin or uncle or 2 times removed brother in laws wifes god father was here. Yet with 2 seconds of questioning it all falls apart. Same with one of my mothers carers said she had studied mechanical and civil engineering at hammersmith to a masters level. when probed she said the university was opposite the bbc studios ie white city campus yet hadnt heard of imperial. She also couldnt tell me what size the length of the hypotenuse of a triangle would be if one side was 3 and the other was 4.
who gives a furry rats backside where they come from and who can be sent where they have all crossed at least 6 safe countries. Its not our problem where they originally came from. Just stop excepting them from france.
