You see me defending Islam because you are attacking Islam.
I am correcting the misapprehensions (there is diplomacy for you) you and others have about Islam and about the murderer and about the religion. Just as I correct the misapprehensions you and others have about the EU and Brexit.
If you were not spreading ■■■■■■■■ I would be here telling you, you are talking ■■■■■■■■.
I do not see myself as a defender of Islam as a religion.
I do see you and others spreading hate and misinformation, in this case against Islam.
I do not think that is the way Great Britain should be and I call out your lies.
If you were telling the same lies about Shinto, or Hinduism ,or Christianity, I would defend them against your views in the same way. I am standing up for any one religion. I am calling out ■■■■■■■■.
Yep. That is my personal suspicion.
Not mentally ill, acting in full knowledge of his own actions, and the consequences.
Converted by whom? When?
There is about as much evidence to support that as there is to support him being a Christian fundamentalist or a Nazi or anything else.
What facts are missing then?
On one hand we can never be sure that we know 100% of every little detail, but what did the Police miss?
In the real world we do not know every thing about someone, and certainly not what goes on their mind.
That we do not have a nice easy to understand motive for the murders is not comfortable.
But to look for scapegoats (as you look at Islam) to explain away a difficult situation is plain wrong.
That is true.
But I would have a bet that if he had, it would have been all over the media in half a second.
If he had not visited a mosque where and when would he have been radicalised? The Police went through all his online stuff and found zip that I can see.