I see our resident apologist has declined to reply to this.
And paragraph 2 here, about why he thinks it’s acceptable that we should be housing these illegals migrants in anything other than a tent at Dover (like they do in France)
The guy is a joke mate. Desperate to either defend or offer some sort of implausible narrative, simply because that opinion will differ from certain posters on here and whom he feels he has to oppose by default, rather than whether he truly believes it or not.
Just got around to watching his latest offering, the ''20 to a room vid.
I don’t usually bother watching his links,.as they are usually the one trick pony style thing from a strong lefty perspective…and this one did not disappoint. 
‘‘Forced’’ to sleep 20 to a room…
No they are NOT 'forced nobody asked them to come here,.they came here illegally just automatically ecpecting the usual gold star treatment,.and they got that on this occasion…tough sh I say.
I woukd have thought a genuine refugee would be happy with anything after ‘‘escaping from the horrors of war’’.
It comes to something when an item like that is newsworthy,.that a group of ‘‘fleeing refugees’’ (my arse) are not given second to none service with all the trimmings but minimalist treatment instead…which is what they SHOULD be getting.
Even Franglais missed the irony of that one in his hurried attempt to prove himself right…again.
Definite own goal.
he didnt respond to mine either that clearly showed 2 beds in a twin room
1 Like
He’s knows he’s fighting a losing battle mate.
As I put in my reply to him (that he’s conveniently ignored) there is ZERO evidence in that video that its a migrant hotel. It’s just 25 seconds showing some empty bunk beds. As you say own goal
Yeah but he sure as hell will NOT admit it, but just keep digging rather than admit that what he has been told to think could actually be wrong.
Yep agree. A genuine refugee has the option of coming through a legal channel with documentation and a safe passage of transport. Not paying thousands to a people smuggling gang to arrive by illegal boat with no documentation or ID, while at the same time “unnecessarily” risking their life in the channel after travelling thousands of miles through several safe countries on mainland Europe. It’s just basic logic if you were genuinely escaping war.
i finaly found the video its from an article in the independant from september 21 like all the lefty hype its full of glareing errors… they say there are 500 people staying there and they are sleeping 24 to a room then the residents said it was 15 then it was 10 then at the end of the article there is 100 rooms and 400-500 people staying there. so max possible is 5 to a room. you know why there were tripple beds in there… because it was a homeless shelter that the council shut down. in other words the native english that are down on their luck are thrown in the street while these scrounging scum get put up with a roof over their heads and 4 square meals a day.
The video i posted from a migrants imaginery phone (to the lefty’s) was posted jan 24 a more recent video of whats going on the marriot mentioned is a 4* hotel posted jan 25.
an old one from 2020 another 4* hotel this time the bromsgrove hilton 147 people in 148 rooms usual story oh no were closed but they place is stuffed with non white people ,.. oh no its a private function eyc etc
1 Like
In the pandemic the headlines in MSM was homeless sleeping in shop doorways will freeze to death so they were provided with accommodation to suit the narrative and make good optics for the government.
When the pandemic ended they were told to leave to sleep on the streets again.
1 Like
I really can not see how these woke lefty liberal idiots can not see the glaringly obvious what is going on here..
Sure I am all for looking after refugees like the Ukranians for instance…, it would be crass and inhumane not to show some charity and humanity…
But these young guys are just chancers.
There was no actual NEED nor NECESSITY for them to come here in terms of actual refuge in the fitst place.
They did not cone here for nothing or for the fun of it, as our terminally gullible ‘friend’ fails to see.
here is a table of how many asylum seekers are in hotels…https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/asylum-accommodation-support-use-of-hotels/#heading-2
| Number of people in contingency accommodation: Hotels | Number of people in contingency accommodation: Other | Total number of people in receipt of asylum support | % of people in receipt of asylum support accommodated in hotels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 March 2023 | 47,518 | 2,088 | 112,294 | 42 |
| 30 June 2023 | 50,546 | 2,113 | 117,450 | 43 |
| 30 September 2023 | 56,042 | 2,427 | 123,758 | 45 |
| 31 December 2023 | 45,768 | 2,010 | 111,132 | 41 |
| 31 March 2024 | 34,530 | 2,642 | 104,299 | 33 |
| 30 June 2024 | 29,585 | 2,458 | 100,995 | 29 |
| 30 September 2024 | 35,651 | 2,729 | 109,024 | 33 |
now how many times has labour said they were going to smash the gangs and end the use of hotels…
30/09/23 there were 56,042 in hotels 30/06/24 there were 29,585 in hotels a decrease of 26,457 or an average of 2,939 per month. 30/09/24 there were 35,651 in hotels an increase of 6,066 or an average of 3,033 per month. In other words labour are filling the hotels quicker than the tories were emptying them.
The biggest increase under the tories was 5,496 between 30/06/23 and 30/09/23 an average of 1,832 so they are filling them quicker than the tories did. Another epic fail.
where did the displaced brits go when the bombs were falling on london… (apart from my father when he returned and just shook the glass out of his bed when the windows blew in) were we shipped off to sweeden or switzerland or some other safe country. nope we were evacuated to other parts of the country that were being bombed like southampton. Only aprox 26% were evacuated to ireland (a safe country). Did the women flee london… nope they were used in the factories that were genuine targets.
As I have said all along it’s Labour collecting future votes.
In 5 yrs time these guys will be well established in their own provided homes…and very grateful to the Labour Party at an election.
Add to that the 2 tier ‘‘favour and appease the Moslems’’ policy …and it’s ‘winner winner chicken dinner’ for Labour.
Love em or hate em you have to admire their tactics and politival acumen on this…ignoring the fact the British people are the ones who are let down and who come off the worst because of it.
And the ‘‘Young men of fighting age’’ did just that…fight for their country.
That is ONE of the reasons I will never buy this ‘‘refugee’’ dog sh that they want (the rest of us who have not been conned) to swallow.
what is fighting age? my father was born in 1926 so he was 14 in 1940 when he came back to london. he wanted to join up but was too young so they found him a position as a boy messenger for the gpo.
Don’t think they will be able to vote, and it takes at least 5 years to get ILR then British Citizenship
The Home Office have established guidelines denying British Citizenship to refugees who arrived in the UK illegally. The policy makes adjustments to the “good character requirement” for naturalisation. It deems those who arrive illegally via “dangerous journeys” ineligible for UK citizenship.
and how long do you think it will take for labour to decide they are british citizens.
And yet my father came to UK at 28 years old, a young fighting man, but he also bought his mother and his daughter with him. As a refugee, and until he landed in UK he didn’t know where they were
going