I am so disappointed by most of the replies on here 
He asked for some information, it was confirmed who he was and he still got slated 
Some posters who are regular I liked but now I have a different opinion of them. I was the one who sent you an email r........@sky.com just to check for my own satisfaction that you were legit. Email me and I will try my best to help with anything you ask.
dri-diddly-iver:
I am so disappointed by most of the replies on hereSome posters who are regular I liked but now I have a different opinion of them. I was the one who sent you an email r........@sky.com just to check for my own satisfaction that you were legit. Email me and I will try my best to help with anything you ask.
Iâm disappointed tooâŚ
I can confirm that r........@sky.com is indeed you. (But I wouldnât post more than that.)
I confirmed that EssexTrafficSgt had used a works email (and I wouldnât post more than that,) so my disappointment is that my word wasnât good enough for you.
So be it, such is life.
dieseldave:
so my disappointment is that my word wasnât good enough for you.So be it, such is life.
Sorry but I had to check, for my own satisfaction.
dieseldave:
Iâm disappointed tooâŚI can confirm that r........@sky.com is indeed you. (But I wouldnât post more than that.)
I confirmed that EssexTrafficSgt had used a works email (and I wouldnât post more than that,) so my disappointment is that my word wasnât good enough for you.
So be it, such is life.
Your word means nothing.
Please explain to TNUK how EssexTrafficSgtâs e.mail address defines it as genuine when you allow all these other multiple account trolls who also need an e.mail address to join?
About sed trailer why donât you just tow it away at cost to owner?
Iâm sure they will be along shortly ÂŁ to collect it.
And while your at it remove that 1 full of rubbish on the A13.
Eyesore doesnât look out of place in Essex tho.
Been there an age?
If I were a traffic cop in Essex me and you Rodders would be millionaires everyday.
Everybody rightly suspicious because when do traffic police listen to or help HGV drivers
Kudos to Essex traffic Sargent for trying even if it is nothing like you were expecting.
Good luck
If you need someone to move it for you where all Ears?
ÂŁ6000 Ono for a tow of motorway
But we could be talking Essex prices?
dri-diddly-iver:
I am so disappointed by most of the replies on hereSome posters who are regular I liked but now I have a different opinion of them. I was the one who sent you an email r........@sky.com just to check for my own satisfaction that you were legit. Email me and I will try my best to help with anything you ask.
Bloody hell mate, I wouldnât worry.
Iâm sure this copper aint some shrinking violet who is now going to need counselling or trauma therapy over all this, and that he is well capable of taking criticism.
It aint the Mutual Admiration Society, itâs a public forum with all the characteristics that one brings with it, disagreement, debate, and all the rest of it.
What are you going to ââhelp himââ with exactly?
Are you going to make an itineray of all the trucks you see parked under a bridge on an MSA slipway, or help him put tickets on billboard trailers ?
Tell you what 
âŚIâll organise a Trucknet support group and we can all sit around in a circle singing this
.youtu.be/vo9AH4vG2wA
Dork Lard:
dieseldave:
Iâm disappointed tooâŚI can confirm that r........@sky.com is indeed you. (But I wouldnât post more than that.)
I confirmed that EssexTrafficSgt had used a works email (and I wouldnât post more than that,) so my disappointment is that my word wasnât good enough for you.
So be it, such is life.
Your word means nothing.
Please explain to TNUK how EssexTrafficSgtâs e.mail address defines it as genuine when you allow all these other multiple account trolls who also need an e.mail address to join?
I think itâs a bit out of order questioning the manâs word mate 
Dave always comes across to me as a decent fella, and I know he is spoken highly of by The Maoster, and that alone confirms it for me.
As for the e-mail address, if itâs come from a kosher â Works address â itâs pretty obvious the chap is a copper. Unless someone is bored/stupid enough to hack a police computer network to give some truckers a hard time 
eagerbeaver:
Dork Lard:
dieseldave:
Iâm disappointed tooâŚI can confirm that r........@sky.com is indeed you. (But I wouldnât post more than that.)
I confirmed that EssexTrafficSgt had used a works email (and I wouldnât post more than that,) so my disappointment is that my word wasnât good enough for you.
So be it, such is life.
Your word means nothing.
Please explain to TNUK how EssexTrafficSgtâs e.mail address defines it as genuine when you allow all these other multiple account trolls who also need an e.mail address to join?
I think itâs a bit out of order questioning the manâs word mate
+1
Dave has always come across to me as straight and fair, âŚone of the better of the Mods.
Got to big him up btw,âŚhe still owes me a tenner. 
Dork Lard:
Your word means nothing.Please explain to TNUK how EssexTrafficSgtâs e.mail address defines it as genuine when you allow all these other multiple account trolls who also need an e.mail address to join?
Essextrafficsgt could post a picture of himself in uniform, inside a police station, surrounded by other cops and youâd probably STILL bang on about him lying.
Constantly questioning it doesnt make anyone ponder it. It makes you look like a tube
maybe if we had decent parking facilities we wouldnât need to park in [zb] lay-bys 
azza91:
maybe if we had decent parking facilities we wouldnât need to park in [zb] lay-bys
I personally donât, ⌠but Iâve got to agree with you big style mate.
azza91:
maybe if we had decent parking facilities we wouldnât need to park in [zb] lay-bys
Excellent idea, who should pay for them and run them ?
dri-diddly-iver:
I am so disappointed by most of the replies on hereSome posters who are regular I liked but now I have a different opinion of them. I was the one who sent you an email r........@sky.com just to check for my own satisfaction that you were legit. Email me and I will try my best to help with anything you ask.
same mate surpised, can`t paint everyone with same brush hes not answering on behalf of whole polifce force is he
dri-diddly-iver:
I am so disappointed by most of the replies on hereSome posters who are regular I liked but now I have a different opinion of them. I was the one who sent you an email r........@sky.com just to check for my own satisfaction that you were legit. Email me and I will try my best to help with anything you ask.
Well done common sense prevails.
trk78:
dri-diddly-iver:
I am so disappointed by most of the replies on hereSome posters who are regular I liked but now I have a different opinion of them. I was the one who sent you an email r........@sky.com just to check for my own satisfaction that you were legit. Email me and I will try my best to help with anything you ask.
same mate surpised, can`t paint everyone with same brush hes not answering on behalf of whole polifce force is he
+1
Dork Lard:
dieseldave:
Iâm disappointed tooâŚI can confirm that r........@sky.com is indeed you. (But I wouldnât post more than that.)
I confirmed that EssexTrafficSgt had used a works email (and I wouldnât post more than that,) so my disappointment is that my word wasnât good enough for you.
So be it, such is life.
Your word means nothing.
Fair enough.
Dork Lard:
Please explain to TNUK how EssexTrafficSgtâs e.mail address defines it as genuine when you allow all these other multiple account trolls who also need an e.mail address to join?
Even though your question âmeans nothingâ (because thereâs no link to the two premises it contains) Iâll answer anyway.
I was going on the premise that itâs very unlikely that somebody outside of the police force has access to a .pnn email account.
As for your other unconnected (non) point, itâs not a question of what I allow, itâs the fact that thereâs nothing in the forum rules to prevent people from having multiple accounts, maybe youâve even got multiple accounts yourself. 
Ah well, after reading some of your posts on this, it looks like Iâm in a minority with my opinions of the UK Police then eh.
Do I care? âŚdo I â â â â !
Weâll see if some of your opinions change when you see that bellend Nairn specimen in his unit is running alongside you in lane 2 posing in his sunglasses, while his â â â â of a mate is recording you eating your coronation chicken sarnie.
Then the same night you park up and get your fuel nicked because PC Nairn and his chum have booked off for the day after making x no of pounds revenue.
Iâll come back and see if your sympathies have changed any eh?
robroy:
Ah well, after reading some of your posts on this, it looks like Iâm in a minority with my opinions of the UK Police then eh.
Do I care? âŚdo I [zb] !Weâll see if some of your opinions change when you see that bellend Nairn specimen in his unit is running alongside you in lane 2 posing in his sunglasses, while his â â â â of a mate is recording you eating your coronation chicken sarnie.
Then the same night you park up and get your fuel nicked because PC Nairn and his chum have booked off for the day after making x no of pounds revenue.Iâll come back and see if your sympathies have changed any eh?
Alternatively, if we did away with the deterent of the law, it would be each for themselves.
I doubt that even your save industrial estate parking spots would be save, if there was no lawâŚ
the nodding donkey:
robroy:
Ah well, after reading some of your posts on this, it looks like Iâm in a minority with my opinions of the UK Police then eh.
Do I care? âŚdo I [zb] !Weâll see if some of your opinions change when you see that bellend Nairn specimen in his unit is running alongside you in lane 2 posing in his sunglasses, while his â â â â of a mate is recording you eating your coronation chicken sarnie.
Then the same night you park up and get your fuel nicked because PC Nairn and his chum have booked off for the day after making x no of pounds revenue.Iâll come back and see if your sympathies have changed any eh?
Alternatively, if we did away with the deterent of the law, it would be each for themselves.
I doubt that even your save industrial estate parking spots would be save, if there was no lawâŚ
Iâve no problem with laws mate, itâs the way they are cherry picked by the Police in order of perceived priority that I have the problem with.
robroy:
the nodding donkey:
robroy:
Ah well, after reading some of your posts on this, it looks like Iâm in a minority with my opinions of the UK Police then eh.
Do I care? âŚdo I [zb] !Weâll see if some of your opinions change when you see that bellend Nairn specimen in his unit is running alongside you in lane 2 posing in his sunglasses, while his â â â â of a mate is recording you eating your coronation chicken sarnie.
Then the same night you park up and get your fuel nicked because PC Nairn and his chum have booked off for the day after making x no of pounds revenue.Iâll come back and see if your sympathies have changed any eh?
Alternatively, if we did away with the deterent of the law, it would be each for themselves.
I doubt that even your save industrial estate parking spots would be save, if there was no lawâŚIâve no problem with laws mate, itâs the way they are cherry picked by the Police in order of perceived priority that I have the problem with.
When was the last time a copper pulled you over, and expected you to pay him a bribe? (As a former Euro driver, I expect I donât need to explain this to you. If I do, you are sadly lacking in experienceâŚ).
Like it or not, the police have only so many bods, and need to cover a lot of bases. Rightly or wrongly, on the whole, this country lives itâs sedate life of gentle contentment, because of the law. I dare say, that 90% of the citizens of this country, wouldnât know what denial of rights means. What loss of freedom really means. What a lawless society really feels like.