NIP arrived a few minutes ago

[coffeeholic]

jessicas dad:
you are too quick neil. i hadnt read all the above replys so ive been back and edited.

I had a feeling you hadn’t read it all when you posted.

[stanley_knife]

scott123:
As i state agencies are under no legal obligations to disclose their staff’s personnell details.

Correct - and I would not want them to. My contract is with the agency, not with the haulier.

scott123:
This not an agreement between Pollock and an Agency this is normal practise.

Correct - standard practice.

This whole episode, unfortunately, smacks of size 10 boots jumping into an ever growing hole.

Stan

[saratoga]

scott123:
Scott Pollock,

Dont really have time for all this nonsense as we very busy but for your info what was said above is correct. If a NIP comes in we check our sheets to see who was driving and then either fill out our own drivers details or if it was an agency we would forward it to them. IN this case it was an agency and we forwarded it to them. They then filled out your details when they should not have done as i agree you were not working for us that night and they should have returned the form to us or completed the form with the correct drivers name . You worked for us on Thursday from 1715hrs until 0600 Friday morning. It really would have been much simpler if you had phoned the office instead of playing little games in a chat room, rather sad really. Anyway keep up the good work and the slow work, i will let the agency know this is how you treat their customers.
For your information Pollock dont hold petty little grudges and we certainly dont try and frame people so please could you refrain from making anymore slanderous comments.
Kind Regards

Kind Regards

scott123:
at the end of the day a simple mistake has been made and there is a simple remedy…the end

Yep, but you as a manager could probably have handled it a bit more diplomatically, with your obvious attitude in the posts and “silly games”.

I doubt the members here thing it’s ‘sad’ or anything else. Unless you’re just trying to dig it in.

So are you saying it was another driver from Scanny’s agency? Surely you provided them with all the relevant information. Such as a copy of the drivers timesheet / tacho to “remind” the agency?

[ohterry]

Saratoga:

scott123:
Scott Pollock,

Dont really have time for all this nonsense as we very busy but for your info what was said above is correct. If a NIP comes in we check our sheets to see who was driving and then either fill out our own drivers details or if it was an agency we would forward it to them. IN this case it was an agency and we forwarded it to them. They then filled out your details when they should not have done as i agree you were not working for us that night and they should have returned the form to us or completed the form with the correct drivers name . You worked for us on Thursday from 1715hrs until 0600 Friday morning. It really would have been much simpler if you had phoned the office instead of playing little games in a chat room, rather sad really. Anyway keep up the good work and the slow work, i will let the agency know this is how you treat their customers.
For your information Pollock dont hold petty little grudges and we certainly dont try and frame people so please could you refrain from making anymore slanderous comments.
Kind Regards

Kind Regards

scott123:
at the end of the day a simple mistake has been made and there is a simple remedy…the end

Yep, but you as a manager could probably have handled it a bit more diplomatically, with your obvious attitude in the posts and “silly games”.

I doubt the members here thing it’s ‘sad’ or anything else. Unless you’re just trying to dig it in.

So are you saying it was another driver from Scanny’s agency? Surely you provided them with all the relevant information. Such as a copy of the drivers timesheet / tacho to “remind” the agency?

utter tosh.

[sweetleaf]

Jen:

i wasnt driving for them that day.

For who then for you own

They don’t gif your name &adress out to them for the fun and take the ■■■■

How come Jen can say take the ■■■■ but others are censored?

[ohterry]

sweetleaf:

Jen:

i wasnt driving for them that day.

For who then for you own

They don’t gif your name &adress out to them for the fun and take the ■■■■

How come Jen can say take the ■■■■ but others are censored?

what relevance to this thread is that■■?

sureley not a ■■■■ take

[suffolk_reeferboy]

sweetleaf:

Jen:

i wasnt driving for them that day.

For who then for you own

They don’t gif your name &adress out to them for the fun and take the ■■■■

How come Jen can say take the ■■■■ but others are censored?

because most people cant understand what she is saying

Although I have noticed alot more swearing on Trucknet , even the site admin, who when he was a owner driver was such a calm pleasant chap

Now he is a simple employee scumbag his standards seem to have
dropped

Although I suspect Mrs Mix has been sacked.

[oddsodz]

its not actualy a nip,it is a declaration of who was the driver,once the driver is confirmed the nip is sent out,unless the registerd owner was the driver,(then it becomes a nip,as you plead guilty to driving it and at the time) it is also an offence to tell the driver if there is a prosecution pending…until the driver is found the owner of the vehicle is liable for any offences the vehicle incures…in this case Pollock

[smcaul]

scott123:
not worried in the slightest just bored of it. As i state agencies are under no legal obligations to disclose their staff’s personnell details. This not an agreement between Pollock and an Agency this is normal practise. So if we cant get the drivers name and address we chase the agencies to fill out the required documentation. All well above bored and very normal

But it is your responsibility not the agencies- maybe the correct way would have been Pollocks filling out the form with drivers name and C/O the agency address.

I am a little perplexed to know how the agency are supposed to know which vehicles the drivers drive at your depot? You have that info, not the agency (usually). If you have 10 trucks then that driver could have been in any of them, how do the agency know which one he was in? they only normally know who they supplied to you, not the vehicle they were in! If they were on an analogue tacho then after 21 days you would have the tachograph, if on digi then you should have a copy of that shift or download the data from the VU. Which ever way you look at it Pollocks had the details of who the driver was, granted they may not have had the address but they should know who it is at the very least. If not then there is something seriously wrong. And as for what is normal practice, most of us do 80mph in our cars on the motorway, may be common practice and normal, but does not mean what we are doing isn’t wrong!!

[coffeeholic]

Suffolk ReeferBoy:
Although I have noticed alot more swearing on Trucknet , even the site admin, who when he was a owner driver was such a calm pleasant chap

Now he is a simple employee scumbag his standards seem to have
dropped

Thank you. I’ve been trying to come up with a new posting style, I think it’s working.

Oh yeah, and don’t call me simple.

[suffolk_reeferboy]

Coffeeholic:

Suffolk ReeferBoy:
Although I have noticed alot more swearing on Trucknet , even the site admin, who when he was a owner driver was such a calm pleasant chap

Now he is a simple employee scumbag his standards seem to have
dropped

Thank you. I’ve been trying to come up with a new posting style, I think it’s working.

Oh yeah, and don’t call me simple.

[mrs_mix]

Suffolk ReeferBoy:

sweetleaf:

Jen:

i wasnt driving for them that day.

For who then for you own

They don’t gif your name &adress out to them for the fun and take the ■■■■

How come Jen can say take the ■■■■ but others are censored?

because most people cant understand what she is saying

Although I have noticed alot more swearing on Trucknet , even the site admin, who when he was a owner driver was such a calm pleasant chap

Now he is a simple employee scumbag his standards seem to have
dropped

Although I suspect Mrs Mix has been sacked.

Nope I’m still here

[montana_man]

scanny77:
i sent the NIP back yesterday with a covering letter. there is nothing else i can do regarding that case however, i do have something else to keep me going

data protection act 1998.
i want to know why the agency gave my details out (which is in contravention of the data protection act 1998)

So let me understand this correctly. If Pollocks had asked to copy your licence, as happens at many places, and therefore having your details that’s OK. They are entitled to see and copy the licence for there records and being an agency driver you will have had this done many times. Yet you cry foul and start spouting the DATA protection act which if you had researched thoroughly, you would realize is not your friend in this instance
Basically your are upset about them giving information you would happily divulge yourself

Tell me as a visitor, what do you think of the planet earth ■■

Drivers wanted urgently , all clueless

[mike-c]

Coffeeholic:

jessicas dad:

Jen:
Good luck with that scanny

I think what the problem is

prat

who is a prat pollocks for trying to set him up. or his agency for half heartly trying to help him or scanny for trying to clear his name.

It seems, from reading some of the above posts, it was his agency who gave the wrong driver details in the first place, not Pollocks, and they have now admitted it. It’s pretty much done and dusted. Simple mistake and easily rectified with a bit of communication as opposed to full on toys out the pram.

Although the toys option is often more fun.

Is everyone forgetting something here? Richie was advised he was getting a NIP even before he got it, his agency told him so. It could of /should of been sorted out there and then?

[montana_man]

Mike-C:
Is everyone forgetting something here? Richie was advised he was getting a NIP even before he got it, his agency told him so. It could of /should of been sorted out there and then?

What and miss out on the self righteous campaigning Not to mention the Footinmouthery Throw in a sprinkle of Libel and it certainly brings a smile to your face Mike

[tagoat]

Where’s Scanny’s indignation gone to now ■■?

[eddie_snax]

montana man:
[

Tell me as a visitor, what do you think of the planet earth ■■

Thats the 2nd best line on this thread

Scanny getting done for speeding is the best

OK he’s trying to wrigle out of it but who cares

[smcaul]

Tagoat:
Where’s Scanny’s indignation gone to now ■■?

I thought he was in Scotland, must admit though that I have never been to Dignation so I suppose that could be in Sweaty land.

[scanny77]

scott123:
the agencies wont give out personnel details of their drivers

in this case, they did and admitted they were wrong. pollocks filled in the NIP, not the agency. there would be no reason for the agency to put my name to it so it still falls on pollocks doorstep which means they dont know who is driving there trucks, they filled it out maliciously or their procedures are up their cracks and quite frankly, i wouldnt be surprised if all three were true

[scanny77]

smcaul:

scott123:
not worried in the slightest just bored of it. As i state agencies are under no legal obligations to disclose their staff’s personnell details. This not an agreement between Pollock and an Agency this is normal practise. So if we cant get the drivers name and address we chase the agencies to fill out the required documentation. All well above bored and very normal

But it is your responsibility not the agencies- maybe the correct way would have been Pollocks filling out the form with drivers name and C/O the agency address.

this is the correct procedure. any half decent manager would know that. its not exactly complicated is it FFS?