New job time (again!)

[robroy]

stevieboy308:

robroy:

stevieboy308:

robroy:
Bloody hell it looks as if all the stick is aimed at me now! and to make it worse EagerB has [zb] ed off.
Ah well c’est la vie as Robbie Neville once said (and Del Boy )

To be fair chaps, I did point out (if you look) and accept, that going off route in general is frowned upon, when I replied to one of your posts (as very kindly pointed out by Mr S btw ) that was not the arguable point.

The bit that griped me, (as I did keep saying) was the ott corporate bs and heavy handed treatment dished out by the pretentious high self opinionated co. in question, when a one to one quiet heads up between Mr Weasel and Mr Beaver (I’m sounding like Beatrix [zb] Potter now ) would have sufficed quite well imo.

So no egg on my face freight dog, and anyway, how can I think the sun shines out of EB’s arse, when it is a well known fact that it actually shines very brightly out of my own.

Stevieboy, I aint feeling guilty whatsoever, what I suggested I stand by.
Mr Weasel rang Mr Beaver (there I go again ) primarily to warn him of a disciinary for breaking the rules, the irony was that Mr Weasel by doing so was breaking the rules himself, by interrupting his wkend rest, so I suggested playing a similar (admittedly petty but they started it) game of doing the same to him.

Hope that puts all this to bed from my side.

[zb] me !..even I’m getting bored [zb] less with it all now, I’m sure everyone else is, so unless anybody else wants a pop.at poor vulnerable, delicate, easily hurt Rob, …can we knock it on the head or what??

Trouble is rob, you’re not that clued up on the rules and like to take the ■■■■ out of those who take an interest in it. If you’re going to use them, you need to know them, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s interrupting your rest period by them ringing you, but if going down that route, it certainly doesn’t interrupt it to ring them and tell them when you’ll be in.

He sounds like the sort of driver that firms are waiting for him to [zb] up big enough so they can get rid of. Your have word in the yard gripe, would hold water if it were the average good guy, with a good reputation who’s took the ■■■■ a bit.

Beaver sucked you in at the beginning with a tale of just nipped home, something loads of have done, then when the truth set him free, it was apparent he’d blatantly took the ■■■■ out of downtown and people defending him on here, so to be fair you two are even after planting the seed!!!

Stevieboy mate, I thought we wer done here but hey ho, I’ll grant you the courtesy of an answer.
Fair comment, I aint THAT clued up cos I aint interested, however I’m clued up sufficiently to know the basic technique of never getting by fully legally week after week, with no infringements …so that’ s good enough for me bud…but hey thanks for clarifying, but after careful consideration…nah, still not really bothered.

As for your opinion on me, the o/p, the thread, and any thing else you are entitled to it, so are we finally done now, it’s getting a bit like pulling teeth here.

Yeah it’s good enough to get by each infringement free, but the point I was getting at was it’s not good enough to be advising someone daft enough to go though with it, poor form

Ok bud fair enough, see my previous post.

[coolrider]

robroy:

Coolrider:

robroy:
Bloody hell it looks as if all the stick is aimed at me now! and to make it worse EagerB has [zb] ed off.
Ah well c’est la vie as Robbie Neville once said (and Del Boy )

To be fair chaps, I did point out (if you look) and accept, that going off route in general is frowned upon, when I replied to one of your posts (as very kindly pointed out by Mr S btw ) that was not the arguable point.

The bit that griped me, (as I did keep saying) was the ott corporate bs and heavy handed treatment dished out by the pretentious high self opinionated co. in question, when a one to one quiet heads up between Mr Weasel and Mr Beaver (I’m sounding like Beatrix [zb] Potter now ) would have sufficed quite well imo.

So no egg on my face freight dog, and anyway, how can I think the sun shines out of EB’s arse, when it is a well known fact that it actually shines very brightly out of my own.

Stevieboy, I aint feeling guilty whatsoever, what I suggested I stand by.
Mr Weasel rang Mr Beaver (there I go again ) primarily to warn him of a disciinary for breaking the rules, the irony was that Mr Weasel by doing so was breaking the rules himself, by interrupting his wkend rest, so I suggested playing a similar (admittedly petty but they started it) game of doing the same to him.

Hope that puts all this to bed from my side.

[zb] me !..even I’m getting bored [zb] less with it all now, I’m sure everyone else is, so unless anybody else wants a pop.at poor vulnerable, delicate, easily hurt Rob, …can we knock it on the head or what??

Robroy It’s quite clear to 80% of the contributors on here by constantly sticking up for this tool you’ve made yourself look a right co#k.

For an experienced driver and a once OD, so you tell us you seem to have a very little grasp on how things work these days.

One question I would ask you to answer is why should the planner cover up and put his own job on the line for a driver who obviously thinks he can do exactly as he likes.
Yes I will admit years ago a quite word in his shell would have probably happened . However them days have long gone. I can tell you now if I found one of my planners covering for a driver who had done this then I would not hesitate in both going down the road. The jobs hard enough without people working against you!

Like I said before I can pretty much guarantee he’s been on the radar for some time and orders from above were already given to keep a very close eye on him.

Also find it very strange that in one of your many, earlier posts on here you describe whilst being anOD that some of your lads tried to take the ■■■■. In your own words though , they soon found out who the boss’s was! Yet you’ll defend this ■■■■ no matter how condemned he’s been on here!

TBF. You’ve made yourself look a real ■■■■ too!

Coolrider, to be fair mate I don’t really give a one… trust me, what your perceived 80% think.

As for you personally I would say a similar percentage take no notice of you, nor take much of what you say seriously, with your over inflated ego, and how important your [zb] job is, so as far as me even giving your opinion on me a second thought goes…well I’m sure you can guess.

You must have been quite excited to address me seeing as you have posted it twice, pity you were not as quick and eager to do the grown up thing and admit you were wrong about the conversation you referred to 6 months (not) ago, but hey, saving face obviously takes priority over apology in your case.

Anyway before you give me the treatment you gave Evil,… a la Liam Neeson/Taken…‘‘I will find you, and I will kill you’’ …ffs
I best get off, as my menial low life job is calling, and I have my poor life to attend to. …ha ha [zb] ha.
Bye now x

Edit ; forgot to say,… re. the Liam Neeson thing, you will have me ‘quacking’ in my boots.

Got to love people like you knobroy who can give it but when it comes back to you your answer is to stop the game. Bet you were an easy target at school. It’s obvious now why you always defend the victim,being one yourself an all that!

Don’t feel to disheartened though you’ve still got your followers. Good old evil and eager the new boys who see you as their guardian angel
Oh and I’d love to see where I’ve wrote I’ll knock anyone’s headoff. That might be your perception but if you can prove I’ve actually wrote it then please publish it. Not the perceived version but the actual wording. I don’t think your perceived version would stand up in court do you?

As you should know robby, you being an experienced driver and failed OD, this industry is actually very close knit and operators, TMs and owners actually speak to each other . More than one way to skin a cat you might say.

Oh and believe me my jobs not particularly important, it’s not particularly interesting either but it keeps people like you and your small band of merry men in a job at least.

Anyway knobroy I’ve said my piece I don’t need to write paragraph after paragraph all day long. I’ll leave that to you and your followers.

As others have said you really don’t like it when people stand up to you do you
That’s the thing you see there are more backbones on here than you realise. The difference is we don’t all go on about how we would do this and how we would do that.
Tatty bye knobroy

[the-snowman]

Coolrider:
I’d love to see where I’ve wrote I’ll knock anyone’s headoff. That might be your perception but if you can prove I’ve actually wrote it then please publish it. Not the perceived version but the actual wording. I don’t think your perceived version would stand up in court do you?

Coolrider:
One day evil I hope to meet you in person , it could be fun.

The only thing more annoying than people who throw thinly veiled threats around are the ones who then hide behind the wording they used as if it was all innocent

[coolrider]

The-Snowman:

Coolrider:
I’d love to see where I’ve wrote I’ll knock anyone’s headoff. That might be your perception but if you can prove I’ve actually wrote it then please publish it. Not the perceived version but the actual wording. I don’t think your perceived version would stand up in court do you?

Coolrider:
One day evil I hope to meet you in person , it could be fun.

The only thing more annoying than people who throw thinly veiled threats around are the ones who then hide behind the wording they used as if it was all innocent

That’s very good that snowballs you can copy and paste.
However where does it actually say there that I’m going to knock anyone out or physically attack anyone.

Where? please copy and paste that bit to show us all your first time wasn’t a fluke

I’m feeling victimised here. This is slander.

Come on robby you look after the victim. Where are you when I need you

[the-snowman]

Coolrider:

The-Snowman:

Coolrider:
I’d love to see where I’ve wrote I’ll knock anyone’s headoff. That might be your perception but if you can prove I’ve actually wrote it then please publish it. Not the perceived version but the actual wording. I don’t think your perceived version would stand up in court do you?

Coolrider:
One day evil I hope to meet you in person , it could be fun.

The only thing more annoying than people who throw thinly veiled threats around are the ones who then hide behind the wording they used as if it was all innocent

That’s very good that snowballs you can copy and paste.
However where does it actually say there that I’m going to knock anyone out or physically attack anyone.

Where? please copy and paste that bit to show us all your first time wasn’t a fluke

If you didnt understand what I meant with the hiding behind wording bit the first time then I doubt me repeating it will help you now

[coolrider]

The-Snowman:

Coolrider:

The-Snowman:

Coolrider:
I’d love to see where I’ve wrote I’ll knock anyone’s headoff. That might be your perception but if you can prove I’ve actually wrote it then please publish it. Not the perceived version but the actual wording. I don’t think your perceived version would stand up in court do you?

Coolrider:
One day evil I hope to meet you in person , it could be fun.

The only thing more annoying than people who throw thinly veiled threats around are the ones who then hide behind the wording they used as if it was all innocent

That’s very good that snowballs you can copy and paste.
However where does it actually say there that I’m going to knock anyone out or physically attack anyone.

Where? please copy and paste that bit to show us all your first time wasn’t a fluke

If you didnt understand what I meant with the hiding behind wording bit the first time then I doubt me repeating it will help you now

I’ll take that to mean you can’t find it snowballs!
That’s because it doesn’t exist

[the-snowman]

Coolrider:
I’ll take that to mean you can’t find it snowballs!
That’s because it doesn’t exist

Nice try but you’ll need to get up a bit earlier in the morning to catch me out with this method of trollin.
Keep demanding an answer when its right there in front of you and been explained? Thats kiddies hour man, and belongs in the youtube comments.
Add in the “hilarious” name changes and well, you’ve made yourself as transparent as a sheet of glass.

[coolrider]

The-Snowman:

Coolrider:
I’ll take that to mean you can’t find it snowballs!
That’s because it doesn’t exist

Nice try but you’ll need to get up a bit earlier in the morning to catch me out with this method of trollin.
Keep demanding an answer when its right there in front of you and been explained? Thats kiddies hour man, and belongs in the youtube comments.
Add in the “hilarious” name changes and well, you’ve made yourself as transparent as a sheet of glass.

Snowballs old chum I don’t think me and you should contribute to 15 pages of this rubbish by arguing but I will say you’ve failed to answer my question?

You’ve posted a quote from me that mentions absolutely nothing about violence in any way. So I don’t really see your point.

When I said , one I day I hope to meet you it could be fun. How do you know I wasn’t trying to organise a night out with evil .? You know the sort of thing a few beers, bit of food and evil could enlighten me on all his years of driving experience he’s gained over the last few months.

Think you look into things a bit much old boy. Chill out

[the-snowman]

Coolrider:
When I said , one I day I hope to meet you it could be fun. How do you know I wasn’t trying to organise a night out with evil .? You know the sort of thing a few beers, bit of food and evil could enlighten me on all his years of driving experience he’s gained over the last few months.

Maybe you did.
I doubt it given your general aggressive attitude
But maybe

[james_the_cat]

If I was on desert Island discs and Kirtsy Young said “James the cat, what would you rather take with you?”

“The compleat works of Carryfast - the thoughts and muses of a learned man” or a print out the latter part of this thread?"

I’d respond if I bring the required pallets to carry them, I’ll chose the Carryfast volumes thanks Kirsty.

[reef]

James the cat:
If I was on desert Island discs and Kirtsy Young said “Reef”, what would you rather take with you?"

I’d say given those choices I’d sooner take a revolver and two bullets, (just in case I missed myself with the first)

[james_the_cat]

Reef:

James the cat:
If I was on desert Island discs and Kirtsy Young said “Reef”, what would you rather take with you?"

I’d say given those choices I’d sooner take a revolver and two bullets, (just in case I missed myself with the first)

That’s a good idea. Have to have that to hand after the first chapter of the Carryfast volumes. I was thinking a packet of pins for the eyes for a little light relief, not sure how generous Kirtsy would be.

[peirre]

James the cat:
“The compleat works of Carryfast - the thoughts and muses of a learned man” or a print out the latter part of this thread?"

You’ll need a bigger island bud to house all of that lot…

[james_the_cat]

peirre:

James the cat:
“The compleat works of Carryfast - the thoughts and muses of a learned man” or a print out the latter part of this thread?"

You’ll need a bigger island bud to house all of that lot…

. Ah yeah, but I’d never run out of fire lighters. Or bog roll

[mac12]

Isn’t this all getting very childish now, soon be my dads bigger than yours.

[reef]

mac12:
Isn’t this all getting very childish now, soon be my dads bigger than yours.

Now? seriously? did you not read the first 13 pages then?

[reef]

Dipper_Dave:
You should all know by now that this thread is Mr Beavers entry into the thread of the year Tnuk annual awards. Close call at the moment between Mr Beezles employee problem jobby, this one and who could forget the one that triggered a poster to send Contraflow pictures of his todger.

Not going to happen, a good thread is like a ■■■■, if you have to force it it’s probably sh…

[evil8beezle]

Well Mr Cuckoo Rooster, if you honestly believe that you words and tone were not a thinly veiled threat in an effort to intimidate me, then I really don’t think you have much respect for the members of this forum. And trying to now deny it just makes you look like the class clown as well as the school bully… But for a bit of fun, let’s play devils advocate instead on what else you could possibly mean, as along with a couple of other things you’ve also just said this:

Coolrider:
As you should know robby, you being an experienced driver and failed OD, this industry is actually very close knit and operators, TMs and owners actually speak to each other . More than one way to skin a cat you might say.

Now what could this possibly mean?
Could it be that you plan to make my life difficult or get me the boot from my firm?
Well let’s think about that for a second and image how that conversation might go with my TM…

So you’ve got a problem with one of my drivers?
Yes, I think he’s a right tool on TruckNet.

Oh dear, that doesn’t sound good. Has he named us as his employer and brought the company into disrepute?
Err, No.

Well has he named us and slagged of the company in anyway?
Err, No.

Well has he stated that he drives like a bellend and you think he’s a liability on the road?
Well he hasn’t said anything but I bet he is…

So you don’t know that for sure?
No.

Well has he said he breaks the law and disregards the highway code, drivers hours, etc?
Not that I can think of…

Well has he threatened anyone?
NO, that’s just me!

So what EXACTLY has he done and what is your problem with him?
Well I just don’t like him and it’s my aim to make his life a misery, so I’m talking to you to ask you to help.

Now let me get this straight. I don’t know you, and just because you have a problem or personality clash with one of my drivers who’s obeying the firms social media policy by being anonymous on a truckers forum, you want me join your little vendetta gang and be a bully. When as far as I’m concerned I’ve got no issue with this driver as he does his job with issue and causes me no stress?
Yes!

Well I think you really need to get a grip and grow up you muppet, as I’ve no intention of potentially causing the firm (and myself) grief by trying to lever this employee out just because psychopathic sycophant weirdo calls me up and asks me to, I’ve got better things to be doing, don’t you?

Does that sound about right mate?

[james_the_cat]

Evil8Beezle:
Well Mr Cuckoo Rooster, if you honestly believe that you words and tone were not a thinly veiled threat in an effort to intimidate me, then I really don’t think you have much respect for the members of this forum. And trying to now deny it just makes you look like the class clown as well as the school bully… But for a bit of fun, let’s play devils advocate instead on what else you could possibly mean, as along with a couple of other things you’ve also just said this:

Coolrider:
As you should know robby, you being an experienced driver and failed OD, this industry is actually very close knit and operators, TMs and owners actually speak to each other . More than one way to skin a cat you might say.

Now what could this possibly mean?
Could it be that you plan to make my life difficult or get me the boot from my firm?
Well let’s think about that for a second and image how that conversation might go with my TM…

So you’ve got a problem with one of my drivers?
Yes, I think he’s a right tool on TruckNet.

Oh dear, that doesn’t sound good. Has he named us as his employer and brought the company into disrepute?
Err, No.

Well has he named us and slagged of the company in anyway?
Err, No.

Well has he stated that he drives like a bellend and you think he’s a liability on the road?
Well he hasn’t said anything but I bet he is…

So you don’t know that for sure?
No.

Well has he said he breaks the law and disregards the highway code, drivers hours, etc?
Not that I can think of…

Well has he threatened anyone?
NO, that’s just me!

So what EXACTLY has he done and what is your problem with him?
Well I just don’t like him and it’s my aim to make his life a misery, so I’m talking to you to ask you to help.

Now let me get this straight. I don’t know you, and just because you have a problem or personality clash with one of my drivers who’s obeying the firms social media policy by being anonymous on a truckers forum, you want me join your little vendetta gang and be a bully. When as far as I’m concerned I’ve got no issue with this driver as he does his job with issue and causes me no stress?
Yes!

Well I think you really need to get a grip and grow up you muppet, as I’ve no intention of potentially causing the firm (and myself) grief by trying to lever this employee out just because psychopathic sycophant weirdo calls me up and asks me to, I’ve got better things to be doing, don’t you?

Does that sound about right mate?

You could use glove puppets and voices to that. Sooty and sweep . You could be that bloke with a beard

“Naughty sooty, I thought you only squeaked, you just said bellend!”

[evil8beezle]

Maybe this is the plan?