Harry Monk:
Less than a minute later and the Obamas have swapped places…
The Danish Prime Minister is now furiously looking at her mobile phone, Michelle Obama has a face like a bulldog licking ■■■■ off of a nettle and Barack is now wishing he hadn’t bought his wife with him when it was her “bad week”.
He was just showing the world the difference between ethnic integration as opposed to multiculturalism with inevitable results from the point of view of his wife who some say has now changed her mind about the idea of apartheid.
kr79:
Prehaps the native americans may think the ethnic europeans should head back there
Yes, likewise the Australian Aboriginies. And here in the UK, there will be a population of about twelve people by the time all the immigrants from the last two thousand years have left, and a very shallow gene pool.
At least what that has taught those two countries is that ethnic integration or aboriginal or native american rule over the ethnic european colonists wouldn’t work.However usually in those cases of British colonial involvement it improved the countries in question rather than wrecking them as shown by the results of what happened in Rhodesia and inevitably next South Africa.
While yet again it conveniently takes ethnic european intervention to sort out the aggravation being caused,as usual,by the natives when they should just be left to get on with it because it’s ‘their country’ to do whatever they like with after all.
As for re patriation of the ethnic African and Asian population that’s not exactly the same thing as repatriating the actual core ethnic make up of the country back just across the North Sea or the Channel or Irish Sea to put it back to where it was when it was effectively unpopulated.Although it’s no surprise that the loony left yet again rely on that tired old argument.
I see. So it’s black people you have a problem with, basically.
You really are an unpleasant little man.
kr79:
Prehaps the native americans may think the ethnic europeans should head back there
Yes, likewise the Australian Aboriginies. And here in the UK, there will be a population of about twelve people by the time all the immigrants from the last two thousand years have left, and a very shallow gene pool.
At least what that has taught those two countries is that ethnic integration or aboriginal or native american rule over the ethnic european colonists wouldn’t work.However usually in those cases of British colonial involvement it improved the countries in question rather than wrecking them as shown by the results of what happened in Rhodesia and inevitably next South Africa.
While yet again it conveniently takes ethnic european intervention to sort out the aggravation being caused,as usual,by the natives when they should just be left to get on with it because it’s ‘their country’ to do whatever they like with after all.
As for re patriation of the ethnic African and Asian population that’s not exactly the same thing as repatriating the actual core ethnic make up of the country back just across the North Sea or the Channel or Irish Sea to put it back to where it was when it was effectively unpopulated.Although it’s no surprise that the loony left yet again rely on that tired old argument.
I see. So it’s black people you have a problem with, basically.
You really are an unpleasant little man.
I didn’t say that we shouldn’t also repatriate many of the other relatively recent east european immigrant communities who certainly are white unless you know better.It’s just that your statement was that to do so the indigenous population would also have to repatriate itself to the relatively local parts of northern and western europe wherever it originated from over a period of thousands of years.Although it doesn’t take a genius to realise that the country’s main ethnic population alienation problems understandably involve the ethnic immigrant African and Asian immigrant populations living here.IE there’s not much point in sending troops to deal with a so called terrorist threat overseas when the problem actually involves those living here who obviously find the nation’s ethnic identity and culture alien to it.
While the fact is it’s more a case that it’s those with your raving socialist reverse racist views who’ve got the problem.Such as seeing no double standards in the idea of removing the ethnic european African rights to hold power in South Africa and Rhodesia because they are ‘white’ while also viewing the idea of an ethnic African president of the USA a good thing because he’s black.It’s no surprise that you’d view anyone who stands against your bs socialist principles as unpleasant.
I personaly couldnt give a ■■■■ im not african and have no intention of going there so let them get on with it.
Same as i dont understand why we dont bring our toops back from afghanistan and let them get on with it.
kr79:
I personaly couldnt give a [zb] im not african and have no intention of going there so let them get on with it.
Same as i dont understand why we dont bring our toops back from afghanistan and let them get on with it.
Exactly.There’s not much point in wasting lives and hardware on a wild goose chase in Afghan when the problem is in our own back yard caused by our immigration and citizenship/nationality definition policies.IE walking in at Dover or even being born here isn’t the relevant definition.
As for Africa the same applies the ethnic european populations of South Africa and Rhodesia are Dutch and British not African and should be repatriated just like the ethnic African population here should be repatriated back there.Then we should just keep away from the place and leave them to get on with it.The same applies in the case of Asia and the Middle East except for if the arabs/asians attack Israel in a big way which the IDF can’t handle.In which case it won’t be the army that’s needed to sort that situation it would be strategic weapons of one form or another.
kr79:
Same as i dont rate obama as a president on his policys but in the last election he was the best candidate out him and Romney.
I think everyone knows how Obama got into power just like Mandela it was all about socialist type political correctness based on his ethnicity and reverse racism.
switchlogic:
God you spout some crap. I suggest you read through this topic again and find out where Ive mentioned my ‘socialist ideology’…you really must try harder. My whole point has simply been that calling Mandela just a terrorist is silly at best. Before you wrote another boring boring essay go back and find one quote in this topic from me about my view on these issues…one quote outlining my ‘socialist ideology’. Good luck.
Btw, you’re like a small kid who’s learnt a new word. Its a different one every topic. Ranting about peoples ‘socialist ideology’ doesn’t make you look clever, it makes you look silly. Run along now, I’m sure mummy has lunch ready soon. X
The fact that you can’t,more likely don’t want to,see that Mandela was simply a socialist terrorist revolutionary,of the type which I was well aware of when I realised very quickly what a dangerous type of ideology it is,means that you’re either just a misguided typically not very bright supporter of that ideology yourself,or you’re just not bright enough to understand the issues at all.
The fact that you don’t seem to be able to understand the difference between an integrationist and/or reverse racist agenda,of the type which was applied in the former Yugoslavia,and which is being applied in South Africa,here,and the USA at least.As opposed to multiculturalism,in the form of the present ethnically seperated Yugoslavia and the reasons for the founding of the State of Israel,and the fact that you regard anyone who does understand that difference as ‘racist’,tells me that you’re just a typical raving socialist of the type which is now obviously ruling over us.Not to mention the fact that you think the BBC isn’t just a biased mouthpiece for that regime.
As I told you Rhythm Thief, when he starts questioning peoples intelligence its a sure fire way of knowing when good old Carryfast isn’t running out of steam. Pot calling the kettle black if ever I saw it. He knows all my beliefs from one comment about Mandela. As I said in another post recently, assumptions are the domain of the stupid.
I take it right wing bias is ok, whereas left wing bias is a big no no. In other words, if you agree with it, it’s not biased.
Just a balanced argument would be fine.It’s obvious the loony left is all we’re allowed to hear while the voice of reason obviously isn’t allowed in the new socialist states of europe and america.
Oh Carry old bean you’re so funny. I just looked at ‘Commieblasters’ and nearly spit my tea out with laughing so hard! I see now exactly where you get all your views. There isn’t an original thought in your head. I love how ‘Commieblasters’ have created a website where you can just hear an angry man yelling all the words on the home page at you, despite it looking like it was designed by a child. Thanks for putting me onto that, I feel like the Bletchley Park codebreakers must have, ‘YES! WE’VE BROKEN THE CARRYFAST CODE’.
I take it right wing bias is ok, whereas left wing bias is a big no no. In other words, if you agree with it, it’s not biased.
Just a balanced argument would be fine.It’s obvious the loony left is all we’re allowed to hear while the voice of reason obviously isn’t allowed in the new socialist states of europe and america.
Oh Carry old bean you’re so funny. I just looked at ‘Commieblasters’ and nearly spit my tea out with laughing so hard! I see now exactly where you get all your views. There isn’t an original thought in your head. I love how ‘Commieblasters’ have created a website where you can just hear an angry man yelling all the words on the home page at you, despite it looking like it was designed by a child. Thanks for putting me onto that, I feel like the Bletchley Park codebreakers must have, ‘YES! WE’VE BROKEN THE CARRYFAST CODE’.
This forum would be so boring without you!
It’s obvious that such a news media outlet wouldn’t appeal to the type of raving leftists who are running the place and it’s biased media propaganda mouithpiece in the BBC.As I see the site in question it has nothing whatsoever to do with any angry ‘person’ and everything to do with objective questions,raised by numerous intelligent people like Horowitz amongst others,relating to the way that the western governments are being run and who they are ‘really’ being run by.Like him I’ve been there seen it and saw the light regarding the type of dangerous thing that socialism really is and how it works.In that Mandela was just part of that machine.
I take it right wing bias is ok, whereas left wing bias is a big no no. In other words, if you agree with it, it’s not biased.
Just a balanced argument would be fine.It’s obvious the loony left is all we’re allowed to hear while the voice of reason obviously isn’t allowed in the new socialist states of europe and america.
Oh Carry old bean you’re so funny. I just looked at ‘Commieblasters’ and nearly spit my tea out with laughing so hard! I see now exactly where you get all your views. There isn’t an original thought in your head. I love how ‘Commieblasters’ have created a website where you can just hear an angry man yelling all the words on the home page at you, despite it looking like it was designed by a child. Thanks for putting me onto that, I feel like the Bletchley Park codebreakers must have, ‘YES! WE’VE BROKEN THE CARRYFAST CODE’.
This forum would be so boring without you!
It’s obvious that such a news media outlet wouldn’t appeal to the type of raving leftists who are running the place and it’s biased media propaganda mouithpiece in the BBC.As I see the site in question it has nothing whatsoever to do with any angry ‘person’ and everything to do with objective questions,raised by numerous intelligent people like Horowitz amongst others,relating to the way that the western governments are being run and who they are ‘really’ being run by.Like him I’ve been there seen it and saw the light regarding the type of dangerous thing that socialism really is and how it works.In that Mandela was just part of that machine.
I think you and I are looking at a different site. The one I looked at yells that Obama is a communist gay jew hating muslim Russian spy (off the top of my head). Sorry but most of the sites you’ve linked to look like they are written by an angry teenager. I’m all for people making their own choices but really, is that the best the extreme right has to offer? If so its no wonder no one listens…
There’s lots of serious and important questions that need asking that the mainstream media shy away from. Its just the people asking them present themselves as a bunch of shouty lunatics and no one listens.
Listening to Americans ranting on websites WTF. After listening to the ramblings of american truck drivers in truckstops and truck dealers for six months i seemed to find 90% of americans are nutcases.
Listening to Americans ranting on websites WTF. After listening to the ramblings of american truck drivers in truckstops and truck dealers for six months i seemed to find 90% of americans are nutcases.
Considering that Stalin was the head of the logical conclusion of what the so called radical left stands for and that infiltration of countries with opposing ideologies,where terrorist revolution doesn’t work,has always been one of it’s main tactics,then yes Obama is no different to Stalin just like Mandela wasn’t.While the idea of questioning the sanity of anyone who dares to oppose it is another identifying trait and tactic of the radical left too.
switchlogic:
Bit like your tactic of questioning the intelligence of anyone who doesn’t agree with you then eh?
Ironically the only bit that Horowitz has got wrong is that he credits the raving radical left wing followers who haven’t had the sense to see it for what it is,as opposed to it’s leaders in the case of tactical knowledge concerning either terrorism in the case of Mandela,or infiltration in the case of the western powers’ regimes,with more intelligence than they deserve.
While your predictable bs comments seem to be everything that I can remember about the way in which the left used to try to make their point because they weren’t bright enough to make any decent arguments to back their ideology.
kr79:
I can assure you im not a radical left winger
I didn’t say that but it’s not difficult to see that even many so called ‘Conservatives’ have swallowed all the bs being used to cover an obviously radical left wing agenda in the form of a typical reverse racist radical left infiltration of the US government let alone South Africa’s.
