Mandatory vaccine

[carryfast]

manalishi:
Just been informed,a good friend of mine up in Manchester’s now officially caught the covid,not surprising given he was in the thick of it all as a senior trauma nurse.He once told me he’s had to take dozens of vaccines over the years.It’s not the vaccines that cause the multiple problems,but the adjuvant preservers,especially (thiremosal) which contain mercury or aluminium in most of them that remains the bone of contention and a good enough reason to avoid them if I myself had to make the choice.Lots of Autism connections revealed by that Dr Wakefield chap years ago.Anything with a Gates element I auto-swerve.

Firstly there are a lot of shades of grey regarding ‘vaccines’.The general idea seems to be to give the body a ‘weakened’ version of the thing in the expectation that the immune system will say oh look a weakened virus let’s kill it.Whereas it supposedly couldn’t do that with the full fat unweakened version.

However the definition of weakened doesn’t seem to be as clear cut as they say.
Some are totally inactive while some are sort of active but not quite.

Bearing in mind that catching polio from vaccine is quite common and the flu jabs I’ve had say if that’s supposedly weakened then the real flu would have a death rate of 100%.Also bearing in mind that I was also told no flu jab as a carer for my late Mum with an immune system compromised by chemo.

In this case we’re dealing with a thermonuclear weapons grade killer non zoonotic bat specific virus, artificially made to transmit between humans with HIV proteins in its Genome for good measure, needing a military grade level 4 biolab to hold it, handled by people wearing full on NBC kit.So I’m supposed to sit there when the friendly Chinese WHO quack says trust me it’s been weakened you’ll be fine as he approaches with the needle.Yeah right.

[franglais]

manalishi:

Franglais:

manalishi:
,training in nutritional disciplines.Aren’t you getting hip to all this Franglais?

Well, actually, I AM a fully qualified UK Nutritionalist.

Edit.
I don`t have ALL the UK qualifications, but I am sufficiently qualified to work professionally as a Nutritionist.

Impressive,a profession of some kudos.I’m dabbling on the fringes of the subject,I juice celery regularly for those all important electrolyte salts that possibly go some way in addressing the Epstein Barr syndrome that’s latent in us all,due in no small measure to Mercury ingestion, I’m led to believe.Natural medicine is proper medicine,big pharmas products a mere sticking plaster with its own nefarious dynamic.I learnt this the hard way with Tramadol addiction.

There was a recent article on mail online with mp Frank Field,canvassing Johnson to make available to everyone a form of Cannabis he took successfully for back pain but could only obtain via private prescription at big expense that most of us couldn’t sustain.Doesn’t that stick in the craw,knowing there’s a medicant out there which our brains are fully adapted to use but is only available to the affluent?

Actually I have a relative who is a qualified Dietitian too: She did her O and A levels, spent 3 years getting her degree and worked at one of the London hospitals. After several years there she took a post grad course and taught sciences to teenagers.

On the other hand, I can start practicing as a nutritionist tomorrow, as can you.
nhs.uk/search/?q=nutritionist
“The title of nutritionists is not protected by law, meaning that anyone can advertise their services as a nutritionist”
There are some well qualified persons who practice as nutritionists, but there are some others less qualified than me!

[winseer]

Believe in Church or State… We’re not in the position in this country yet - where they are both back to being one and the same thing like is becoming the case in America and Russia right now.

Anyone with any sense - might want to resist being “Marked up” in a way that takes total control over one’s entire life from cradle to the grave…

[franglais]

manalishi:
I get a lot of these front line medical nuggets from my currently stricken friend,who is a most astute cynic in respect of what the system tries to foist on its customers and its pretty chastening to hear tbh.Things like the fact that most Oncologists refuse to undergo Chemotherapy themselves when stricken with the big C.

“most Oncologists”? 50% or more? Your friend has done a survey, or knows of one? If you have any figures to support your friends claim, please show them.
.
forbes.com/sites/quora/2018 … et-cancer/
The following is a personal view article.

" What will an oncologist do if he himself gets a tumour? originally appeared on Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world.

Answer by David Chan, MD from UCLA, Stanford Oncology Fellowship, on Quora:

Oncologists get cancer and die of cancer at the same rates as the general population. There are a number of very famous academic oncologist who have died from cancer, ironically in some cases from the cancer for which they were considered world experts.

I’ve treated or participated in the treatment of oncologists with cancer. They take the same treatment as everyone else, including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and all the various kinds of radiation.

What I’ve never witnessed or heard about, is an oncologist with cancer who decided to not take appropriate treatment but instead attempt any of the homeopathic or alternative “treatments” in vogue for that year.

I have had oncologists decline treatment when it’s appropriate to not treat. I recently had the misfortune of treating a very well known experienced oncologist and personal friend who’d I had treated for a couple of decades through three different kinds of cancer. On the fourth cancer, he’d had a widespread cancer found late and of a type poorly treated by anything.

After all the testing, I met with him and his family and went through the options. At the end of a very extensive discussion of the situation and options available for treatment, several of his children urged him to take chemotherapy which I had explained that in his situation would not be curative and of minimal effectiveness.

My oncologist friend made up his mind by saying that he greatly appreciated my thoughts on his situation. He very kindly and with a small smile complemented me on a discussion well done. He then turned to his family and told them why he wasn’t going to take treatment. He’d been through a lot with his previous cancers which had successfully treated. He didn’t want to do much more this time around. He decided on hospice and I agreed.

This question originally appeared on Quora - the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world."

[manalishi]

Franglais:

manalishi:
I get a lot of these front line medical nuggets from my currently stricken friend,who is a most astute cynic in respect of what the system tries to foist on its customers and its pretty chastening to hear tbh.Things like the fact that most Oncologists refuse to undergo Chemotherapy themselves when stricken with the big C.

“most Oncologists”? 50% or more? Your friend has done a survey, or knows of one? If you have any figures to support your friends claim, please show them.
.
forbes.com/sites/quora/2018 … et-cancer/
The following is a personal view article.

" What will an oncologist do if he himself gets a tumour? originally appeared on Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world.

Answer by David Chan, MD from UCLA, Stanford Oncology Fellowship, on Quora:

Oncologists get cancer and die of cancer at the same rates as the general population. There are a number of very famous academic oncologist who have died from cancer, ironically in some cases from the cancer for which they were considered world experts.

I’ve treated or participated in the treatment of oncologists with cancer. They take the same treatment as everyone else, including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and all the various kinds of radiation.

What I’ve never witnessed or heard about, is an oncologist with cancer who decided to not take appropriate treatment but instead attempt any of the homeopathic or alternative “treatments” in vogue for that year.

I have had oncologists decline treatment when it’s appropriate to not treat. I recently had the misfortune of treating a very well known experienced oncologist and personal friend who’d I had treated for a couple of decades through three different kinds of cancer. On the fourth cancer, he’d had a widespread cancer found late and of a type poorly treated by anything.

After all the testing, I met with him and his family and went through the options. At the end of a very extensive discussion of the situation and options available for treatment, several of his children urged him to take chemotherapy which I had explained that in his situation would not be curative and of minimal effectiveness.

My oncologist friend made up his mind by saying that he greatly appreciated my thoughts on his situation. He very kindly and with a small smile complemented me on a discussion well done. He then turned to his family and told them why he wasn’t going to take treatment. He’d been through a lot with his previous cancers which had successfully treated. He didn’t want to do much more this time around. He decided on hospice and I agreed.

This question originally appeared on Quora - the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world."

[manalishi]

manalishi:

Franglais:

manalishi:
I get a lot of these front line medical nuggets from my currently stricken friend,who is a most astute cynic in respect of what the system tries to foist on its customers and its pretty chastening to hear tbh.Things like the fact that most Oncologists refuse to undergo Chemotherapy themselves when stricken with the big C.

“most Oncologists”? 50% or more? Your friend has done a survey, or knows of one? If you have any figures to support your friends claim, please show them.
.
forbes.com/sites/quora/2018 … et-cancer/
The following is a personal view article.

" What will an oncologist do if he himself gets a tumour? originally appeared on Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world.

Answer by David Chan, MD from UCLA, Stanford Oncology Fellowship, on Quora:

Oncologists get cancer and die of cancer at the same rates as the general population. There are a number of very famous academic oncologist who have died from cancer, ironically in some cases from the cancer for which they were considered world experts.

I’ve treated or participated in the treatment of oncologists with cancer. They take the same treatment as everyone else, including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and all the various kinds of radiation.

What I’ve never witnessed or heard about, is an oncologist with cancer who decided to not take appropriate treatment but instead attempt any of the homeopathic or alternative “treatments” in vogue for that year.

I have had oncologists decline treatment when it’s appropriate to not treat. I recently had the misfortune of treating a very well known experienced oncologist and personal friend who’d I had treated for a couple of decades through three different kinds of cancer. On the fourth cancer, he’d had a widespread cancer found late and of a type poorly treated by anything.

After all the testing, I met with him and his family and went through the options. At the end of a very extensive discussion of the situation and options available for treatment, several of his children urged him to take chemotherapy which I had explained that in his situation would not be curative and of minimal effectiveness.

My oncologist friend made up his mind by saying that he greatly appreciated my thoughts on his situation. He very kindly and with a small smile complemented me on a discussion well done. He then turned to his family and told them why he wasn’t going to take treatment. He’d been through a lot with his previous cancers which had successfully treated. He didn’t want to do much more this time around. He decided on hospice and I agreed.

This question originally appeared on Quora - the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world."

I guess we’re all looking for clues at the scene of the crime,you go for establishment narratives,I do the opposite.I recommend a PDF by Eustace Mullins-Murder By Injection for an interesting overview and the ‘Anti terrorist Handbook’ (Authors name not given…banksy style,balaclava wearing chap on the cover) for an interesting take on matters,medical and other.

[carryfast]

Winseer:
Believe in Church or State

0
Anyone with any sense - might want to resist being “Marked up” in a way that takes total control over one’s entire life from cradle to the grave…
1

Going by the book it obviously also infers that resistance is futile.‘He’ ‘will’ win that battle but not the war.Believe in Church 'and State is the mark of a Nationalist as opposed to evil atheistic Commy scum.

[juddian]

maybe time a famous obituary was heard again before quoting it triggers the, coming your way in due course, censorbots

‘‘Today we mourn the passing of a beloved old friend, Common Sense, who has been with us for many years. No one knows for sure how old he was, since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic red tape.
He will be remembered as having cultivated such valuable lessons as knowing when to come in out of the rain, why the early bird gets the worm, life isn’t always fair, and maybe it was my fault. Common Sense lived by simple, sound financial policies (don’t spend more than you earn) and reliable parenting (adults, not children, are in charge). His health began to deteriorate rapidly when well-intentioned, but overbearing, regulations were set in place.
Reports of a six-year-old boy charged with ■■■■■■ harassment for kissing a classmate, teenagers suspended from school for using mouthwash after lunch and a teacher fired for reprimanding an unruly student, only worsened his condition. Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked teachers for doing the job they had themselves failed to do in disciplining their unruly children. It declined even further when schools were required to get parental consent to administer paracetamol, sun lotion or a plaster to a pupil, but could not inform the parents when a pupil became pregnant and wanted to have an abortion.
Common Sense lost the will to live as the Ten Commandments became contraband, churches became businesses and criminals received better treatment than their victims. Common Sense took a beating when you couldn’t defend yourself from a burglar in your own home, but the burglar could sue you for assault because you protected yourself and your own.
Common Sense finally gave up the will to live after a woman failed to realise that a steaming cup of coffee was hot. She spilled a little in her lap and was promptly awarded a huge settlement.
Common Sense was preceded in death by his parents, Truth and Trust, his wife, Discretion, his daughter, Responsibility and his son, Reason. He is survived by three stepbrothers; I Know My Rights, Someone Else is to Blame, and I’m A Victim. Not many attended his funeral because so few realised that he was gone.’’

[carryfast]

Juddian:
He is survived by three stepbrothers; I Know My Rights, Someone Else is to Blame, and I’m A Victim. Not many attended his funeral because so few realised that he was gone.‘’

In this case the ‘victim’ was all those poor US and Australian troops who were needlessly sacrificed in Vietnam as part of the CCP appeasement agenda because the US was too scared of war with China by taking Le May’s advice.With CCP laughably playing the victim card.
Here we are 55 years later the victims of a CCP bioweapon attack.With their conventional forces about to run rampant without opposition.

[winseer]

One day, people will wake up and realize that they’ve been lying to themselves all along: They don’t really give a crap about anything, even their own well-being.

The lives of all too many these days - are based on a complete “Emperor’s New Clothes” fashion-lie that somehow what someone got told by the guy down the pub who put it in a tweet and it went viral… rather than bother to find out the facts from themselves, which means that you needed to learn it at Pre-Leftie-takeover School, rather than something that got re-plugged on the internet after the Wiki re-write of old historical accounts to reflect the Nu-Narrative…

[franglais]

manalishi:

manalishi:

Franglais:

manalishi:
I get a lot of these front line medical nuggets from my currently stricken friend,who is a most astute cynic in respect of what the system tries to foist on its customers and its pretty chastening to hear tbh.Things like the fact that most Oncologists refuse to undergo Chemotherapy themselves when stricken with the big C.

“most Oncologists”? 50% or more? Your friend has done a survey, or knows of one? If you have any figures to support your friends claim, please show them.
.
forbes.com/sites/quora/2018 … et-cancer/
The following is a personal view article.

" What will an oncologist do if he himself gets a tumour? originally appeared on Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world.

Answer by David Chan, MD from UCLA, Stanford Oncology Fellowship, on Quora:

Oncologists get cancer and die of cancer at the same rates as the general population. There are a number of very famous academic oncologist who have died from cancer, ironically in some cases from the cancer for which they were considered world experts.

I’ve treated or participated in the treatment of oncologists with cancer. They take the same treatment as everyone else, including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and all the various kinds of radiation.

What I’ve never witnessed or heard about, is an oncologist with cancer who decided to not take appropriate treatment but instead attempt any of the homeopathic or alternative “treatments” in vogue for that year.

I have had oncologists decline treatment when it’s appropriate to not treat. I recently had the misfortune of treating a very well known experienced oncologist and personal friend who’d I had treated for a couple of decades through three different kinds of cancer. On the fourth cancer, he’d had a widespread cancer found late and of a type poorly treated by anything.

After all the testing, I met with him and his family and went through the options. At the end of a very extensive discussion of the situation and options available for treatment, several of his children urged him to take chemotherapy which I had explained that in his situation would not be curative and of minimal effectiveness.

My oncologist friend made up his mind by saying that he greatly appreciated my thoughts on his situation. He very kindly and with a small smile complemented me on a discussion well done. He then turned to his family and told them why he wasn’t going to take treatment. He’d been through a lot with his previous cancers which had successfully treated. He didn’t want to do much more this time around. He decided on hospice and I agreed.

This question originally appeared on Quora - the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world."

I guess we’re all looking for clues at the scene of the crime,you go for establishment narratives,I do the opposite.I recommend a PDF by Eustace Mullins-Murder By Injection for an interesting overview and the ‘Anti terrorist Handbook’ (Authors name not given…banksy style,balaclava wearing chap on the cover) for an interesting take on matters,medical and other.

So, I choose an “establishment” viewpoint?
Yep. Openly published works, by known persons, whose qualifications are open to scrutiny, whose research is openly discussed and criticised by their peers. Not drugs recommended “on a hunch”. Drugs that are approved by NICE, and which I, as an adult, am free to accept or refuse.
The “establishment” is not perfect.
The should IMHO be greater State scrutiny of drug trials and more State expenditure on research and development as well as on supervision.
But I prefer this to anonymous www pieces and books by holocaust deniers etc.

[winseer]

Keep a hold on your freedoms. Once they’re gone otherwise - they ain’t coming back!

There’s been a lot of police memes of late involving a certain “Robot”…

You have 20 seconds to comply.

Whilst “What could possibly go wrong?” springs to mind from this decades-old scene - it is worth considering that the police had to have got orders or at least permission to act they way they are of late…

I don’t think this has anything to do with Priti Patel, neither btw.

q u a r a n t i n e 🥱

<Warning - Contains Category-15 swear words - Not suitable for PG or U certification>