I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.
So are you saying that it’s illegal for anyone to marry or at least have a normal ■■■■■■ relationship with a ‘child’ under the age of 18 or not .
The question as to wether it should ever be legal for two blokes or two women to marry each other is another matter.I certainly wouldn’t want to get married under any roof in any church where the vicar had married two blokes or two women to each other.
I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.
So are you saying that it’s illegal for anyone to marry or at least have a normal ■■■■■■ relationship with a ‘child’ under the age of 18 or not .
The question as to wether it should ever be legal for two blokes or two women to marry each other is another matter.I certainly wouldn’t want to get married under any roof in any church where the vicar had married two blokes or two women to each other.
I called you morally dubious, not illegal. And let’s face it you’re the most morally dubious character on here. It’s a fine line between 15 and 16 and one I reckon you’d have no problems crossing. I’m 34 and I’d consider it morally dubious having a relationship with a 16 year old at my age let alone your advanced years. Thankfully I doubt any would touch you with a bargepole.
switchlogic:
And as for Carryfast I assume he has nothing in his closet since he seems more than happy to tell us about his paedophilic tendencies on an open forum…
As I’ve said if anything I’ve said about my own views is the same thing as being a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ then so is Prince Philip, Prince Charles,at least two other examples which I’ve posted here and two others which I know of personally in which the church was happy enough to marry the couples which precedent shows were perfectly legal large age gap relationships,and my own Father.
You keep mentioning Charles and his Father, what did they do to make them paedophiles?
Prince Philip began corresponding with Elizabeth when she was 13. When he was at war I doubt he was shagging her in the orchard of the palace. The royals have their path mapped out for them, or they certainly did then, the choice of suitors is decidedly small.
And how does Prince Charles marrying Diana make him a ■■■■■■■■■■, she was working as a play school teacher when they got together. she was 19
As I heard it he was what would be classed an ‘adult’ assuming adult means the age of 18 sending romantic letters (e mails now) to a thirteen year old girl.Is that grooming under your ideas or not .
Prince Charles first ‘noticed’ Dianna Spencer when she was 15 so not much different to a quick whistle and wink at the 15 year old Sam Fox assuming that she’d have preferred bokes to women.
Perhaps you have read the romantic letters I haven’t, but what is so different from writing pen pal messages to a friend? We did that before email and she was probably helping him to learn English or she to learn Greek.
Of course Charles noticed Diana, he was shagging her sister Sarah
None of which make it paedophilia.
I have had several wet dreams over Suzi Quattro, non of them arrestable some of them quite healthy, will she be accused of inappropriate behaviour towards me on her 65th birthday.
However many of your own posts would lead me to think if someone went missing in your area, then the police would have reason to visit for an alibi
I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.
So are you saying that it’s illegal for anyone to marry or at least have a normal ■■■■■■ relationship with a ‘child’ under the age of 18 or not .
The question as to wether it should ever be legal for two blokes or two women to marry each other is another matter.I certainly wouldn’t want to get married under any roof in any church where the vicar had married two blokes or two women to each other.
I called you morally dubious, not illegal. And let’s face it you’re the most morally dubious character on here. It’s a fine line between 15 and 16 and one I reckon you’d have no problems crossing. I’m 34 and I’d consider it morally dubious having a relationship with a 16 year old at my age let alone your advanced years. Thankfully I doubt any would touch you with a bargepole.
Make your mind up you’re saying that what I’ve said isn’t illegal and then you say the line between 15 and 16 is a fine line which I’d cross.
Based on what and where have I ever said that.Assuming that you mean the type of relationship which would be subject to the age of consent .
To make it clear again I’m saying that there’s nothing illegal,therefore morally wrong,about anyone,regardless of age,being in a relationship with any girl who’s under the age of 18.I’ve also said that anyone involved in a ■■■■■■ relationship with a girl under the age of consent would be a criminal which would also therefore obviously be morally wrong too.
Which is why I’ve also posted at least two examples which prove that.So what gives you the right to say that a couple who love each other are morally wrong to marry each other regardless of their relative ages.That’s their choice and decision not yours and contrary to your bs ideas there are no laws,legally or morally,that would stop such a relationship subject to the usual age of consent which has been in place for years.
No surprise though that yet more hypocricy applies to the issues.In this case it’s someone who seems to want everyone to accept their perverted ideas,concerning human relationships,on the basis that anyone who disagrees with them is homophobic,while themselves seeming to be ageophobic,in the case of normal heterosexual relationships,when it suits them.So far many of those in the church have seen through and obviously disagree with those bs hypocritical ideas when it comes to marrying large age gap couples involving blokes over your abitrary bs limits to women under the age of 18 as opposed to marrying same ■■■ couples of any age.Hopefully that will remain the case.
triple-tango:
You come across as a single, bitter homophobic, who likes underage girls. Am I right?
It’s ironic how biologically perverted relationships that were not long ago illegal are now legal but other types of legal biologically normal relationships are being increasingly seen as illegal.
No surprise though that the hypocrites see ageophobia,in the case of heterosexual marriages,as acceptable.While complaining about those,who refuse to recognise same ■■■ marriage,because it’s a perversion,on the bs grounds of homophobia.It seem to me to be a case of a phobia when it suits but not when it doesn’t.
keebs26uk:
Jackson is one of my childhood idols, I know for a fact they picked him as a target because he was a easy one. Weird lifestyle and comes across troubled etc etc oh what an easy target
It was all bull
Know for a fact■■?
Load of ■■■■■■■■, he was a dirty perv and is in the best place for everyone right now, underground.
Shame he used his money to avoid the truth coming out.
To say a legend like MJ deserves to be in the ground is a joke. How come the guy has millions of fans still after all that crap ? Because none of us believe 1 word. The world loved that man his career nearly got destroyed because of the bull
And to switch logic I am not defending Peodos it’s sick. If he did do all the accused stuff then he was a horrible man who should of been punished.
I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.
So are you saying that it’s illegal for anyone to marry or at least have a normal ■■■■■■ relationship with a ‘child’ under the age of 18 or not .
The question as to wether it should ever be legal for two blokes or two women to marry each other is another matter.I certainly wouldn’t want to get married under any roof in any church where the vicar had married two blokes or two women to each other.
I called you morally dubious, not illegal. And let’s face it you’re the most morally dubious character on here. It’s a fine line between 15 and 16 and one I reckon you’d have no problems crossing. I’m 34 and I’d consider it morally dubious having a relationship with a 16 year old at my age let alone your advanced years. Thankfully I doubt any would touch you with a bargepole.
I’m a similar age to you I’m 33 and I wouldn’t dream of having a relationship with a 16 year old. A person under 21 has such a different outlook of life than someone of my age there views on life and moral compass isn’t formed and I think dn older person can manipulate them and take advantage and I’ve found men I have come across who are over 30 who have been in relationships with teenage girls have given me the creeps and come across as Pervs.
And this is no PCM brainwashing Carryfast its real life experince.
As for gays your mental the thought of getting intimate with a man makes me cringe but if you want to do it with another consenting man it’s none of my business and you should be able to and if you want to commit to marriage it’s about love not gender.
Anyway what time you off to the park tomorrow.
switchlogic:
And as for Carryfast I assume he has nothing in his closet since he seems more than happy to tell us about his paedophilic tendencies on an open forum…
As I’ve said if anything I’ve said about my own views is the same thing as being a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ then so is Prince Philip, Prince Charles,at least two other examples which I’ve posted here and two others which I know of personally in which the church was happy enough to marry the couples which precedent shows were perfectly legal large age gap relationships,and my own Father.
You keep mentioning Charles and his Father, what did they do to make them paedophiles?
Prince Philip began corresponding with Elizabeth when she was 13. When he was at war I doubt he was shagging her in the orchard of the palace. The royals have their path mapped out for them, or they certainly did then, the choice of suitors is decidedly small.
And how does Prince Charles marrying Diana make him a ■■■■■■■■■■, she was working as a play school teacher when they got together. she was 19
As I heard it he was what would be classed an ‘adult’ assuming adult means the age of 18 sending romantic letters (e mails now) to a thirteen year old girl.Is that grooming under your ideas or not .
Prince Charles first ‘noticed’ Dianna Spencer when she was 15 so not much different to a quick whistle and wink at the 15 year old Sam Fox assuming that she’d have preferred bokes to women.
Perhaps you have read the romantic letters I haven’t, but what is so different from writing pen pal messages to a friend? We did that before email and she was probably helping him to learn English or she to learn Greek.
Of course Charles noticed Diana, he was shagging her sister Sarah
None of which make it paedophilia.
However many of your own posts would lead me to think if someone went missing in your area, then the police would have reason to visit for an alibi
According to the historians the letters written by Prince Philip were a bit more romantically inclined than just pen pals as the marriage which came a bit later after them proves.But no surprise that you’re one of those who seem to think that the idea of understanding large age gap relationships and marriages seems to in some way then jump to the assumption of someone being a suspect in something like ‘someone going missing’ .Where the zb is the logic and your justification for that .
All of which seems to suggest to me,just as I’ve said,that the whole thing possibly in this case,but definitely in the Jeremy Forrest case,is just being used as a stunt to turn decent large age gap relationship into something much more sinister.
Next thing you’ll be saying that it was me not Savile who was there pulling all the birds on TOTP.If only I was that lucky.
I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.
So are you saying that it’s illegal for anyone to marry or at least have a normal ■■■■■■ relationship with a ‘child’ under the age of 18 or not .
The question as to wether it should ever be legal for two blokes or two women to marry each other is another matter.I certainly wouldn’t want to get married under any roof in any church where the vicar had married two blokes or two women to each other.
I called you morally dubious, not illegal. And let’s face it you’re the most morally dubious character on here. It’s a fine line between 15 and 16 and one I reckon you’d have no problems crossing. I’m 34 and I’d consider it morally dubious having a relationship with a 16 year old at my age let alone your advanced years. Thankfully I doubt any would touch you with a bargepole.
I’m a similar age to you I’m 33 and I wouldn’t dream of having a relationship with a 16 year old. A person under 21 has such a different outlook of life than someone of my age there views on life and moral compass isn’t formed and I think dn older person can manipulate them and take advantage and I’ve found men I have come across who are over 30 who have been in relationships with teenage girls have given me the creeps and come across as Pervs.
And this is no PCM brainwashing Carryfast its real life experince.
As for gays your mental the thought of getting intimate with a man makes me cringe but if you want to do it with another consenting man it’s none of my business and you should be able to and if you want to commit to marriage it’s about love not gender.
Anyway what time you off to the park tomorrow.
Who gives a zb what ‘you’ think it’s a matter of choice and if two people of very different ages love each other that’s got nothing to do with you because it’s none of your business just so long as such a relationship complies with the age of consent.
What you’re saying is that large age gap relationships involving under 18 girls and middle aged blokes are illegal and perverted just because of the age gap when the fact is they aren’t.Yet.
But if you really want a retrospective witch hunt,concerning middle aged blokes,who’ve dated and managed to marry mid teen girls there’s plenty of examples out there for you to start rounding up not me.Because,as I’ve said,I haven’t ever managed to find one whereas there’ plenty of blokes out there who have and that’s also based on real life experience and their wives or the vicars who married them certainly didn’t think that they were perverts.
I’d say that your comments are jut a load of ageist bs as bad as,if not worse than,any so called homophobia or racism.
By all accounts they’ve already done it but he’s done a runner.Reports said that someone heard someone shouting ow’s about that then but thought they were hearing things.
I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.
So are you saying that it’s illegal for anyone to marry or at least have a normal ■■■■■■ relationship with a ‘child’ under the age of 18 or not .
The question as to wether it should ever be legal for two blokes or two women to marry each other is another matter.I certainly wouldn’t want to get married under any roof in any church where the vicar had married two blokes or two women to each other.
I called you morally dubious, not illegal. And let’s face it you’re the most morally dubious character on here. It’s a fine line between 15 and 16 and one I reckon you’d have no problems crossing. I’m 34 and I’d consider it morally dubious having a relationship with a 16 year old at my age let alone your advanced years. Thankfully I doubt any would touch you with a bargepole.
I’m a similar age to you I’m 33 and I wouldn’t dream of having a relationship with a 16 year old. A person under 21 has such a different outlook of life than someone of my age there views on life and moral compass isn’t formed and I think dn older person can manipulate them and take advantage and I’ve found men I have come across who are over 30 who have been in relationships with teenage girls have given me the creeps and come across as Pervs.
And this is no PCM brainwashing Carryfast its real life experince.
As for gays your mental the thought of getting intimate with a man makes me cringe but if you want to do it with another consenting man it’s none of my business and you should be able to and if you want to commit to marriage it’s about love not gender.
Anyway what time you off to the park tomorrow.
Who gives a zb what ‘you’ think it’s a matter of choice and if two people of very different ages love each other that’s got nothing to do with you because it’s none of your business just so long as such a relationship complies with the age of consent.
What you’re saying is that large age gap relationships involving under 18 girls and middle aged blokes are illegal and perverted just because of the age gap when the fact is they aren’t.Yet.
But if you really want a retrospective witch hunt,concerning middle aged blokes,who’ve dated and managed to marry mid teen girls there’s plenty of examples out there for you to start rounding up not me.Because,as I’ve said,I haven’t ever managed to find one whereas there’ plenty of blokes out there who have and that’s also based on real life experience and their wives or the vicars who married them certainly didn’t think that they were perverts.
I’d say that your comments are jut a load of ageist bs as bad as,if not worse than,any so called homophobia or racism.
Let’s throw that back at you, slightly modified -
“Who gives a zb what ‘you’ think it’s a matter of choice and if two people of the same ■■■ love each other that’s got nothing to do with you because it’s none of your business just so long as such a relationship complies with the age of consent.”
See what I did there?
Maybe if you weren’t so judgemental and bigoted when it comes to others people may be prepared to listen to you. As it is you’re just a sad old man fantasising about young girls way out of your reach.
Carryfast:
Based on what and where have I ever said that.Assuming that you mean the type of relationship which would be subject to the age of consent .
Based on having read a lot of your tripe and deciding you come across as a freaky old creep.
Muckaway:
Sky News have shown pictures of Savilles’ accusers how they looked when the abuse occured, and how they look today.
The captions say “Now…then…now…then…now…then.”
Or more like
Well considering they were underage you seem to have just implied something here…
I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.
So are you saying that it’s illegal for anyone to marry or at least have a normal ■■■■■■ relationship with a ‘child’ under the age of 18 or not .
The question as to wether it should ever be legal for two blokes or two women to marry each other is another matter.I certainly wouldn’t want to get married under any roof in any church where the vicar had married two blokes or two women to each other.
I called you morally dubious, not illegal. And let’s face it you’re the most morally dubious character on here. It’s a fine line between 15 and 16 and one I reckon you’d have no problems crossing. I’m 34 and I’d consider it morally dubious having a relationship with a 16 year old at my age let alone your advanced years. Thankfully I doubt any would touch you with a bargepole.
I’m a similar age to you I’m 33 and I wouldn’t dream of having a relationship with a 16 year old. A person under 21 has such a different outlook of life than someone of my age there views on life and moral compass isn’t formed and I think dn older person can manipulate them and take advantage and I’ve found men I have come across who are over 30 who have been in relationships with teenage girls have given me the creeps and come across as Pervs.
And this is no PCM brainwashing Carryfast its real life experince.
As for gays your mental the thought of getting intimate with a man makes me cringe but if you want to do it with another consenting man it’s none of my business and you should be able to and if you want to commit to marriage it’s about love not gender.
Anyway what time you off to the park tomorrow.
Who gives a zb what ‘you’ think it’s a matter of choice and if two people of very different ages love each other that’s got nothing to do with you because it’s none of your business just so long as such a relationship complies with the age of consent.
What you’re saying is that large age gap relationships involving under 18 girls and middle aged blokes are illegal and perverted just because of the age gap when the fact is they aren’t.Yet.
But if you really want a retrospective witch hunt,concerning middle aged blokes,who’ve dated and managed to marry mid teen girls there’s plenty of examples out there for you to start rounding up not me.Because,as I’ve said,I haven’t ever managed to find one whereas there’ plenty of blokes out there who have and that’s also based on real life experience and their wives or the vicars who married them certainly didn’t think that they were perverts.
I’d say that your comments are jut a load of ageist bs as bad as,if not worse than,any so called homophobia or racism.
Let’s throw that back at you slightly, modified -
Who gives a zb what ‘you’ think it’s a matter of choice and if two people of the same ■■■ love each other that’s got nothing to do with you because it’s none of your business just so long as such a relationship complies with the age of consent.
Maybe if you weren’t so judgemental and bigoted when it comes to others people maybe prepared to listen to you. As it is you’re just a sad old man fantasising about young girls way out of your reach.
The difference is an older man marrying a,sometimes much,younger woman doesn’t go against all the laws of nature which is why the church has never had a problem marrying that type of couple compared to a couple of the same ■■■.However assuming that maybe reaching an agreement to disagree,by dropping the charges against Jeremy Forrest, in exchange for each seperate group minding their own business,might fix it.In which case everyone is happy and who knows as they say there’s someone for everyone out there although unfortunately the one for me chose a bloke around 30 years older than her when she was in her mid teens.Although some say that lightning can strike twice though so who knows maybe it’ll hit me instead next time.
Muckaway:
Sky News have shown pictures of Savilles’ accusers how they looked when the abuse occured, and how they look today.
The captions say “Now…then…now…then…now…then.”
Or more like
Well considering they were underage you seem to have just implied something here…
So was I assuming it was all about the early 1970’s or before and as I’ve said the age of consent doesn’t apply in the case of just smiling at or dating a bird anyway.
But it was meant more of a comparison concerning the way they’ve aged since because birds with those morals wouldn’t have been on my list anyway at the time.
Ah so Carryfast is a religious man I see. No wonder he lives in a fantasy land when he believes in a bunch of fairy stories. You’ll be defending ■■■■■■■■■ priests next. I’m happy to be disliked by any institution that covers up widespread ■■■■■■ abuse.
Muckaway:
Sky News have shown pictures of Savilles’ accusers how they looked when the abuse occured, and how they look today.
The captions say “Now…then…now…then…now…then.”
Or more like
Well considering they were underage you seem to have just implied something here…
So was I assuming it was all about the early 1970’s or before and as I’ve said the age of consent doesn’t apply in the case of just smiling at or dating a bird anyway.
But it was meant more of a comparison concerning the way they’ve aged since because birds with those morals wouldn’t have been on my list anyway at the time.
Birds with those morals? Ah yes, you mean young girls who objected to being ■■■■■■■■ abused as children. Well done you old perv.
.
