Jimmy Savile

It looks like they’re going to be firing up that JCB after all then. :smiling_imp:

Although I always thought what a waste when I found out that Sam Fox preferred other women and gradually started turning into a bloke instead of a schoolgirl with great knockers.No doubt the BBC think she did the right thing and all those blokes who admired her figure when she was on page 3 as a teenager are now perverts. :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19856081#

Looks as if Freddie Starr is going to take some stick now.

Dave the Renegade:
Looks as if Freddie Starr is going to take some stick now.

:open_mouth:

I’m just waiting someone at the BBC to say that they’ve found a letter left by Savile with instructions not to be opened before 6/10/2012 saying that the whole thing is a big wind up thought up by Star and Savile before he went. :smiling_imp:

youtube.com/watch?v=ClR4Df8Z … re=related

A group of dislexic mothers have just given Jimmy Somerville a right kicking.

Carlc:
A group of dislexic mothers have just given Jimmy Somerville a right kicking.

For no other reason than that he deserved it :laughing:

Blatant ■■■■■■ abuse at the Radio 1 roadshows apparently.

Was Smiley Miley involved?

A single creepy tracksuit wearing god fan who lived with his mother.

If it were,nt for fame he would of been a security guard.

oatcake1967:
A single creepy tracksuit wearing god fan who lived with his mother.

If it were,nt for fame he would of been a security guard.

And an Eddie Stobart spotter.

What I don’t understand is if it did happen I could understand it not coming out at the time but over the years as people like Garry glitter and Jonathan king got caught why it didn’t come out then.
I always thought it would come out he was gay.

Got to love this forum, where some who think being a homosexual and having relationships with same ■■■ consenting adults is disgusting yet will happily defend pedophilia. It was an open secret for years that Saville was a pervert, these revelations are nothing new, they are just being taken more seriously now. They should have been taken seriously years ago and I don’t give a ■■■■ if he’s dead they need to be looked into.

And as for Carryfast I assume he has nothing in his closet since he seems more than happy to tell us about his paedophilic tendencies on an open forum…

And it’s all good and well saying they should have said something at the time but how would you feel as a 12/13/14 year old victim of ■■■■■■ abuse going up in public against the most famous man in the country? You’ve really no idea. ■■■■■■ abuse destroys lives and leaves people mentally ruined, stop judging them.

switchlogic:
And as for Carryfast I assume he has nothing in his closet since he seems more than happy to tell us about his paedophilic tendencies on an open forum…

As I’ve said if anything I’ve said about my own views is the same thing as being a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ then so is Prince Philip, Prince Charles,at least two other examples which I’ve posted here and two others which I know of personally in which the church was happy enough to marry the couples which precedent shows were perfectly legal large age gap relationships,and my own Father. :imp:

In just the same way that I think that the so called ‘crime’ that Jeremy Forrest has committed in no way has any relationship whatsoever to the type of crime that the evil zb,who’s committed a real case of child abduction,in the recent news,has done.In the former case it’s no different to either of those other two legal precedents.While in the latter,as I’ve said,if they catch the zb and he’s found guilty then he should fry in the electric chair.

By the same yardstick of good old fashioned justice the perversion of homosexuality should still be subject to exactly the same laws as we had here before it was legalised.Who’s calling who a pervert now. :imp:

As for Jimmy Savile he’s dead so it’s going to be a bit difficult to make him answer in court for his alleged crimes now.Although as I’ve said it doesn’t take a genius to realise that his views on treating women were a lot different to mine or the type of decent age gap relationship involving a middle aged bloke and a 15-16 year old girl such as in the legal examples which I’ve posted and which the Jeremy Forrest case fall into.

As for the women involved in the Savile case it also doesn’t take a genius to realise that many of them were old enough to know what they were doing and weren’t exactly snatched off the street by him and dragged kicking and screaming into his room while still fighting him off when they got there .While in the Jeremy Forrest type case if only those type of girls would actually show just a bit more morals in the type of blokes that they’re looking for so it’s the single ones who get the girl not married or divorced ones.

keebs26uk:
Jackson is one of my childhood idols, I know for a fact they picked him as a target because he was a easy one. Weird lifestyle and comes across troubled etc etc oh what an easy target

It was all bull

Know for a fact■■?
Load of ■■■■■■■■, he was a dirty perv and is in the best place for everyone right now, underground.
Shame he used his money to avoid the truth coming out.

switchlogic:
And it’s all good and well saying they should have said something at the time but how would you feel as a 12/13/14 year old victim of ■■■■■■ abuse going up in public against the most famous man in the country? You’ve really no idea. ■■■■■■ abuse destroys lives and leaves people mentally ruined, stop judging them.

So true. I know of a family who had to go through it, but they are still too frightened to speak out. It is the way the ■■■■■■■■■■ or child abuser works by instilling fear or ridicule into their minds.

.

Carryfast:
Who’s calling who a pervert now. :imp:

I’m calling you a pervert you daft old codger because I’ve had enough of morally dubious types like you on here calling me one for having relationships with consenting adults. Yes adults, because unlike you I don’t ■■■■ after children.

Carryfast:

switchlogic:
And as for Carryfast I assume he has nothing in his closet since he seems more than happy to tell us about his paedophilic tendencies on an open forum…

As I’ve said if anything I’ve said about my own views is the same thing as being a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ then so is Prince Philip, Prince Charles,at least two other examples which I’ve posted here and two others which I know of personally in which the church was happy enough to marry the couples which precedent shows were perfectly legal large age gap relationships,and my own Father. :imp:

You keep mentioning Charles and his Father, what did they do to make them paedophiles?

Prince Philip began corresponding with Elizabeth when she was 13. When he was at war I doubt he was shagging her in the orchard of the palace. The royals have their path mapped out for them, or they certainly did then, the choice of suitors is decidedly small.

And how does Prince Charles marrying Diana make him a ■■■■■■■■■■, she was working as a play school teacher when they got together. she was 19

I’m amazed Crazyfart hasn’t blamed Thatcher for Jimmy Savilles’ behaviour.

Wheel Nut:

Carryfast:

switchlogic:
And as for Carryfast I assume he has nothing in his closet since he seems more than happy to tell us about his paedophilic tendencies on an open forum…

As I’ve said if anything I’ve said about my own views is the same thing as being a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ then so is Prince Philip, Prince Charles,at least two other examples which I’ve posted here and two others which I know of personally in which the church was happy enough to marry the couples which precedent shows were perfectly legal large age gap relationships,and my own Father. :imp:

You keep mentioning Charles and his Father, what did they do to make them paedophiles?

Prince Philip began corresponding with Elizabeth when she was 13. When he was at war I doubt he was shagging her in the orchard of the palace. The royals have their path mapped out for them, or they certainly did then, the choice of suitors is decidedly small.

And how does Prince Charles marrying Diana make him a ■■■■■■■■■■, she was working as a play school teacher when they got together. she was 19

As I heard it he was what would be classed an ‘adult’ assuming adult means the age of 18 sending romantic letters (e mails now) to a thirteen year old girl.Is that grooming under your ideas or not :question: .

Prince Charles first ‘noticed’ Dianna Spencer when she was 15 so not much different to a quick whistle and wink at the 15 year old Sam Fox assuming that she’d have preferred bokes to women. :open_mouth: :smiling_imp: :laughing: