kr79:
Carryfast I can assure you I won’t get in your way in the stampede for 19 year old clunge.
Still I thought 19 would be a bit past it on your book.
Read what I’ve said.25 would be ok,19 would be great and under that would be an impossible dream.BUT.If Megan Stammers ever does send me that line saying that she’s read all my posts,taking into account the marriage between Joe and Nicola Philpot,and the way I got stitched up through life,and therefore she’s changed her mind about going for Jeremy Forrest and wants a date with me instead,then I’d be prepared to face down the age police taliban nutters on here.
Shes 15!!!
That’s right and in a matter of months she’ll be 16 when she,and whoever she’s with,can tell everyone,including you,to zb off and mind their own business regardless of what the couple decide to do at that point.However there’s no law against a bloke of whatever age having a chat and a coffee with a bird of 15.
The question is are you then saying that assuming the girl is in love with someone who doesn’t suit your accepted age range for her that she should then be forced against her will into a relationship with someone who she doesn’t love but who does fit that range, yes or no .
No not at all, love should come before anything else including age but not when that age is a child
So in the case of a 16 year old girl then what .
But she won’t know if it’s love or not before a few of those coffees and chats for a while.
It seems obvious to me that if you’d have been in my shoes during the 1970’s you would have freaked out and ended up in the nut house by 1980.
I still think 16 is too young, still a child no matter what the law says. If there wasnt a law to say you cant go out and beat up and rob a 80 year old lady that has just collected her pension money does that make it ok??
And you have lost me on the nut house bit, why would i be in there??
You didn’t answer the question.I don’t give a zb wether you think it’s too young or not.Are you saying that just based on that supposition,that because ‘you’ think it’s too young,the girl should be forced into a relationship with someone she doesn’t love but of her own age or can she keep dating and then marry the bloke who’s 30 years older than her who she does love .
You’ve been all that with the gob now answer the zb question.
The 50 year old bloke has to take some responsibility in knowing whats best for her and him. If she loves him it doesnt matter, he should still not go there and i think its pretty selfish to prey on a young teenage girls mind and feelings which are still going through puberty and changes with her body physically and mentally. Every man wants to be with a virgin but grooming a child for when she is 16 is not the right way to do it. And if she is like the average 16 year old around here then shes probably had more pricks than a dart board anyway.
kr79:
Carryfast I can assure you I won’t get in your way in the stampede for 19 year old clunge.
Still I thought 19 would be a bit past it on your book.
Read what I’ve said.25 would be ok,19 would be great and under that would be an impossible dream.BUT.If Megan Stammers ever does send me that line saying that she’s read all my posts,taking into account the marriage between Joe and Nicola Philpot,and the way I got stitched up through life,and therefore she’s changed her mind about going for Jeremy Forrest and wants a date with me instead,then I’d be prepared to face down the age police taliban nutters on here.
Shes 15!!!
That’s right and in a matter of months she’ll be 16 when she,and whoever she’s with,can tell everyone,including you,to zb off and mind their own business regardless of what the couple decide to do at that point.However there’s no law against a bloke of whatever age having a chat and a coffee with a bird of 15.
The question is are you then saying that assuming the girl is in love with someone who doesn’t suit your accepted age range for her that she should then be forced against her will into a relationship with someone who she doesn’t love but who does fit that range, yes or no .
No not at all, love should come before anything else including age but not when that age is a child
So in the case of a 16 year old girl then what .
But she won’t know if it’s love or not before a few of those coffees and chats for a while.
It seems obvious to me that if you’d have been in my shoes during the 1970’s you would have freaked out and ended up in the nut house by 1980.
I still think 16 is too young, still a child no matter what the law says. If there wasnt a law to say you cant go out and beat up and rob a 80 year old lady that has just collected her pension money does that make it ok??
And you have lost me on the nut house bit, why would i be in there??
You didn’t answer the question.I don’t give a zb wether you think it’s too young or not.Are you saying that just based on that supposition,that because ‘you’ think it’s too young,the girl should be forced into a relationship with someone she doesn’t love but of her own age or can she keep dating and then marry the bloke who’s 30 years older than her who she does love .
You’ve been all that with the gob now answer the zb question.
The 50 year old bloke has to take some responsibility in knowing whats best for her and him. If she loves him it doesnt matter, he should still not go there and i think its pretty selfish to prey on a young teenage girls mind and feelings which are still going through puberty and changes with her body physically and mentally. Every man wants to be with a virgin but grooming a child for when she is 16 is not the right way to do it. And if she is like the average 16 year old around here then shes probably had more pricks than a dart board anyway.
So what you’re saying is that HE should have let her go and go to me instead yes or no
bearing in mind that they’re still ,up to at least recently,assuming he’s not dead now,happily married and the fact he didn’t makkes him a ■■■■■■■■■■ just like zb Savile yes or no .
Assuming your answer is yes to both of those that makes you a bigger muppett than even kr and the rest which is saying something.
kr79:
Plenty more fish in the sea Geoffrey. You should have took it on the chin splashed some more brut on and hit the local discotheque
No either I was stitched up like a zb kipper at the time by a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ who went for the bird (child ) who should have been forced into accepting a date from me or everyone’s going to get an invite to the wedding between me and Megan Stammers and tell me how lucky I am to have pulled her.Assuming that adultering zb Jeremy Forrest doesn’t get her instead.
well confused. If you both went for the same bird (child) and hes a ■■■■■■■■■, what does that make you? And also, why should she be forced into a date with you??
He’s not a ■■■■■■■■■■ at all it’s only you who’s been saying he’s a ■■■■■■■■■■ just because of the age gap.Now answer the zb question.Yes or no should she be forced into a same age relationship with a bloke who she doesn’t love or should she be allowed to carry on dating and then eventually marry the bloke who’s 30 years older than her being that she’s 16 now .
But are you now also saying that it’s wrong for a 16 year old bloke to be dating ( just a coffee and a chat) a 15 year old bird too .
I have no idea what who your talking about!! Who have i said is a ■■■■■■■■■■■? I just read your response to kr79 and responded to that post alone.
And no its perfectly fine for a 16 year old boy to take a 15 year old bird out for coffee and a chat.
kr79:
Carryfast I can assure you I won’t get in your way in the stampede for 19 year old clunge.
Still I thought 19 would be a bit past it on your book.
Read what I’ve said.25 would be ok,19 would be great and under that would be an impossible dream.BUT.If Megan Stammers ever does send me that line saying that she’s read all my posts,taking into account the marriage between Joe and Nicola Philpot,and the way I got stitched up through life,and therefore she’s changed her mind about going for Jeremy Forrest and wants a date with me instead,then I’d be prepared to face down the age police taliban nutters on here.
Shes 15!!!
That’s right and in a matter of months she’ll be 16 when she,and whoever she’s with,can tell everyone,including you,to zb off and mind their own business regardless of what the couple decide to do at that point.However there’s no law against a bloke of whatever age having a chat and a coffee with a bird of 15.
The question is are you then saying that assuming the girl is in love with someone who doesn’t suit your accepted age range for her that she should then be forced against her will into a relationship with someone who she doesn’t love but who does fit that range, yes or no .
No not at all, love should come before anything else including age but not when that age is a child
So in the case of a 16 year old girl then what .
But she won’t know if it’s love or not before a few of those coffees and chats for a while.
It seems obvious to me that if you’d have been in my shoes during the 1970’s you would have freaked out and ended up in the nut house by 1980.
I still think 16 is too young, still a child no matter what the law says. If there wasnt a law to say you cant go out and beat up and rob a 80 year old lady that has just collected her pension money does that make it ok??
And you have lost me on the nut house bit, why would i be in there??
You didn’t answer the question.I don’t give a zb wether you think it’s too young or not.Are you saying that just based on that supposition,that because ‘you’ think it’s too young,the girl should be forced into a relationship with someone she doesn’t love but of her own age or can she keep dating and then marry the bloke who’s 30 years older than her who she does love .
You’ve been all that with the gob now answer the zb question.
The 50 year old bloke has to take some responsibility in knowing whats best for her and him. If she loves him it doesnt matter, he should still not go there and i think its pretty selfish to prey on a young teenage girls mind and feelings which are still going through puberty and changes with her body physically and mentally. Every man wants to be with a virgin but grooming a child for when she is 16 is not the right way to do it. And if she is like the average 16 year old around here then shes probably had more pricks than a dart board anyway.
So what you’re saying is that HE should have let her go and go to me instead yes or no
bearing in mind that they’re still ,up to at least recently,assuming he’s not dead now,happily married and the fact he didn’t makkes him a ■■■■■■■■■■ just like zb Savile yes or no .
Assuming your answer is yes to both of those that makes you a bigger muppett than even kr and the rest which is saying something.
Got our wires crossed somewhere… I havent been talking about anyone in particular, just a made up 40 50 60 year old bloke and a made up 15 year old girl just for examples.
kr79:
Plenty more fish in the sea Geoffrey. You should have took it on the chin splashed some more brut on and hit the local discotheque
No either I was stitched up like a zb kipper at the time by a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ who went for the bird (child ) who should have been forced into accepting a date from me or everyone’s going to get an invite to the wedding between me and Megan Stammers and tell me how lucky I am to have pulled her.Assuming that adultering zb Jeremy Forrest doesn’t get her instead.
well confused. If you both went for the same bird (child) and hes a ■■■■■■■■■, what does that make you? And also, why should she be forced into a date with you??
He’s not a ■■■■■■■■■■ at all it’s only you who’s been saying he’s a ■■■■■■■■■■ just because of the age gap.Now answer the zb question.Yes or no should she be forced into a same age relationship with a bloke who she doesn’t love or should she be allowed to carry on dating and then eventually marry the bloke who’s 30 years older than her being that she’s 16 now .
But are you now also saying that it’s wrong for a 16 year old bloke to be dating ( just a coffee and a chat) a 15 year old bird too .
I have no idea what who your talking about!! Who have i said is a ■■■■■■■■■■■? I just read your response to kr79 and responded to that post alone.
And no its perfectly fine for a 16 year old boy to take a 15 year old bird out for coffee and a chat.
You’ve really lost the zb plot haven’t you.Go back and read the questions.The 16 year old boy in this case was me.The girl gave me the cold shoulder because she was dating a bloke 30 years older than her who she loved,who you’ve said was grooming her because it was his responsibility to drop her which makes him a zb ■■■■■■■■■■.Then to add to that you said that you also said that I was a ■■■■■■■■■■ for wanting a date with her too.
kr79:
Plenty more fish in the sea Geoffrey. You should have took it on the chin splashed some more brut on and hit the local discotheque
No either I was stitched up like a zb kipper at the time by a zb ■■■■■■■■■■ who went for the bird (child ) who should have been forced into accepting a date from me or everyone’s going to get an invite to the wedding between me and Megan Stammers and tell me how lucky I am to have pulled her.Assuming that adultering zb Jeremy Forrest doesn’t get her instead.
well confused. If you both went for the same bird (child) and hes a ■■■■■■■■■, what does that make you? And also, why should she be forced into a date with you??
He’s not a ■■■■■■■■■■ at all it’s only you who’s been saying he’s a ■■■■■■■■■■ just because of the age gap.Now answer the zb question.Yes or no should she be forced into a same age relationship with a bloke who she doesn’t love or should she be allowed to carry on dating and then eventually marry the bloke who’s 30 years older than her being that she’s 16 now .
But are you now also saying that it’s wrong for a 16 year old bloke to be dating ( just a coffee and a chat) a 15 year old bird too .
I have no idea what who your talking about!! Who have i said is a ■■■■■■■■■■■? I just read your response to kr79 and responded to that post alone.
And no its perfectly fine for a 16 year old boy to take a 15 year old bird out for coffee and a chat.
You’ve really lost the zb plot haven’t you.Go back and read the questions.The 16 year old boy in this case was me.The girl gave me the cold shoulder because she was dating a bloke 30 years older than her who she loved,who you’ve said was grooming her because it was his responsibility to drop her which makes him a zb ■■■■■■■■■■.Then to add to that you said that you also said that I was a ■■■■■■■■■■ for wanting a date with her too.
Oh right i thought you was talking about now in present time. So yeah the bloke who “stole” your bird off you is a pedo, and no you wernt a ■■■■■■■■■ when you was 16
FarnboroughBoy11:
So what you’re saying is that HE should have let her go and go to me instead yes or no
bearing in mind that they’re still ,up to at least recently,assuming he’s not dead now,happily married and the fact he didn’t makkes him a ■■■■■■■■■■ just like zb Savile yes or no .
Assuming your answer is yes to both of those that makes you a bigger muppett than even kr and the rest which is saying something.
Got our wires crossed somewhere… I havent been talking about anyone in particular, just a made up 40 50 60 year old bloke and a made up 15 year old girl just for examples.
[/quote]
Just answer the questions.
(1) Girl of 16 and a bloke of 46 she loves him.
(2) Bloke of her own age he fancies her but gets cold shoulder.
Older bloke won’t drop her.(Not surprisingly).
Should she be forced to go with the bloke of her own age or should the relationhip with the older bloke be allowed to continue .
I think the thread has been lost along the line. It started of talking about Jimmy Savile but it has now gone on to other strange stories. In my tin pot world any responsible adult who takes advantage of a minor, and I dont mean someone who works down the bloody pit, should be dealt with by the authorities.
More like lots of gobby tossers (mention no names but if the cap fits wear it) making twisted connections between a ■■■■ treating women like zb because being a ■■■■ he obviously doesn’t like them,then being turned into a witch hunt against those involved in decent,loving,large age gap relationships/marriages involving teenaged girls choosing to be with middle aged blokes because they love them not because their husbands are zb paedophiles and/or poofs like zb Savile.To keep things on topic.
Which is why none of those blokes went to jail unlike zb Savile should have done.
bigvern1:
Nah…■■■■■■ for even considering pumping someone as soon as legally possible. Dirty, dirty ■■■■■■■■■.
You really have got issues if you think that normal,legal,loving heterosexual,relationships are ‘dirty’. .If you’re right then the church would refuse to marry anyone between the ages of 16-18 because although it might come as a shock to you what you seem to think is described as ‘pumping’ a girl is actually an inherent part of a loving relationship.So if they raise the age of consent to 18 would that be ok .
Why don’t you be honest that it’s just the age gap that you’ve got issues with anyway and zb all to do with exactly what age a girl chooses to enter into a physical relationship on reaching the age of consent.
Anyway save your bs and go and tell it to the faces of those families resulting from those relationships assuming you’ve got the bottle.
But no surprise that you probably can’t or won’t want to answer that question as to what you’d do in the case of a girl who loves a bloke who’s a lot older than her when she’s 16.IE would you force her to drop him and enter into a relationship with a bloke of her own age who she doesn’t love. Yes or no .
And/Or are you saying that she should live like a nun until at least 18 or even older regardless .
You’re like all the rest big on all the gob but no real idea or answers.
(2) Bloke of her own age he fancies her but gets cold shoulder.
Older bloke won’t drop her.(Not surprisingly).
Should she be forced to go with the bloke of her own age or should the relationhip with the older bloke be allowed to continue .
Is he a ■■■■■■■■■■ for refusing to drop her .
I’ve ready answered the ■■■■■■■ question but I will answer it again.
She shouldn’t be forced to go with anyone at all.
The relationship with the older bloke shouldn’t be allowed, he has groomed her and if we didn’t have laws I’m sure he would have a ■■■■■■ relationship with her much younger than 16.
@carryfast, Sir Jimmy Saville was not a homosexual he was a predatory ■■■ offender with a predilection for young pubescent girls, not boys or men Paedophiles are not gay men they are men and women who have an unnatural ■■■■■■ interest in children and usually find it very difficult to form any kind of ordinary/loving/■■■■■■ relationship with someone of the same age group be that a man or a woman.
He was a very cunning & manipulative person who was also very powerful and had influential friends who might have been involved in some way, either as a participant or by ignoring his behaviour, trying to expose him in any way would have been very difficult because of the ‘saintly’ aura he had cultivated for himself over the years through his never ending self promotion, phony eccentricity and massive amount of charity work.
He typically went for ‘troubled’ young girls who couldn’t challenge him and felt they wouldn’t be believed by those in authority and those who became star struck by his fame and wealth also he played the generous loving father figure roll as part of his game plan (grooming), but this generosity and attention always had to be repaid, that is how a successful ■■■■■■■■■■ operates
If you knew anything about the behaviour of ■■■ offenders you would be more restrained with some of the things you are saying on this forum as you are coming across as an old bloke with an unnatural interest in under age pubescent girls
Carryfast, half, no all your drivel posted on this thread belongs on the Teacher and Pupil thread. This thread is about Jim’ll Flick It not about justifying seducing young girls, or the rights and wrongs of homosexuality.
I reckon you’re not on pre mod because proof reading your waffle would take ages.
Right, jingle jangle, jewellery, jewellery…
(2) Bloke of her own age he fancies her but gets cold shoulder.
Older bloke won’t drop her.(Not surprisingly).
Should she be forced to go with the bloke of her own age or should the relationhip with the older bloke be allowed to continue .
Is he a ■■■■■■■■■■ for refusing to drop her .
I’ve ready answered the [zb] question but I will answer it again.
She shouldn’t be forced to go with anyone at all.
The relationship with the older bloke shouldn’t be allowed, he has groomed her and if we didn’t have laws I’m sure he would have a ■■■■■■ relationship with her much younger than 16.
yes he is a ■■■■■■■■■
So she shouldn’t be forced into a relationship with someone who she doesn’t love but she should be forced into dropping the bloke who she does love just because of the age gap being,in your view,too much,obviously with the aim of only a same/close age relationship being acceptable or nothing so what’s the big difference .
If he’s a ■■■■■■■■■■ then how is it that he never went to jail and he’s still ( at least up to very recently) married to her.In which case your taliban type bs would have zb’d up her life considering how long the marriage lasted which proves how much they loved each other.
What you’re saying is no different to an arranged/forced type Asian marriage based on your zb’d up views not the girl’s own choices in life.
davepenn54: @carryfast, Sir Jimmy Saville was not a homosexual he was a predatory ■■■ offender with a predilection for young pubescent girls not boys or men Paedophiles are not gay men they are men and women who have an unnatural ■■■■■■ interest in children and usually find it very difficult to form any kind of normal relationship with someone of the same age group be that a man or a woman.
He was a very cunning & manipulative person who was also very powerful and had influential friends who might have been involved in some way, either as a participant or by ignoring his behaviour, trying to expose him in any would have been very difficult because of the ‘saintly’ aura he had cultivated for himself over the years through his never ending self promotion, phony eccentricity and massive amount of charity work.
He typically went for ‘troubled’ young girls who couldn’t challenge him in any way and those who became star struck by his fame and wealth and he played the generous loving father figure roll as part of his game plan, but this generosity and attention always had to be repaid, that is how a successful ■■■■■■■■■■ operates
If you knew anything about the behaviour of ■■■ offenders you would be very careful about some of the things you are saying on this forum as you are coming across as an old bloke with an unnatural interest in under age pubescent girls
Regards
Dave Penn;
No just upsetting the bs age gap issues that seem to be applied on an arbitrary basis to decent age gap relationships and which as I’ve said are being tied into some bs connection with the actions of a pervert like zb Savile.
If you really think that I’ve said anything criminal then tough in which case as I’ve said there’s plenty of others out there who’ll now be going to jail for actually (legally) doing what I’m just talking about and discussing nothing more.Although no surprise that most replies on here have more to do with personal animosity than intelligent debate.
(2) Bloke of her own age he fancies her but gets cold shoulder.
Older bloke won’t drop her.(Not surprisingly).
Should she be forced to go with the bloke of her own age or should the relationhip with the older bloke be allowed to continue .
Is he a ■■■■■■■■■■ for refusing to drop her .
I’ve ready answered the [zb] question but I will answer it again.
She shouldn’t be forced to go with anyone at all.
The relationship with the older bloke shouldn’t be allowed, he has groomed her and if we didn’t have laws I’m sure he would have a ■■■■■■ relationship with her much younger than 16.
yes he is a ■■■■■■■■■
So she shouldn’t be forced into a relationship with someone who she doesn’t love but she should be forced into dropping the bloke who she does love just because of the age gap being,in your view,too much,obviously with the aim of only a same/close age relationship being acceptable or nothing so what’s the big difference .
If he’s a ■■■■■■■■■■ then how is it that he never went to jail and he’s still ( at least up to very recently) married to her.In which case your taliban type bs would have zb’d up her life considering how long the marriage lasted which proves how much they loved each other.
What you’re saying is no different to an arranged/forced type Asian marriage based on your zb’d up views not the girl’s own choices in life.
It’s not my views that are ■■■■■■ up, trust me.
The bloke shouldn’t have been grooming a child in the first place, she’s been brainwashed.
The reason why he hasn’t been to jail is because he’s a clever ■■■■■■■■■ who obviously has patience and waited until she was 16 to pork her. Like I said before if the law didn’t exist I’m almost certain he would try his luck much younger than 16. Sicko.
Nothing at all to do with Asian marriages. Let’s not get sidetracked now
davepenn54: @carryfast, Sir Jimmy Saville was not a homosexual he was a predatory ■■■ offender with a predilection for young pubescent girls not boys or men Paedophiles are not gay men they are men and women who have an unnatural ■■■■■■ interest in children and usually find it very difficult to form any kind of normal relationship with someone of the same age group be that a man or a woman.
He was a very cunning & manipulative person who was also very powerful and had influential friends who might have been involved in some way, either as a participant or by ignoring his behaviour, trying to expose him in any would have been very difficult because of the ‘saintly’ aura he had cultivated for himself over the years through his never ending self promotion, phony eccentricity and massive amount of charity work.
He typically went for ‘troubled’ young girls who couldn’t challenge him in any way and those who became star struck by his fame and wealth and he played the generous loving father figure roll as part of his game plan, but this generosity and attention always had to be repaid, that is how a successful ■■■■■■■■■■ operates
If you knew anything about the behaviour of ■■■ offenders you would be very careful about some of the things you are saying on this forum as you are coming across as an old bloke with an unnatural interest in under age pubescent girls
Regards
Dave Penn;
No just upsetting the bs age gap issues that seem to be applied on an arbitrary basis to decent age gap relationships and which as I’ve said are being tied into some bs connection with the actions of a pervert like zb Savile.
If you really think that I’ve said anything criminal then tough in which case as I’ve said there’s plenty of others out there who’ll now be going to jail for actually (legally) doing what I’m just talking about and discussing nothing more.Although no surprise that most replies on here have more to do with personal animosity than intelligent debate.
I agree with you carryfast that age shouldn’t matter. If a 20 year old bird wants to be with a 70 year old man, I think that’s fine, assuming the 70 year old hasn’t groomed her and brainwashed her since she was 12.
@carryfast, I’m sure I didn’t say you had said anything criminal but as you always interpret things in your own closed mind way I should have expected that kind of response
I understand the problems with different age relationships much better than you may think and if you just cared to research a little around this site you would find that out about me.
Once again you have disrupted a topic to pursue your own agenda, I tried to bring it back on topic by making my post about Jimmy Saville with a little bit of friendly advice for yourself at the end but because you do not understand the words ‘intelligent debate’ I’m out of here. I’ve got more important things to do than read your narcissistic drivel
Regards
Dave Penn;
BTW before you quote my post again go back and read it because I’ve edited it and I would prefer that you would quote the latest version. Why you feel the need to quote everyone’s post in your response’s is beyond me though it doesn’t add anything to what you write, just makes you look a bigger fool That’s only my opinion though
(2) Bloke of her own age he fancies her but gets cold shoulder.
Older bloke won’t drop her.(Not surprisingly).
Should she be forced to go with the bloke of her own age or should the relationhip with the older bloke be allowed to continue .
Is he a ■■■■■■■■■■ for refusing to drop her .
I’ve ready answered the [zb] question but I will answer it again.
She shouldn’t be forced to go with anyone at all.
The relationship with the older bloke shouldn’t be allowed, he has groomed her and if we didn’t have laws I’m sure he would have a ■■■■■■ relationship with her much younger than 16.
yes he is a ■■■■■■■■■
So she shouldn’t be forced into a relationship with someone who she doesn’t love but she should be forced into dropping the bloke who she does love just because of the age gap being,in your view,too much,obviously with the aim of only a same/close age relationship being acceptable or nothing so what’s the big difference .
If he’s a ■■■■■■■■■■ then how is it that he never went to jail and he’s still ( at least up to very recently) married to her.In which case your taliban type bs would have zb’d up her life considering how long the marriage lasted which proves how much they loved each other.
What you’re saying is no different to an arranged/forced type Asian marriage based on your zb’d up views not the girl’s own choices in life.
It’s not my views that are [zb] up, trust me.
The bloke shouldn’t have been grooming a child in the first place, she’s been brainwashed.
The reason why he hasn’t been to jail is because he’s a clever ■■■■■■■■■ who obviously has patience and waited until she was 16 to pork her. Like I said before if the law didn’t exist I’m almost certain he would try his luck much younger than 16. Sicko.
Nothing at all to do with Asian marriages. Let’s not get sidetracked now
How does a legal relationship and marriage,which lasted until up to at least very recently,since the 1970’s,which started out as a relationship between his wife as a mid teens girl and him being a middle aged bloke,who’s stayed with that same girl at least until recently into her 50’s,have any connection whatsoever with some bs claim of him just being interested in grooming and him being a so called ‘■■■■■■■■■■’ .
I’m sure every one seems to be going collectively bonkers.As I’ve said the fact that such people could be called for jury service is frightening.
As for me as I’ve said and for dave penn’s benefit a girl of 25 would do fine thanks.Although as I’ve said I’d bet exactly the same bs claims would be made because it’s all about some zb’d up modern revulsion concerning age gaps.
they are men and women who have an unnatural ■■■■■■ interest in children and usually find it very difficult to form any kind of ordinary/loving/■■■■■■ relationship with someone of the same age group be that a man or a woman.
