You sound like one of them mad Muslims now waiting for your 72 virgins in paradise
Doesn’t he just. Don’t like to break it to him but a) heaven doesn’t exist and b) even if it did a man like him with fantasies about children wouldn’t be going there.
I also love how despite defending him at first he now changed him to a dirty gay pervert to suit his paper thin arguments because of ONE currently UNFOUNDED accusation that he ‘read in the paper’. Now that’s the sign of a towering intelligence. (Sarcasm again)
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Can’t believe this thread is still going.
I gave up on about page 3 I think when Carryfast protested that it was ok if a 40 year old geezer passionately kisses a 15 year old girl.This is not a age gap thing it’s a sick peado thing.
It’s no different to a 15 year old bloke kissing that 15 year old bird and the clue is no one has ever been prosecuted for kissing a girl under the age of consent for a ■■■■■■ relationship because there’s big difference between the two.
I can’t believe what I’m reading.
There is a massive difference!!! They are both 15 therefor both kids, if a fella is 40 years old and kissing a 15 year old that is not right.
I don’t care if anyone has never been prosecuted for kissing a 15 year old it’s not right.
Your just picking and trying to find loopholes in the law to boast your views about age consent but morally its not right.Oh and for the record, if I was 30 I would happily mac daddy a bird of 19!!
Who gives a zb what you think is ‘morally’ right or not.The fact is if you’re right Joe Philpot and at least two other blokes who I know of personally,who dated mid teens girls,and then married them would have gone to jail.The fact is they didn’t so get over it.It’s a free country,so far,and it’s about time that the younger blokes these days realised that an older bloke has got just as much right to compete with them for the available women within the law as they have.Which is what the issue is really about in reserving the single birds for themselves and removing the competition.
What are you actually saying? If the law of consensual ■■■ was reduced to say 13, you would go for a 13 year old girl if she looked “developed”■■
It seems to me you go about your ways with regards to relationships/■■■ etc at the laws discretion, not what is human instinctively right or wrong.
Your just missing the point entirely, age gaps in relationships shouldn’t matter, but they do matter if its a kid for Christ sake!!
Carryfast, I also dont know how you can say there is no such thing as Bi-■■■■■■, if someone is attracted to both sexes that makes them Bi- ■■■■■■, not gay not hetro but Bi 
kr79:
You sound like one of them mad Muslims now waiting for your 72 virgins in paradise
Just one will do thanks and look on the bright side no one gets blown up in this case to get her either. 
switchlogic:
Doesn’t he just. Don’t like to break it to him but a) heaven doesn’t exist and b) even if it did a man like him with fantasies about children wouldn’t be going there.I also love how despite defending him at first he now changed him to a dirty gay pervert to suit his paper thin arguments because of ONE currently UNFOUNDED accusation that he ‘read in the paper’. Now that’s the sign of a towering intelligence. (Sarcasm again)
No surprise that all the others except that one are founded in your view and no suprise that’s how the media will want to keep the issue by taking the heat off of the homosexual angle which explains the scumbag’s treatment of women. 
And I don’t think heaven would lock out anyone on the basis of the idea of agreeing with the age of consent at which the church can marry a couple regardless of age.It would be a bit like the church contradicting itself in that case by sending the vicar who I saw marry a 47 year old bloke to my 16 year old relative to hell for doing it. 
But I’m sure that the views of anyone who agrees with two blokes trying to procreate a family,instead of a man and woman,but failing because the basic biology that god gave them to do the job with won’t let them,would just be ignored as bs anyway. 
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast, I also dont know how you can say there is no such thing as Bi-■■■■■■, if someone is attracted to both sexes that makes them Bi- ■■■■■■, not gay not hetro but Bi
Really so try telling a girl that you like shagging,and being shagged by,blokes but you’re not a ■■■■ and then see if she’ll believe you and be stupid enough to let you marry her afterwards.
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Can’t believe this thread is still going.
I gave up on about page 3 I think when Carryfast protested that it was ok if a 40 year old geezer passionately kisses a 15 year old girl.This is not a age gap thing it’s a sick peado thing.
It’s no different to a 15 year old bloke kissing that 15 year old bird and the clue is no one has ever been prosecuted for kissing a girl under the age of consent for a ■■■■■■ relationship because there’s big difference between the two.
I can’t believe what I’m reading.
There is a massive difference!!! They are both 15 therefor both kids, if a fella is 40 years old and kissing a 15 year old that is not right.
I don’t care if anyone has never been prosecuted for kissing a 15 year old it’s not right.
Your just picking and trying to find loopholes in the law to boast your views about age consent but morally its not right.Oh and for the record, if I was 30 I would happily mac daddy a bird of 19!!
Who gives a zb what you think is ‘morally’ right or not.The fact is if you’re right Joe Philpot and at least two other blokes who I know of personally,who dated mid teens girls,and then married them would have gone to jail.The fact is they didn’t so get over it.It’s a free country,so far,and it’s about time that the younger blokes these days realised that an older bloke has got just as much right to compete with them for the available women within the law as they have.Which is what the issue is really about in reserving the single birds for themselves and removing the competition.
What are you actually saying? If the law of consensual ■■■ was reduced to say 13, you would go for a 13 year old girl if she looked “developed”■■
It seems to me you go about your ways with regards to relationships/■■■ etc at the laws discretion, not what is human instinctively right or wrong.
Your just missing the point entirely, age gaps in relationships shouldn’t matter, but they do matter if its a kid for Christ sake!!
What I’m saying is that the age of consent is,as always,the law and 16 is about right although if they must raise it to 18 so be it.If anyone breaks that law a bloke should rightly be charged as a zb ■■■■■■■■■■,regardless of age.Likewise if that law is adhered to then no law has been broken and no one is charged as being a ■■■■■■■■■■ regardless of age.Anyone who sees the law different to that is either zb ageist or a zb ■■■■■■■■■■.
In just the same way that if I had a 13 year old daughter who was involved in a ■■■■■■ relationship with a 13 year old bloke I’d regard the zb as just as much a ■■■■■■■■■■ as if the zb had been over 30.
Whereas if I had a 16 year old daughter who said she was in love with a 40 + year old bloke and wanted to marry him I’d give the permission for it rather than force her into a same age marriage with a bloke she doesn’t love.Do you get it yet. 
Your ideas have been screwed up by loads of pc bs brainwashing.
Ok after the last bout of comments from Carryfast I think we should leave him be. I know he’s a judgemental moron, and probably a peadophile, but I also think he has mental issues and its not kind to mock the afflicted, so for that reason, Im out.
Good day to.you gentlemen.
Carryfast:
But I’m sure that the views of anyone who agrees with two blokes trying to procreate a family.
Sorry, final comment, couldn’t let this one go! You dont know much about ■■■ do you? You are actually a virgin aren’t you?
switchlogic:
Carryfast:
But I’m sure that the views of anyone who agrees with two blokes trying to procreate a family.Sorry, final comment, couldn’t let this one go! You dont know much about ■■■ do you? You are actually a virgin aren’t you?
Let’s just say that there’s not much point in two blokes trying to get each other pregnant which is basically what the act of procreation is,should be,all about fore and foremost.
Carryfast:
switchlogic:
Carryfast:
But I’m sure that the views of anyone who agrees with two blokes trying to procreate a family.Sorry, final comment, couldn’t let this one go! You dont know much about ■■■ do you? You are actually a virgin aren’t you?
Let’s just say that there’s not much point in two blokes trying to get each other pregnant which is basically what the act of procreation is,should be,all about fore and foremost.
I think you’ll find pregnancy is most certainly not the desired result of ■■■ for most heterosexual males and we go to great lengths to avoid it 
Carryfast:
switchlogic:
Carryfast:
But I’m sure that the views of anyone who agrees with two blokes trying to procreate a family.Sorry, final comment, couldn’t let this one go! You dont know much about ■■■ do you? You are actually a virgin aren’t you?
Let’s just say that there’s not much point in two blokes trying to get each other pregnant which is basically what the act of procreation is,should be,all about fore and foremost.
Ok so you answered that question, no you dont. Oh dear, poor you. You really are even more unintelligent that even I thought.
I think Saville may have abused my Dad!
Well, he was on Top of the Pops!
billybigrig:
Carryfast:
switchlogic:
Carryfast:
But I’m sure that the views of anyone who agrees with two blokes trying to procreate a family.Sorry, final comment, couldn’t let this one go! You dont know much about ■■■ do you? You are actually a virgin aren’t you?
Let’s just say that there’s not much point in two blokes trying to get each other pregnant which is basically what the act of procreation is,should be,all about fore and foremost.
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Carryfast:
FarnboroughBoy11:
Can’t believe this thread is still going.
I gave up on about page 3 I think when Carryfast protested that it was ok if a 40 year old geezer passionately kisses a 15 year old girl.This is not a age gap thing it’s a sick peado thing.
It’s no different to a 15 year old bloke kissing that 15 year old bird and the clue is no one has ever been prosecuted for kissing a girl under the age of consent for a ■■■■■■ relationship because there’s big difference between the two.
I can’t believe what I’m reading.
There is a massive difference!!! They are both 15 therefor both kids, if a fella is 40 years old and kissing a 15 year old that is not right.
I don’t care if anyone has never been prosecuted for kissing a 15 year old it’s not right.
Your just picking and trying to find loopholes in the law to boast your views about age consent but morally its not right.Oh and for the record, if I was 30 I would happily mac daddy a bird of 19!!
Who gives a zb what you think is ‘morally’ right or not.The fact is if you’re right Joe Philpot and at least two other blokes who I know of personally,who dated mid teens girls,and then married them would have gone to jail.The fact is they didn’t so get over it.It’s a free country,so far,and it’s about time that the younger blokes these days realised that an older bloke has got just as much right to compete with them for the available women within the law as they have.Which is what the issue is really about in reserving the single birds for themselves and removing the competition.
What are you actually saying? If the law of consensual ■■■ was reduced to say 13, you would go for a 13 year old girl if she looked “developed”■■
It seems to me you go about your ways with regards to relationships/■■■ etc at the laws discretion, not what is human instinctively right or wrong.
Your just missing the point entirely, age gaps in relationships shouldn’t matter, but they do matter if its a kid for Christ sake!!What I’m saying is that the age of consent is,as always,the law and 16 is about right although if they must raise it to 18 so be it.If anyone breaks that law a bloke should rightly be charged as a zb ■■■■■■■■■■,regardless of age.Likewise if that law is adhered to then no law has been broken and no one is charged as being a ■■■■■■■■■■ regardless of age.Anyone who sees the law different to that is either zb ageist or a zb ■■■■■■■■■■.
In just the same way that if I had a 13 year old daughter who was involved in a ■■■■■■ relationship with a 13 year old bloke I’d regard the zb as just as much a ■■■■■■■■■■ as if the zb had been over 30.
Whereas if I had a 16 year old daughter who said she was in love with a 40 + year old bloke and wanted to marry him I’d give the permission for it rather than force her into a same age marriage with a bloke she doesn’t love.Do you get it yet.
Your ideas have been screwed up by loads of pc bs brainwashing.
How can a 13 year old boy be a ■■■■■■■■■ if the girl is also 13… Arnt they both as bad as each other? What if she was 3 months older than him, does that make her a peado and not him??
Muckaway:
I think Saville may have abused my Dad!
Well, he was on Top of the Pops!
And you were the result. That explains a lot.
Carryfast:
triple-tango:
Carryfast:
It’s no different to a 15 year old bloke kissing that 15 year old bird .Of course its bloody different. As I said before I got bored with your paedo drivel, if you had a child you would feel differntly.
Any CHILD that young is still experimentling with its ■■■■■■■■■. A young girl is probably looking for a more mature father type figure as teenage boys are generally prats. Also, a lot of kids even go through an experimental gay phase.I’m sorry Carryfast, I genarally try not to pre-judge people but the image I have of you isnt good.
I don’t really care about your image of me.There’s plenty of decent large age gap marriages out there which prove that you’re talking bs with no understanding of the law whatsoever.
You really have swallowed all the pc bs about young people not knowing wether they’re heterosexuals,homosexuals,or lesbians until the age of 18.The fact is any bloke that fancies another bloke is a ■■■■ and any woman that fancies another woman is a lesbian regardless of age there are no shades of grey in between just as a bird can’t be a little bit pregnant and the idea of experimentation is just a load of pc bs.Which is actually just the type of zb that Savile probably would have said to justify his perverted acts.
But if you’re right then the age of consent should be 18 not 16 and should apply to everyone because a bloke could end up shagging and/or marrying a bird who’s actually a lesbian and a vice versa under the present law.
The really BIG difference is experience. I’ve successfully raised 3 girls & 3 boys.
Whereas you have just fantasised about kids.
bigvern1:
Nah, the older ones know what the’yre doing. Gimme a dirty 30+ woman anyday.
Absolutely spot on. The older ones are much better.
Forgive me if any of what I’m saying has been said already, but I couldn’t be ■■■■■■ to read through all the ■■■■■■■■ it was boring me.
Anyway I was abit wary about Saville being guilty but was listening to that women called June on the Radio today about how she witnessed him kiss a young brain damaged girl…and then touch her and the rest etc.
Hearing her on the radio I found that story very disturbing.
Made me really think why would she lie ? What has she to gain ?