Rjan:
tommy t:
If corbyn win a GE ge would flood the uk with imported labour and rapeugees
Corbyn has been voting against the EU for 40 years, and seems to be openly against EU free movement. I’m sure he’s not dead set against immigration, but I don’t know why you think he’d be in favour of flooding us with imported labour. He’s in favour of taking refugees in if necessary, but he has also opposed all the wars of late which created such a large refugee problem.
the man is a fool and a danger to this country and his own people, how can someone like him be for the working classes ? because the country could not cope with more people it’s already at breaking point NHS ,Schools, local authorities , road networks affordable housing . even rented property in some areas
Are you sure you know what Corbyn’s policies actually are? The fact that he’s in favour of taking in refugees is not an appreciably different position to the Blairites or the Tories (or many others). Where he does differ from the Blairites (Hilary Benn, for example, who is trying to oust him), is he’s against the military follies that have created these tidal waves of refugees.
So, if you’re against huge numbers of refugees, you would seem to be on Corbyn’s side in solving the problem at root (and against most of those who were in New Labour, not to mention the Tory party, who keep supporting war and military action).
Or do you think it’s necessary to smash states like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and almost Syria, but that the waves of refugees it creates must still be kept out?
Of course most want higher wages, and less undercutting by foreign companies operating in the uk that the brits cannot compete with , butr for wages to increase the size of the imported labour pool will have to shrink and be tightly controlled in the future,
And Corbyn supports these restrictions, and thinks that the EU can only continue if it upholds workers’ rights and living standards. It’s the people who are trying to topple him who don’t believe in these things.
there needs to be better a more capable border force, and all failed asylum seekers should be removed ASAP , changes in the law may be required to close the loophole that many bogus refugees (aka rapeugees) are exploiting having no id , Having no id should mean no entry into the uk deported to last country, so back to France or Belgium in most cases without further waste of tax payers money, and transported back on the most basic form of transport , IE no nice coaches,
There’d be a difference on these points but so asylum seekers really feature as large in your life as your wages, your access to housing, or your kids’ education? I know a lot of people think asylum seekers are taking houses and school places, but broadly the real cause is simply that they aren’t building remotely enough houses (like they did in the 60s) and are closing schools down (or were doing in the late 90s and early 00s).
In other words, the right-wing attacks on schools, housebuilding, and the health service, would be attacked even if there wasn’t a single immigrant in the country.
If he’s supposedly against dodgy wars surely the EU’s stance on Ukraine and its militarisation of the old Soviet buffer states,would be a deal breaker for him.
While if he’s as committed to being as anti EU as you say he is why change his principles in that regard.
Oh wait he is ideologically opposed to the idea of the nation state and wants the same vote as the Blairites because he knows that Socialist Labour is rightly a floundering rabble and an electoral liabilty.So any port in a storm on the basis that the EU is as Socialist as he needs to get at the moment. 
As for Corbyn’s ‘anti immigration’ credentials that’s another larf in itself bearing in mind all the above.While no thanks the idea of not wanting to live in a Socialist allocated Baghdad suburb or Soviet style inner city land scape,as part of Merkel’s Socialist Stasi no borders Eurasian Federation,doesn’t make anyone ‘right wing’.
As for Socialist bs Corbyn has proved that beyond doubt.
