Winseer:
Yes, it does make sense that the US want to keep hold of Britain and it’s Trident - as something they don’t actually have themselves. In that regard, then of course we could get a situation where America is attacked, Europe is not, but we’d be “told” via NATO that we have to launch a retaliatory strike at whatever new target the US (through channels) give us. Would those channels operate though?Each of our subs at sea has it’s own protocols with regards to “orders taken whilst at sea”. IF the chain of command is broken at the top, then on the day - our subs will be carrying out UK contigency orders ahead of US ones - which may well involve the UK leaving the US to burn, if they are attacked in a conflict we are otherwise not involved in.
Corbyns “I wouldn’t push the button” might not even arise!
“Someone else won’t push it not for him”.
I’d be very surprised if our PM or military Chiefs even have access to the launch codes with the ‘independent’ deterrent just being a con to keep the electorate happy.While unless America descends into inter ethnic and/or Federalist anti Federalist internal warfare it’s difficult to see any circumstances whereby it would be worth us sitting back if someone decides to take out America because at that point the world wouldn’t be a very friendly place for the civilised western world to want to live in.Although on the other side of that coin I think America would rather take us out than take a hit in retaliation for a unilateral Brit launch against anyone,assuming the ‘independent’ deterrent really is that.In either case we don’t need to be part of the USE.Which is the real choice we face ‘if’ Cameron honours the promise of a referendum and that referendum isn’t rigged.Although unfortunately the US obviously regards secession and anti Federalism in whatever form as a threat and that’s probably the main issue that is actually keeping us in the scam and what is driving it,with everything else in the in campaign being a diversion from that fact.