robroy:
GORDON 50:
I normally agree with most of your posts but I think this might be a bit unfair, yes, drivers don’t stick together like they used to but then who does? There may be 1 or 2 industries where this still happens but I believe the union actions in the 70s (which lets face it was a bit militant with striking for 30-40% pay rises) has lead to popularity of the extreme opposite (Thatcher), which in turn lead to the culture of fear of losing ones job, and this is still with us toady.
.
I know what you are saying, but the 70s were 40/50 years ago ffs, you would think that a happy MEDIUM would have evolved between times then and times now, but the anti Union propaganda taught in school history lessons, and the Thatcher governments sale of workers council homes, preventing strikes (mortgage commitments) seems to have prevented that…Ffs Hit me on the head, I’m morphing into Carryfast.
I believe strongly in Unions, in their literal sense, and for the reasons of their origins and existence only , but I am the first to agree with your 70s examples, the tables did turn, to the point where the tail was wagging the dog, and things HAD to change, problem is they changed to a direct opposite end of the spectrum where all the fought for employees rights to fairness went down the khazi.
Today it is an unarguable FACT that those who work for Union based firms have better Ts and C.s, just because that does not fit in with general misguided opinion on here, does not alter the facts.
I have rang mates who are on literally 2x as much a rate as me for working bank hols for instance, and getting the same rate for running back in on a Saturday, than I work all day for, and those are only two of many examples…but we are getting off the subject here.
I don’t think you can blame anything to do with the Unions for employees attitudes, or in this case drivers attitudes towards each other, I really do not know what it is.
When I started most of the older drivers were a different calibre, I really looked up to these guys, they taught me a lot. They got on with their work, but on the whole did not take any [zb] from their firms, and yes did stick together, not in a brotherhood type of ■■■■■■■■ sense, or all for one and one for all, but in the sense they helped each other out, and as far as I remember never (VERY rarely at least) dropped each other in it, certainly not ‘‘grassed’’ others up,
There will be some come back at me with the obligatory ‘rosy specs’ adage, and sure there were cases to prove me wrong, but that is how I genuinely remember it starting out as a young lad.
Look ! I am the first to admit to adopting a look after myself and [zb] everyone else stance in the job nowadays, but the thread subject, along with employers attitudes and policies have led me to this …what is the alternative ?
I think a lot of it is the way things in business have changed over the years, less small firms and more logistics companies that micro manage everything and pay as little as they can get away with. This puts a bottom on the rates, then you have the morons who think they’re doing great by getting £1/hr more as a Ltd company so they can fiddle their tax, but don’t see that they’re worse off than the PAYE lads on the same job with less fall backs if anything goes pear shapped.
Training has to be done ‘properly’ now, more so because of the blame and sue culture that we live in to protect everyone. I’m the same as you Rob, I learnt from the old hands and picked things up from guys who were willing to show me it out on the road. I have repaid this in the past and still do occasionally with selected individuals, but its getting less and less.
I don’t think it’ll ever change, and only get worse especially as the logistics lot dumb the job down further with set routes, planned breaks etc. There will still be the odd niche firm who treat drivers right, but they are few and far between and getting less and less, and harder to get into as the ones that are there know they’re onto a good screw.