Carryfast:
I think that reply says everything about the whole bs situation.On one hand you’re saying that the British don’t want to work so we give the jobs to foreign immigrant labour instead.Then you conveniently change the argument to one of discrimination when someone says if it’s all about the Brits not wanting the job then let’s leave the job advertised and if a Brit wants it then the Brit gets it and the foreign worker has to go home.
This is two different things, and I explained my reasons why I think this is ridiculous in a first place. Do it as its done in Poland: first you have to advertise for Polish (or EU Citizens) workers, and only if you can prove that you was unable to find someone to fill your post, you can invite a foreigner. But then, after you gave him a job, he has to be secure.
It makes no difference that the British worker might be an untrained worker nor wether the employer has invested time in training the foreign worker in the job.The fact is the foreign worker shouldn’t have been here in the first place when there’s British workers,wether trained or not, who need a job
Yeah, great idea: don’t invite Polish engineers to build your railways, employ some neds who quit school at 16 instead, BECAUSE THEY ARE BRITISH
The issue of the Asian community is just another stereotypical red herring.Ther are sections of the Asian community that work in many different sectors of the economy.However what they do have in common with all the other types of immigrant workforce is that they add demand for housing and social security and health provision and add supply and capacity to the labour market which lowers tax revenues and income levels and removed/s job opportunities for the indigenous workforce.British cab drivers would have had a lot more opportunities and would be earning more for example if there were no Asian cab drivers for example
No. Because if there would be no all this PHC driven by asians, not many people would be able to afford a cab.
:lol: just as there would have been more job opportunities and higher wage levels in public transport like the bus service jobs over the years if there’d been no immigrant workers brought in from the other parts of the so called ‘Commonwealth’ like Jamaica.However the situation would have been balanced more if British workers could have gone to other parts of the commonwealth in that case to drive cabs and buses in Canada and Australia which they couldn’t.
That’s interesting what you are saying. My plumber was in my place today and we had a nice chat. He spent 15 years of his life in Australia doing guess what? Yeah, you’re right. Plumbing!
So as I’ve said it’s all a big con put up by the British employers and the government to over supply the British labour market to keep wage levels down.
I am fascinated by this theory. Are there any flying saucers involved as well?
As I’ve said if foreign workers are so good and British workers are so bad then how is it that Britain seems to have been turned by those same useless British workers into a country where foreign workers want to live while those so called ‘better’ foreign workers only seem to have managed to turn their own countries into places that they wanted to leave and not return to
.
Well. Have you ever heard about Yalta agreements? That might give you answer to that question when it comes to Eastern Europe. And last time I checked my history book, Edvard BeneÅ¡ or WÅ‚adysÅ‚aw Raczkiewicz had not much to say there, it was all done by UK, USA and USSR. So again you proved your ignorance blaming Eastern Europeans for that they had to spent 50 years under Soviet occupation when you were enjoying benefits of Marshall Plan and later European Commonwealth…