Franglais:
It’s not 50/50.
It’s 100/100.
Two total idiots.
I knew we’d agree on something sooner or later. It’s only took 5.5 years 
Terry T:
Franglais:
It’s not 50/50.
It’s 100/100.
Two total idiots.I knew we’d agree on something sooner or later. It’s only took 5.5 years
Didn`t we agree on summat about fuel economy once?
But, even if not…
grumpybum:
The merge is 50/50 fault, the brake check is suicidal and 100% ■■■■■■ car driver.
I think the merge is more the trucks fault tbh. The car is in a live lane and is clearly ahead by the time the arrows telling you to merge (in turn) appear. Perhaps the car was on an unfamiliar road and wasn’t aware exactly when the road was going to narrow. Either way he was clearly ahead at the merge point. The truck then clearly closed the gap creating a dangerous situation.
What the car did after was ridiculous though. Even worse than what the truck did. So yeah, 100/100, both morons.
Franglais:
Terry T:
Franglais:
It’s not 50/50.
It’s 100/100.
Two total idiots.I knew we’d agree on something sooner or later. It’s only took 5.5 years
Didn`t we agree on summat about fuel economy once?
But, even if not…
I don’t know, it’s such a rare event that it gets lost with all the other stuff
Terry T:
grumpybum:
The merge is 50/50 fault, the brake check is suicidal and 100% ■■■■■■ car driver.I think the merge is more the trucks fault tbh. The car is in a live lane and is clearly ahead by the time the arrows telling you to merge (in turn) appear. Perhaps the car was on an unfamiliar road and wasn’t aware exactly when the road was going to narrow. Either way he was clearly ahead at the merge point. The truck then clearly closed the gap creating a dangerous situation.
What the car did after was ridiculous though. Even worse than what the truck did. So yeah, 100/100, both morons.
Agree both downright morons although it always bugs me a lot more when a so called professional drives dangerously. We are supposed to be a step further in training and memory refreshed doing an LGV test but sometimes you would’t think so.
Far too much aggresion shown to those who make an error.
jakethesnake:
We are supposed to be a step further in training
Common sense not training says look at what these criminally stupid road planners have done here I need to back off to create a large space ahead of me in case anyone is predictably tempted to use the left lane and will need to get back in.
jakethesnake:
Terry T:
grumpybum:
The merge is 50/50 fault, the brake check is suicidal and 100% ■■■■■■ car driver.I think the merge is more the trucks fault tbh. The car is in a live lane and is clearly ahead by the time the arrows telling you to merge (in turn) appear. Perhaps the car was on an unfamiliar road and wasn’t aware exactly when the road was going to narrow. Either way he was clearly ahead at the merge point. The truck then clearly closed the gap creating a dangerous situation.
What the car did after was ridiculous though. Even worse than what the truck did. So yeah, 100/100, both morons.
Agree both downright morons although it always bugs me a lot more when a so called professional drives dangerously. We are supposed to be a step further in training and memory refreshed doing an LGV test but sometimes you would’t think so.
Far too much aggresion shown to those who make an error.
Shock horror I agree with Jake! In that situation I would have simply eased off and let the moronic car driver in, only cos I couldnt be bovered to get embroiled in aggro like the brake check .
I’d have backed off too. Retaining the moral high ground is one thing, but exchanging details on the hard shoulder is tiresome and a PITA.