Eu referendum whats your vote

Franglais:
Maybe itd be "x"thousand permits for UK trucks to go to EU and "x"thousand permits for EU trucks to go to UK. Thats reciprocity.
Of course thats up for negotiation. So some more civil servants for us to train and send off to Brussels. Glad to see were saving so much.

The idea of ‘reciprocity’ in this case not being negotiable it would be a fact so why the need for all the aggro with Brussels ?.In this case,unlike previously,the ‘permits’ in question possibly being something like a government computer generated pass code denoting a UK or EU registered carrier,issued to the shipper,that has to be cleared at the point of leaving or entering the UK.Other than that there’s no need for any change to existing CMR conventions regardless of whether we’re out or in. :bulb:

The fact is all concerned want to make the issue of us leaving as needlessly difficult as possible because the banks are massively exposed to the German economy which stands to lose billions without our net contributions and the Federalist US and Commy Chinese governments hate the idea of secession and national self determination.

As for having Blair and Obama on your side good luck with that.

Simple reciprocity could work, sure. And yes, paperless permits are prob the way to go. But Im surprised youre suggesting that a shipper will have his choice of haulier origin dictated to him by a government office!
But I doubt it would for cabotage permits. As tubbysboy points out UK hauliers will be more in need of those than EU hauliers. Eu trucks within the UK looking for a load wont likely go more than Scotland to London m/t to find a load out. A UK haulier could end up with many times more of dead miles looking for a load home. Hence, I say theres inequality in the value of cab. perms. Hence they`ll be scope for haggling. So, unlikely that EU and UK diplomats would lose that opportunity to create another admin mountain. Unless you think that EU negotiators are gonna be laid back and laissez faire.

Carryfast, are you somehow saying that UK contributions to EU coffers are somehow ending up in private banks supporting a failing German economy ■■
I cant see how that works? Assuming were discussing the same Germany? The one whom Bloomberg describes as being “German Economy Defied 2015 Global Slowdown as Growth Accelerated”. The same Germany that made a contribution to the EU of 25.8 B.Euro compared with Frances 19.6B and the UKs 11.3B ■■ Exactly how are WE supporting THEM ■■
(figures from 2014). (ec.europa.eu/budget/library/bibl … 0-2014.xls)

Ha Ha ! Yes with friends like Blair, who needs enemies?
But I`m happy enough to be associated with the likes of Obama. His failure to implement much needed improvements to US gun laws, and health reforms is only due to the broken “lame duck President” situation in the US rather than effort and good sense on his part.
How happy are you? that your side of this debate is supported by
Boris, the trustworthy man who declared during his Mayoral election campaign that being Mayor of London was a full time job? But retains a full salary as a journalist/columnist. Then while doing it stood for and won a seat in Parliament… Just a small part time job clearly. And although his father says not, may, just possibly, have his eye on a job as Conservative Leader?? Obviously not a flip flopping opportunist is he?

Franglais:

ramone:
I havent read much of this but it looks like someone is dominating it , i will be voting out , i dont understand why we need to be an alliance why cant we all run our own countries and still trade with others , how can Brussells tell us how we should run our country , if Germany want to let millions of refugees in let them get on with it but dont involve the ones who dont want to follow suit , if France want to work 35 hours a week good luck to them , why should that affect us trading with them we should all be independent and still work together .The EU is jobs for the boys Kinnock`s done well out of it Blair too and his wife even better with the human rights law . Lets put our little island back on track instead of being constantly bullied into laws and regulations we dont want :wink:

Let`s look at a coupla points here:

" i dont understand why we need to be an alliance why cant we all run our own countries and still trade with others"
Assume we leave the EU:
We will be free to form Trade Agreements as we like. The money we dont send to the EU can be used to fund the thousands of negotiators well be sending to our new, prospective, partners in, where?
Most likely trading market is the… guess what…? Eu… Pop of 508 million. Next door. So some of the money we wont be sending to them will be given to new inexperienced UK civil servants to haggle with them. They choose from their negotiators from half a billion, we choose from 65million. All exports from us will of course have to conform to EU regs. But in that future we will have no say in making those regs. Some more of the money saved, will have to go to trade negotiators for our USA clients. USA market is of 320 million. Its quite a bit further than EU so car plant “just in time” deliveries aint an option. Their farmers are gov subsidised, to the extent that poorly paid Central and South American countries cant compete.
Australia? We could spend some more of our our (dwindling) savings on another army of new negotiators to spend a coupla years telling the Aussies that they trade with us, not their existing TPP (TransPacificPartnership) colleagues. That market of 24 million is in desperate need of goods unable to be supplied by their partners such as USA, Japan, Canada, etc. But I aint sure what? Nearest? Biggest? market is the EU, and if weve left we`ve no say in standards in that market.

" how can Brussells tell us how we should run our country"
The same way London tells Norfolk what colour its street signs are to be. The same way Hampshire tells Winchester how to paint its schools. It`s levels of responsibility in Government.

“if France want to work 35 hours a week good luck to them , why should that affect us trading with them”
They do work 35hrs. We don`t. We trade. So nowt wrong there then.

"The EU is jobs for the boys Kinnocks done well out of it Blair too and his wife even better with the human rights law" Im not happy about the Commissioner system in the EU. But surely there is a movement for change there now. From the inside we can do summat to change it. From outside we can`t. So glad our domestic politicians are above any corruption vis-a-vis housing allowances, employing relatives, cash for questions, etc.

Imagine EU food labels if we came out of the EU…
Would we suddenly have supermarket shelfs stocked with brown paper bags with no ingredients labels?? I think not. Being in the EU means one label is good thro out the EU zone of over 500 million consumers, and we get a say on that labelling. If as outsiders we wanna trade with the EU we obey all the same regs, but don`t get to vote on what those regs are.

Voting “out” will NOT turn back the clock to the fifties and sixties when we had an independent manufacturing base, our own coal, and oil about to be tapped. Australia, NZ, SA, have grown up and dont rely on us any more as trade partners. You can analyse about the causes, mistakes etc of the above, but I dont see how you can deny the truth of it.
I would give a fuller explanation, of my point, but I`ve a serious fear of hitting delete rather than submit…

So what you are assuming is if we leave the EU we wont be able to trade with EU countries , why not , what about all the companies in the EU that own British companies ■■? we trade with the USA they arent in the EU we dont seem to have a problem with that , i would go as far as to say i would much sooner see stronger links to the USA than a set of countries that quite clearly dont respect us. Dont know where youre going with the labelling crap either i bought a couple of bottles of juice from ASDA the other day and the labels ingredients were written in Polish.
Being in the EU to me means having to adhere to laws that have been inflicted on us by Euro MPs who have never been democratically elected , whats good for France isn`t nessessarily good for Britain , whats good for Germany may not work in Holland we should govern our own countries and trade freely without restraints.
No ones saying voting out will turn the clock back but it will cut the ridiculous ties we have of having to do it the EU way and hopefully we can get shut of the Human Rights Law that made Cherie Blair and her husband multi millionaires and left poor victims of crime distraught and criminals laughing all the way to a life of luxury , much the same way as the Blairs did.

Franglais:
Simple reciprocity could work, sure. And yes, paperless permits are prob the way to go. But Im surprised youre suggesting that a shipper will have his choice of haulier origin dictated to him by a government office!
But I doubt it would for cabotage permits. As tubbysboy points out UK hauliers will be more in need of those than EU hauliers. Eu trucks within the UK looking for a load wont likely go more than Scotland to London m/t to find a load out. A UK haulier could end up with many times more of dead miles looking for a load home. Hence, I say theres inequality in the value of cab. perms. Hence they`ll be scope for haggling. So, unlikely that EU and UK diplomats would lose that opportunity to create another admin mountain. Unless you think that EU negotiators are gonna be laid back and laissez faire.

It’s obvious that in the protectionist environment needed for us to get lost market share back from East Euro rate cutting that means the government dictating who the shipper can use between a EU v a UK carrier.That’s the idea of quotas and ‘permits’.As for the cabotage issue we stand to gain more by the enforced protection regards UK-EU traffic and protecting the domestic market from uncontrolled East Euro competition than we stand to lose in the current status quo of uncontrolled East Euro competition effectively taking everything.On that note it’s obvious that our international running fleet has been decimated by East Euro competition and over capacity with no reason to not expect the same in the case of a free for all cabotage regime.

Franglais:
Carryfast, are you somehow saying that UK contributions to EU coffers are somehow ending up in private banks supporting a failing German economy ■■
I cant see how that works? Assuming were discussing the same Germany? The one whom Bloomberg describes as being “German Economy Defied 2015 Global Slowdown as Growth Accelerated”. The same Germany that made a contribution to the EU of 25.8 B.Euro compared with Frances 19.6B and the UKs 11.3B ■■ Exactly how are WE supporting THEM ■■
(figures from 2014). (ec.europa.eu/budget/library/bibl … 0-2014.xls)

When our trade deficit with Germany ( 48 bn ),is added to our net contributions much of which end up spent on German goods and services to the net reipients,that obviously means that the German economy is massively dependent on what is effectively a UK foreign aid scam.

While you’re saying that adding the UK’s lost contributions to the existing German ones,won’t make any difference to the German economy and it’s obvious position of being a major investment haven of the bankers.Bearing in mind the state of the French economy. :unamused:

Ramone & Carryfast, good afternoon gentlemen.

Franglais:
Ha Ha ! Yes with friends like Blair, who needs enemies?
But I`m happy enough to be associated with the likes of Obama. His failure to implement much needed improvements to US gun laws, and health reforms is only due to the broken “lame duck President” situation in the US rather than effort and good sense on his part.
How happy are you? that your side of this debate is supported by
Boris, the trustworthy man who declared during his Mayoral election campaign that being Mayor of London was a full time job? But retains a full salary as a journalist/columnist. Then while doing it stood for and won a seat in Parliament… Just a small part time job clearly. And although his father says not, may, just possibly, have his eye on a job as Conservative Leader?? Obviously not a flip flopping opportunist is he?

Firstly I regard Boris and Galloway as pro EU infiltrators sent in by the in campaign to damage the direction and/or credibility of the out campaign.

As for Obama’s bs gun laws you can’t disinvent the gun in American society while his ideas just mean that it’s only the criminals who’ll have the guns.While obviously also reducing the possibility of local militias ever fighting back against his Stalinist Federalist dictatorial aims.Which make no mistake justified healthy distrust of dictatorial Federal government is a large motivation of the pro gun lobby in the States and taking their guns away,as opposed to thinking about the idea of secession in a positive light,isn’t going to help in that.

As for Boris yes what can you expect from someone who stands for a Party that preaches Green Belt protection while at the same time calling for more expansion of London’s zb hole urban environment into the surrounding counties.

Ramone:
“So what you are assuming is if we leave the EU we wont be able to trade with EU countries , why not , what about all the companies in the EU that own British companies ■■? we trade with the USA they arent in the EU we dont seem to have a problem with that , i would go as far as to say i would much sooner see stronger links to the USA than a set of countries that quite clearly dont respect us." As it is today we trade within the EU because of our trade agreements with the EU. If we leave the EU we will have to negotiate new agreements to trade with the remaining EU group of countries. Thats how trading zones & borders work isnt it? No agreement = No trade. Yes, we trade with the USA. We trade through a position as members of the EU which has existing trade agreements with the US, so if we leave the EU that agreement with cease to apply. We will then need to negotiate agreements with the US as an independent state. Isnt that so?
We trade freely within the EU because we are in the EU.Being in the EU to me means having to adhere to laws that have been inflicted on us by Euro MPs who have never been democratically elected (bit obvious innit?) If we leave the EU we will have to negotiate agreements to trade with them.
What of companies with cross border holdings you ask?? Good question… Ask those who seem to think an exit is a easy quick and cheap option ! I sure as heck dont have an answer to that one! And why you seem keen for us to to trade with the US, I cant imagine.
“Being in the EU to me means having to adhere to laws that have been inflicted on us by Euro MPs who have never been democratically elected "
We can all recognise faults in all the existing electoral systems. Including the various EU systems. Im all in favour of electoral reform. Including of course in the UK where Scots have to obey laws voted in by a Conservative Gov when they may have not voted in any Cons MPs at all. "whats good for France isnt nessessarily good for Britain , whats good for Germany may not work in Holland we should govern our own countries and trade freely without restraints”
Equally whats good for Cornwall aint necessarily good for the Home Counties etc etc. This is the real world. EU is not paradise. No one says it is. Dont throw it over in search of some Utopia promised by some egotistical politician, who cant deliver sweet F.A.
" No ones saying voting out will turn the clock back but it will cut the ridiculous ties we have of having to do it the EU way”
If we want to trade with the EU we WILL have to do it the EU way, or no deal. . . Ask Norway. Ask Switzerland.
" No ones saying voting out will turn the clock back but it will cut the ridiculous ties we have of having to do it the EU way and hopefully we can get shut of the Human Rights Law that made Cherie Blair and her husband multi millionaires and left poor victims of crime distraught and criminals laughing all the way to a life of luxury , much the same way as the Blairs did."
Im also no fan of the Blairs, but which bit of the Human Rights Acts do you wanna loose? The Rights of The Child? The 1949 Geneva Convention? I guess not. I wouldnt accuse you of that.
The EU ain`t perfect. But it seems better than any CREDIBLE alternative.

Carryfast: can we call a small private truce here? I wont bait you with Boris & Galloway if you dont bait me with Blair & Cameron?? Im sure we can still have a more than interesting discussion without those ....distractions?? "It's obvious that in the protectionist environment needed for us to get lost market share back from East Euro rate cutting that means the government dictating who the shipper can use between a EU v a UK carrier" I cant see how the EU Free Trade Zone (hint in the name) would allow the UK Gov to dictate who Hauls for a client. And cant see how a UK exporter would welcome interference in their choice of haulier. Im surprised how you who profess leanings toward local freedom could support centralisation of decision making.
“That’s the idea of quotas and ‘permits’”
In the 80s and 90s there was free competition those who held the required permits. An exporter was free to chose.

" When our trade deficit with Germany ( 48 bn ),is added to our net contributions much of which end up spent on German goods and services to the net reipients,that obviously means that the German economy is massively dependent on what is effectively a UK foreign aid scam.
While you’re saying that adding the UK’s lost contributions to the existing German ones,won’t make any difference to the German economy and it’s obvious position of being a major investment haven of the bankers.Bearing in mind the state of the French economy. :unamused:"
What I said/did was to point out the different contributions made by the UK, Germany, and France. No more, no less.
Adding trade deficits to EU contributions is a bit like adding your bank overdaft onto your tax bill, and assuming it means something… In my case it may seem like a frightening big number, but really it don`t mean much, does it?

Franglais:
As it is today we trade within the EU because of our trade agreements with the EU. If we leave the EU we will have to negotiate new agreements to trade with the remaining EU group of countries. Thats how trading zones & borders work isnt it? No agreement = No trade.
Yes, we trade with the USA. We trade through a position as members of the EU which has existing trade agreements with the US, so if we leave the EU that agreement with cease to apply. We will then need to negotiate agreements with the US as an independent state. Isnt that so? We trade freely within the EU because we are in the EU.Being in the EU to me means having to adhere to laws that have been inflicted on us by Euro MPs who have never been democratically elected (bit obvious innit?) If we leave the EU we will have to negotiate agreements to trade with them. What of companies with cross border holdings you ask?? Good question... Ask those who seem to think an exit is a easy quick and cheap option ! I sure as heck dont have an answer to that one!
And why you seem keen for us to to trade with the US, I cant imagine. "Being in the EU to me means having to adhere to laws that have been inflicted on us by Euro MPs who have never been democratically elected " We can all recognise faults in all the existing electoral systems. Including the various EU systems. Im all in favour of electoral reform. Including of course in the UK where Scots have to obey laws voted in by a Conservative Gov when they may have not voted in any Cons MPs at all.
"whats good for France isnt nessessarily good for Britain , whats good for Germany may not work in Holland we should govern our own countries and trade freely without restraints" Equally whats good for Cornwall aint necessarily good for the Home Counties etc etc. This is the real world. EU is not paradise. No one says it is. Dont throw it over in search of some Utopia promised by some egotistical politician, who cant deliver sweet F.A. " No ones saying voting out will turn the clock back but it will cut the ridiculous ties we have of having to do it the EU way" If we want to trade with the EU we WILL have to do it the EU way, or no deal. . . Ask Norway. Ask Switzerland. " No ones saying voting out will turn the clock back but it will cut the ridiculous ties we have of having to do it the EU way and hopefully we can get shut of the Human Rights Law that made Cherie Blair and her husband multi millionaires and left poor victims of crime distraught and criminals laughing all the way to a life of luxury , much the same way as the Blairs did." Im also no fan of the Blairs, but which bit of the Human Rights Acts do you wanna loose? The Rights of The Child? The 1949 Geneva Convention? I guess not. I wouldnt accuse you of that. The EU aint perfect. But it seems better than any CREDIBLE alternative.

You mean the the credible alternative we had before 1973.On that note I don’t remember us being stopped from trading with anyone we chose to.The difference in the case of the EU being that we weren’t paying a fortune in contributions to be a massive net importer of EU goods.While if we didn’t like the laws and policies that our MP’s etc were making we had the electoral control to chuck them out.In addition to the fact that,unlike now,we weren’t in the situation of possibly condemning future generations to all the potential horrors of a war of secession as in the case of the former Yugoslavia and the USA.

But yes great more what are effectively bs threats of trade sanctions against us by the EU if we dare to have the nerve to tell them to shove their federalist dream.Good luck with that from your position of massive trade surplus weakness. :unamused:

Franglais:
Carryfast: can we call a small private truce here? I wont bait you with Boris & Galloway if you dont bait me with Blair & Cameron?? Im sure we can still have a more than interesting discussion without those ....distractions?? "It's obvious that in the protectionist environment needed for us to get lost market share back from East Euro rate cutting that means the government dictating who the shipper can use between a EU v a UK carrier" I cant see how the EU Free Trade Zone (hint in the name) would allow the UK Gov to dictate who Hauls for a client. And cant see how a UK exporter would welcome interference in their choice of haulier. Im surprised how you who profess leanings toward local freedom could support centralisation of decision making.
“That’s the idea of quotas and ‘permits’”
In the 80s and 90s there was free competition those who held the required permits. An exporter was free to chose.

" When our trade deficit with Germany ( 48 bn ),is added to our net contributions much of which end up spent on German goods and services to the net reipients,that obviously means that the German economy is massively dependent on what is effectively a UK foreign aid scam.
While you’re saying that adding the UK’s lost contributions to the existing German ones,won’t make any difference to the German economy and it’s obvious position of being a major investment haven of the bankers.Bearing in mind the state of the French economy. :unamused:"
What I said/did was to point out the different contributions made by the UK, Germany, and France. No more, no less.
Adding trade deficits to EU contributions is a bit like adding your bank overdaft onto your tax bill, and assuming it means something… In my case it may seem like a frightening big number, but really it don`t mean much, does it?

Let’s get this right you think that running a 48 bn trade deficit with just Germany alone doesn’t matter because the resulting shortfall and difference can just be magicked away.Or the fact that our net contributions don’t mean that money we need to be spending at home is given away to rebuild Eastern Europe and for the poorer EU states to spend on German imports.

As for a free trade zone I thought I’ve made it clear that I don’t agree with the status quo of bs race to the bottom so called ‘free trade’.In which our EU contributions go for investment in over capacity in the East Euro road transport industry for example so that it can then use it to come back and under cut ours out of the frame. :unamused:

Franglais:
Ramone:
“So what you are assuming is if we leave the EU we wont be able to trade with EU countries , why not , what about all the companies in the EU that own British companies ■■? we trade with the USA they arent in the EU we dont seem to have a problem with that , i would go as far as to say i would much sooner see stronger links to the USA than a set of countries that quite clearly dont respect us." As it is today we trade within the EU because of our trade agreements with the EU. If we leave the EU we will have to negotiate new agreements to trade with the remaining EU group of countries. Thats how trading zones & borders work isnt it? No agreement = No trade. Yes, we trade with the USA. We trade through a position as members of the EU which has existing trade agreements with the US, so if we leave the EU that agreement with cease to apply. We will then need to negotiate agreements with the US as an independent state. Isnt that so?
We trade freely within the EU because we are in the EU.Being in the EU to me means having to adhere to laws that have been inflicted on us by Euro MPs who have never been democratically elected (bit obvious innit?) If we leave the EU we will have to negotiate agreements to trade with them.
What of companies with cross border holdings you ask?? Good question… Ask those who seem to think an exit is a easy quick and cheap option ! I sure as heck dont have an answer to that one! And why you seem keen for us to to trade with the US, I cant imagine.
“Being in the EU to me means having to adhere to laws that have been inflicted on us by Euro MPs who have never been democratically elected "
We can all recognise faults in all the existing electoral systems. Including the various EU systems. Im all in favour of electoral reform. Including of course in the UK where Scots have to obey laws voted in by a Conservative Gov when they may have not voted in any Cons MPs at all. "whats good for France isnt nessessarily good for Britain , whats good for Germany may not work in Holland we should govern our own countries and trade freely without restraints”
Equally whats good for Cornwall aint necessarily good for the Home Counties etc etc. This is the real world. EU is not paradise. No one says it is. Dont throw it over in search of some Utopia promised by some egotistical politician, who cant deliver sweet F.A.
" No ones saying voting out will turn the clock back but it will cut the ridiculous ties we have of having to do it the EU way”
If we want to trade with the EU we WILL have to do it the EU way, or no deal. . . Ask Norway. Ask Switzerland.
" No ones saying voting out will turn the clock back but it will cut the ridiculous ties we have of having to do it the EU way and hopefully we can get shut of the Human Rights Law that made Cherie Blair and her husband multi millionaires and left poor victims of crime distraught and criminals laughing all the way to a life of luxury , much the same way as the Blairs did."
Im also no fan of the Blairs, but which bit of the Human Rights Acts do you wanna loose? The Rights of The Child? The 1949 Geneva Convention? I guess not. I wouldnt accuse you of that.
The EU ain`t perfect. But it seems better than any CREDIBLE alternative.

So we re negotiate then , its a two way street we buy off them they buy off us , like i mentioned earlier lots of companies in Britain are foreign owned ,take Saint Gobain for example French owned global company are they all of a sudden not going to export from Britain to France because we arent in the EU no more i think not . I dont understand why we need an EU in the first place ,every country should stand on their own ,we dont need a group of countries demanding how we should operate to export or import ,it`s gone too far ,they should stick to trading not laws .If the EU want to trade with us they WILL have to trade under our conditions if we have the balls to negotiate ,the bullying tactics of the EU of their way or no way will have to stop if countries stand up to them , they tried it with the Euro we stood up to them and won i will be voting out
The Human Rights Law is a joke that protects the culprits and restricts how far they can go on being prosecuted , Cameron promised to reform it but never did .

ramone:
I dont understand why we need an EU in the first place ,every country should stand on their own ,we dont need a group of countries demanding how we should operate to export or import ,it`s gone too far ,they should stick to trading not laws .If the EU want to trade with us they WILL have to trade under our conditions if we have the balls to negotiate ,the bullying tactics of the EU of their way or no way will have to stop if countries stand up to them , they tried it with the Euro we stood up to them and won

^ This.

Carryfast:
" Let’s get this right you think that running a 48 bn trade deficit with just Germany alone doesn’t matter because the resulting shortfall and difference can just be magicked away"
No I dont mean that. (the deficit was 34.4 B£ in 2015 according to [www.tradingeconomics.com](http://www.tradingeconomics.com)). I meant that adding a deficit onto a debt due means sweet FA. And how would leaving the EU in any way HELP with our trading inbalance? "Or the fact that our net contributions don't mean that money we need to be spending at home is given away to rebuild Eastern Europe and for the poorer EU states to spend on German imports" If we keep the east Euro States down we wont just have poor Africans and Middle East citizens looking for a better life by clandestine immigration, but East Euros too, and who could blame them?
" As for a free trade zone I thought I’ve made it clear that I don’t agree with the status quo of bs race to the bottom so called ‘free trade’.In which our EU contributions go for investment in over capacity in the East Euro road transport industry for example so that it can then use it to come back and under cut ours out of the frame"
So far so good, but does your (I guess) support of a Central Command Economy square with your previously expressed support of local democracy??
If you oppose Total Free Trade why do you oppose EU regs■■? I apologise, but I can`t see any consistency in your positions.

Franglais:
Carryfast:
" Let’s get this right you think that running a 48 bn trade deficit with just Germany alone doesn’t matter because the resulting shortfall and difference can just be magicked away"
No I dont mean that. (the deficit was 34.4 B£ in 2015 according to [tradingeconomics.com](http://www.tradingeconomics.com)). I meant that adding a deficit onto a debt due means sweet FA. And how would leaving the EU in any way HELP with our trading inbalance? "Or the fact that our net contributions don't mean that money we need to be spending at home is given away to rebuild Eastern Europe and for the poorer EU states to spend on German imports" If we keep the east Euro States down we wont just have poor Africans and Middle East citizens looking for a better life by clandestine immigration, but East Euros too, and who could blame them?
" As for a free trade zone I thought I’ve made it clear that I don’t agree with the status quo of bs race to the bottom so called ‘free trade’.In which our EU contributions go for investment in over capacity in the East Euro road transport industry for example so that it can then use it to come back and under cut ours out of the frame"
So far so good, but does your (I guess) support of a Central Command Economy square with your previously expressed support of local democracy??
If you oppose Total Free Trade why do you oppose EU regs■■? I apologise, but I can`t see any consistency in your positions.

Firstly ‘free trade’ ‘but’ with the caveat of retaining the right to enforce ‘trade balance’ by way of tarrifs and barriers and/or stopping the under cutting of developed economies by ones run on exploitative cheap labour or Communist etc type lines isn’t the same thing as a so called ‘Command Economy’.In fact not doing so,as we’ve seen.just creates a situation of economic suicide for our domestic industries.On that note I don’t see any inconsistency in the support of all the above and being anti EU.Nor is there any inconsistency in telling the East Euros to look after themselves along the same lines by paying their workers a decent wage to spend in their domestic economies instead of paying them peanuts and to stop dumping their resulting over capacity issues on us as part of that.

Having sorted out the economics that leaves the basic difference between the idea of the recognition of the democratic superiority in the idea of the Nation State and Local government v inferiority of the Federal government systems.

On that note as I’ve said my idea of a European Constitution is one based along Confederal,as opposed to Federal,lines.Which allows for and recognises all of the above. :bulb:

The problem being that the US understandably and rightly sees that as a threat to its bs dictatorial Federal domestic governmental system in which it has shown itself willing to kill a massive proportion of its own population defending. :imp: :unamused:

Ramone:
“So we re negotiate then , its a two way street we buy off them they buy off us" Exactly where we are now, level playing field, no tarifs. " like i mentioned earlier lots of companies in Britain are foreign owned ,take Saint Gobain for example French owned global company are they all of a sudden not going to export from Britain to France because we arent in the EU no more i think not .”
If we vote out then negotiations will start about our departure, with the expense of all those civil servants. (a bit like a messy divorce with expensive lawyers arguing about the house, car, mortgage, pensions, savings etc) It can be done. If we vote out it will be done. Sure. Painless? Easy? Your guess is as good as mine.
" I dont understand why we need an EU in the first place ,every country should stand on their own"
Yes. Absolutely. But, “We Is, Where We Is”. Trading as an Independent against the Eu or the Pacific Rim Group or Whatever Group aint a realistic option is it? I too wish it were otherwise, but... " if we have the balls to negotiate ," Negotiators ? Ours?? Who have made our current EU deal■■? The ones whose performance youre clearly unhappy with■■? The ones who negotiated our previous EU deal■■? I hope you got a good bunch of them hidden up your sleeves cause if we vote “out” well surely need lots of them. Look, if youre unhappy about our position as regards our manufacturing base, trade balance, etc, why blame the EU? Why not look at years of under-investment by multi-nationals chasing the quick buck? Years of gov (various colours) short term vote chasing?? Our membership of the EU has run parallel to this, but don`t confuse Association with Cause & Effect.

Unfortunately he writes for the Mail on Sunday, i do wish he’d get out and find another spiritual home but then reality dawns.

Hitchens’ article todays sums up my views eloquently, the Boris eurosceptic act is just a front, to convince those easily led and to help secure the official OUT designation for the Tory Westmonster group from the electoral commission, amusingly then we’ll have Social Democrats masquerading as Tories presenting the leave and stay arguments, win win for them whatever the outcome, vote IN and they win, vote out and we get another renegotiation with Boris half way round another sleight of hand and another vote.
We’ll be staying one way or another i have no doubt, and our children and their children will reap the benefits and live to regret them.
I wonder if we’ll live long enough to see German Jack Boots (EU Stormtroopers) stomping on British streets to quell the inevitable civil strife when the population approaches 100 million or more and it all kicks off, if we don’t i have no doubt our children will see it happen.

hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/

Juddian:
I wonder if we’ll live long enough to see German Jack Boots (EU Stormtroopers) stomping on British streets to quell the inevitable civil strife when the population approaches 100 million or more and it all kicks off, if we don’t i have no doubt our children will see it happen.

hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/

As I said history suggests that it’s a question of when not if the idea of ethnic integration and Federal governments descend into the inevitable wars of inter ethnic rivalry and self determination and/or secession.Yugoslavia and USA being two prime examples.Realistically in any sensible modern society the in campaign should be regarded as criminally insane. :open_mouth: :frowning: