Some reasoned and pertinent stuff:
Harry Monk:
‘… Cadbury’s plant at Keynsham. It was efficient and profitable, but it was simply ‘more’ profitable to move the entire operation to Poland …’
With a claim for infamy and embarrassment, I am closely related to a guy who was deeply yet highly manipulated within that company’s management chain some two years ago 
Yes, to his family’s broad dismay, he played a major role in UK workforce dismissals 
muckles:
'… Cadburys is now part of the giant Kraft food empire …‘so why should they care provided we keep eating their products…’
Hmm, her brother is now about to move to a promoted position in Zurich, Switzerland - where Kraft HQ is located. Enough said? 
It is thus that my savvy and very good, personal and ‘insider’ advice has told me that Cadbury will still thrive, but with billions of profit taken from the UK. But didn’t mainstream MP’s and other pro-EU puppets tell us the utter balloney that conducting business from outside the EU is unthinkable? 
Ha! Nationally we fell for it! We remain a nation having excellent salesmen and excellent consumers of every product imaginable - except anti-EU membership, political truths that few are willing to fund to any significant degree in case they become politically castrated! However, amongst other worthily British causes, I give them what I can manage each month to proudly carry their card.
Incidentally, they dont really know what (your) President Van Rumpuy is positively doing for the UK, do you?
Harry Monk:
‘… You may as well say that fruit is picked by eastern Europeans because they have a better attitude, in that they will live ten to a caravan and work for the £3.50 an hour the gangmaster pays them. It is not a question of attitude…’
Eh? Not even an ‘attitude’ of ‘blow that, I’m not working for monkey-money?’
lynchy:
‘… before the European Economic Comunity/Union/Empire was ‘widened’ I don’t remember any discussion about the possible influx we would suffer? …how could we be expected to know if we open the sweetie shop door and let all everyone in to help themselves to what was left of Britain more than 30,000,the commonly quoted expected number would land?..’
Lynchy, we are part of a well intended, but now aged & distorted post war experiment that is now going hideously wrong. But because all major UK political parties are signed up to it, and above most other considerations, Britons vote tribally or on issues other than the EU, we shall remain lumbered by default unless a party advocating non-EU membership gets a meaningful, national toehold.
There is only one party which is severely underfunded both financially and in rational BBC airtime terms. It has hardworking, pro-Britain, non-sycophant or toady EU civil-servants, who were delightfully and democratically elected there by Britons at the last Euro elections, with their MEP seats in Brussels/Strasbourg or where ever the Gravy Train, which they abhor, stops this week.
They ask such questions such as ‘why havent the accounts been properly audited these last twenty years’ Ask Kinnock, he sacked the woman who first publicly asked that very question and who is now the party’s deputy leader.
If I’m wrong, please point out where or how, etc
. 
But why is globalisation unavoidable when all it takes is a government which says enough no more and puts up the required trade and immigration barriers to put our own country and it’s indigenous population back to work.That would include leaving the EU considering that it’s now not the same thing as it was when we joined it.