Clinton or Trump ? (poll)

OUT OF HOURS BULLY'S TRUCKSTOP BAR (INTERACTIVE)
41

Watching a bit of late night telly recently, i caught the tail end of an investigation into the murky (pronounced “mob”) connections uncle Donalds been heavily associated with. It revealed that two giant "Trump" branded plazas were zilch to do with him - mob dollars - LOTS of em, plain and simple. Doubtless the tip of the proverbial iceberg. No great headlines here then.

Then we have the thinking chipmunk`s centrefold… Dunno about God Bless America - more
God help America.

Btw, if pushed to choose, itd have to be Hilary. I know theyre both megalomaniac narcissists, but shes not overtly insane like her adversary. Hes like a younger, redneck cousin of our Phil`s.

42

Euro:
With no great enthusiasm, I voted Clinton
US is a democracy so the voters choice must be respected
History tells us that, while many attributes are required of a leader, sanity is not one of them
I believe that Adolf was democratically elected

Whilst i think that belief can sometimes be a good thing, you could have omitted that last sentence tbf. Study is your friend.

43

I watched the Trump v Piers Morgan interview on ITV and changed my mind on the Cruz v Trump choice.As for Hilary hopefully Trump will win out.

44

I aint really into US politics, but in my opinion they/we need people in power that are on our side that speak the truth and not afraid to do so.

The US has a problem with immigrants coming through Mexico, Trump plans to sort it, what is the alternative?.. ■■■■ about like we do with the Calais situation?..but he get’s stick for it.

His views on I.S, and keeping Muslims at bay until they can decide what action to take, again …stick.

I have NOTHING against Muslims whatsoever, seriously, but I hate the murdering scum type ones. They need sorted and learn to ■■■■ behave themselves.
You don’t get Sikh or Buddhists blowing up planes, murdering kids on beaches or killing people in airports do you, so they MUST be singled out in many ways to stop it. Positive profiling at airports etc. it aint racism, predjudice or victimisation, it’s common sense and logic.
The peaceful Muslims must stop as he says harboring them, as they appeared to do in Belgium, it comes across as condonment.

Appeasement and bowing down to the PC lobby does not work. Look at 1939, if Chamberlain had been pm instead of Churchill and his policies in WW2, we would all be under the present Fuherer.

All this pc ■■■■ ing about has to stop, they/we need a hard line approach, but unfortunately the balls up in Iraq with Bush and Blair, and all it’s results, are causing reluctance to do so.

Jeeez… Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill??.. I’m starting to sound like Carryfast, :open_mouth: :blush: :blush: :smiley:

Don’t mods or anybody else insult me by labelling me racist, I know I am not…end of, so what you think does not matter a ■■■■ to me.

45

robroy:
I aint really into US politics, but in my opinion they/we need people in power that are on our side that speak the truth and not afraid to do so.

The US has a problem with immigrants coming through Mexico, Trump plans to sort it, what is the alternative?.. [zb] about like we do with the Calais situation?..but he get’s stick for it.

His views on I.S, and keeping Muslims at bay until they can decide what action to take, again …stick.

I have NOTHING against Muslims whatsoever, seriously, but I hate the murdering scum type ones. They need sorted and learn to [zb] behave themselves.
You don’t get Sikh or Buddhists blowing up planes, murdering kids on beaches or killing people in airports do you, so they MUST be singled out in many ways to stop it. Positive profiling at airports etc. it aint racism, predjudice or victimisation, it’s common sense and logic.
The peaceful Muslims must stop as he says harboring them, as they appeared to do in Belgium, it comes across as condonment.

Appeasement and bowing down to the PC lobby does not work. Look at 1939, if Chamberlain had been pm instead of Churchill and his policies in WW2, we would all be under the present Fuherer.

All this pc [zb] ing about has to stop, they/we need a hard line approach, but unfortunately the balls up in Iraq with Bush and Blair, and all it’s results, are causing reluctance to do so.

Jeeez… Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill??.. I’m starting to sound like Carryfast, :open_mouth: :blush: :blush: :smiley:

Trump is the only realistic choice to sort out the issues of US foreign policy which are causing the problem.As for profiling it’s more a case of looking at both Saudi and Iran as being similar to ■■■■ Germany in their respective nutter zb ideologies and government systems.In which case like ■■■■ Germany we don’t have the luxury of being able to sort the good Islamists from the bad but it’s a reasonable bet that there are more wahabbi and Iranian Islamic revolutionary nutters than there are so called ‘moderates’.Ironically our own government is stupid enough to support the Saudis against Assad in that regard. :open_mouth: :unamused:

As for Neville Chamberlain.More like one of the greatest leaders this country has ever had in fooling Hitler that we weren’t going to be a threat to Germany, to buy us the time needed to arm up to stand the slightest chance of stopping the invasion which,like everyone else,he knew was coming.On that note the production and issuing of Spitfires to the RAF was well under way in 1938.Some appeaser. :bulb:

As for Churchill the warmonger who effectively kicked off WW1 and thereby also created all the ingredients for WW2 in addition to the needless deaths of loads of people regarding the question of Irish independence… :unamused:

46

Worth a watch.