You can use this for every politician though, just change the name of the politician in question and “leftist” media for “rightwing” media.
We” only know about Trump from the left wing media”?
The right wing media, never talks about him? Or is all media left wing? Fox News, GBN, Murdoch owned outlets are all closet commies? As POTUS he has no access to put his own message out there?
And of course, being a shy and retiring individual, he never makes videos nor posts himself.
trouble is the loony left dont have the brains to understand plain english. that mirror will show you proof.
Yeah and you of all people are famous for your impartiality when it comes to the media ain’t cha. 
It refers to and applies to YOU more than anybody mate…..especially item 2.
Obviously if Trump, rightly, ‘gives away’ some of Ukraine ( and pulls NATO back off of Russia’s face ) that would stop Starmer’s Commy double cross of our forces to Comrade Putin, in a false flag fake war to provide the pretext for their surrender.
Or at worse betting our farm against nuclear destruction over a piece of Russian waste ground.
Obviously Starmer and Macron seem suspiciously sure that Russia won’t press the button, while also importing the Arab enforcers to carry out the double cross theory here at home with the forces conveniently out of their way in a Siberian ‘POW’ camp.
Obviously Mevdev and Trump ain’t in on the Commy plot.Putin is one of yours and you know it and protest too much.
Nice to see that @carryfast is still true to form.
It is “right” for Trump to give away the land of another country? You will not be surprised if I disagree. To appease Putain, or more accurately, reward him for for his aggression, will only encourage him, and looking at Trump’s actions, or lack of them, China will be looking much closer at Taiwan. And make no mistake that will not be the only country to see an opportunity for gain through military means.
So Putain is a commie, but Medvedev [Mevdev?] his defence minister is an ally of Trump? Some would argue that Trump is being played by Putain, Some even that Trump is directly under Putain’s orders, but I have never heard of an alliance like you are suggesting before.
Anybody??
Franglais where did you buy that ironymeter of yours, ….let me know eh?
I find myself needing one more and more after many of your posts.
I didn’t say that Madvedev isn’t a Commy like Putin. I said he’s just not ‘in’ on Macron’s and Starlin’s probable machiavellian plot, for the surrender of European forces in a Russian wasteland, to clear the way for their Commy take over of Europe using an imported Arab etc army to enforce it.
You do know that America negotiated giving away Istria to Yugoslavia under threat by Stalin to invade and the havoc being caused by Yugoslav partisans.
Much to the relief of my Father posted there who would have gone from WW2 straight into WW3.
But ironically the disappointment of German POWs who relished the thought of killing some more Russians.
Ah, much clearer. Thank you. 
Which bit is now clearer.
Trying to find any logic in sending troops into Ukraine to at worse be surrounded and slaughtered or at best marched into custody in Siberia.Bearing in mind you obviously ain’t going to volunteer for supply convoy duty.Unless the plan is to set them up in a Commy double cross.On the basis of why would a known Commy sympathiser in the form of Starlin want to go to war against known KGB man Putin ?.
Or why the double standards regarding Truman handing over North Eastern Italy to Yugoslavia v Trump handing over a chunk of Ukraine back to more credible owner Russia.To save losing the whole of western Europe to WW3 in both cases.
The borders made at the ned of WW2 caused later conflicts. The borders set after WW1 caused later conflicts. ■■■■ happens. There are no perfect solutions.
Ukraine had it’s borders fully recognised in the early 90’s by Russia. It wasn’t forced on them as a defeated nation. It is the current leader Putain who is upsetting the apple cart. Allowing him to win some of his aims through his use of naked force will only encourage him, (and most likely others) to continue on their violent course.
Putain will not sit back saying “Oh, that is enough, I’ll stop here”. Never.
If Russia had the power to surround and kill or imprison the Ukraine Army, then why haven’t they done so?
And no one is talking of sending foreign troops to aid Ukraine. It is notable that North Korean troops have been helping Russia though.
Are you seriously suggesting that Russia won’t commit more forces in the case of a NATO v Russia confrontation on Ukrainian turf and is holding back forces from the Ukraine v Russia fight for exactly that reason.
In this case it’s your supply lines that Russia would take out no need to get involved in direct fighting.At best what’s you’re objective assuming you’re not going to try to march on and occupy all of Russia.
While Russia can attack and retreat and counter attack at will if you’re going to limit your operations to Ukraine.
Assuming that Macron and Starlin know all that leaves only one logical conclusion for them being so keen to go in.While inviting in a Commy backed army here at home.Unless you’re denying both KGB Putin’s and Starlin’s Commy credentials.
There has never been further conflict between Italy and Yugoslavia/Croatia/Slovenia it was a done deal just like Austria ceding Sud Tyrol to Italy after WW1.
Or for that matter the deal made by Collins over the Eire/UK border albeit ironically the least successful in terms of acceptance to the unofficial continuity factions.But no reason for UK to start a war against Eire.
Russia has committed everything it has available. Everything apart from those forces it retains as defence on it’s frontiers. That is why they have been using N.Korean troops and putting poorly trained young conscripts on the front line as cannon fodder.
Russia is not the efficient fighting force of the Cold War era. When it started the current invasion just about everyone thought it would all be over in a few days. They all thought it would be a highly trained and well equiped force sweeping to victory. It very much was not.
As already said no one is talking of putting NATO or any other western boots on Ukraine soil because Putain would see that as an excuse (if he really needs one) to use nuclear weapons. We do need to remember that he is not exactly a rational person. Not a fool, nor an idiot, nor any sort of easy target, but his motives and constraints are not those of a democratically elected western leader who has a free press or an election to worry about.
But having recognised the dangers he presents we must see that doing nothing, letting him win territory will not stop him. If Trump thinks that allowing Putain to gain some of the land he wants will not satisfy him. The more he has, the more he sees that his aggression pays. Give away Ukraine today, and he is one step nearer to Poland. Take away the sanctions imposed on Russia and they are not stupid, they will have learnt from the debacle of the (initial) invasion of Ukraine and they will be using the funds earnt from Ukrainian agriculture and mineral wealth to re-arm, and re-arm better this time.
Supporting Ukraine is both “the right thing to do” morally, helping a country against an aggressor, but economically better too. Stop it here and now. If not we will need to buy even more weapons for our own armies in the future. We are anyway, but giving some aid now, and showing strength and unity to an aggressor will convince those around Putain, even if not the man himself that we will not be taken easily one-by-one. Even Putain needs to be careful walking past high windows.
They do not have vast reserves to move about at will. Their war economy is stymied by sanctions, not killed, but restricted. Do not let Trump ease the sanctions. They are not a magic bullet but they do work.
In the early part of the war Ukraine was fighting with one hand tied behind their back. They could not use western weapons to attack Russian supply lines inside Russia. With hindsight that might have put Ukraine in a better position now. Russia has never had scruples about killing Ukraine civilians, but scream “foul” when anyone dies inside Russia.
Putain was a card carrying Communist of the the KGB. What he is now is a dictator. Communism has thrown up more than it’s fair share of dictators, but once they are in power, whether they rose through left or right wing channels, dictators look the same.
Strong military, suppressed press and freedom of speech, so false information is thrown around; more money spent on arms than on the poorest in society. Appeals to patriotism because the masses have no hope of anything else. Dictators need to pay well those immediately around them.
Anyway….enough from me…
If Trump makes some stupid deal after listening to Putain, if he is fooled again by false promises, then we will see more, much more danger than we see now.
Trump professes to care about America first and foremost. He does not even pretend to care about Europe. He is probably more concerned with himself, and since he is mostly financially involved in the US, he will be indeed caring more about the US. He wants to release Russian assets because it suits himself. He does not care about Ukraine, nor about peace in Europe 5 or 10 years from now.
He will be looking for a nice easy short cut to a Nobel prize. Give away someone else’s land and call it a win for King Trump.
And as we see more dissatisfaction and peaceful protest on US streets we also see Trump introducing troops on the streets, again. Something that did not happen when an armed mob attacked the Gov buildings on Jan 6th.
Oh, but they were protesting for Trump, not against him.
wrong again…national gaurd were deployed…10] At 2:49 p.m., the Governor of Virginia activated all available assets including the Virginia National Guard to aid the U.S. Capitol; the authorization from DoD required for legal deployment was not granted.[10][11] By 3:10 p.m., police from Fairfax County, Virginia, were dispatched to the District,[12] and began arriving at 3:15 p.m.[10]
not only the national gaurd but swat too… .[13] By 4:24 p.m., a 12-man armed FBI SWAT team had arrived at the Capitol Complex.[14]
further more….Then-Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller finally approved deployment of the National Guard at 4:32 p.m.[15] Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, later told the House committee that investigated January 6 that Pence, not Trump, had requested the deployment of the National Guard.[16]
At 5:02, about 150 soldiers of the DCNG departed the D.C. Armory; the contingent reached the Capitol complex and began support operations at 5:40.
From your post….
After the Governor of Virginia requested the National Guard the (trump controlled) initially DoD refused it.
Trump did not deploy the National Guard, he and some of his minions stood in the way of deploying them. Pence and others did eventually stand up for the constitution. I doubt that Vance would do that.
Here is the link to the wiki page you have selectively edited so anyone can see the full piece.
1 Like
Spot on, much better to stop him now rather than marching off to full blown war a la 1939. Trouble is we are not blessed in our situation with the 2 most destructive countries on the planet being both run by absolute morons, who care nothing for the death and destruction they cause or allow to happen.