EU leaders are having a conference call with Trump in their ‘‘Alliance of the willing’‘ or whatever tf they call themselves.….to brief him in his meeting.
Trump will be waiting in trepidation as we speak.
Word is Starmer is dressing up in his Action Man kit to take the call, ……so expect a surrender from Putin anytime soon.
Yeah well let’s not get carried away before giving the talks a chance.
It may or may not be the best deal towards peace on the table, but atm it’s the ONLY one.
Way I see it Putin just carrys on until thousands are killed on both sides, either to a stalemate or occupation of Ukraine, or the likes of Starmer puts his size 12s in with his pseudo bravado with no substance or real chance of winning, and it escalates to nuclear weapons then WW3.
Or we give Trump a chance whether anybody hates him or not or whatever his motive…..(I ain’t naive enough to detect the obligatory ‘‘hidden agenda when it comes to politicians’’ scenario either.)
If he fails try something else.
It’s like this mate, I can’t stand Starmer, but in the unlikely or neo impossible event of him actually doing something good for my country, I will be the first to give him credit.
So if Trump’s methods work, see what the Ukranians say.
I ain’t one to put dislike or even hatred of a political figure over substance and circumstances……and particularly potential ones.
Zelensky has said he doesn’t want to surrender any land as a reward to an aggressor. And who can blame him?
Putain, if given an inch tomorrow, will just re-arm and take another yead in a couple of years time. “Trying it out” or “giving it a go” is not a zero cost option. It is a chance for Russia to trade with the world again outside of sanctions, build up it’s funds and invest in more arms. Putain is currently too cash strapped to do too much. Giving him a breather is only postponing the inevitable.
Let Trump talk by all means, I seriously doubt any good will come, but as you say, talking will do little harm. But if those talks result in Trump giving in to Putain, then it will be bad for all of us.
And the last I heard Trump and Putain will be talking one-on-one before Zelensky gets in the room. Trump thinks he is a great deal-maker, but I reckon Putain will wrap him around his little finger.
Surrender someone else’s land just like Sud Tyrol and Istria and Northern Ireland were ‘surrendered’.
You seem too keen on kicking off this unwinnable foreign war.Especially when Communists like Starmer say they are doing it in the name of an argument with a KGB man, on the KGB man’s terms and turf.
While inviting in an enemy army with Communist ties at home.
An alliance of the willing, for a false flag sacrifice surrender of European forces in a Russian wasteland as part of a hidden commy double cross agenda.
That’s the only logical explanation as to why Comrade Starlin is putting on an act of hostility to a fellow dyed in the wool Socialist comrade with KGB credentials.To set the pretext for their delivery.
Also why we’re being deliberately invaded at home by a foreign army known for its Communist bloc ties.
You really are deluded.You admit that Russia has committed everything to the Ukraine operation except the forces it needs for any potential NATO v Russia conflict.Which obviously means retaining most of those forces.
The rest of your strategic planning is about as credible.NATO v Russia would be a catastrophic no win conflict.Starting with pre emptive Russian strategic nuke strikes on western European targets sufficient to take out UK before it even starts.Those with your views are actually madder than Madvedev.
A couple of geography and common sense fails this week. OK more than a couple, but who can count them all?
Rupert Lowe in the UK thinking that Lowestoft is a landing zone for migrants, and in the US Trump saying that he is meeting with Putain in Russia.
Or maybe Trump is not mistaking Alaska as Russia? Maybe this is a “stable genius” giving us a hint about his deal making tactics? Maybe he is not about to give away part of Ukraine to Russia?
Maybe he is returning historical Russian territory to it’s rightful owner?
Or maybe Trump didn’t actually say Russia he said Alaska or maybe he didn’t even refer to the location at all.Or maybe the location was changed.Im sure that comrade Starlin has more in common with KGB Putin than Trump has.
You seem conveniently too keen on kicking off WW3 and with it the destruction of Europe over a piece of Russian waste ground.Or more like setting up the forces to be marched into internment in Siberia so that your imported army of enforcers have a clear shot at the Socialist takeover end game at home.
it doesnt just have to be dover… in fact why not change it up especially as your buddy has started his 1 in 1 out deal and says he is going to send them all back. Admittedly there are better places than lowestoft i have always said the sand banks off reculver would be a good place dont need to do anything then just wait for the tide to turn
A complete lack of decorum. By so doing he is demeaning the Office of President of the United States of America. The veiled threat included regarding tariffs, in language he might understand, suggests the action of ‘a two bit gangster’.
You’ve missed the point Rob.For some reason the commies actually want to go to war against KGB Putin’s Russia and China and NK allies.They literally couldn’t make it up.
It’s the the definition of a false flag hidden agenda.Setting us up for a fall on their terms.