this doesn’t seem to have attracted as much MSM attention as my cat being deported for eating a robin.
Can’t get any better unimpeachable pucker news content than from the organ of the orange suit himself.
Notable highlights within include
Increase the provision of surplus military assets to support local law enforcement and evaluate their use in crime prevention.
I don’t know how well everyone knows the US constitution…
The very famous 2nd amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
If I was a freeborn citizen of the US of A, I’d be very very concerned about talk of the police, while acting under and for the federal government A.K.A the president, getting armed to the teeth with tanks, howitzers, perhaps even attack helicopters and warplanes.
Indeed I do, but not a parallel case, she was not deported she left of her own free will and then, allegedly, took actions against the interests of the UK but could/would not have been barred from re-entering if it was not for the fact that she had, allegedly, dual nationality with Bangla Desh. So, strictly speaking, perfectly internationally legal as she was not deprived of all citizenship.
not sure how much you are joking about this.
The facts however are that she is interned in a camp neither in the UK nor Bangladesh.
She does not have Bangladeshi citizenship. She was born here. They understandably don’t want her.
So, how about renewing your vocal protests about Salman Ramadan Abedi, the cowardly despicable ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ who murdered the Manchester Arena victims. His brother instead of lounging around in prison should be sent back to Libya to serve his sentence there, a far less cushy number, as should his family especially his father who was known to be a Jihadist, and hence a potential threat to the UK.
You know, actual terrorists and murderers, not simply brown people that you don’t like the look of.
But lets argue about this concept of bad people being stripped of their birthright citizenship for a minute.
Trump’s mother - presumably the mare that carried him to term - was born and bred in Scotland. Therefore he as a convicted felon and someone whose current actions would be judged by many to be treasonous and inciting civil unrest if not outright rebellion, is the very type of “bad person” that if he was on the other side of a different Trumpian president acting the same, would be deported in chains.
But there is the saying “whoever wins the war, dictates the law”
If you are beaten by your opponent he gets to decide what to do with your life. So when we sit back and laugh and ignore the clear trashing of justice, we feed a future where if we in turn are on the losing side, we forfeit our rights and even our lives.
I keep banging this drum in the hope that at least one other person sees the truth innate. Vote in the despot, and it’s you who risk losing your rights.
As Rob admits, politicians lie. They make empty promises with no intention of fulfilling them, or even been honest about the facts. So it is insane to welcome known liars and abusers of the system like fartage into power over us. The outcome can only be bad for us.
Get it into your thick skulls, the likes of ferret face farage are only interested in their own interests and are using everyone else to further their own interests.
The point Franglais was making, and seemed quite clear to me, was that you choose to vote, whether “to stick it to the man” or “make the libtards angry” or because you imagine you’ll get a better deal. Then when what we say will happen, happens, you plead ignorance and claim you’ve been deceived. Or it doesn’t really matter…
But then it’s too late to row back, we’re all over the weir and totally ■■■■■■.
who knows whether it’s still part of the orange suit’s crazy “keep em guessing” art of the deal gaming. But it’s not clever or good.
One likely short term effect is more and more of the Kyle Rittenhouse type of angry young thugs with guns, will take it upon themselves to assist “law enforcement” with not only rounding up all the brown people with or without citizenship or green cards, but now also anyone seen to be resisting the right wing take over. It’s gonna become a really bad ■■■■ show soon there.
What do we think of young girls who are groomed? Maybe in person, but most likely firstly on-line.
Are school age kids, say 15 yrs old truly able to make good decisions about their future lives?
I know when I was 15 I thought I knew it all, but now I doubt that vey much.
Should a 15 yr old girl who is influenced by older and more worldly men be held 100% responsible if she gets caught up in illegal events? Is she a criminal or a victim?
When she gets to be say 18 is she still a victim? or is she automatically an adult and a criminal?
If she is caught up in a crime gang how easy is it for her to walk away, at any age?
Obviously the story told from the US Communist Party side.Who would obviously want to undermine the US operation against Chinese backed VC aggression including Communist take over of Cambodia.
Which became the savoury Khmer Rouge regime.
So now we’ve got Socialists whingeing about America wanting to stay out of the Zalensky v Putin show.
Bearing in mind the question of both Putin and Zalensky being onside with China.To the point of Zalensky telling the US, that KGB man Putin’s, ally China ( Communism ), isn’t a geopolitical threat.
It all seems a bit conveniently and predictably selective, comrade.
Zb tends to happen, when anyone tries to undermine a country’s efforts and providing support for the enemy, in wartime.
You’re only concerned depending on whether the US National Guard is acting for Trump against his opposition, or for Harris and your team against your opposition.
Now he’s obviously working to a different agenda.
If ‘they’ want to get into a fight with Russia over bleedin Ukraine then let 'em.We’ll cheer em on from the side lines then chuck 'em under the bus when it all kicks off and maybe get something out of the deal.
Because Russia won’t nuke Ukraine nor us because we’ll make a deal after France, Germany and UK are an irradiated, smoking, crater.
Although if Trump is stupid it would be the stupidity of trusting Putin and Zalensky and China to honour any deal made over Ukrainian resources.Let alone actually kicking off a war between US and Russia.
My bet is he’s not stupid and he just regards, keeping the US out of this even bigger zb show than Iraq was, as a win.
Either way it’s obviously a lose lose for Europe.
At best nuked.
Or at worse a surrendered Commy run crap hole although great for Comrade Frangles and his Commy band.
My bet is the latter.
We’ve got ‘unity’ whether it’s given, or implied, or taken, or not.
Going to war with Russia means mutually assured destruction of Europe and much of Russia.
Russia regards European involvement in Ukraine as a red line in that regard.
The US isn’t going to take a nuke strike for London let alone over Ukraine.
Trump seems to be saying Europe should have been careful what it wished for now let 'em have it.We’ll pretend to go along with it up until the point if/when WW3 starts.
Or he knows that the whole thing is the staged false flag surrender of Euroland and it’s forces to Socialism and maybe the US can get something out of the results, shared with China.
Possibly a much better deal for the US than the Iraq zb show turned into.
There’s nothing in it for us either way.
As you appear, by quoting me, to have directed that tirade of nonsense at me and, as much of it is complete bullxxxx, it is not worth replying to, so I will leave you to stew in your fantasy and leave it at that.
Of course that is so. It needs balance.
The protesters some of them armed with placards, and shouting loud enough to bring down the walls of buildings, or at least give a serious headache to innocent bystanders, were a serious danger to the guards. The guards were in a particularly vulnerable position because they were burdened with heavy equipment. Those shields and weapons weigh a lot.
Sometimes it is necessary to hold one’s nose, in the national good, when dealing with nasty issues. In this case it looks like a very smelly heap.
It may be cheaper for the country to massage the ego of one man(baby) rather than give away much more to the nation he (is meant to) represent, but it still stinks.
When you’ve got a country divided between Socialist v anti Socialist it’s obviously all about which side you’re on not the methodology.
As we’ve seen Socialism is just as/more happy to use force and internment to maintain its power.
So you and your ilk obviously view the Vietnam War as US aggression against righteous Socialism.By implication also supportive of the Khmer Rouge.
You view the US National Guard as fine when it’s on your side.
But not when it’s fighting against Commy infiltration of the country.Ironically those misguided students put themselves in harm’s way in support of what became the Khmer Rouge and undermining the efforts of the US government and forces trying to stop what became Pol Pot’s killing fields.
As I said it depends which side you’re on and your side is clear.
